[Pythonmac-SIG] appscript terminology caching #2
has
hengist.podd at virgin.net
Fri Oct 22 03:40:46 CEST 2004
Bob wrote:
>>>There's all sorts of issues with starting daemons (like: will the
>>>daemon be system-wide or per-user?
>>
>>It's a user-level process, so I guess that makes it per-user. Out
>>of interest, does [Mac]Python run anything at any other level?
>
>Python runs at whatever level you run it at, and it dies when the
>script is over. Python is not a daemon (unless your script is).
Was a dumb question.:) Perhaps a slightly less dumb one: can
application scripting be done at any level other than user-level?
>>Question: what are the rules for Python.app? ATS occupies a
>>position equivalent to that of Python.app, so presumably we can
>>apply any rules for the latter to the former.
>
>There is no real Python.app. Python.app is just a trick that puts
>the interpreter inside of an application bundle so pythonw will work.
Yeah, basically both are tools to facilitate execution of Python
scripts. In Python.app's case, scripts that require a GUI connection;
in ATS's case, scripts that require a call to OSAGetAppTerminology.
How they're implemented isn't really important; it's more about what
they do and why. Does that make sense?
has
--
http://freespace.virgin.net/hamish.sanderson/
More information about the Pythonmac-SIG
mailing list