[scikit-image] Gearing up for 0.13

[Johannes Schönberger]

Trying to ship 0.13 sounds good to me! And those 32-bit bugs can be
back-ported.


Cheers,

Johannes



On Sat, Mar 25, 2017, at 05:19 PM, Juan Nunez-Iglesias wrote:

> That’s fine. My general approach is to merge things as they’re ready.
> That’s the point of continuous integration. =) Would you like to have
> a stab at the rebase? If you ping me here I’ll review ASAP.
> 

> CC list: sorry, I forgot to reply-all earlier. Full (tiny)
> thread below.
> 

> On 25 Mar 2017, 12:09 PM -0400, Nelle Varoquaux
> <nelle.varoquaux at gmail.com>, wrote:
> 

>> His point was that backporting would be easier if it was merged
>> before.
>> 

>> On 25 March 2017 at 09:03, Juan Nunez-Iglesias
>> <jni.soma at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 

>>> Oh! I thought the consensus was to have it *after* the release!
>>> #releasemanagerfail =P But it’s still on the 0.14 milestone. And
>>> looking at the comments it’s not clear that he wanted that? Anyway,
>>> I’m personally happy to merge if a rebase fixes the failing travis
>>> build.
>>> 

>>> On 25 Mar 2017, 11:57 AM -0400, Nelle Varoquaux
>>> <nelle.varoquaux at gmail.com>, wrote:
>>> 

>>>> 

>>>> 

>>>> On 25 March 2017 at 08:37, Juan Nunez-Iglesias <jni.soma at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 

>>>>> Hi everyone, 

>>>>> 

>>>>> We’ve had these two 32-bit blockers[1] holding up 0.13 for a
>>>>> couple of months now. Importantly, both of these bugs:
>>>>> - existed in 0.12

>>>>> - are only testing bugs, not actual bugs (as far as I can tell)

>>>>> 

>>>>> Therefore, I’ve proposed to ship 0.13.0 before fixing them. When
>>>>> we do fix them, we can back-port to 0.13.1/2/3. Stéfan was on
>>>>> board with this plan. If there are no objections, I’ll get the
>>>>> ball rolling shortly on the release. But, I wanted to give people
>>>>> a chance to comment on the decision before starting. =)
>>>> 

>>>> Stéfan wanted my pytest PR in before the release. Is that still the
>>>> case?
>>>> 

>>>> Cheers,

>>>> N

>>>>  

>>>>> 

>>>>> Juan.

>>>>> 

>>>>> _______________________________________________

>>>>>  scikit-image mailing list

>>>>> scikit-image at python.org

>>>>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-image

>>>>> 

> _________________________________________________

> scikit-image mailing list

> scikit-image at python.org

> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-image




Links:

  1. https://github.com/scikit-image/scikit-image/milestone/6
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/scikit-image/attachments/20170325/e23f74d6/attachment.html>