large PyWavelets update, please test

[Stuart Mumford]

Hello,

On the topic of wavelet's I am involved in a very small scale effort to
tidy up this continuous wavelet package, with (if we can contact the
original author) the eventual aim of making it useful and potentially a
part of some larger package (scipy?).

https://github.com/nabobalis/kPyWavelet

Stuart


On 4 October 2013 09:15, François Boulogne <fboulogne at sciunto.org> wrote:

> Dear skimagers,
>
>
> With Ralf, we initiated a "friendly" fork of pywavelet for a future
> inclusion in scipy and David joined us in this work. We improved the
> doc, removed old-fashioned codes and we are trying now to add tests.
> We started this because I was considering this ticket:
> https://github.com/scikit-image/scikit-image/issues/602
> Indeed, I believe wavelets may be useful for scikit-image. Instead of
> requiring a new dependency, I thought it is much more valuable to
> integrate the code in scipy and this is now in the workplan for scipy1.0.
>
> If some of you used pywavelet before, we would be grateful to you if you
> can check your code against the fork. It must be fully compatible with
> pywavelets.
>
> Thanks!
> Cheers.
> François.
>
>
> -------- Message original --------
> Sujet:  large PyWavelets update, please test
> Date :  Tue, 1 Oct 2013 17:56:36 +0200
> De :    Ralf Gommers <ralf.gommers at gmail.com>
> Pour :  pywavelets at googlegroups.com
> Copie à :       François Boulogne <fboulogne at sciunto.org>,
> david.menendez.hurtado at scilifelab.se
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> https://github.com/nigma/pywt/pull/7 contains a large refactoring of
> PyWavelets, with contributions from Francois Boulogne, David Menendez
> Hurtado and myself. Main feature is support for Python 3 (single code
> base). Other changes are:
>
> - Numpy style docstrings for all public functions
> - A unit test suite with reasonable coverage (see
> https://coveralls.io/r/rgommers/pywt)
> - PEP8 and Numpy C code standard compliance
> - Changes to source tree layout, build setup, Numpy interfaces and C and
> Cython templating to more standard styles.
>
> This set of changes is supposed to be fully backwards compatible. They
> were quite invasive though (~150 commits), so there's a decent chance
> that some things not covered by the test suite were broken in the
> process. To catch those now, it would be very helpful if people could
> test their own code against either use the PR or the master branch of
> https://github.com/rgommers/pywt.
>
> While we've kept full backwards compatibility so far, we've also
> compiled a list of things that could be improved in the current API:
> https://github.com/rgommers/pywt/issues/38. Please add suggestions there
> if you have them.
>
> Cheers,
> Ralf
>
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "scikit-image" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to scikit-image+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/scikit-image/attachments/20131004/70b825bb/attachment.html>