[SciPy-User] Order of numpy orperations is not equal to logic (and also octave)?

[Oz Nahum Tiram]

Hi Everyone,

So here is something which I discovered lately and is making me wonder.

I want to define a scalar which I call Net Absolute Mass Balance Error or in
short NAMBE. This NAMBE is the absolute difference between a base vector and
another vector, divided by the base vector and multiplied by a hundred, in
pseudo-code notation:

NAMBE=sum(abs(a-b)/a)*100

When I do it in python, I decided to break the line into two lines so the
code is more readable:

>>> a=np.array([0.1,0.1,0.1,0.1,0.1])
>>> b=np.array([0.1,0.1,0.1,0.1,0.1])*2
>>> b
array([ 0.2,  0.2,  0.2,  0.2,  0.2])
>>> a-b
array([-0.1, -0.1, -0.1, -0.1, -0.1])
>>> s=np.sum(abs(a-b))
>>> s
0.5
>>> s/np.sum(a)
1.0

I thought the numpy does everything element wise so if I do it one line, I
noticed the the result is different:

>>> s=np.sum(abs(a-b)/a)
>>> s
5.0

Now If I check myself on the data I have with a octave, I get different
results:

octave:1> a=[0.1,0.1,0.1,0.1,0.1]

a =

   0.10000   0.10000   0.10000   0.10000   0.10000

octave:2> b=a*2

b =

   0.20000   0.20000   0.20000   0.20000   0.20000

octave:3> sum(a)

ans =  0.50000
octave:4> sum(b)

ans =  1
octave:5> sum(a-b)

ans = -0.50000
octave:6> sum(abs(a-b))

ans =  0.50000
octave:7> s=sum(abs(a-b))

s =  0.50000
octave:8> s/sum(a)

ans =  1
octave:9> s=sum(abs(a-b)/a)

s =  1.0000
octave:10> s=sum(abs(a-b)/sum(a))

s =  1

Note that the is no difference in the output of 9 and 10 in Octave, although
there is in Python ... So, my question is: Why is python is behaving like
that ? Which one is right ? Octave or Python ?


Thanks in advance,


-- 
Oz Nahum
Graduate Student
Zentrum für Angewandte Geologie
Universität Tübingen

---

Imagine there's no countries
it isn't hard to do
Nothing to kill or die for
And no religion too
Imagine all the people
Living life in peace
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/scipy-user/attachments/20101031/dbf39029/attachment.html>