[scikit-learn] Changes in Travis billing
adrin.jalali at gmail.com
Thu Dec 3 05:36:32 EST 2020
I got a response from Travis, and according to this, we don't qualify for
the free credits:
The free plan will grant your organization 10000 credits.
We offer an Open Source Subscription for free to non-commercial open-source
projects. To qualify for an Open Source subscription, the project must meet
the following requirements:
- You are a project lead or regular committer (latest commit in the last
- Project must be at least 3 months old and is in active development
(with regular commits and activity)
- Project meets the OSD <https://opensource.org/docs/osd> specification
*Project must not be sponsored by a commercial company or organization
(monetary or with employees paid to work on the project) *
- Project can not provide commercial services or distribute paid
versions of the software
Does this sound like you and your project? We'd be very happy to support
However, if your project does not match these requirements or you have
further questions , please feel free to ask!
We look forward to your response if you meet these requirements to proceed
with the next steps.
On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 10:17 AM Guillaume Lemaître <g.lemaitre58 at gmail.com>
> ARM support
> On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 at 01:37, Andreas C. Mueller <
> andreasmuellerml at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Sorry I'm probably missing some detail but what does travis provide that
>> github actions and azure pipeline don't provide?
>> ------ Original Message ------
>> From: "Gael Varoquaux" <gael.varoquaux at normalesup.org>
>> To: "Scikit-learn mailing list" <scikit-learn at python.org>
>> Sent: 11/26/2020 6:12:12 AM
>> Subject: Re: [scikit-learn] Changes in Travis billing
>> >On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 03:06:52PM +0100, Gael Varoquaux wrote:
>> >> On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 02:45:33PM +0100, Adrin wrote:
>> >> > At this point I'm at a loss, and reading the NumFocus chat and other
>> >> > packages' experience with them on the same topic, seems like we just
>> >> > need to move out of Travis.
>> >> Agreed. Do we still need them for something essential?
>> >Sorry, ARM, it was just above in the conversation.
>> >I think that we have no other option than reduce the frequency of the
>> >cron, and wait for other platforms to offer ARM, which will hopefully
>> >happen soonish.
>> >scikit-learn mailing list
>> >scikit-learn at python.org
>> scikit-learn mailing list
>> scikit-learn at python.org
> Guillaume Lemaitre
> Scikit-learn @ Inria Foundation
> scikit-learn mailing list
> scikit-learn at python.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the scikit-learn