[SciPy-Dev] Enabling use of scipy.special from Numba

[Nathaniel Smith]

On Thu, Jun 20, 2019, 13:03 Stanley Seibert <sseibert at anaconda.com> wrote:

> We're not looking for the ufunc, but the underlying scalar call, along
> with a type signature.
>

I know that's what you're looking for. I'm hoping to understand why :-).
The loop function pointer is very close to the raw scalar call, and it
already has a type signature. Does the extra C level for loop add that much
overhead?

-n
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/scipy-dev/attachments/20190620/b175fad9/attachment.html>