[Security-sig] Implementation of the PEP 524
Nick Coghlan
ncoghlan at gmail.com
Thu Aug 18 08:10:08 EDT 2016
On 18 August 2016 at 03:16, Victor Stinner <victor.stinner at gmail.com> wrote:
> 2016-08-17 18:39 GMT+02:00 Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com>:
>> - if blocking *is* set, it prints a warning to stderr, before trying
>> again without the GRND_NONBLOCK flag
>
> I implemented the PEP 524. Such warning is not part of the PEP.
>
> Sorry, but I'm not interested to reopen the discussion on the PEP
> since the PEP was accepted...
OK, I'll review it on that basis, and then submit a follow-up RFE and
patch to add the warning.
I'd like to minimise the divergence between upstream and Fedora, and
we'll at least have the warning in the downstream version.
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
More information about the Security-SIG
mailing list