Fwd: [Pythonmac-SIG] Collaborative pyObjC development

[Pete]

Begin forwarded message:

> From: Pete <pymac at jorjun.org.uk>
> Date: 26 January 2005 14:36:16 GMT
> To: Bob Ippolito <bob at redivi.com>
> Subject: Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Collaborative pyObjC development
>
>
> On 26 Jan 2005, at 12:56, Bob Ippolito wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jan 26, 2005, at 7:24 AM, Pete wrote:
>>
>>>>
>>>> What's wrong with using http://pythonmac.org/wiki ?  I think a 
>>>> Plone site is a bit much.
>>>>
>>> Well you have the possibility of developing and sharing Plone 
>>> Archetypes as well man.
>>> My feeling right now for new development : start with a new 
>>> web-based app that suits all clients-platforms, then build it 
>>> 'properly' using pyObjc clients and decent native widgets. Diversity 
>>> is to be encouraged and code sharing with others is very good here 
>>> too. You never know, somebody might make a Plone App. that will 
>>> perform the py2App function as a web service.
>>
>> Sounds like a lot more than "setting up a Plone site".  If you build 
>> it, it might get used, but I wouldn't hold your breath.  The wiki is 
>> used mostly in a read-only context as-is.
>>
>> Do you have any examples of projects that actually work like that to 
>> develop non-web applications?  I'm not aware of any projects that use 
>> such a development strategy.
>>
>> -bob
>
> No Bob
>
> It think (hope) it is a new and therefore untried and untested 
> strategy. The thing is the start-up cost is pretty low, my Plone site 
> has two instances - so at least one for long-running tasks. It costs 
> me less than $30 per month, how many users that can support I don't 
> know. Probably only a smallish team.
>
> -Pete
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/enriched
Size: 1837 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.python.org/pipermail/pythonmac-sig/attachments/20050126/89e7163a/attachment.bin