[scikit-learn] Sprint discussion points?

Andreas Mueller t3kcit at gmail.com
Wed Feb 20 15:33:36 EST 2019


I messaged them and also tasks Thomas Fan with working with Microsoft to 
set up azure pipelines.

On 2/20/19 12:12 PM, Guillaume Lemaître wrote:
> @Andy You were the one contacting Travis.
>
> On Wed, 20 Feb 2019 at 17:23, Andreas Mueller <t3kcit at gmail.com 
> <mailto:t3kcit at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     Thanks for bringing that up.
>     Did I email travis last time?
>
>     We should also follow up with Microsoft as they promised unlimited
>     builds...
>
>
>     On 2/20/19 3:48 AM, Alexandre Gramfort wrote:
>     > we should also see if we can have a lot of CI machines for the 5
>     days
>     > as it's always the blocker to move fast during 1 week.
>     >
>     > my 2c
>     > Alex
>     >
>     > On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 7:35 AM Roman Yurchak via scikit-learn
>     > <scikit-learn at python.org <mailto:scikit-learn at python.org>> wrote:
>     >> Thanks for putting the draft schedule together!
>     >>
>     >> Personally I will be there 3 days out of 5 and wouldn't want to
>     miss the
>     >> discussion on euclidean distance issues. Maybe we could adjust the
>     >> schedule during the sprint (say on Tuesday) based on people's
>     interest
>     >> and availability? That might be easier than trying to figure it
>     out for
>     >> 29 participants over email..
>     >>
>     >> Also IMO it would makes sense to have some discussions (that
>     are not
>     >> that controversial or about high level API but still useful)
>     earlier
>     >> during the week to be able to work on them during the sprint.
>     >>
>     >> --
>     >> Roman
>     >>
>     >> On 20/02/2019 02:30, Joel Nothman wrote:
>     >>> I don't think I'll be able to stay for the Friday 10am
>     discussion, but
>     >>> have a PR open on "efficient grid search" so should probably
>     be involved.
>     >>>
>     >>> Perhaps the fit_transform discussion can happen without you, Andy?
>     >>>
>     >>> On Wed, 20 Feb 2019 at 10:17, Andreas Mueller
>     <t3kcit at gmail.com <mailto:t3kcit at gmail.com>
>     >>> <mailto:t3kcit at gmail.com <mailto:t3kcit at gmail.com>>> wrote:
>     >>>
>     >>>      I put a draft schedule here:
>     >>>
>     https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/wiki/Upcoming-events#technical-discussions-schedule
>     >>>
>     >>>      it's obviously somewhat opinionated ;)
>     >>>      Happy to reprioritize.
>     >>>      Basically I wouldn't like to miss any of the big API
>     discussions
>     >>>      because coming late to the party.
>     >>>
>     >>>      The two things on (grid?) searches are somewhat related:
>     one is
>     >>>      about specifying search-spaces, the other about executing
>     a given
>     >>>      search space efficiently. They probably warrant separate
>     discussions.
>     >>>
>     >>>      I haven't added plotting or sample props on it, which are
>     maybe two
>     >>>      other discussion points.
>     >>>      I tried to cover most controversial things from the roadmap.
>     >>>
>     >>>      Not sure if discussing the schedule via the mailing list
>     is the best
>     >>>      way? Don't want to create even more traffic than I
>     already am ;)
>     >>>
>     >>>      On 2/19/19 5:48 PM, Guillaume Lemaître wrote:
>     >>>>      > Not sure if Guillaume had ideas about the schedule,
>     given that
>     >>>>      he seems to be running the show?
>     >>>>
>     >>>>      Mostly running behind the show ...
>     >>>>
>     >>>>      For the moment, we only have a 30 minutes presentation of
>     >>>>      introduction planned on Monday.
>     >>>>      For the rest of the week, this is pretty much opened and
>     I think
>     >>>>      that we can propose a schedule such that we can be
>     efficient.
>     >>>>      IMO, two meetings of an hour per day look good to me.
>     >>>>
>     >>>>      Shall we prioritize the list of the issues? Maybe that
>     some issues
>     >>>>      could be packed together.
>     >>>>      I would not be against having a rough schedule on the wiki
>     >>>>      directly and I think that having it before Monday could
>     be better.
>     >>>>
>     >>>>      Let me know how I can help.
>     >>>>
>     >>>>      On Tue, 19 Feb 2019 at 22:23, Andreas Mueller
>     <t3kcit at gmail.com <mailto:t3kcit at gmail.com>
>     >>>>      <mailto:t3kcit at gmail.com <mailto:t3kcit at gmail.com>>> wrote:
>     >>>>
>     >>>>          Yeah, sounds good.
>     >>>>          I didn't want to unilaterally post a schedule, but
>     doing some
>     >>>>          google form or similar seems a bit heavy-handed?
>     >>>>          Not sure if Guillaume had ideas about the schedule,
>     given that
>     >>>>          he seems to be running the show?
>     >>>>
>     >>>>          On 2/19/19 4:17 PM, Joel Nothman wrote:
>     >>>>>          I don't think optics requires a large meeting, just
>     a few
>     >>>>>          people.
>     >>>>>
>     >>>>>          I'm happy with your proposal generally, Andy. Do we
>     schedule
>     >>>>>          specific topics at this point?
>     >>>>>
>     >>>>> _______________________________________________
>     >>>>>          scikit-learn mailing list
>     >>>>> scikit-learn at python.org <mailto:scikit-learn at python.org>
>     <mailto:scikit-learn at python.org <mailto:scikit-learn at python.org>>
>     >>>>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
>     >>>> _______________________________________________
>     >>>>          scikit-learn mailing list
>     >>>> scikit-learn at python.org <mailto:scikit-learn at python.org>
>     <mailto:scikit-learn at python.org <mailto:scikit-learn at python.org>>
>     >>>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
>     >>>>
>     >>>>
>     >>>>
>     >>>>      --
>     >>>>      Guillaume Lemaitre
>     >>>>      INRIA Saclay - Parietal team
>     >>>>      Center for Data Science Paris-Saclay
>     >>>> https://glemaitre.github.io/
>     >>>>
>     >>>> _______________________________________________
>     >>>>      scikit-learn mailing list
>     >>>> scikit-learn at python.org <mailto:scikit-learn at python.org>
>     <mailto:scikit-learn at python.org <mailto:scikit-learn at python.org>>
>     >>>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
>     >>> _______________________________________________
>     >>>      scikit-learn mailing list
>     >>> scikit-learn at python.org <mailto:scikit-learn at python.org>
>     <mailto:scikit-learn at python.org <mailto:scikit-learn at python.org>>
>     >>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
>     >>>
>     >>
>     >> _______________________________________________
>     >> scikit-learn mailing list
>     >> scikit-learn at python.org <mailto:scikit-learn at python.org>
>     >> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
>     > _______________________________________________
>     > scikit-learn mailing list
>     > scikit-learn at python.org <mailto:scikit-learn at python.org>
>     > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     scikit-learn mailing list
>     scikit-learn at python.org <mailto:scikit-learn at python.org>
>     https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
>
>
>
> -- 
> Guillaume Lemaitre
> INRIA Saclay - Parietal team
> Center for Data Science Paris-Saclay
> https://glemaitre.github.io/
>
> _______________________________________________
> scikit-learn mailing list
> scikit-learn at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/scikit-learn/attachments/20190220/1d32ab13/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the scikit-learn mailing list