CIELUV Transformations

Isaac Gerg isaac.gerg at gergltd.com
Wed Oct 23 09:25:54 EDT 2013


As I understand it, they simply could not agree on a single standard and
felt both must be approved.  That is as much as i can get out of the
literature.


On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 9:17 AM, Stéfan van der Walt <stefan at sun.ac.za>wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Isaac Gerg <isaac.gerg at gergltd.com>
> wrote:
> > I am seeing some chatter on github about the differences between CIELUV
> and
> > CIELAB.  My understanding is that the committee could not agree on a
> single
> > standard and didnt feel they could approve CIELAB alone.
>
> Did they provide some motivation as to why not, or why both standards
> are needed?
>
> Stéfan
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
> Google Groups "scikit-image" group.
> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/scikit-image/DIRaSXJoEes/unsubscribe.
> To unsubscribe from this group and all of its topics, send an email to
> scikit-image+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/scikit-image/attachments/20131023/c06b568f/attachment.html>


More information about the scikit-image mailing list