Understanding HoG output
bricklemacho
bricklemacho at gmail.com
Thu Feb 16 12:25:02 EST 2012
Hi Brian, and Tony.
Thanks both for your response. I hope my newbie terminology is not
making this more confusing.
> Tony's answer is spot on here. Perhaps you expect that the HoG image
> should look like the gradient image? Instead, what the descriptor is
> really aiming to capture is the direction (that's the 'oriented'
> part), that the gradients go. So assuming an image where the left half
> is black and the right half white, there would be a vertical of
> horizontal (or as close as possible, depending on the number of bins)
> lines in the HoG image.
Okay, makes sense, the direction of the change would be horizontal
direction if the line in the orignal image was vertical. This is how
I originally interpreted the visualisation provide by the skimage-hog
algorithm.
The problem was when I comparing this to the visualisation from the
Dalal & Triggs paper. In the paper the R-HOG descriptor seems to
show a different relationship, when visualised the dominant
orientations appear to be parallel to lines in the original image. If
you have access to the Dalal & Triggs paper, I am basing my
expectations on Figure 6(e), top of page 8. I don't have access to
the original Dalal & Triggs visualisation code so I will reread the
paper to make sure I am comparing like with like.
> This is what I was referring to when I talked about the number of
> bins. If you look carefully at the HoG image, you'll notice that
> there are vertical lines in some places (like at the black billboard),
> but there are no perfectly horizontal lines. The closest
> approximation to horizontal is maybe a 20deg line. That's because
> there are 9 bins. If you tried this with 8 bins, you should see some
> horizontal lines.
If I change play with the bins I do end up with horizontal lines. I
suspect what is being visualised is different, or being interpreted
differently, to what the Dala & Triggs paper is visualisation. I
just have to understand the different visualisations.
Thanks again for your help.
Michael.
--
More information about the scikit-image
mailing list