[scikit-learn] NEP: Random Number Generator Policy

[Andreas Mueller]

I don't think I have the bandwidth but I agree :-/
Not sure if any of the other core devs do. I can try to read it next 
week but that's probably too late?


On 06/19/2018 02:34 AM, Robert Kern wrote:
> On 6/16/18 00:59, Robert Kern wrote:
>> I have made a significant revision. In this version, downstream 
>> projects like scikit-learn should experience significantly less 
>> forced churn.
>>
>> https://github.com/rkern/numpy/blob/nep/rng-clarification/doc/neps/nep-0019-rng-policy.rst 
>>
>> https://mail.python.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/2018-June/078252.html
>
> The screaming has died down on numpy-discussion, and it seems like 
> everyone who has participated over there has more or less come to 
> consensus about accepting this NEP. However, I'd really appreciate it 
> if I could get some kind of feedback from a scikit-learn dev, whether 
> it's "I don't care" or "I need a couple of days to get around to 
> reading the NEP" or just "+1" or "-1000; this is awful!"
>
> I'm not picky.
>