[scikit-learn] VOTE: scikit-learn governance document

[Noel Dawe]

Hi Andy,

+1 from me as well :)

On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 8:54 PM Jacob Schreiber <jmschreiber91 at gmail.com>
wrote:

> +1 from me as well. Thanks for putting in the time to write this all out.
>
> On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 4:54 PM Hanmin Qin <qinhanmin2005 at sina.com> wrote:
>
>> +1 (personally I still think it's better to keep the flow chart, it seems
>> useful for beginners)
>>
>> Hanmin Qin
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Alexandre Gramfort <alexandre.gramfort at inria.fr>
>> To: Scikit-learn mailing list <scikit-learn at python.org>
>> Subject: Re: [scikit-learn] VOTE: scikit-learn governance document
>> Date: 2019-02-11 01:29
>>
>> +1 for me too
>>
>> Alex
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Feb 9, 2019 at 10:06 PM Gilles Louppe <g.louppe at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Andy,
>>
>> I read through to document. Even though I have not been really active
>> these past months/years, I think it summarizes well our governance
>> model.
>>
>> +1.
>>
>> Gilles
>>
>> On Sat, 9 Feb 2019 at 12:01, Adrin <adrin.jalali at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > +1
>> >
>> > Thanks for the work you've put in it!
>> >
>> > On Sat, Feb 9, 2019, 03:00 Andreas Mueller <t3kcit at gmail.com wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hey all.
>> >>
>> >> I want to call a vote on the final version on the scikit-learn
>> >> governance document, which can be found in this PR:
>> >>
>> >> https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/pull/12878
>> >>
>> >> It underwent some significant changes in the last couple of weeks.
>> >>
>> >> The two-sentence summary is: conflicts are resolved by vote among core
>> >> devs, with a technical committee resolving anything that can not be
>> >> decided by at least a 2/3 majority. The initial technical committee is
>> >> Alexander Gramfort, Olivier Grisel, Joel Nothman, Hanmin Qin, Gaël
>> >> Varoquaux and myself (Andreas Müller).
>> >>
>> >> I would ask all of the *core developers* to either vote +1 for the
>> >> governance doc, -1 against it, or to explicitly abstain here on the
>> >> public mailing list (which is the way any vote will be conducted
>> >> according to the new governance document).
>> >>
>> >> I suggest we leave the vote open for two weeks, so that the decision is
>> >> made before the sprint and we can take actions.
>> >>
>> >> Anyone can still comment on the PR or here, though I would rather not
>> >> make more changes as this has already been discussed to some length.
>> >>
>> >> Thank you for participating,
>> >>
>> >> Andy
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> scikit-learn mailing list
>> >> scikit-learn at python.org
>> >> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > scikit-learn mailing list
>> > scikit-learn at python.org
>> > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
>> _______________________________________________
>> scikit-learn mailing list
>> scikit-learn at python.org
>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> scikit-learn mailing list
>> scikit-learn at python.org
>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
>> _______________________________________________
>> scikit-learn mailing list
>> scikit-learn at python.org
>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
>>
> _______________________________________________
> scikit-learn mailing list
> scikit-learn at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/scikit-learn/attachments/20190210/fa7903ca/attachment.html>