[Pythonmac-SIG] My stab at a new page
charles.hartman at conncoll.edu
Fri Feb 10 14:49:05 CET 2006
It seems to me (as *much* closer to a newbie than a developer) that
simply recommending the download & install of Python 2.4.x not only
wouldn't put a major obstacle in the way of beginners, but wouldn't
seem to, either. That one step isn't a problem -- if we can get to
the point where that's the only step (because no Fix or Compat is
needed, the PATH gets tweaked, etc).
On Feb 10, 2006, at 8:36 AM, Louis Pecora wrote:
> Bob Ippolito wrote:
>> The largest issue is that you can't legally redistribute the Python
>> interpreter that ships with Mac OS X, so you can't create standalone
>> applications. Even if you could, it wouldn't have a chance of being
>> backwards compatible with the way that Apple builds things.
> This seems to be where this argument goes: the user/newbies vs. the
> developers. Can we break this knot? Sure a developer wants a system
> that guarantees no barriers for anyone trying to use his product.
> a newbie or just a user wants no barriers to just get up and running.
> If each side insists on having its way, this will go nowhere. I
> thought it had a chance for a few days and now I'm having my doubts.
> I sense developers here want everyone to get the latest and greatest
> python so then their product is a no-brainer to use (sorry about the
> slang). Of course, users/newbies want to just jump in there and go
> without pain. I'm a user so perhaps that explains why I am more on
> user side. You shouldn't be forcing everyone to adopt a python system
> that then suits your marketing model.
> Why a compromise can't be reached here is beyond me. Does this happen
> with Perl? Ruby?
> I'm not sure how helpful that was, but I need to vent.
> Lou Pecora
> Code 6362
> Naval Research Lab
> Washington, DC 20375
> Ph: +202-767-6002
> email: pecora at anvil.nrl.navy.mil
> Pythonmac-SIG maillist - Pythonmac-SIG at python.org
More information about the Pythonmac-SIG