[Scipy-organizers] Publication and review in SciPy
Andy Ray Terrel
andy.terrel at gmail.com
Wed Nov 6 12:22:24 EST 2013
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 11:17 AM, James Bergstra
<james.bergstra at gmail.com> wrote:
> This approach has been adopted by the ICLR conference. They just started
> doing it last year, but by all accounts it was a great success. It was all
> open *except* that the area chairs would permit (actually request)
> specifically chosen reviewers to review certain papers anonymously.
>
> On github, this would be more labour-intensive because it's not really what
> github was made for, but it could work if e.g. area chairs accept reviews by
> email, and then paste them into github as anonymized reviews.
>
Yes. We could do something like put a simple web app that then
uploads the comments as "SciPy Proceedings Reviewer" account or
something. Definitely more work.
-- Andy
>
> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 11:59 AM, sheila miguez <sheila at codersquid.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Andy Ray Terrel <andy.terrel at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > The number 1 problem with the github system that has been brought to
>> > my attention (by folks who don't want to get into a fight and haven't
>> > posted here) is the lack of anonymity for some reviewers.
>>
>>
>> This was something I was wondering about but didn't want to get in to
>> it in the other thread. I was thinking of bouncing ideas around to see
>> if github could work with anonymous reviews (asking people to make
>> pseudonymous github accounts would be clunky).
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> sheila at codersquid.com
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Scipy-organizers mailing list
>> Scipy-organizers at scipy.org
>> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers
>
>
More information about the Scipy-organizers
mailing list