[scikit-image] Future of nose and issues for scikit-image

[Steven Silvester]

Hi all,

I agree with Stéfan that a forward-looking clean break would be best.  It looks like a rather large undertaking though, judging from https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/pull/5405 <https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/pull/5405>.


Regards,

Steve


> On Dec 31, 2016, at 1:29 PM, Stefan van der Walt <stefanv at berkeley.edu> wrote:
> 
> Hi François
> 
> Thanks for bringing this up. I've now started using pytest for new projects, and I think it's possible to have a test suite that runs under both that and nose. However, I'm not sure if such backward compatibility gives us significant advantage, and suggest we make pytest the recommended and default way of running the test suite.
> 
> Best regards
> Stéfan
> 
> 
> On December 31, 2016 02:43:04 François Boulogne <fboulogne at sciunto.org> wrote:
> 
>> Hello Nelle,
>> 
>> Thank you for your nice proposition, it's really appreciated. To me,
>> this sounds like the way to move but let's wait for other reactions.
>> 
>> Best,
>> 
>> --
>> François Boulogne.
>> http://www.sciunto.org
>> GPG: 32D5F22F
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> scikit-image mailing list
>> scikit-image at python.org
>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-image
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> scikit-image mailing list
> scikit-image at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-image

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/scikit-image/attachments/20161231/4cad00ed/attachment.html>