[scikit-learn] Changes in Travis billing
g.lemaitre58 at gmail.com
Thu Dec 3 04:15:50 EST 2020
On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 at 01:37, Andreas C. Mueller <andreasmuellerml at gmail.com>
> Sorry I'm probably missing some detail but what does travis provide that
> github actions and azure pipeline don't provide?
> ------ Original Message ------
> From: "Gael Varoquaux" <gael.varoquaux at normalesup.org>
> To: "Scikit-learn mailing list" <scikit-learn at python.org>
> Sent: 11/26/2020 6:12:12 AM
> Subject: Re: [scikit-learn] Changes in Travis billing
> >On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 03:06:52PM +0100, Gael Varoquaux wrote:
> >> On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 02:45:33PM +0100, Adrin wrote:
> >> > At this point I'm at a loss, and reading the NumFocus chat and other
> >> > packages' experience with them on the same topic, seems like we just
> >> > need to move out of Travis.
> >> Agreed. Do we still need them for something essential?
> >Sorry, ARM, it was just above in the conversation.
> >I think that we have no other option than reduce the frequency of the
> >cron, and wait for other platforms to offer ARM, which will hopefully
> >happen soonish.
> >scikit-learn mailing list
> >scikit-learn at python.org
> scikit-learn mailing list
> scikit-learn at python.org
Scikit-learn @ Inria Foundation
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the scikit-learn