scikit-image paper

[Adam Hughes]

On Monday, November 18, 2013 3:59:22 AM UTC-5, Stefan van der Walt wrote:

> On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 10:47 AM, Juan Nunez-Iglesias 
> <jni.... at gmail.com <javascript:>> wrote: 
> > If we are going to worry about JIF, PLOS ONE has 3.7, and does accept 
> papers 
> > from all disciplines. (You will also find a Scholarly Kitchen post about 
> how 
> > a JIF of 3.7 is a sign that PLOS and open access are doomed.) 
>
> Thanks, I won't take Scholarly Kitchen too seriously then.  I know 
> that impact factors are a lousy way (by itself) to determine where to 
> publish, but that's a whole other kettle of fish. 
>
> > Currently my two top candidates then are JMLR MLOSS and PLOS ONE. (The 
> > latter does charge $1300 US per article.) 
>
> Open access fees should not pose too much of a problem: 
>
> http://library.sun.ac.za/English/services/oa/Pages/su-oafund.aspx 
>
> Let's get started on some content! 
>
> I think we would do well to emphasize the following in the paper: 
>
> - Pythonic API 
> - Building block for reproducible research, use in academic world (we 
> need a list of publications of work that used skimage) 
> - Educational aspects (skimage.novice) 
> - Google Summer of Code contributions 
> - Use in industry (do we have examples here?) 
>

It may be non-disclosable, but I know that Enthought may have some 
industrial examples.
 

> - ... other ideas? 
>
> Stéfan 
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/scikit-image/attachments/20131118/0f949dda/attachment.html>