[SciPy-Dev] establishing a Code of Conduct for SciPy

[Ralf Gommers]

On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 10:28 PM, Andrew Nelson <andyfaff at gmail.com> wrote:

> I can't make it on Thursday morning if that makes a difference to the
> timing.
>

Hi Andrew, it's Friday morning for you. Either way, doesn't make too much
of a difference because I'm in New Zealand which is only 2 hours ahead of
Australia. But we could shift it forward one or two hours if needed.

Ralf



> On 16 Oct 2017 7:52 pm, "Ralf Gommers" <ralf.gommers at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 7:05 AM, Matthew Brett <matthew.brett at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 6:42 PM, Ralf Gommers <ralf.gommers at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 6:51 AM, Matthew Brett <matthew.brett at gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 6:47 PM, Ilhan Polat <ilhanpolat at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >> > I guess my second mail didn't make it to the server for some reason.
>> >> > I've
>> >> > written:
>> >> >
>> >> > "I should have probably put a smiley in the end. I mean it quite
>> lightly
>> >> > by
>> >> > the way. "
>> >> >
>> >> > No problem at all, Matthew for one I'm not a native speaker and
>> second
>> >> > you
>> >> > guys probably have seen more conflicts than I ever did. I just
>> wanted to
>> >> > have the text a bit less formal.
>> >>
>> >> Sure - no problem from my side - I completely agree that less formal
>> >> is better ...
>> >
>> >
>> > Thanks Bennett, Matthew and Ilhan. I agree that "be concise" can be
>> > misunderstood if not worded right.
>> >
>> > Stefan commented on the PR "Points 5, 6, 7, and 8 seem less relevant to
>> me,
>> > and less tied to principles. Consider cutting for the sake of brevity?".
>> > I think that's a good point, so would like to go with that. It also
>> means we
>> > don't have to choose between your three versions of point 5:)
>>
>> Excellent outcome - more concise :)
>>
>
>
> Hi all, there haven't been more comments on the PR in the last 10 days and
> so far it seems everyone is happy. I said earlier that I'd organise a
> public conference call in order to give another venue for input, and I'd
> still like to do that. So here's a proposal:
>
>     Thursday 19 Oct at 7pm UCT on Google Hangouts
>
> We've puzzled with time zones before, the best one was very early morning
> in Australia and late evening in Russia. This time will be 6am in Sydney,
> 10pm in Moscow, 8pm CET, 3pm US east cost, noon US west coast.
>
>
> Also, it would be great to get a few volunteers for the CoC committee. Any
> takers?
>
> Cheers,
> Ralf
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SciPy-Dev mailing list
> SciPy-Dev at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SciPy-Dev mailing list
> SciPy-Dev at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/scipy-dev/attachments/20171016/d235434c/attachment.html>