[scikit-learn] Changes in Travis billing

Andreas C. Mueller andreasmuellerml at gmail.com
Wed Dec 2 19:35:45 EST 2020

Sorry I'm probably missing some detail but what does travis provide that 
github actions and azure pipeline don't provide?

------ Original Message ------
From: "Gael Varoquaux" <gael.varoquaux at normalesup.org>
To: "Scikit-learn mailing list" <scikit-learn at python.org>
Sent: 11/26/2020 6:12:12 AM
Subject: Re: [scikit-learn] Changes in Travis billing

>On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 03:06:52PM +0100, Gael Varoquaux wrote:
>>  On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 02:45:33PM +0100, Adrin wrote:
>>  > At this point I'm at a loss, and reading the NumFocus chat and other
>>  > packages' experience with them on the same topic, seems like we just
>>  > need to move out of Travis.
>>  Agreed. Do we still need them for something essential?
>Sorry, ARM, it was just above in the conversation.
>I think that we have no other option than reduce the frequency of the
>cron, and wait for other platforms to offer ARM, which will hopefully
>happen soonish.
>scikit-learn mailing list
>scikit-learn at python.org

More information about the scikit-learn mailing list