[scikit-learn] Vote on SLEP010: n_features_in_ attribute

[Andrew Howe]

Perhaps because some skl objects have R *n_features_in*, but then S
*n_features_out*, where S!=R.

Andrew

<~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~>
J. Andrew Howe, PhD
LinkedIn Profile <http://www.linkedin.com/in/ahowe42>
ResearchGate Profile <http://www.researchgate.net/profile/John_Howe12/>
Open Researcher and Contributor ID (ORCID)
<http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3553-1990>
Github Profile <http://github.com/ahowe42>
Personal Website <http://www.andrewhowe.com>
I live to learn, so I can learn to live. - me
<~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~>


On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 9:43 AM Trevor Stephens <trev.stephens at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Not a core contributor, but what's with the "_in" bit? Just go with a
> public n_features which I think a bunch of estimators already have? Feels
> clumsy
>
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 8:22 PM Andrew Howe <ahowe42 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Excellent idea.
>>
>>
>> <~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~>
>> J. Andrew Howe, PhD
>> LinkedIn Profile <http://www.linkedin.com/in/ahowe42>
>> ResearchGate Profile <http://www.researchgate.net/profile/John_Howe12/>
>> Open Researcher and Contributor ID (ORCID)
>> <http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3553-1990>
>> Github Profile <http://github.com/ahowe42>
>> Personal Website <http://www.andrewhowe.com>
>> I live to learn, so I can learn to live. - me
>> <~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 10:14 PM Nicolas Hug <niourf at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> As per our Governance <http://scikit-learn.org/stable/governance.html>
>>> document, changes to API principles are to be established through an
>>> Enhancement Proposal (SLEP) from which any core developer can call for a
>>> vote on its acceptance.
>>>
>>> *SLEP010: n_features_in attribute *is up for a vote. Please see
>>> https://scikit-learn-enhancement-proposals.readthedocs.io/en/latest/slep010/proposal.html
>>>
>>> *This SLEP proposes the introduction of a public n_features_in_
>>> attribute for most estimators*
>>>
>>> Core developers are invited to vote on this change until 4 January 2020
>>> by replying to this email thread.
>>>
>>> All members of the community are welcome to comment on the proposal on
>>> this mailing list, or to propose minor changes through Issues and Pull
>>> Requests at https://github.com/scikit-learn/enhancement_proposals/.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> scikit-learn mailing list
>>> scikit-learn at python.org
>>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> scikit-learn mailing list
>> scikit-learn at python.org
>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
>>
> _______________________________________________
> scikit-learn mailing list
> scikit-learn at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/scikit-learn/attachments/20191204/486e7dde/attachment.html>