[SciPy-user] constrained optimization
eric jones
eric at enthought.com
Thu May 15 16:09:16 EDT 2003
> John Hunter wrote:
>
> >>>>>>"Travis" == Travis Oliphant <oliphant.travis at ieee.org> writes:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >
> > Travis> It's been a while since I looked and I could very likely
> > Travis> have missed some. It's an area we would definitely like
> > Travis> to add to scipy.
> >
> >I just spoke with one of the creators of optsolve, who I worked with
> >when I worked on that library, and told her about the interest at
> >scipy in a good optimizer library that could be extended to python,
> >and expressed my regrets about their 'free for non-commercial use'
> >license. She said this license was currently under negotiation, and
> >I'm going to talk with them further about this possibility. What
> >licensing terms does scipy require?
> >
> >If any you have any input for me about whether you think this would
be
> >a good inclusion for scipy if the license were right, give me some
> >feedback and I'll pass it their way.
Peter Stoltz is at Tech-X also. I've copied him on the mail to give him
a heads up about the discussion.
> Libraries in SciPy need an unrestrictive open source license
(something
> like the Python license itself or the BSD license) but Eric can
verify
> that.
That is right.
>
> One thing we can also do is place the interface in SciPy but require
the
> user to download the library separately as an add on (we do that with
> the PIL right now for example)
PIL has a license that is compliant with SciPy. fftw is another package
that we have optional support for that doesn't have a compatible
license. The key here, though, is that there is a functional equivalent
in fftpack. If fftw is used, SciPy doesn't loose any functionality, it
is just a little slower.
For something as important as a constrained multi-dimensional optimizer,
the version we use needs to be a license compatible with SciPy (free for
academic/commercial, no restrictions that additions must be contributed
back to package). I'm really interested in getting a good version of
one of these, but am willing to wait until we find one with a conforming
license, or someone develops one for SciPy.
See ya,
eric
More information about the SciPy-User
mailing list