[SciPy-Dev] establishing a Code of Conduct for SciPy

[Ralf Gommers]

On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 6:51 AM, Matthew Brett <matthew.brett at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 6:47 PM, Ilhan Polat <ilhanpolat at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I guess my second mail didn't make it to the server for some reason. I've
> > written:
> >
> > "I should have probably put a smiley in the end. I mean it quite lightly
> by
> > the way. "
> >
> > No problem at all, Matthew for one I'm not a native speaker and second
> you
> > guys probably have seen more conflicts than I ever did. I just wanted to
> > have the text a bit less formal.
>
> Sure - no problem from my side - I completely agree that less formal
> is better ...
>

Thanks Bennett, Matthew and Ilhan. I agree that "be concise" can be
misunderstood if not worded right.

Stefan commented on the PR "Points 5, 6, 7, and 8 seem less relevant to me,
and less tied to principles. Consider cutting for the sake of brevity?".
I think that's a good point, so would like to go with that. It also means
we don't have to choose between your three versions of point 5:)

Cheers,
Ralf



> Cheers,
>
> Matthew
> _______________________________________________
> SciPy-Dev mailing list
> SciPy-Dev at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/scipy-dev/attachments/20171006/3033904b/attachment.html>