[spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-858925 ] Add notification sound to Outlook addin

[SourceForge.net]

Patches item #858925, was opened at 2003-12-13 03:22
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=858925&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Add notification sound to Outlook addin

Initial Comment:
This patch adds support for playing notification sounds 
when messages are processed by SpamBayes.  The 
attached ZIP file contains 3 diff files to patch files in the 
Outlook2000 directory, and a 
notification_sound_patch.txt file that describes the 
notification sound feature and how to configure it.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-12-18 12:48

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Hmm.  There are a *lot* of experimental/new features that 
will be present in the next release that weren't in 1.0a7 as a 
result of dumping the 1_0_release branch and the current 
popularity of 'x-' options.  I suppose these don't effect the 
plug-in in any obvious way, but they are still there in the 
background (apart from the web interface changes).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt)
Date: 2003-12-18 03:16

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=859086

I agree that we shouldn't be adding any new features, 
especially experimental ones, to the 1.0 release.  A branch 
sounds like a good idea, and fits with the branching strategy 
discussed earlier on spambayes-dev.  Either a single branch 
for all new features or a separate branch per feature is fine 
with me.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-12-17 19:55

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I'm reluctant to include this in the trunk at this stage. 
How would you feel about it going on a branch, and after 1.0
we integrate it?  If we are really keen, we could build
"experimental" binaries for people as we go (but these would
not be official)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=858925&group_id=61702