[scikit-image] Numba on pypi
Ralf Gommers
ralf.gommers at gmail.com
Fri Jul 14 04:29:12 EDT 2017
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 8:15 PM, Matthew Brett <matthew.brett at gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 9:10 AM, Matthew Brett <matthew.brett at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 8:50 AM, Ralf Gommers <ralf.gommers at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 6:16 PM, Stefan van der Walt <
> stefanv at berkeley.edu>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi everyone,
> >>>
> >>> As many of you know, speed has been a point of contention in
> >>> scikit-image for a long time. We've made a very deliberate decision to
> >>> focus on writing high-level, understandable code (via Python and
> >>> Cython): both to lower the barrier to entry for newcomers, and to
> lessen
> >>> the burden on maintainers. But execution time comparisons, vs OpenCV
> >>> e.g., left much to be desired.
> >>>
> >>> I think we have hit a turning point in the road. Binary wheels for
> >>> Numba (actually, llvmlite) were recently uploaded to PyPi, making this
> >>> technology available to users on both pip and conda installations. The
> >>> importance of this release on pypi should not be dismissed, and I am
> >>> grateful to the numba team and Continuum for making that decision.
> >>
> >>
> >> Agreed. Note that there are no Windows wheels up on PyPI (yet, or not
> >> coming?). Given that there are no SciPy wheels for Windows either I
> don't
> >> think that that changes your argument much - people should just use a
> binary
> >> distribution on Windows - but I thought I'd point it out anway.
> >
> > We might be close to a working scipy wheel - discussion evolving over
> > at https://github.com/scipy/scipy/issues/7551#issuecomment-314922271
>
> Following up on my own post - updates on progress for a scipy wheel here:
>
> https://github.com/scipy/scipy/issues/759
>
> > If we do succeed, that would make the lack of a numba wheel for
> > Windows much more significant.
> >
> > Does anyone know Continuum's plans in this matter? Is the numba
> > wheel recipe open-source?
>
> Can anyone comment here?
>
> The basic question is - what would happen if Continuum stopped
> supplying a pypi wheel? If the answer is the standard open source
> answer - someone else would take over pretty quickly - that's fine.
> Otherwise, it's a problem.
>
Can't read their mind, but did look at the build instructions. Doesn't look
that hard to build and package, if the need arises (which is unlikely). And
the current wheels will not disappear. So I don't really see an issue.
Cheers,
Ralf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/scikit-image/attachments/20170714/d4b70f12/attachment.html>
More information about the scikit-image
mailing list