Migration to Python 3.x

[Juan Nunez-Iglesias]

@Emmanuelle I'm probably among the ones pushing hardest for this, and I can
tell you, I can't wait for this change in policy, and would be sorely
disappointed by having to work in an experimental branch of scikit-image.
Both @-matmul and keyword-only arguments are, imho, compelling reasons to
switch. (Imagine the amount of fiddling with the API that we could do with
keyword-only arguments, without the annoying deprecation cycle!)

@Ralf I would argue in favour of 3.5, for the above reasons and because
anyone who had the temerity to update to 3.4 is very likely to subsequently
move to 3.5. (Self-selected group of early adopters, plus no backwards
incompatibility issues between the two versions.)

Juan.

On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 8:14 AM, Stéfan van der Walt <stefanv at berkeley.edu>
wrote:

> Hi Ralf
>
> On 9 August 2016 at 15:09, Ralf Gommers <ralf.gommers at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Stefan, do you propose then to drop Python 3.4 at the same time (@ is
>> >= 3.5)?
>>
>
> Yes, I guess I am.  But if that's too much of a stretch, I will be open to
> >= 3.4.
>
> Stéfan
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "scikit-image" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to scikit-image+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to scikit-image at googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/
> msgid/scikit-image/CABDkGQmSC7Q7jZJDBuhutj2PXjQTDGDirxafVw-GFuqcN%3DK1_A%
> 40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/scikit-image/CABDkGQmSC7Q7jZJDBuhutj2PXjQTDGDirxafVw-GFuqcN%3DK1_A%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/scikit-image/attachments/20160810/67b64321/attachment.html>