[SciPy-user] Inconsistent function calls?

[Ivo Maljevic]

You can also add Gödel's twist:

"Robert K. will never say this sentence is true". And then ask him if this
sentence is true or not.




2009/5/21 Travis Vaught <travis at enthought.com>

>
> On May 21, 2009, at 11:42 AM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>
> > On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 9:35 AM, Robert Kern <robert.kern at gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >> On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 11:29, Travis Vaught <travis at enthought.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>> On May 21, 2009, at 11:13 AM, Ivo Maljevic wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> ...
> >>>>
> >>>> Robert, by following this list I know that I shouldn't even try to
> >>>> respond to your message as
> >>>> you always turn out to be right, but I'll try anyway. ...
> >>>
> >>> Robert,
> >>>
> >>> Could you write some code to verify this?
> >>>
> >>> Here's a snippet off the top of my head:
> >>>
> >>> def check_robert():
> >>>     if 1:
> >>>         print "Robert is right."
> >>>     else:
> >>>         print "Robert is wrong."
> >>
> >> These days, it's been more like:
> >>
> >>  def check_robert():
> >>    if random() > 0.5:
> >>      print "Robert is right."
> >>    else:
> >>      print "Robert is wrong."
> >
> > what about:
> >
> > def check_enthought():
> >  if 1:
> >    print "Robert is right."
> >  else:
> >    print "Travis is right."
> >
> > O.
>
> This is nonsense--because I always agree with Robert ;-)
>
> Travis
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SciPy-user mailing list
> SciPy-user at scipy.org
> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-user
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/scipy-user/attachments/20090521/424ea644/attachment.html>