Python for image processing on Wikipedia

[Johannes Schönberger]

> I think a better ideas is to mark the article for deletion (and I've
> done so), as it's meaningless (any of those algorithms could be coded
> in python, matlab, or mathematica), it doesn't list arguably more
> popular image processing tools (e.g., ImageJ, OpenCV), and the list
> seems arbitrarily constructed.  Far better would be to add links from
> each of the algorithms' pages to the software that implements that
> particular algorithm.

I totally agree here.