[scikit-image] Request to try a GitHub integration for automatic code style review | "PEP8Speaks"

[Egor Panfilov]

Hi Himanshu,

The bot looks really nice! What would be the pre-requisites from our side
to deploy it?

@scikit-image/core,

I'd vote to give it a try. What do you think about 3-4 months probation
period for the bot? During the period we could evaluate how well it
supplements our current practices, and how the contributors are responding.

Regards,
Egor

2017-03-21 2:08 GMT+03:00 Stefan van der Walt <stefanv at berkeley.edu>:

> This also came across my radar today:
>
> https://landscape.io/
>
> Stéfan
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 20, 2017, at 14:33, Stefan van der Walt wrote:
>
> Hi Himanshu
>
> On Mon, Mar 20, 2017, at 12:24, Himanshu Mishra wrote:
>
> I am not sure if this is the right place to talk about it, but a lot of
> times I have witnessed reviewers leave a little comment after reviewing the
> whole PR, and it is more or less about "some style issues. :)". It should
> be better for the reviewer to focus more on the implementation of the PR
> and leave the style issues to a bot. Thinking this in mind, a while ago, I
> created a Github Integration called PEP8 Speaks which automatically reviews
> the code style and comments on the Pull Request. It is written in Python
> and is open source. Github - https://github.com/orkohunter/pep8speaks
>
>
> I've been wanting to put something like this in place for a while; so, if
> you're willing to help out, we'd be grateful.
>
> We've also looked at Code Climate before; do you know how your proposed
> solution compares?
>
> Thanks!
> Stéfan
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> scikit-image mailing list
> scikit-image at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-image
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/scikit-image/attachments/20170321/0eaf4588/attachment-0001.html>