Renaming scikits.image to skimage

[Nelle Varoquaux]

On 16 October 2011 22:24, Emmanuelle Gouillart <
emmanuelle.gouillart at nsup.org> wrote:

> On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 12:55:58PM -0700, Stéfan van der Walt wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 12:38 AM, Nelle Varoquaux
> > <nelle.varoquaux at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I think scikit-learn decision was to still do the branding with the
> name
> > > "scikits-learn". In that case, I don't think it is necessary to rename
> the
> > > repository.
> > > What do you think about it ?
> > > If we rename the repository, there's a bit more work to do.
>
> > We're going to keep the scikits-image organisation on GitHub, but I
> > think we need to move the source repo to skimage.git (instead of
> > scikits.image.git).
>
> +1
>
+1


>
> I think we should move "everything" to skimage, except the name of the
> source repo, and the name of the mailing list. A few examples of changes
> that could be made (from a 'git grep scikits.image' in Nelle's skimage
> branch)
>
> TASKS.txt:Developing Open Source is great fun!  Join us on the
> `scikits-image mailing-list
> doc/source/conf.py:copyright = u'2011, scikits-image team'
> doc/Makefile:   --project-url=http://scikits-image.org \
> (now that Stéfan kindly provided the new domain name!)
> ...
> and many similar occurrences found by git grep
>
> In some places, we could also use "the Image Scikit", to make clear that
> our package is... an image scikit. What do you think?
>

+1 too


>
> Emmanuelle
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/scikit-image/attachments/20111016/63478685/attachment.html>