[Security-sig] Unified TLS API for Python

[Nick Coghlan]

On 12 January 2017 at 22:44, Cory Benfield <cory at lukasa.co.uk> wrote:
> We can do that.
>
> I should note that MINIMUM_SUPPORTED and MAXIMUM_SUPPORTED are not intended
> to be equal to SSLv2 and TLSv1_3, or indeed to any other value in this enum.
> They are future-proofing tools that allow users to say “I want TLSv1 *or
> higher*” without setting an upper bound on what “higher” means.

Cool, I wasn't sure how you intended to handle that, and supplying the
values will make it explicit that those are really only useful in
"version_range" and not anywhere else. Although at that point the
question becomes whether or not they're offering any benefit beyond
just using "None" in the appropriate location.

Cheers,
Nick.



-- 
Nick Coghlan   |   ncoghlan at gmail.com   |   Brisbane, Australia