scikit-image paper
Johannes Schönberger
jsch at demuc.de
Wed Feb 5 10:01:56 EST 2014
I also thought about contributing one example covering feature detection, extraction, matching and some simple image stitching using projective transformations... your thoughts? Is this too long?
On Feb 5, 2014, at 9:56, Johannes Schönberger <jsch at demuc.de> wrote:
> Fully agree on all your thoughts!
>
> On Feb 5, 2014, at 9:45, Stéfan van der Walt <stefan at sun.ac.za> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Working on the scikit-image paper, I've had some further thoughts
>> about authorship (yes, this is much harder than writing the paper :).
>>
>> I suggest the following (what I consider to be) fair guideline:
>>
>> 1) Anyone who contributes significantly to the writing of the paper
>> gets their name in the authors list
>> 2) All other contributors are included in the "scikit-image contributors" author
>>
>> To me, this feels like the fairest way to reward those who time into
>> writing the paper, while also giving credit to all of those whose work
>> is described therein. I felt uncomfortable adding all "core
>> contributors" to the authors list, since that concept is becoming more
>> and more nebulous with GitHub PRs.
>>
>> I'd like to hear your thoughts.
>>
>> Stéfan
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "scikit-image" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to scikit-image+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
More information about the scikit-image
mailing list