[scikit-learn] Predictive probability from cross_validate
g.lemaitre58 at gmail.com
Tue Aug 13 03:47:31 EDT 2019
As the note is saying, you should not use this approach to evaluate your
You should use cross_val_score instead.
On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 at 04:30, charujing123 <charujing123 at 163.com> wrote:
> this function is exactly what i wanted. However, the description of this
> function contained this: Passing these predictions into an evaluation
> metric may not be a valid way to measure generalization performance.
> Could i use this prediction to calculate the accuracy? I am not sure after
> seeing this sentence.
> *发件人：*Guillaume Lemaître <g.lemaitre58 at gmail.com>
> *发送时间：*2019-08-12 23:16
> *主题：*Re: [scikit-learn] Predictive probability from cross_validate
> *收件人：*"Scikit-learn mailing list"<scikit-learn at python.org>
> cross_validate should not be used to make predictions but to evaluate the
> performance, the parameter, etc of models.
> You probably want to check cross_val_predict to get the prediction.
> However, be aware of what it involves:
> On Mon, 5 Aug 2019 at 16:57, Rujing Zha <charujing123 at 163.com> wrote:
>> How to acquire the probability in the cross_validate function?
>> 在 2019-08-05 22:31:38，"Andreas Mueller" <t3kcit at gmail.com> 写道：
>> As usual, I agree ;)
>> I think it would be good to call out particularly important bugfixes so
>> they get reviews.
>> We might also want to think about how we can organize the issue tracker
>> Having more full-time people on the project certainly means more activity
>> but ideally we can use some of that time to make the issue tracker more
>> On 8/5/19 9:21 AM, Joel Nothman wrote:
>> Yay for technology! Awesome to see you all and have some matters
>> Adrin is right that the issue tracker is increasingly overwhelming
>> (because there are more awesome people hired to work on the project, more
>> frequent sprints, etc). This meeting is a useful summary.
>> The meeting mostly focussed on big features. We should be careful to not
>> leave behind important bugs fixes and work originating outside the core
>> Despite that: Some of Guillaume's activities got cut off. I think it
>> would be great to progress both on stacking and resampling before the next
>> I also think these meetings should, as a standing item, note the
>> estimated upcoming release schedule, to help us remain aware of that
>> Good night!
>> scikit-learn mailing listscikit-learn at python.orghttps://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
>> scikit-learn mailing list
>> scikit-learn at python.org
> Guillaume Lemaitre
> INRIA Saclay - Parietal team
> Center for Data Science Paris-Saclay
> scikit-learn mailing list
> scikit-learn at python.org
INRIA Saclay - Parietal team
Center for Data Science Paris-Saclay
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the scikit-learn