[scikit-learn] Sprint discussion points?

[Andreas Mueller]

Thanks for bringing that up.
Did I email travis last time?

We should also follow up with Microsoft as they promised unlimited builds...


On 2/20/19 3:48 AM, Alexandre Gramfort wrote:
> we should also see if we can have a lot of CI machines for the 5 days
> as it's always the blocker to move fast during 1 week.
>
> my 2c
> Alex
>
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 7:35 AM Roman Yurchak via scikit-learn
> <scikit-learn at python.org> wrote:
>> Thanks for putting the draft schedule together!
>>
>> Personally I will be there 3 days out of 5 and wouldn't want to miss the
>> discussion on euclidean distance issues. Maybe we could adjust the
>> schedule during the sprint (say on Tuesday) based on people's interest
>> and availability? That might be easier than trying to figure it out for
>> 29 participants over email..
>>
>> Also IMO it would makes sense to have some discussions (that are not
>> that controversial or about high level API but still useful) earlier
>> during the week to be able to work on them during the sprint.
>>
>> --
>> Roman
>>
>> On 20/02/2019 02:30, Joel Nothman wrote:
>>> I don't think I'll be able to stay for the Friday 10am discussion, but
>>> have a PR open on "efficient grid search" so should probably be involved.
>>>
>>> Perhaps the fit_transform discussion can happen without you, Andy?
>>>
>>> On Wed, 20 Feb 2019 at 10:17, Andreas Mueller <t3kcit at gmail.com
>>> <mailto:t3kcit at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>>      I put a draft schedule here:
>>>      https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/wiki/Upcoming-events#technical-discussions-schedule
>>>
>>>      it's obviously somewhat opinionated ;)
>>>      Happy to reprioritize.
>>>      Basically I wouldn't like to miss any of the big API discussions
>>>      because coming late to the party.
>>>
>>>      The two things on (grid?) searches are somewhat related: one is
>>>      about specifying search-spaces, the other about executing a given
>>>      search space efficiently. They probably warrant separate discussions.
>>>
>>>      I haven't added plotting or sample props on it, which are maybe two
>>>      other discussion points.
>>>      I tried to cover most controversial things from the roadmap.
>>>
>>>      Not sure if discussing the schedule via the mailing list is the best
>>>      way? Don't want to create even more traffic  than I already am ;)
>>>
>>>      On 2/19/19 5:48 PM, Guillaume Lemaître wrote:
>>>>      > Not sure if Guillaume had ideas about the schedule, given that
>>>>      he seems to be running the show?
>>>>
>>>>      Mostly running behind the show ...
>>>>
>>>>      For the moment, we only have a 30 minutes presentation of
>>>>      introduction planned on Monday.
>>>>      For the rest of the week, this is pretty much opened and I think
>>>>      that we can propose a schedule such that we can be efficient.
>>>>      IMO, two meetings of an hour per day look good to me.
>>>>
>>>>      Shall we prioritize the list of the issues? Maybe that some issues
>>>>      could be packed together.
>>>>      I would not be against having a rough schedule on the wiki
>>>>      directly and I think that having it before Monday could be better.
>>>>
>>>>      Let me know how I can help.
>>>>
>>>>      On Tue, 19 Feb 2019 at 22:23, Andreas Mueller <t3kcit at gmail.com
>>>>      <mailto:t3kcit at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>          Yeah, sounds good.
>>>>          I didn't want to unilaterally post a schedule, but doing some
>>>>          google form or similar seems a bit heavy-handed?
>>>>          Not sure if Guillaume had ideas about the schedule, given that
>>>>          he seems to be running the show?
>>>>
>>>>          On 2/19/19 4:17 PM, Joel Nothman wrote:
>>>>>          I don't think optics requires a large meeting, just a few
>>>>>          people.
>>>>>
>>>>>          I'm happy with your proposal generally, Andy. Do we schedule
>>>>>          specific topics at this point?
>>>>>
>>>>>          _______________________________________________
>>>>>          scikit-learn mailing list
>>>>>          scikit-learn at python.org  <mailto:scikit-learn at python.org>
>>>>>          https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
>>>>          _______________________________________________
>>>>          scikit-learn mailing list
>>>>          scikit-learn at python.org <mailto:scikit-learn at python.org>
>>>>          https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>      --
>>>>      Guillaume Lemaitre
>>>>      INRIA Saclay - Parietal team
>>>>      Center for Data Science Paris-Saclay
>>>>      https://glemaitre.github.io/
>>>>
>>>>      _______________________________________________
>>>>      scikit-learn mailing list
>>>>      scikit-learn at python.org  <mailto:scikit-learn at python.org>
>>>>      https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
>>>      _______________________________________________
>>>      scikit-learn mailing list
>>>      scikit-learn at python.org <mailto:scikit-learn at python.org>
>>>      https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> scikit-learn mailing list
>> scikit-learn at python.org
>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
> _______________________________________________
> scikit-learn mailing list
> scikit-learn at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn