[spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-774650 ] Additional
post-filtering options
SourceForge.net
noreply at sourceforge.net
Sun Jul 20 16:08:08 EDT 2003
Feature Requests item #774650, was opened at 2003-07-20 18:44
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by vbpf0jsb0a30kc
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=774650&group_id=61702
Category: Outlook
Group: Next Release (example)
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: John D. Zanette (vbpf0jsb0a30kc)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Additional post-filtering options
Initial Comment:
1. Option to "Permanently Delete" certain spam rather
than just moving it.
2. Better than that, the option to do anything with a
post-filtered message that I can do with an Outlook rule
filtered message (forward, flag, etc.)
3. User configurable number of filtering levels - i.e.,
more than two.
4. A way to view/modify/tweak the database directly
(maybe this already exists and I don't know it?)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Comment By: John D. Zanette (vbpf0jsb0a30kc)
Date: 2003-07-20 22:08
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=826656
#1 - That had already been suggested by Mr. Meyer when I
posted to the SpamBayes list (he also suggested that I [re]
post it here)
#2 - Header or subject line modification would work for this (I
have used that technique successfully with the K9 filter
(http://kier.net) and Outlook's rules. Unfortunately K9 does
not support Outlook/Exchange directly (only through POP3),
which is why I now use SpamBayes since I needed support for
multiple simultaneous Exchange and POP3 mailboxes.
#3 - What I mean is more spam score filters. Since it is
CRITICAL for me to NEVER lose a "ham" message, I would like
to have at least three levels of filtering. For example:
70% - 100% Immediate Delete (via SpamBayes
as in #2 or using the AutoArchive method in #1)
30% - 69% Move to Spam folder with autodelete
after 3 days
10%-29% Move to Suspect folder for manual review
I have had such great success in less than a month of using
SpamBayes (over 99.9%) that I am actually considering how I
can "trust" it to autodelete. I have tried many alternatives
including commercial products and none (with the exception
of K9, noted above) has come close to SpamBayes.
#4 - Agreed.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist)
Date: 2003-07-20 20:02
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=583713
For #1, you can right click the spam folder and set the auto
archive options to delete messages in that folder after a
certain time (1 day is smallest amount) or move them to
another pst file for retraining.
For #2, convince a developer that it is useful. I would think
either header or subject line modication would be easier and
then build your rules using outlook.
For #3, Do you mean more than filtering on different ranges
of the the spam score or trying to do spam/ham and
work/personal (etc.) type of thing?
For #4, Looking at the spam clues for a message is filtered
snapshot of the db. I think viewing would kinda neat, but
modify/tweak could have some bad results.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=774650&group_id=61702
More information about the Spambayes-bugs
mailing list