From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Nov 1 10:48:19 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Nov 1 10:48:22 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-834159 ] Uncaptured Pythonexception Message-ID: Bugs item #834159, was opened at 2003-11-01 16:48 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=834159&group_id=61702 Category: hammie Group: Source code 1.0a6 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Carsten Nitschke (carstennitschke) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Uncaptured Pythonexception Initial Comment: Hello, I am using Python 2.3, the Spambayes POP3 Proxy Beta 0.3 on a linux system with a standard SuSE 8.2 professional setup. For the last 2 weeks or so it seems that when I have my spambayes proxy running at one point or another there will appear an uncaptured python exception which not only seems to crash the spambayes proxy but also closes down my DSL connection. Along with the spambayes proxy I had only eDonkey or overnet running as well as an open Opera window for the administration of the spambayes proxy. As attachment I include the screen output. I crossed out the names of the pop3servers that are proxied. The first exception is the one that crashes the spambayes proxy and closes the DSL connection. I am able to hit the save & shutdown option from the opera window, but the proxy is not stopped in the shell. The second error and the traceback appear after hitting two times ctrl-c to shut down the crashed server for a restart. I hope you can help. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=834159&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Nov 1 12:26:02 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Nov 1 12:26:13 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-828669 ] Toolbars refuse to work after reset Message-ID: Bugs item #828669, was opened at 2003-10-23 04:27 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by w_hughes You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=828669&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: William Hughes (w_hughes) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Toolbars refuse to work after reset Initial Comment: I noticed the toolbar was not working and followed your instructions about removing it and then I checked the log file for an error. See the attached log file. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: William Hughes (w_hughes) Date: 2003-11-01 17:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=892918 I sent the db file to your other address. I retrained the db. however I don't know if it was successful as the Dialog box said "Saving: Writing database" but it never changed the msg. I don't know if this is typical behavior or not. After doing this there appears to be no change in the functioning of the program, meaning that it is still filtering spam although my guess is that it is somehow not doing it as effectively as it should becuase the number of spam msgs that are appearing in my inbox is significant (approx 20) as opposed to 3 or 4 when it was working flawlessly. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-10-31 05:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 mhammond at users.sourceforge.net should be fine. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: William Hughes (w_hughes) Date: 2003-10-31 04:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=892918 I just learned that the max file size is 256K and this file is almost 1 meg zipped. I could not locate an email address to send it to you directly. Please advise. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: William Hughes (w_hughes) Date: 2003-10-31 04:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=892918 For some reason I got an invalid file type error when submitting the db file using its original name so I am trying it again zipped. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: William Hughes (w_hughes) Date: 2003-10-31 04:47 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=892918 Here is the file you requested. However you should know that I the first thing I did after I tried all the toolbar fixets was to retrain the database. It had no effect. I am going to retrain it now. Do you want a copy of the db file after I train it? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-10-26 23:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 This appears to be a duplicate of https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=807217&group_id=61702&atid=498103, which mentions the same error that appears in your log. The only solution I know of at the moment is to go to the "Training" tab, and do a complete re-train. If you could possibly attach a copy of your "default_bayes_database.db" before you do this, I would appreciate it - either mail it directly to me, or attach it here. However, that doesn't explain why you can't use the toolbars. The only reference to the toolbars is "Creating new SpamBayes toolbar to host our buttons", which is what we expect after clobbering outcmd.dat. Are there any messages regarding toolbars in subsequent startups? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: William Hughes (w_hughes) Date: 2003-10-26 19:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=892918 Toolbar Still Does Not Work...This problem developed while I was running version 6.xx. I installed the latest version avaliable. No change in symptoms. I closed Outlook and deleted the file outlook.dat and rebooted the computer. Symptoms remain the same: It is filtering messages but the toolbar does not work. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: William Hughes (w_hughes) Date: 2003-10-24 16:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=892918 Here is some more information. SpamBayes is filtering messages. The toolbar does not work. I have tried all the fixets listed including deleting the file outlook.dat. Toolbar still does not work. If there are tests you would like me to run to help, please let me know. w_hughes ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=828669&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Nov 2 07:23:35 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Nov 2 07:23:39 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-834511 ] 1.0a6: Python 2.3 is required Message-ID: Bugs item #834511, was opened at 2003-11-02 13:23 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=834511&group_id=61702 Category: hammie Group: Source code 1.0a6 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Simone Piunno (pioppo) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: 1.0a6: Python 2.3 is required Initial Comment: In README.txt for 1.0a6 I found: Prerequisites ============= You need to have Python 2.2 or later (2.3 is recommended). You can download Python from . Many distributions of unix now ship with Python - try typing 'python' at a shell prompt. So 2.2 should be enough, but: [pioppo@liston Mailman]$ python storage.py Traceback (most recent call last): File "storage.py", line 17, in ? from spambayes import storage File "spambayes/storage.py", line 67, in ? from spambayes import classifier File "spambayes/classifier.py", line 43, in ? from spambayes.Options import options File "spambayes/Options.py", line 33, in ? defaults = { NameError: name 'False' is not defined Either you fix Options.py adding proper False definition, or you raise the python requirement. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=834511&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Nov 2 11:02:22 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Nov 2 11:02:32 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-834606 ] 550 Server Response Possible? Message-ID: Bugs item #834606, was opened at 2003-11-02 11:02 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=834606&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: a b (hwatkin) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: 550 Server Response Possible? Initial Comment: Would it be possible to add the ability to reject supposed spam with a 550 error response? I believe that Apple Mail can do this from the client level? I currently use the Outlook XP plugin, so my interest would primarily be for that version, although I am sure the proxy version users would also appreciate this feature. Thanks for a great app!!! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=834606&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Nov 2 13:16:51 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Nov 2 13:17:02 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-834511 ] 1.0a6: Python 2.3 is required Message-ID: Bugs item #834511, was opened at 2003-11-02 12:23 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by richiehindle You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=834511&group_id=61702 Category: hammie Group: Source code 1.0a6 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Simone Piunno (pioppo) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: 1.0a6: Python 2.3 is required Initial Comment: In README.txt for 1.0a6 I found: Prerequisites ============= You need to have Python 2.2 or later (2.3 is recommended). You can download Python from . Many distributions of unix now ship with Python - try typing 'python' at a shell prompt. So 2.2 should be enough, but: [pioppo@liston Mailman]$ python storage.py Traceback (most recent call last): File "storage.py", line 17, in ? from spambayes import storage File "spambayes/storage.py", line 67, in ? from spambayes import classifier File "spambayes/classifier.py", line 43, in ? from spambayes.Options import options File "spambayes/Options.py", line 33, in ? defaults = { NameError: name 'False' is not defined Either you fix Options.py adding proper False definition, or you raise the python requirement. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Date: 2003-11-02 18:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=85414 Already fixed in CVS. Fix will be available in 1.0a7. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=834511&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Nov 2 15:25:43 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Nov 2 15:25:50 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-834696 ] sb_filter -t -- train unsure msg as spam Message-ID: Feature Requests item #834696, was opened at 2003-11-02 14:25 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=834696&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Paramjit Oberoi (psoberoi) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: sb_filter -t -- train unsure msg as spam Initial Comment: At the moment, sb_filer.py in "filter and train" mode trains unsure messsages as ham. It would be nice to have an option ot make it train them as spam instead. So far I have seen only one message that was marked unsure that was not spam. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=834696&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Nov 3 18:58:58 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Nov 3 18:59:11 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-828669 ] Toolbars refuse to work after reset Message-ID: Bugs item #828669, was opened at 2003-10-23 04:27 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by w_hughes You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=828669&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: William Hughes (w_hughes) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Toolbars refuse to work after reset Initial Comment: I noticed the toolbar was not working and followed your instructions about removing it and then I checked the log file for an error. See the attached log file. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: William Hughes (w_hughes) Date: 2003-11-03 23:58 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=892918 Another interesting tidbit: Throughout the day I randomly try the toolbar to see if it works, but it never does. However today, on one occasion it did it work. It has not worked since. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: William Hughes (w_hughes) Date: 2003-11-01 17:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=892918 I sent the db file to your other address. I retrained the db. however I don't know if it was successful as the Dialog box said "Saving: Writing database" but it never changed the msg. I don't know if this is typical behavior or not. After doing this there appears to be no change in the functioning of the program, meaning that it is still filtering spam although my guess is that it is somehow not doing it as effectively as it should becuase the number of spam msgs that are appearing in my inbox is significant (approx 20) as opposed to 3 or 4 when it was working flawlessly. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-10-31 05:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 mhammond at users.sourceforge.net should be fine. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: William Hughes (w_hughes) Date: 2003-10-31 04:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=892918 I just learned that the max file size is 256K and this file is almost 1 meg zipped. I could not locate an email address to send it to you directly. Please advise. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: William Hughes (w_hughes) Date: 2003-10-31 04:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=892918 For some reason I got an invalid file type error when submitting the db file using its original name so I am trying it again zipped. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: William Hughes (w_hughes) Date: 2003-10-31 04:47 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=892918 Here is the file you requested. However you should know that I the first thing I did after I tried all the toolbar fixets was to retrain the database. It had no effect. I am going to retrain it now. Do you want a copy of the db file after I train it? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-10-26 23:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 This appears to be a duplicate of https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=807217&group_id=61702&atid=498103, which mentions the same error that appears in your log. The only solution I know of at the moment is to go to the "Training" tab, and do a complete re-train. If you could possibly attach a copy of your "default_bayes_database.db" before you do this, I would appreciate it - either mail it directly to me, or attach it here. However, that doesn't explain why you can't use the toolbars. The only reference to the toolbars is "Creating new SpamBayes toolbar to host our buttons", which is what we expect after clobbering outcmd.dat. Are there any messages regarding toolbars in subsequent startups? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: William Hughes (w_hughes) Date: 2003-10-26 19:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=892918 Toolbar Still Does Not Work...This problem developed while I was running version 6.xx. I installed the latest version avaliable. No change in symptoms. I closed Outlook and deleted the file outlook.dat and rebooted the computer. Symptoms remain the same: It is filtering messages but the toolbar does not work. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: William Hughes (w_hughes) Date: 2003-10-24 16:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=892918 Here is some more information. SpamBayes is filtering messages. The toolbar does not work. I have tried all the fixets listed including deleting the file outlook.dat. Toolbar still does not work. If there are tests you would like me to run to help, please let me know. w_hughes ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=828669&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Nov 3 21:00:38 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Nov 3 21:00:46 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-835435 ] UnicodeEncodeError (Japanese Language) Message-ID: Bugs item #835435, was opened at 2003-11-04 11:00 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=835435&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Armand Suarez (armandeus) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: UnicodeEncodeError (Japanese Language) Initial Comment: The problem: cannot analyze existing Japanese- language mail to build a database of good messages using the manager. I am using SB version 0.81 with Outlook 2003 (Japanese) in WinXP Pro (Japanese). SB installs and works properly, filtering English-language spam that arrives (which is the vast majority of spam). However, when I use the manager to analyze existing messages to build the database, the manager stops at "writing the database." The log says: "UnicodeEncodeError: 'ascii' codec can't encode characters in position 26-35: ordinal not in range (128)." The log file is attached (contains some Japanese characters, file in ANSI). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=835435&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Nov 4 12:46:22 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Nov 4 12:46:33 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-814099 ] Old filters still in place - 2 COM servers Message-ID: Bugs item #814099, was opened at 2003-09-28 13:25 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kwladyka You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=814099&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Kevin Wladyka (kwladyka) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Old filters still in place - 2 COM servers Initial Comment: While using an older version of SpamBayes (version 0.3) the filtering would continually move some good emails to my deleted items folder (the folder I selected for SPAM emails) no matter how much I trained it. I decided to remove this version and start over with the current version (0.81). After the uninstall of version 0.3 and then the install of version 0.81, the first thing I found was that I could no longer move SPAM to the deleted items folder since it was not a listed choice. (I hope this can be changed as I much prefer to move SPAM there when the program is working well. Otherwise it is a several step process to permanently delete emails). However, these same aforementioned emails were still being moved to the deleted items folder under version 0.81. (Note I have no other rules setup in Outlook and when SpamBayes is uninstalled this does not happen). I have also tried to uninstall and completely remove the SpamBayes directories both in C:\Program Files and under my Document and Settings profile and in the add- in sections for Outlook in the registry and then reinstall. Still the problem exists. I also noticed that while SpamBayes appears to work fine other than the above issue, the add-in does not appear in the Outlook Com add-ins any longer. The SpamBayes log states : Addin terminating: 2 COM client and 2 COM servers exist. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Kevin Wladyka (kwladyka) Date: 2003-11-04 10:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=823907 Mark, thanks for the analysis. The early versions of Spambayes did allow for the movement of SPAM to the Deleted Items folder which is how I had my plug-in setup. That may be the source of the problem. For me, assuming the filter was working correctly why not move the SPAM right to the Deleted Items Folder? Any way, I understand why that would not work for most people (I run a computer consulting business) but for me it was optimal. I have the program running with several of my clients. No one has this problem. However, no one was ever setup to push the SPAM to the deleted folders and of course with the later versions that is not a choice anyway. I've found no log indicating that email is getting moved to the deleted items folder. However, each log says that "Addin terminating: 2 COM client and 2 COM servers exist" thus, it must be so? I know that all email from some of my clients was always seen as SPAM and moved to my selected SPAM folder (which was deleted items). I wanted to start anew and the newer version did not allow the movement to the deleted items any more. However, the same clients still when to the deleted items folder as before. I've attached another log file showing the Spambayes reviewing the email as it comes in. There are no Com Add-in's listed in Outlook, not even SpamBayes is listed. I hope the problem can be found. I imagine wiping out and re-creating my desktop profile might be a work-a-round but it would be nice to not have to go there if possible. Thanks again. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-10-26 17:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Unfortunately, we can not use "Deleted Items" as the destination for Spam, as this would screw up the way we train - all good items also moved to this folder would be assumed to be Spam - almost certainly not what you want. It should be impossible for 2 plugins to be running at the same time, as they use identical "Ids". Further, the log you attached does not show SpamBayes moving any items. Can you find a log where SpamBayes is indicating it is moving the Spam to "deleted items"? Are you sure there are no other installed plugins that could be doing this? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=814099&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Nov 4 15:23:31 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Nov 4 15:23:40 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-836018 ] MAPI_E_NOT_ENOUGH_MEMORY when filtering lots of spam Message-ID: Bugs item #836018, was opened at 2003-11-04 15:23 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=836018&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Thomas A. Grobicki (tagrobicki) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: MAPI_E_NOT_ENOUGH_MEMORY when filtering lots of spam Initial Comment: I recieve the following error when filtering approximately 1247 spam messages: Moving a message failed due to an unexpected Outlook error. Exception 0x8007000e (MAPI_E_NOT_ENOUGH_MEMORY): Not enough storage is available to complete this operation. At which point, it appears that SpamBayes stops working. Outlook continues to work, but the dialog recommends restarting it. This happened in version 0.81 running on WinXP Pro with all patches using Outlook 2002 (10.4712.4219) SP2. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=836018&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Nov 5 05:28:25 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Nov 5 05:28:29 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-836386 ] assertion failed during classfication Message-ID: Bugs item #836386, was opened at 2003-11-05 11:28 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=836386&group_id=61702 Category: hammie Group: Source code 1.0a6 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Uwe Schmitt (rocksportrocker) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: assertion failed during classfication Initial Comment: echo "boost maillinglist microsoft " | sb_filter.py says: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/sb_filter.py", line 187, in ? main() File "/usr/bin/sb_filter.py", line 183, in main action(msg) File "/usr/bin/sb_filter.py", line 120, in filter return h.filter(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/hammie.py", line 109, in filter prob, clues = self._scoremsg(msg, True) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/hammie.py", line 38, in _scoremsg return self.bayes.spamprob(tokenize(msg), evidence) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 158, in chi2_spamprob clues = self._getclues(wordstream) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 395, in _getclues prob = self.probability(record) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 242, in probability assert hamcount <= nham AssertionError ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=836386&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Nov 5 09:12:34 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Nov 5 09:13:00 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-831123 ] error initializing outlook addin Message-ID: Bugs item #831123, was opened at 2003-10-27 16:24 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by nikbeyer You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=831123&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None >Priority: 7 Submitted By: Nikolas Beyer (nikbeyer) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: error initializing outlook addin Initial Comment: I installed the addin without errors, configured it manually and trained it. Next day, starting Outlook gives the message above. SpamBayes is then automatically disabled and no spam is checked. After enabling, background filtering doesn't work. Spam still remains in inbox. Already checked Bug item #823722, but doesn't help. Hope you can help. Nik Software: Win200 Sp4, Outlook 2002, SpamBayes bin version 0.8 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=831123&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Nov 5 09:13:43 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Nov 5 09:14:15 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-831123 ] error initializing outlook addin Message-ID: Bugs item #831123, was opened at 2003-10-27 16:24 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by nikbeyer You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=831123&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None >Priority: 9 Submitted By: Nikolas Beyer (nikbeyer) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: error initializing outlook addin Initial Comment: I installed the addin without errors, configured it manually and trained it. Next day, starting Outlook gives the message above. SpamBayes is then automatically disabled and no spam is checked. After enabling, background filtering doesn't work. Spam still remains in inbox. Already checked Bug item #823722, but doesn't help. Hope you can help. Nik Software: Win200 Sp4, Outlook 2002, SpamBayes bin version 0.8 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=831123&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Nov 5 12:25:22 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Nov 5 12:26:25 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-836642 ] Add "ham" folder to sb_imapfilter.py (and others?) Message-ID: Feature Requests item #836642, was opened at 2003-11-05 11:25 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=836642&group_id=61702 Category: Interface Improvements (example) Group: Next Release (example) Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Brian Greenberg (grnbrg) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Add "ham" folder to sb_imapfilter.py (and others?) Initial Comment: A "ham" output folder would be useful. ie: Read folder "INBOX", copy spam to INBOX.SPAM, unsure messages to INBOX.Unsure, and ham to INBOX.Ham. This option could be defaulted to whichever folder(s) are marked for classification. This feature will be useful on IMAP servers, as messages are manipulated on the server, rather than filtered through a SpamBayes application. I don't think it would be applicable to the POP3 filter or procmail applications. Why? I will frequently notice and act on an email in my inbox before Spambayes has a chance to classify it, resulting in confused flags. Secondly (and this might be considered a bug in the mail app) if the mail app retrieves the headers for a mail before it is classified it will process it through it's filters, which may then result in a second (classified) copy being re-filtered and moved. Adding an "X-Spambayes-Classification" check to each filter rule is clunky and has given inconsistant results. Addition of a "ham" folder will allow me to monitor for messages that have already been classified. Duplication, deletion and race condition issues disappear with this setup, as it effectively turns SpamBayes from another client accessing the mailbox to a filter. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=836642&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Nov 5 16:10:54 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Nov 5 16:12:39 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-836788 ] Recover / Delete buttons only work once Message-ID: Bugs item #836788, was opened at 2003-11-05 21:10 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=836788&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tim Lockwood (browman) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Recover / Delete buttons only work once Initial Comment: "Recover from spam" & "delete from spam" buttons only work once (tested in Spam(Unsure) folder), then they fail to do anything. Various errors in the log file linked to the buttonclick event, see attached. Platform: WinXPHome, OL2000 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=836788&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Nov 5 16:12:32 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Nov 5 16:17:43 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-827239 ] Cannot initialize Message-ID: Bugs item #827239, was opened at 2003-10-20 18:40 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by andrewappel You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=827239&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 >Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Andrew Appel (andrewappel) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Cannot initialize Initial Comment: hi there, my app gets the can't initialize whenever I restart Outlook. I then enable through the toolbars and the toolbar works, but no filtering occurs. Thanks for your help! Andrew ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Andrew Appel (andrewappel) Date: 2003-11-05 13:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=891212 I tried your suggestions, thanks, but It didn't work. Interestingly enough, it does work if I'm working in Offline mode of Outlook. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-10-26 16:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Can you try re-configuring the "filter" folders via the SpamBayes manager, or if that fails, reboot? For some reason, SpamBayes is having trouble with Outlook trying to watch the folders you have configured, and Outlook is giving its generic "I'm kinda screwed up" error. Re-select *all* filter folders, and let me know if that solves the problem. If not, please reset this status back to "open" ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=827239&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Nov 5 16:40:59 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Nov 5 16:41:05 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-836788 ] Recover / Delete buttons only work once Message-ID: Bugs item #836788, was opened at 2003-11-05 21:10 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by browman You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=836788&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None >Priority: 2 Submitted By: Tim Lockwood (browman) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Recover / Delete buttons only work once Initial Comment: "Recover from spam" & "delete from spam" buttons only work once (tested in Spam(Unsure) folder), then they fail to do anything. Various errors in the log file linked to the buttonclick event, see attached. Platform: WinXPHome, OL2000 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tim Lockwood (browman) Date: 2003-11-05 21:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=902775 Update: Managed to get it to work by deleting the spambayes database and ini files and re-creating from scratch. Seems something got corrupted. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=836788&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Nov 5 19:37:09 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Nov 5 19:37:13 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-836922 ] sb_mboxtrain include_trained mbox fix Message-ID: Patches item #836922, was opened at 2003-11-05 16:37 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=836922&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: John Hazen (jhazen) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: sb_mboxtrain include_trained mbox fix Initial Comment: Version: SB 1.0a6 When dealing with mbox files, it looks like the processing for the 'include_trained' option is incorrect. I found this when training repeatedly on the same ham and spam files, and seeing that all messages were being added to the database repeatedly. Then I saw that the 'X-Spambayes-Trained:' header had not been added to the files. After looking at Options.options, I believe the correct solution is to change the processing of mbox files, as 'include_trained' defaults to true, and I have not unset it. The patch below fixed the problem for me. Let me know if you need any further information. This is my first patch on SF, so I'm not sure it will send me email. You can reach me directly at (john at hazendotnet). (In case this context isn't clear, the two "not"s are removed in mbox_train.) gate2:scripts$ diff -c sb_mboxtrain.py sb_mboxtrain.jsh.py *** sb_mboxtrain.py Thu Sep 18 08:36:30 2003 --- sb_mboxtrain.jsh.py Wed Nov 5 16:03:01 2003 *************** *** 157,167 **** sys.stdout.flush() if msg_train(h, msg, is_spam, force): trained += 1 ! if not options["Headers", "include_trained"]: # Write it out with the Unix "From " line outf.write(msg.as_string(True)) ! if not options["Headers", "include_trained"]: outf.seek(0) try: os.ftruncate(f.fileno(), 0) --- 157,167 ---- sys.stdout.flush() if msg_train(h, msg, is_spam, force): trained += 1 ! if options["Headers", "include_trained"]: # Write it out with the Unix "From " line outf.write(msg.as_string(True)) ! if options["Headers", "include_trained"]: outf.seek(0) try: os.ftruncate(f.fileno(), 0) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=836922&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Nov 6 17:27:51 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Nov 6 17:27:56 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-835435 ] UnicodeEncodeError (Japanese Language) Message-ID: Bugs item #835435, was opened at 2003-11-04 13:00 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=835435&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Armand Suarez (armandeus) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: UnicodeEncodeError (Japanese Language) Initial Comment: The problem: cannot analyze existing Japanese- language mail to build a database of good messages using the manager. I am using SB version 0.81 with Outlook 2003 (Japanese) in WinXP Pro (Japanese). SB installs and works properly, filtering English-language spam that arrives (which is the vast majority of spam). However, when I use the manager to analyze existing messages to build the database, the manager stops at "writing the database." The log says: "UnicodeEncodeError: 'ascii' codec can't encode characters in position 26-35: ordinal not in range (128)." The log file is attached (contains some Japanese characters, file in ANSI). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-11-07 09:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Thanks for the report. A work around should be to create a "data_directory" in your config file - see the configuration guide for details. The problem appears to be a bug in Python - os.utime does not accept Unicode strings. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=835435&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Nov 6 17:28:12 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Nov 6 17:31:24 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-835435 ] UnicodeEncodeError (non-English Language) Message-ID: Bugs item #835435, was opened at 2003-11-04 13:00 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=835435&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Armand Suarez (armandeus) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) >Summary: UnicodeEncodeError (non-English Language) Initial Comment: The problem: cannot analyze existing Japanese- language mail to build a database of good messages using the manager. I am using SB version 0.81 with Outlook 2003 (Japanese) in WinXP Pro (Japanese). SB installs and works properly, filtering English-language spam that arrives (which is the vast majority of spam). However, when I use the manager to analyze existing messages to build the database, the manager stops at "writing the database." The log says: "UnicodeEncodeError: 'ascii' codec can't encode characters in position 26-35: ordinal not in range (128)." The log file is attached (contains some Japanese characters, file in ANSI). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-11-07 09:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Thanks for the report. A work around should be to create a "data_directory" in your config file - see the configuration guide for details. The problem appears to be a bug in Python - os.utime does not accept Unicode strings. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=835435&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Nov 6 19:40:28 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Nov 6 19:40:37 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-837601 ] spam folder not registering Message-ID: Bugs item #837601, was opened at 2003-11-07 11:40 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=837601&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: John Mamutil (javinm) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: spam folder not registering Initial Comment: I have been using Spambayes for some months now - but just this morning - for some unknown reason I got a message saying that the SPAM folder cannot be found. Everytime I try to insert the SPAM folder in the MOVED TO... boxes - it places the SPAM folder name in there but then when I open that dialog again - it still says "unknown folder". So I just can't get that folder to registered. What is really strange is the fact that all was working perfectly yesterday. I downloaded the newest version of spambayes this morning after noticing this problem but after installing this new version - the config wizard won't work and the spambayes does not appear in the COM add-ins section. Yet Spambayes appears on my Outlok toolbar. The only thing that doesn't work is the config wizard which in turn is stopping the whole thing from functioning. John Mamutil WIN 2000 Pro and Outlook 2000. email: jrg@bigpond.net.au ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=837601&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Nov 6 19:45:30 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Nov 6 19:45:35 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-837604 ] regsvr32 works but SPAMbayes not functional Message-ID: Bugs item #837604, was opened at 2003-11-07 11:45 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=837604&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: John Mamutil (javinm) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: regsvr32 works but SPAMbayes not functional Initial Comment: Spambayes does not appear in the COM-addins dialog but yet it is present on my toolbar. unfortunately the config wizard won't work. I have done a manual install with regsvr32..... - which succeeded but spambayes still won;t work in outlook. JohnMamutil jrg@bigpond.net.au ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=837604&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Nov 6 21:07:05 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Nov 6 21:07:14 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-837601 ] spam folder not registering Message-ID: Bugs item #837601, was opened at 2003-11-07 11:40 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=837601&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: John Mamutil (javinm) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: spam folder not registering Initial Comment: I have been using Spambayes for some months now - but just this morning - for some unknown reason I got a message saying that the SPAM folder cannot be found. Everytime I try to insert the SPAM folder in the MOVED TO... boxes - it places the SPAM folder name in there but then when I open that dialog again - it still says "unknown folder". So I just can't get that folder to registered. What is really strange is the fact that all was working perfectly yesterday. I downloaded the newest version of spambayes this morning after noticing this problem but after installing this new version - the config wizard won't work and the spambayes does not appear in the COM add-ins section. Yet Spambayes appears on my Outlok toolbar. The only thing that doesn't work is the config wizard which in turn is stopping the whole thing from functioning. John Mamutil WIN 2000 Pro and Outlook 2000. email: jrg@bigpond.net.au ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-11-07 13:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 The config wizard has a bug when one of the folder is deleted (which appears to be the case). Try using the "Manager", then the "Filtering" tab, and configure this way. If that doesn't work, please reopen. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=837601&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Nov 6 21:10:33 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Nov 6 21:10:44 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-837604 ] regsvr32 works but SPAMbayes not functional Message-ID: Bugs item #837604, was opened at 2003-11-07 11:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=837604&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: John Mamutil (javinm) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: regsvr32 works but SPAMbayes not functional Initial Comment: Spambayes does not appear in the COM-addins dialog but yet it is present on my toolbar. unfortunately the config wizard won't work. I have done a manual install with regsvr32..... - which succeeded but spambayes still won;t work in outlook. JohnMamutil jrg@bigpond.net.au ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-11-07 13:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 There is a bug in the config wizard if a folder has recently been deleted. Try using the Manager's "Filtering" tab to define the folders to watch, and optionally the "Training" dialog to perform training. After you do this, the config wizard will then work (which is too late as it is already configured :) Please reopen if this isn't the case. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=837604&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Nov 7 13:15:55 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Nov 7 13:16:01 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-826954 ] Database corruption after multiple trainings Message-ID: Bugs item #826954, was opened at 2003-10-20 10:59 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jpfarmer You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=826954&group_id=61702 Category: imapfilter Group: Source code 1.0a6 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jacob Farmer (jpfarmer) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Database corruption after multiple trainings Initial Comment: I've made a few posts about this to the Spambayes mailing list and I'm going to paste those messages for reference. However, in summary: regardless of what data format I use, after several trainings using the -t flag, my database becomes corrupted. I've been able to reproduce this using both a Pickle and Bsddb[3]. Each time, if I remove the DB and retrain from scratch, there isn't a problem. Also, if I just classify, I don't have any corruption problems (that is, if I just train once and after that never train again). The training always completes, and when it moves onto classifying, I get an assertion error. The messages from the mailing list follow. Below the message, I've included a sample sb_imapfilter session transcript. ---------------------------------------- Messages from mailing list: ---------------------------------------- >From "Tony Meyer" Subject RE: [Spambayes] Serious Database Corruption Problems Date Wed, October 15, 2003 6:18 pm To leotune@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx,spambayes@xxxxxx.xxx ------------------------------------------------------ -------------------------- > I'm having a lot of trouble with what I think is database corruption. > I've included the output I get from the program before, but > from what I've read, an assertion error usually means the database is dead. Yes - what this is saying is that you have a token that has appeared in more spam than you have trained, which is obviously impossible. > As the FAQ suggests, I've tried both Bsddb[3] and Pickle formats, but > after a few trainings, I always get this error. If I delete > my databases and start over, then I'm fine for a few additional trainings, > but the same thing happens. It's very strange that this happens with a pickle. To me, that sounds like this is an imapfilter bug, although not one I've seen reported before. > I'm getting a little frusturated with this. Is there > something I can do to keep this from happening? Do you do all your training with "sb_imapfilter.py -t"? Up until the assertion error, does the training always successfully complete? (i.e. it doesn't crash halfway through?) If you run db_expimp.py on your database to convert it to text ("db_expimp.py -e -d hammie.db -f hammie.txt" if it's a pickle) and open it up, what are the ham and spam counts at the top? (I suspect 0 for both). =Tony Meyer -------------------------------------------------- >From jacob-spambayes-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx Subject RE: [Spambayes] Serious Database Corruption Problems Date Wed, October 15, 2003 10:56 pm To spambayes@xxxxxx.xxx ------------------------------------------------------ -------------------------- >> I'm getting a little frusturated with this. Is there >> something I can do to keep this from happening? > > Do you do all your training with "sb_imapfilter.py -t"? Up until the > assertion error, does the training always successfully complete? (i.e. > it doesn't crash halfway through?) Yes, I do all of my training that way. The training always completes, and then the program fails during classification. I've included a typical transcript below. Something worth making note of: it seems like, many times during training, it'll report that messages are trained when there are no new messages in that particular folder. > > If you run db_expimp.py on your database to convert it to text > ("db_expimp.py -e -d hammie.db -f hammie.txt" if it's a pickle) and open > it > up, what are the ham and spam counts at the top? (I suspect 0 for both). suslik% more hammie.txt 311,431, I can send you the whole file if it'd be useful. Thanks, Jacob ---------------------------------------- A sample sb_imapfilter transcript: ---------------------------------------- Something worth noting about the following transcript: for the lines that look like these, the contents of those two folders never changed, so I don't understand why they indicated messages were trained. It doesn't do this with the Inbox. Training ham folder INBOX .*............ 1 trained. Training spam folder INBOX.-Spam *.......................................................................... ............................................................................ ............................................................................ ............................................................................ ............................................................................ .................................................... 1 trained. ---------------------------------------- suslik% ./sb_imapfilter.py -l 5 -c -t -v -d hammie.db SpamBayes IMAP Filter Beta1, version 0.1 (September 2003), using SpamBayes IMAP Filter Web Interface Alpha2, version 0.02 and engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003). Loading state from hammie.db pickle hammie.db is an existing pickle, with 310 ham and 417 spam Loading database hammie.db... Done. Training Training ham folder INBOX.-Wanted ............................................................................ ............................................................................ ............................................................................ ..................................................................... 0 trained. Training ham folder INBOX .*............ 1 trained. Training spam folder INBOX.-Spam *.......................................................................... ............................................................................ ............................................................................ ............................................................................ ............................................................................ ......................................************** 15 trained. Persisting hammie.db as a pickle Training took 35.0596210957 seconds, 16 messages were trained Classifying ................... Classified 0 ham, 0 spam, and 0 unsure. Classifying took 0.656105995178 seconds. Training Training ham folder INBOX.-Wanted ............................................................................ ............................................................................ ............................................................................ ..................................................................... 0 trained. Training ham folder INBOX .*............ 1 trained. Training spam folder INBOX.-Spam *.......................................................................... ............................................................................ ............................................................................ ............................................................................ ............................................................................ .................................................... 1 trained. Persisting hammie.db as a pickle Training took 29.7854119539 seconds, 2 messages were trained Classifying ..................*.Traceback (most recent call last): File "./sb_imapfilter.py", line 824, in ? run() File "./sb_imapfilter.py", line 814, in run imap_filter.Filter() File "./sb_imapfilter.py", line 675, in Filter self.unsure_folder) File "./sb_imapfilter.py", line 594, in Filter evidence=True) File "/u/jpfarmer/lib/python2.3/site- packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 158, in chi2_spamprob clues = self._getclues(wordstream) File "/u/jpfarmer/lib/python2.3/site- packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 395, in _getclues prob = self.probability(record) File "/u/jpfarmer/lib/python2.3/site- packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 245, in probability assert spamcount <= nspam AssertionError ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Jacob Farmer (jpfarmer) Date: 2003-11-07 13:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=890838 The behavior seems to have disappeared in the a7 release. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=826954&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Nov 8 09:27:58 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Nov 8 09:33:07 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-838427 ] IMAP filter gives traceback on start (1.0a7) Message-ID: Bugs item #838427, was opened at 2003-11-08 15:27 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=838427&group_id=61702 Category: imapfilter Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Ilmar Kruis (seaeagle1) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: IMAP filter gives traceback on start (1.0a7) Initial Comment: When starting the imap filter with an other option than - b it gives a traceback: Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600] (C) Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp. D:\Program Files\Python\Scripts>sb_imapfilter.py -b SpamBayes IMAP Filter Beta1, version 0.1 (September 2003), using SpamBayes IMAP Filter Web Interface Alpha2, version 0.02 and engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003). User interface url is http://localhost:8880/ D:\Program Files\Python\Scripts>sb_imapfilter.py -t SpamBayes IMAP Filter Beta1, version 0.1 (September 2003), using SpamBayes IMAP Filter Web Interface Alpha2, version 0.02 and engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003). Traceback (most recent call last): File "D:\Program Files\Python\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 825, in ? run() File "D:\Program Files\Python\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 811, in run imap_filter.Train() File "D:\Program Files\Python\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 633, in Train num_ham_trained = folder.Train(self.classifier, False) File "D:\Program Files\Python\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 558, in Train for msg in self: File "D:\Program Files\Python\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 485, in __iter__ yield self[key] File "D:\Program Files\Python\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 534, in __getite m__ msg.Save() File "D:\Program Files\Python\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 415, in Save self.as_string()) File "D:\PROGRA~1\PYTHON\lib\imaplib.py", line 313, in append return self._simple_command(name, mailbox, flags, date_time) File "D:\PROGRA~1\PYTHON\lib\imaplib.py", line 1000, in _simple_command return self._command_complete(name, self._command (name, *args)) File "D:\PROGRA~1\PYTHON\lib\imaplib.py", line 832, in _command_complete raise self.abort('command: %s => %s' % (name, val)) imaplib.abort: command: APPEND => unexpected response: '* 101 exists' D:\Program Files\Python\Scripts>sb_imapfilter.py -c -t -l 5 SpamBayes IMAP Filter Beta1, version 0.1 (September 2003), using SpamBayes IMAP Filter Web Interface Alpha2, version 0.02 and engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003). Traceback (most recent call last): File "D:\Program Files\Python\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 825, in ? run() File "D:\Program Files\Python\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 811, in run imap_filter.Train() File "D:\Program Files\Python\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 633, in Train num_ham_trained = folder.Train(self.classifier, False) File "D:\Program Files\Python\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 558, in Train for msg in self: File "D:\Program Files\Python\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 485, in __iter__ yield self[key] File "D:\Program Files\Python\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 534, in __getite m__ msg.Save() File "D:\Program Files\Python\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 415, in Save self.as_string()) File "D:\PROGRA~1\PYTHON\lib\imaplib.py", line 313, in append return self._simple_command(name, mailbox, flags, date_time) File "D:\PROGRA~1\PYTHON\lib\imaplib.py", line 1000, in _simple_command return self._command_complete(name, self._command (name, *args)) File "D:\PROGRA~1\PYTHON\lib\imaplib.py", line 832, in _command_complete raise self.abort('command: %s => %s' % (name, val)) imaplib.abort: command: APPEND => unexpected response: '* 102 exists' D:\Program Files\Python\Scripts> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=838427&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Nov 8 18:05:44 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Nov 8 18:05:47 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-838599 ] Training wizard is purely wrong Message-ID: Bugs item #838599, was opened at 2003-11-09 01:05 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=838599&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Luci Sandor (lucisandor) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Training wizard is purely wrong Initial Comment: When I installed it, I didn't thought to keep spam (as any normal person would do). So I didn't use the wizard (esp. since it doesn't like "deleted mail" folder where some spam might be kept). After one month of using, I saw that I couldn't train it on good messages, since they were kept as ham, but the score for those words was not added to database (correct if I'm wrong). One day I moved the spam from "Deleted" to another folder and I applied the training wizad. Guess what? It erased all the spam training I've provided in the last month. So don't use Training Wizard to train SpamBayes, because the only thing it does is to delete your database. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=838599&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Nov 10 14:29:27 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Nov 10 14:29:31 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-836386 ] assertion failed during classfication Message-ID: Bugs item #836386, was opened at 2003-11-05 02:28 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by regs You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=836386&group_id=61702 Category: hammie Group: Source code 1.0a6 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Uwe Schmitt (rocksportrocker) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: assertion failed during classfication Initial Comment: echo "boost maillinglist microsoft " | sb_filter.py says: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/sb_filter.py", line 187, in ? main() File "/usr/bin/sb_filter.py", line 183, in main action(msg) File "/usr/bin/sb_filter.py", line 120, in filter return h.filter(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/hammie.py", line 109, in filter prob, clues = self._scoremsg(msg, True) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/hammie.py", line 38, in _scoremsg return self.bayes.spamprob(tokenize(msg), evidence) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 158, in chi2_spamprob clues = self._getclues(wordstream) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 395, in _getclues prob = self.probability(record) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 242, in probability assert hamcount <= nham AssertionError ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Ari Gordon-Schlosberg (regs) Date: 2003-11-10 11:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=9074 I'm seeing the same traceback when using hammie.py: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/local/src/spambayes-1.0a7/hammie.py", line 265, in ? hammiebulk.main() File "/usr/local/src/spambayes-1.0a7/hammiebulk.py", line 220, in main filtered = h.filter(msg) I have noticed that a fresh database fixes the problem. I instrumented classifier.py, inserting this line before line 242: sys.stderr.write("hamcount = %d nham = %d\n"%(hamcount,nham)) With a freshly created database, I'm seeing this: hamcount = 0 nham = 1 hamcount = 0 nham = 1 hamcount = 0 nham = 1 hamcount = 0 nham = 1 hamcount = 0 nham = 1 hamcount = 0 nham = 1 hamcount = 0 nham = 1 hamcount = 0 nham = 1 hamcount = 0 nham = 1 hamcount = 0 nham = 1 hamcount = 0 nham = 1 hamcount = 0 nham = 1 hamcount = 0 nham = 1 hamcount = 0 nham = 1 hamcount = 0 nham = 1 hamcount = 0 nham = 1 hamcount = 0 nham = 1 hamcount = 0 nham = 1 hamcount = 0 nham = 1 hamcount = 0 nham = 1 hamcount = 0 nham = 1 hamcount = 0 nham = 1 hamcount = 0 nham = 1 hamcount = 0 nham = 1 hamcount = 0 nham = 1 hamcount = 0 nham = 1 hamcount = 0 nham = 1 hamcount = 0 nham = 1 hamcount = 0 nham = 1 hamcount = 0 nham = 1 hamcount = 0 nham = 1 hamcount = 0 nham = 1 hamcount = 0 nham = 1 >From .... And classification works. With the broken db, I'm seeing this: hamcount = 1352 nham = 1427 hamcount = 1427 nham = 1427 hamcount = 8 nham = 1427 hamcount = 766 nham = 1427 hamcount = 6 nham = 1427 hamcount = 39 nham = 1427 hamcount = 27 nham = 1427 hamcount = 1318 nham = 1427 hamcount = 18 nham = 1427 hamcount = 869 nham = 1427 hamcount = 1221 nham = 1427 hamcount = 28 nham = 1427 hamcount = 826 nham = 1427 hamcount = 36 nham = 1427 hamcount = 1000 nham = 1427 hamcount = 704 nham = 1427 hamcount = 252 nham = 1427 hamcount = 4 nham = 1427 hamcount = 1667 nham = 1427 Traceback (most recent call last): (... as above) I've removed the asserts, which appear to be used for debugging during development. Any word on when/how this will be fixed? File "/usr/local/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/hammie.py", line 109, in filter prob, clues = self._scoremsg(msg, True) File "/usr/local/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/hammie.py", line 38, in _scoremsg return self.bayes.spamprob(tokenize(msg), evidence) File "/usr/local/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 158, in chi2_spamprob clues = self._getclues(wordstream) File "/usr/local/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 395, in _getclues prob = self.probability(record) File "/usr/local/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 242, in probability assert hamcount <= nham AssertionError ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=836386&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Nov 10 19:01:17 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Nov 10 19:01:27 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-839648 ] SpamBayes/Rules conflict Message-ID: Bugs item #839648, was opened at 2003-11-10 18:01 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=839648&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tyson Vanek (tvanek) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: SpamBayes/Rules conflict Initial Comment: This is an interesting problem to which I've found a solution, but I'll explain. I have Outlook 2002 checking 4 email accounts. Inside my "Inbox" folder, I have a folder for each of these email accounts. I then have a rule created for each email account that moves messages from the Inbox to the appropriate folder based on which account received the message, a setup I believe to be fairly common among people using Outlook to check multiple accounts. I installed SpamBayes (the Outlook 0081 plug-in) today and went into configuring it. Because I have many rules that move messages all over the place into different folders, I configured SpamBayes' email filtering to watch the "Inbox" folder and marked the "Include Subfolders" checkbox, assuming this would monitor every single piece of email that Outlook retrieves. Then I bounced a known spam message to one of my email accounts. Even with the delayed filtering in place, the offending spam was not moved to the appropriate spam folder. Checking the "Spam Clues" on the offending message revealed a 100% match for spam. Considering I had SpamBayes configured to move spam 90% or higher to the spam folder, it baffled me that this email hadn't been moved. Then I took a look at the log files and figured out what was taking place. When the email originally landed in the "Inbox", SpamBayes properly identifie it as SPAM and attempted to move it to the spam folder. However, my Outlook rule for moving messages received through that account to the sub-folder inbox was pulling the email OUT of the spam folder and placing it in the designated pseudo-inbox folder. As a result of this action, SpamBayes also thought I was retrieving this email from the spam folder, so it also logged an entry that it learned that this email was NOT SPAM and would fail to score future duplicate emails properly. How did I get around all this? Simple. I went back to the filtering options of the plug-in and unchecked the "Inbox" folder. Instead, I opened it up and checked every single folder that exists inside of the "Inbox", but not the "Inbox" itself - and I also kept the "all sub- folders" option checked. This means SpamBayes now only scans the message when it arrives in one of my folders after Outlook rules process it, and everything is working correctly. I hope this makes sense to the developers. I'm sure this is the same scenario being reported by many of your users that utilize rules for managing multiple email accounts. They simply need to ignore the "Inbox" and filter everything else so that SpamBayes doesn't trap the spam until it lands in the rule-specified folder and Outlook doesn't "steal" it from the spam folder. If you need any clarification on this, please let me know. Other than this minor configuration glitch, I LOVE the plug-in so far! Great work - keep it up! Thanks, Tyson ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=839648&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Nov 11 05:15:11 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Nov 11 05:15:24 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-839831 ] Outlook locks up and disables TaskManager and reboot Message-ID: Bugs item #839831, was opened at 2003-11-11 10:15 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=839831&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Gunnlaugur Thor Briem (gthb) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook locks up and disables TaskManager and reboot Initial Comment: I just tried installing the SpamBayes Outlook plugin. It seemed fine immediately after installation (I installed with "have not prepared" option, and did no initial training). I already had a PGP plugin installed, and the McAfee VirusScan plugin. Have used these for a year or more (about three months on this computer), with no problems whatsoever. I now tried to delete a couple of hundred emails from a folder (not Inbox) by block-selecting them and using shift-delete. An Outlook dialog came up saying it failed to load plugin pgpExch.dll. I clicked OK. The same dialog immediately came up, now specifying the HawkEx.dll (which is McAfee VirusScan's DLL). I clicked OK again. Same dialog came up with pgpExch.dll again. This was an infinite loop. The dialog is modal, so I can't get anywhere else in Outlook or close it. I tried Ctrl-Alt-Del as well as right-clicking the taskbar, to get the TaskManager up. It did come up this first time, but its display was incomplete. I managed to get Outlook displayed in the Applications tab (all other tabs were empty) and tried to kill it there, but nothing happened. I tried to shutdown; it seemed to work but hung somewhere in the shutdown process with an empty blue screen. After a hard reboot, I tried this again, and got the exact same error in Outlook. It starts up OK, but fails on this delete operation. But this time Task Manager did not come up at all, and shutdown did not even start working. This has the markings of an infinite loop. Since none of the other components have ever given me any trouble, the SpamBayes plugin seems like the obvious culprit, although it is also possible that its presence somehow triggers an infinite loop (or similarly manifested problem) in the other add-ins. The "Frequently Reported Bug List" mentions the PGP freeware plugin, but I am using a commercial one (from pgp.com) ... not that that makes it any more trustworthy, but it's a different add-in and has never given me any problems. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=839831&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Nov 11 05:24:13 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Nov 11 05:24:27 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-839831 ] Outlook locks up and disables TaskManager and reboot Message-ID: Bugs item #839831, was opened at 2003-11-11 10:15 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by gthb You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=839831&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Gunnlaugur Thor Briem (gthb) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook locks up and disables TaskManager and reboot Initial Comment: I just tried installing the SpamBayes Outlook plugin. It seemed fine immediately after installation (I installed with "have not prepared" option, and did no initial training). I already had a PGP plugin installed, and the McAfee VirusScan plugin. Have used these for a year or more (about three months on this computer), with no problems whatsoever. I now tried to delete a couple of hundred emails from a folder (not Inbox) by block-selecting them and using shift-delete. An Outlook dialog came up saying it failed to load plugin pgpExch.dll. I clicked OK. The same dialog immediately came up, now specifying the HawkEx.dll (which is McAfee VirusScan's DLL). I clicked OK again. Same dialog came up with pgpExch.dll again. This was an infinite loop. The dialog is modal, so I can't get anywhere else in Outlook or close it. I tried Ctrl-Alt-Del as well as right-clicking the taskbar, to get the TaskManager up. It did come up this first time, but its display was incomplete. I managed to get Outlook displayed in the Applications tab (all other tabs were empty) and tried to kill it there, but nothing happened. I tried to shutdown; it seemed to work but hung somewhere in the shutdown process with an empty blue screen. After a hard reboot, I tried this again, and got the exact same error in Outlook. It starts up OK, but fails on this delete operation. But this time Task Manager did not come up at all, and shutdown did not even start working. This has the markings of an infinite loop. Since none of the other components have ever given me any trouble, the SpamBayes plugin seems like the obvious culprit, although it is also possible that its presence somehow triggers an infinite loop (or similarly manifested problem) in the other add-ins. The "Frequently Reported Bug List" mentions the PGP freeware plugin, but I am using a commercial one (from pgp.com) ... not that that makes it any more trustworthy, but it's a different add-in and has never given me any problems. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Gunnlaugur Thor Briem (gthb) Date: 2003-11-11 10:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=130612 I just tried disabling the PGP add-in, restarting Outlook, and doing the same operation (permanently deleting a couple of hundred mails in one go). The problem did not come up. I enabled the PGP add-in again, and did the same kind of operation, and the problem did come up. So yes, it does seem to occur only with the PGP add-in active. It also seems to occur only with spambayes installed, since I have been doing big deletes like this (I get a lot of automated mail from CVS commits) for months, with no problems, with PGP add-in active. That seems worth looking into. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=839831&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Nov 11 07:01:53 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Nov 11 07:01:59 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-824651 ] Japanese (and/or other CJK languages) message support Message-ID: Patches item #824651, was opened at 2003-10-16 17:23 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by hatukanezumi You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=824651&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Hatuka*nezumi (hatukanezumi) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Japanese (and/or other CJK languages) message support Initial Comment: Maybe this also applicable to other East-Asian languages. o Unicode'ify text: For example by Japanese message, RFC1468 recommends that ISO/EIC 2022 encoding scheme, with ASCII and multibyte character set both designated to GL, should be used. Original tokenizer generates only bogus meaningless text fragments for Japanese messages. o Concatinate C/J lines. In Japanese (and maybe Chinese) messages, line folding often breaks 'words'. o Bigram of C/J characters. In Japanese (and often Chinese) messages, 'words' are not separated by character such as whitespace. Tokenization to grammatical 'words' will require heuristic algorithms using large corpus. Instead of expensive human-language parser, generate bigram from run of kanji (ideograph for C/J/K) or run of hiragana & katakana (syllabic letters for J). N.B.: - I believe number of database items is roughly O(n^2) for bigram, O(n^3) for trigram,... and O(n^i) for i-gram, where n is size of used character set. On katakana & hiragana n is approximately 100. On kanzi it is approx. 5000 (KS X 1001), 7000 (JIS X 0208), or more (Chinese standards). By C/J messages, 3-or-more-gram will generate very sparse and large database. - Words of single kanzi should not be discarded by tokenizer. Since most of basic kanzi words are of 1 or 2 characters. Words of single hiragana/katakana may be discarded. - As far as I know, in Korean message, phrase (not 'word' but similar) is often separated by whitespace. As run of hangul (syllabic character for K) may not splitted to n-gram. o Punctuation --- what is 'punctuation'? A lot of punctuations, spaces, signs and symbols registered with Unicode Standard are added to punctuation_run_re (for compatibility, some of them are overlapped with subject_words_re). Since many of them are also registered as punctuations or symbols with C/J/K character set standards. Problems: o sb_dbexpimp.py become incompatible. o Only BMP range is supported. Surrogates are not recognized. o Tested by Japanese messages only, not by other East-Asian messages. o No batch tests. This only aims at Japanese support. Configuration: o To support unicode, .spambayesrc must be set: [Tokenizer] replace_nonascii_chars: False ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Hatuka*nezumi (hatukanezumi) Date: 2003-11-11 21:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=529503 o db_expimp.py is imcompatible again. It exports / imports data as UTF-8. o Unicode'ifyed sb_server.py. - HTTP charset is UTF-8. - clues in X-Spambayes-Evidences will be MIME header encoded. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hatuka*nezumi (hatukanezumi) Date: 2003-10-29 19:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=529503 OK. I'll test the code untill addition. minor fix: 'replace_nonascii_chars' option works correctly, etc. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-10-21 12:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Just a wee note to say thanks for this, and that someone will get to looking at adding this in, but everyone's pretty busy with other stuff at the moment! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hatuka*nezumi (hatukanezumi) Date: 2003-10-19 19:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=529503 fix for Korean message. Hangul phrases/words can be of 1 or 2 chars. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hatuka*nezumi (hatukanezumi) Date: 2003-10-17 18:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=529503 minor fix. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hatuka*nezumi (hatukanezumi) Date: 2003-10-16 21:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=529503 > ISO/EIC 2022 encoding scheme, with ASCII and > multibyte character set both designated to GL, Not 'designate'. 'Invoke' is correct. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=824651&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Nov 11 09:21:29 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Nov 11 09:21:37 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-839971 ] Outlook 2002 add-in not registered under WinXP Message-ID: Bugs item #839971, was opened at 2003-11-11 08:21 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=839971&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Bob Alfson (balfson) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook 2002 add-in not registered under WinXP Initial Comment: Running 8.1 with Outlook 2002 on Win2K-SP3, SpamBayes works fine, even though the "Add-ins available" box is empty. With the same setup on WinXP, there's also nothing in the "Add-ins available" box, but I get the message that SpamBayes is not registered. I have reinstalled several times, including a complete uninstall of SpamBayes. I have tried running "regsvr32.exe spambayes_addin.dll" after a fresh install as well as after having brought up Outlook to find that SB was unregistered. I'm stumped. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=839971&group_id=61702 From JJ708 at bellsouth.net Wed Nov 12 08:00:16 2003 From: JJ708 at bellsouth.net (John Jones) Date: Wed Nov 12 08:00:40 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] Outlook Install Problems with release .81 Message-ID: <001301c3a91c$eec4f710$5ca0d6d1@IBMR32> When I attempt to install release 0.81 on Outlook 2002 (on Windows XP) I receive the following error message. Unable to register DLL/OCX: Dll Register server failed; code 0x00000000. Any suggestions would be appreciated. Note: This error also occurs on release .7. Thanks John Jones JJ708@bellsouth.net -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes-bugs/attachments/20031112/0c4f0a5e/attachment.html From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Nov 12 09:45:16 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Nov 12 09:45:31 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-840731 ] SpamBayes stops working after MS hot fix KB824145 Message-ID: Bugs item #840731, was opened at 2003-11-12 09:45 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=840731&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Rick Monnin (rickmo) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: SpamBayes stops working after MS hot fix KB824145 Initial Comment: SpamBayes was working great until after I installed MS hot fix KB824145 and restarted my PC. All of a sudden, the SpamBayes icons wouldn't respond and incoming mail was not being ranked. I even tried uninstalling/resinstalling SpamBayes, no dice. I also tried the regsvr32.exe spambayes_addin.dll as shown in the docs. Still nothing. The SpamBayes add-in manager will no longer register and the SpamBayes log files are clean. I am using Windows XP, Sp1 Outlook 2002. Chalk another one up to Microsoft! Anyone seen this or have any suggestions? Thanks! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=840731&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Nov 12 09:46:23 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Nov 12 09:46:27 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-840731 ] SpamBayes stops working after MS hot fix KB824145 Message-ID: Bugs item #840731, was opened at 2003-11-12 09:45 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by rickmo You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=840731&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None >Priority: 8 Submitted By: Rick Monnin (rickmo) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: SpamBayes stops working after MS hot fix KB824145 Initial Comment: SpamBayes was working great until after I installed MS hot fix KB824145 and restarted my PC. All of a sudden, the SpamBayes icons wouldn't respond and incoming mail was not being ranked. I even tried uninstalling/resinstalling SpamBayes, no dice. I also tried the regsvr32.exe spambayes_addin.dll as shown in the docs. Still nothing. The SpamBayes add-in manager will no longer register and the SpamBayes log files are clean. I am using Windows XP, Sp1 Outlook 2002. Chalk another one up to Microsoft! Anyone seen this or have any suggestions? Thanks! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=840731&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Nov 12 11:27:31 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Nov 12 11:27:46 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-840731 ] SpamBayes stops working after MS hot fix KB824145 Message-ID: Bugs item #840731, was opened at 2003-11-12 08:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by tvanek You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=840731&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 8 Submitted By: Rick Monnin (rickmo) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: SpamBayes stops working after MS hot fix KB824145 Initial Comment: SpamBayes was working great until after I installed MS hot fix KB824145 and restarted my PC. All of a sudden, the SpamBayes icons wouldn't respond and incoming mail was not being ranked. I even tried uninstalling/resinstalling SpamBayes, no dice. I also tried the regsvr32.exe spambayes_addin.dll as shown in the docs. Still nothing. The SpamBayes add-in manager will no longer register and the SpamBayes log files are clean. I am using Windows XP, Sp1 Outlook 2002. Chalk another one up to Microsoft! Anyone seen this or have any suggestions? Thanks! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tyson Vanek (tvanek) Date: 2003-11-12 10:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=906172 I just had windows update download this patch, but am now going to delay installing it until this is addressed. Thanks for the heads up! -Tyson ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=840731&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Nov 12 11:59:03 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Nov 12 11:59:11 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-840731 ] SpamBayes stops working after MS hot fix KB824145 Message-ID: Bugs item #840731, was opened at 2003-11-12 14:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by rmalayter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=840731&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 8 Submitted By: Rick Monnin (rickmo) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: SpamBayes stops working after MS hot fix KB824145 Initial Comment: SpamBayes was working great until after I installed MS hot fix KB824145 and restarted my PC. All of a sudden, the SpamBayes icons wouldn't respond and incoming mail was not being ranked. I even tried uninstalling/resinstalling SpamBayes, no dice. I also tried the regsvr32.exe spambayes_addin.dll as shown in the docs. Still nothing. The SpamBayes add-in manager will no longer register and the SpamBayes log files are clean. I am using Windows XP, Sp1 Outlook 2002. Chalk another one up to Microsoft! Anyone seen this or have any suggestions? Thanks! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ryan Malayter (rmalayter) Date: 2003-11-12 16:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=731834 I am having no problems with this patch. I have two XPsp1+all hotfix systems, one running Outlook 2002sp2, and one running Outlook 2003. Spambayes 0.81 is still working fine on both. I think you might be chasing a red herring here. There may be no relationship between the two events. And, considering the patch only touches IE files (which are only used for rendering HTML mail by outlook, not accessing messages or communicating with the plug-in), I don't think there would be any relationship. Many users have reported that the plug-in spontaneously stopped working for them in the past, with no other actions. I think this might have happened to you, and it just happened to occur at the same time as the patch installation. -ryan- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tyson Vanek (tvanek) Date: 2003-11-12 16:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=906172 I just had windows update download this patch, but am now going to delay installing it until this is addressed. Thanks for the heads up! -Tyson ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=840731&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Nov 12 12:05:56 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Nov 12 12:06:01 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-840731 ] SpamBayes stops working after MS hot fix KB824145 Message-ID: Bugs item #840731, was opened at 2003-11-12 09:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kpitt You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=840731&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 8 Submitted By: Rick Monnin (rickmo) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: SpamBayes stops working after MS hot fix KB824145 Initial Comment: SpamBayes was working great until after I installed MS hot fix KB824145 and restarted my PC. All of a sudden, the SpamBayes icons wouldn't respond and incoming mail was not being ranked. I even tried uninstalling/resinstalling SpamBayes, no dice. I also tried the regsvr32.exe spambayes_addin.dll as shown in the docs. Still nothing. The SpamBayes add-in manager will no longer register and the SpamBayes log files are clean. I am using Windows XP, Sp1 Outlook 2002. Chalk another one up to Microsoft! Anyone seen this or have any suggestions? Thanks! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2003-11-12 12:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 I installed KB824145 earlier today and also have had no problems so far. Environment is Windows 2000 SP4 with Outlook 2003, and running latest Outlook plugin from CVS source. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ryan Malayter (rmalayter) Date: 2003-11-12 11:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=731834 I am having no problems with this patch. I have two XPsp1+all hotfix systems, one running Outlook 2002sp2, and one running Outlook 2003. Spambayes 0.81 is still working fine on both. I think you might be chasing a red herring here. There may be no relationship between the two events. And, considering the patch only touches IE files (which are only used for rendering HTML mail by outlook, not accessing messages or communicating with the plug-in), I don't think there would be any relationship. Many users have reported that the plug-in spontaneously stopped working for them in the past, with no other actions. I think this might have happened to you, and it just happened to occur at the same time as the patch installation. -ryan- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tyson Vanek (tvanek) Date: 2003-11-12 11:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=906172 I just had windows update download this patch, but am now going to delay installing it until this is addressed. Thanks for the heads up! -Tyson ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=840731&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Nov 12 12:22:48 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Nov 12 12:22:56 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-840731 ] SpamBayes stops working after MS hot fix KB824145 Message-ID: Bugs item #840731, was opened at 2003-11-12 09:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by rickmo You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=840731&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 8 Submitted By: Rick Monnin (rickmo) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: SpamBayes stops working after MS hot fix KB824145 Initial Comment: SpamBayes was working great until after I installed MS hot fix KB824145 and restarted my PC. All of a sudden, the SpamBayes icons wouldn't respond and incoming mail was not being ranked. I even tried uninstalling/resinstalling SpamBayes, no dice. I also tried the regsvr32.exe spambayes_addin.dll as shown in the docs. Still nothing. The SpamBayes add-in manager will no longer register and the SpamBayes log files are clean. I am using Windows XP, Sp1 Outlook 2002. Chalk another one up to Microsoft! Anyone seen this or have any suggestions? Thanks! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Rick Monnin (rickmo) Date: 2003-11-12 12:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=907560 ok. So what I do then to make SpamBayes work again?? I used the system restore to roll my PC back to before the hot fixes. I completely uninstalled SpamBayes, even renamed the preferences files in the Documents and Settings folder. Still no dice. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2003-11-12 12:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 I installed KB824145 earlier today and also have had no problems so far. Environment is Windows 2000 SP4 with Outlook 2003, and running latest Outlook plugin from CVS source. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ryan Malayter (rmalayter) Date: 2003-11-12 11:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=731834 I am having no problems with this patch. I have two XPsp1+all hotfix systems, one running Outlook 2002sp2, and one running Outlook 2003. Spambayes 0.81 is still working fine on both. I think you might be chasing a red herring here. There may be no relationship between the two events. And, considering the patch only touches IE files (which are only used for rendering HTML mail by outlook, not accessing messages or communicating with the plug-in), I don't think there would be any relationship. Many users have reported that the plug-in spontaneously stopped working for them in the past, with no other actions. I think this might have happened to you, and it just happened to occur at the same time as the patch installation. -ryan- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tyson Vanek (tvanek) Date: 2003-11-12 11:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=906172 I just had windows update download this patch, but am now going to delay installing it until this is addressed. Thanks for the heads up! -Tyson ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=840731&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Nov 12 12:44:27 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Nov 12 12:44:46 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-840731 ] SpamBayes stops working after MS hot fix KB824145 Message-ID: Bugs item #840731, was opened at 2003-11-12 09:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by rickmo You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=840731&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 8 Submitted By: Rick Monnin (rickmo) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: SpamBayes stops working after MS hot fix KB824145 Initial Comment: SpamBayes was working great until after I installed MS hot fix KB824145 and restarted my PC. All of a sudden, the SpamBayes icons wouldn't respond and incoming mail was not being ranked. I even tried uninstalling/resinstalling SpamBayes, no dice. I also tried the regsvr32.exe spambayes_addin.dll as shown in the docs. Still nothing. The SpamBayes add-in manager will no longer register and the SpamBayes log files are clean. I am using Windows XP, Sp1 Outlook 2002. Chalk another one up to Microsoft! Anyone seen this or have any suggestions? Thanks! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Rick Monnin (rickmo) Date: 2003-11-12 12:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=907560 ok. So go figure. I uninstall SpamBayes again. Made sure that the preferences files were also deleted. I then reinstalled SpamBayes, copied the preferences files back, and now everything works. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Rick Monnin (rickmo) Date: 2003-11-12 12:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=907560 ok. So what I do then to make SpamBayes work again?? I used the system restore to roll my PC back to before the hot fixes. I completely uninstalled SpamBayes, even renamed the preferences files in the Documents and Settings folder. Still no dice. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2003-11-12 12:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 I installed KB824145 earlier today and also have had no problems so far. Environment is Windows 2000 SP4 with Outlook 2003, and running latest Outlook plugin from CVS source. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ryan Malayter (rmalayter) Date: 2003-11-12 11:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=731834 I am having no problems with this patch. I have two XPsp1+all hotfix systems, one running Outlook 2002sp2, and one running Outlook 2003. Spambayes 0.81 is still working fine on both. I think you might be chasing a red herring here. There may be no relationship between the two events. And, considering the patch only touches IE files (which are only used for rendering HTML mail by outlook, not accessing messages or communicating with the plug-in), I don't think there would be any relationship. Many users have reported that the plug-in spontaneously stopped working for them in the past, with no other actions. I think this might have happened to you, and it just happened to occur at the same time as the patch installation. -ryan- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tyson Vanek (tvanek) Date: 2003-11-12 11:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=906172 I just had windows update download this patch, but am now going to delay installing it until this is addressed. Thanks for the heads up! -Tyson ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=840731&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Nov 12 16:08:34 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Nov 12 16:08:58 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-840731 ] SpamBayes stops working after MS hot fix KB824145 Message-ID: Bugs item #840731, was opened at 2003-11-12 09:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by rickmo You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=840731&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 >Status: Closed Resolution: None >Priority: 1 Submitted By: Rick Monnin (rickmo) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: SpamBayes stops working after MS hot fix KB824145 Initial Comment: SpamBayes was working great until after I installed MS hot fix KB824145 and restarted my PC. All of a sudden, the SpamBayes icons wouldn't respond and incoming mail was not being ranked. I even tried uninstalling/resinstalling SpamBayes, no dice. I also tried the regsvr32.exe spambayes_addin.dll as shown in the docs. Still nothing. The SpamBayes add-in manager will no longer register and the SpamBayes log files are clean. I am using Windows XP, Sp1 Outlook 2002. Chalk another one up to Microsoft! Anyone seen this or have any suggestions? Thanks! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Rick Monnin (rickmo) Date: 2003-11-12 16:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=907560 Looks like it was one of those mysterious times when SpamBayes just stopped working. I have reinstalled MS Hot Fix KB824145, and all is working fine. Thanks all for the help. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Rick Monnin (rickmo) Date: 2003-11-12 12:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=907560 ok. So go figure. I uninstall SpamBayes again. Made sure that the preferences files were also deleted. I then reinstalled SpamBayes, copied the preferences files back, and now everything works. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Rick Monnin (rickmo) Date: 2003-11-12 12:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=907560 ok. So what I do then to make SpamBayes work again?? I used the system restore to roll my PC back to before the hot fixes. I completely uninstalled SpamBayes, even renamed the preferences files in the Documents and Settings folder. Still no dice. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2003-11-12 12:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 I installed KB824145 earlier today and also have had no problems so far. Environment is Windows 2000 SP4 with Outlook 2003, and running latest Outlook plugin from CVS source. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ryan Malayter (rmalayter) Date: 2003-11-12 11:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=731834 I am having no problems with this patch. I have two XPsp1+all hotfix systems, one running Outlook 2002sp2, and one running Outlook 2003. Spambayes 0.81 is still working fine on both. I think you might be chasing a red herring here. There may be no relationship between the two events. And, considering the patch only touches IE files (which are only used for rendering HTML mail by outlook, not accessing messages or communicating with the plug-in), I don't think there would be any relationship. Many users have reported that the plug-in spontaneously stopped working for them in the past, with no other actions. I think this might have happened to you, and it just happened to occur at the same time as the patch installation. -ryan- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tyson Vanek (tvanek) Date: 2003-11-12 11:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=906172 I just had windows update download this patch, but am now going to delay installing it until this is addressed. Thanks for the heads up! -Tyson ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=840731&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Nov 12 22:06:37 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Nov 12 22:06:43 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-841147 ] install problem Message-ID: Support Requests item #841147, was opened at 2003-11-12 16:06 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=841147&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: robert betz (bbxrider) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: install problem Initial Comment: this is for win2k, outlook2k tried to run the .exe option but windows didn't recognize it, so -installed python 2.3.2 -installed the win32all extensions, -ran the 'setup.py install', lots of copy messages, looked good, ended with, copying build\scripts-2.3\pop3proxy_tray.py -> C:\Program Files\pythonInstaller\Scripts - ran addin.py, got this output # This window will display output from any programs that import win32traceutil # win32com servers registered with '--debug' are in this category. Registered: SpamBayes.OutlookAddin Registration complete. but.... no spambays tool bar in my outlook2k and its not listed in the outlook addin area any ideas what might be missing? i would really like to have this running, i'm drowning in spam ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=841147&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Nov 13 11:26:46 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Nov 13 11:26:53 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-841534 ] Failure: toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' Message-ID: Bugs item #841534, was opened at 2003-11-13 09:26 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=841534&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Joe Stibrich (stibden) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Failure: toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' Initial Comment: Can not get SpamBayes to work on home PC (WIN XP Home) or work PC (Win 2000). Installation defaults wouldn't work, then tried suggestion of using simpler directory name, and installation worked on both PC's, Wizard started with Outlook, and SpamBayes seemed to be working. On next startup of Outlook, however, SpamBayes stopped working (Toolbar was there, but nothing was filtering). Tried the Comm Add-ins options approach, and Spambayes didn't appear in the list. Tried adding it to the list, but nothing happened. Also tried suggested regserv command, appeared to be successfull, but SpamBayes still not working. Here is latest log file: Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\jstibrich\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\jstibrich\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 0 spam and 1 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.81 (September 9, 2003) starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003)) on Windows 5.0.2195 (Service Pack 4) using Python 2.3+ (#46, Aug 6 2003, 16:39:24) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Junk E-Mail Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox' took 2.17597ms FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (- 2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) Deleted the dead popup control - re-creating ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=841534&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Nov 13 18:28:12 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Nov 13 18:28:21 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-841819 ] 500 Server error: DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error Message-ID: Bugs item #841819, was opened at 2003-11-13 18:28 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=841819&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code 1.0a6 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Marek Zielinski (marekz) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: 500 Server error: DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error Initial Comment: Actually version is 1.0a7 Windows 2000, with Pegasus e-mail software, using the pop3proxy. Updated from 1.0a7, and it worked for a few days. Now any attempt to train using the web interface yields the same error (see below). Restarting the service did not help. Database corrupted? 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\PROGRA~1\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\Dibbler.py", line 453, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "C:\PROGRA~1\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\ProxyUI.py", line 310, in onReview targetCorpus.takeMessage(id, sourceCorpus) File "C:\PROGRA~1\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\Corpus.py", line 201, in takeMessage self.addMessage(msg) File "C:\PROGRA~1\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\FileCorpus.py", line 143, in addMessage Corpus.Corpus.addMessage(self, message) File "C:\PROGRA~1\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\Corpus.py", line 136, in addMessage obs.onAddMessage(message) File "C:\PROGRA~1\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\storage.py", line 580, in onAddMessage self.train(message) File "C:\PROGRA~1\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\storage.py", line 588, in train self.bayes.learn(message.tokenize(), self.is_spam) File "C:\PROGRA~1\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\classifier.py", line 211, in learn self._add_msg(wordstream, is_spam) File "C:\PROGRA~1\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\classifier.py", line 346, in _add_msg self._wordinfoset(word, record) File "C:\PROGRA~1\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\storage.py", line 279, in _wordinfoset self.db[word] = record.__getstate__() File "C:\Program Files\Python23\lib\shelve.py", line 130, in __setitem__ self.dict[key] = f.getvalue() File "C:\Program Files\Python23\lib\bsddb\__init__.py", line 120, in __setitem__ self.db[key] = value DBRunRecoveryError: (-30982, 'DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error, run database recovery -- fatal region error detected; run recovery') ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=841819&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Nov 13 19:40:34 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Nov 13 19:40:55 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-814099 ] Old filters still in place - 2 COM servers Message-ID: Bugs item #814099, was opened at 2003-09-28 13:25 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kwladyka You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=814099&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Kevin Wladyka (kwladyka) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Old filters still in place - 2 COM servers Initial Comment: While using an older version of SpamBayes (version 0.3) the filtering would continually move some good emails to my deleted items folder (the folder I selected for SPAM emails) no matter how much I trained it. I decided to remove this version and start over with the current version (0.81). After the uninstall of version 0.3 and then the install of version 0.81, the first thing I found was that I could no longer move SPAM to the deleted items folder since it was not a listed choice. (I hope this can be changed as I much prefer to move SPAM there when the program is working well. Otherwise it is a several step process to permanently delete emails). However, these same aforementioned emails were still being moved to the deleted items folder under version 0.81. (Note I have no other rules setup in Outlook and when SpamBayes is uninstalled this does not happen). I have also tried to uninstall and completely remove the SpamBayes directories both in C:\Program Files and under my Document and Settings profile and in the add- in sections for Outlook in the registry and then reinstall. Still the problem exists. I also noticed that while SpamBayes appears to work fine other than the above issue, the add-in does not appear in the Outlook Com add-ins any longer. The SpamBayes log states : Addin terminating: 2 COM client and 2 COM servers exist. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Kevin Wladyka (kwladyka) Date: 2003-11-13 17:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=823907 Just a follow-up. Instead of waiting for a resolution, I uninstalled SpamBayes, wiped out my existing Windows profile and created a new one, and reinstalled SpamBayes. No more problems and everything works fine now. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kevin Wladyka (kwladyka) Date: 2003-11-04 10:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=823907 Mark, thanks for the analysis. The early versions of Spambayes did allow for the movement of SPAM to the Deleted Items folder which is how I had my plug-in setup. That may be the source of the problem. For me, assuming the filter was working correctly why not move the SPAM right to the Deleted Items Folder? Any way, I understand why that would not work for most people (I run a computer consulting business) but for me it was optimal. I have the program running with several of my clients. No one has this problem. However, no one was ever setup to push the SPAM to the deleted folders and of course with the later versions that is not a choice anyway. I've found no log indicating that email is getting moved to the deleted items folder. However, each log says that "Addin terminating: 2 COM client and 2 COM servers exist" thus, it must be so? I know that all email from some of my clients was always seen as SPAM and moved to my selected SPAM folder (which was deleted items). I wanted to start anew and the newer version did not allow the movement to the deleted items any more. However, the same clients still when to the deleted items folder as before. I've attached another log file showing the Spambayes reviewing the email as it comes in. There are no Com Add-in's listed in Outlook, not even SpamBayes is listed. I hope the problem can be found. I imagine wiping out and re-creating my desktop profile might be a work-a-round but it would be nice to not have to go there if possible. Thanks again. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-10-26 17:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Unfortunately, we can not use "Deleted Items" as the destination for Spam, as this would screw up the way we train - all good items also moved to this folder would be assumed to be Spam - almost certainly not what you want. It should be impossible for 2 plugins to be running at the same time, as they use identical "Ids". Further, the log you attached does not show SpamBayes moving any items. Can you find a log where SpamBayes is indicating it is moving the Spam to "deleted items"? Are you sure there are no other installed plugins that could be doing this? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=814099&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Nov 14 10:11:20 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Nov 14 10:11:33 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-804075 ] All mail items non-filterable Message-ID: Bugs item #804075, was opened at 2003-09-11 01:38 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by axelfoley You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=804075&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: All mail items non-filterable Initial Comment: >From the list: I started using SpamBayes last week with the .7x version. I just upgraded to .81, but I'm still having a problem I experienced with .7x. Platform: Windows XP Program: Outlook 2000 I started using the plugin on my wife's profile on the machine and it worked great. I then tried to use it in my profile, and the plugin does not work at all. I try to train the SpamBayes and it fails to see any messages. It finishes the training in a split second and ends up saying it has 0 good message and 0 spam. Trying to get the training to see a message, I selected all my folder to train on, and managed to get 1 message to appear as good. I put the folders back to their proper settings, retrained and got the 0 good 0 spam result again... If I try and delete a message as Spam it always says, "No filterable mail items are selected". I don't know what to do. It still works great on my wife's profile though... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Axel Foley (axelfoley) Date: 2003-11-14 16:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=909220 I can confirm that it is a problem with mails exported from outlook express to Outlook using Outlook Express export wizard. Affected mails appear formally correct, but I haven't analysed headers in details. All the other emails are "filtered" correctly. Maybe some headers are missing in the faulty ones and SpamBayes parser skips them. It's easy to reproduce this behaviour if you want to analyse and correct it. Keep us updated. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tobias Kothe (mr_useless) Date: 2003-09-24 01:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=873198 Same problem here. I just moved my Mails from outlook express to Outlook. Now the training wont find any mails in the folders. The "Delete as spam" wont work either giving the "no filterable items selected" message. But suprisingly all new messages, those which i did not transfer from "outlook express", work fine. I can delete them as spam without any problem. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Richard Cook (awhig) Date: 2003-09-11 07:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=863989 In response to a question from Mark: Yes, all my emails have the regular envelope icon next to them ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=804075&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Nov 14 10:56:24 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Nov 14 10:57:26 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-842182 ] email not deleted from server Message-ID: Bugs item #842182, was opened at 2003-11-14 10:56 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=842182&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Larry Aaronson (gi234201) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: email not deleted from server Initial Comment: Running 0.81 outlook plugin with OutlookXP. Things worked well for a day. The plugin now downloads and processes mail, but does not remove email from the pop server. I'm running my own mail server on Windows Server 2003. Outlook is on the same machine as the server. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=842182&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Nov 14 13:59:46 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Nov 14 13:59:57 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-804075 ] All mail items non-filterable Message-ID: Bugs item #804075, was opened at 2003-09-10 19:38 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by awhig You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=804075&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: All mail items non-filterable Initial Comment: >From the list: I started using SpamBayes last week with the .7x version. I just upgraded to .81, but I'm still having a problem I experienced with .7x. Platform: Windows XP Program: Outlook 2000 I started using the plugin on my wife's profile on the machine and it worked great. I then tried to use it in my profile, and the plugin does not work at all. I try to train the SpamBayes and it fails to see any messages. It finishes the training in a split second and ends up saying it has 0 good message and 0 spam. Trying to get the training to see a message, I selected all my folder to train on, and managed to get 1 message to appear as good. I put the folders back to their proper settings, retrained and got the 0 good 0 spam result again... If I try and delete a message as Spam it always says, "No filterable mail items are selected". I don't know what to do. It still works great on my wife's profile though... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Richard Cook (awhig) Date: 2003-11-14 13:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=863989 I'll confirm that my initial entry was dealing with mails that I just imported from Outlook Express. I moved to Outlook 2000 to use Spambayes. Thanks, Rich ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Axel Foley (axelfoley) Date: 2003-11-14 10:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=909220 I can confirm that it is a problem with mails exported from outlook express to Outlook using Outlook Express export wizard. Affected mails appear formally correct, but I haven't analysed headers in details. All the other emails are "filtered" correctly. Maybe some headers are missing in the faulty ones and SpamBayes parser skips them. It's easy to reproduce this behaviour if you want to analyse and correct it. Keep us updated. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tobias Kothe (mr_useless) Date: 2003-09-23 19:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=873198 Same problem here. I just moved my Mails from outlook express to Outlook. Now the training wont find any mails in the folders. The "Delete as spam" wont work either giving the "no filterable items selected" message. But suprisingly all new messages, those which i did not transfer from "outlook express", work fine. I can delete them as spam without any problem. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Richard Cook (awhig) Date: 2003-09-11 01:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=863989 In response to a question from Mark: Yes, all my emails have the regular envelope icon next to them ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=804075&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Nov 14 15:15:01 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Nov 14 15:15:11 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-841819 ] 500 Server error: DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error Message-ID: Bugs item #841819, was opened at 2003-11-13 18:28 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by marekz You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=841819&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code 1.0a6 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Marek Zielinski (marekz) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: 500 Server error: DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error Initial Comment: Actually version is 1.0a7 Windows 2000, with Pegasus e-mail software, using the pop3proxy. Updated from 1.0a7, and it worked for a few days. Now any attempt to train using the web interface yields the same error (see below). Restarting the service did not help. Database corrupted? 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\PROGRA~1\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\Dibbler.py", line 453, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "C:\PROGRA~1\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\ProxyUI.py", line 310, in onReview targetCorpus.takeMessage(id, sourceCorpus) File "C:\PROGRA~1\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\Corpus.py", line 201, in takeMessage self.addMessage(msg) File "C:\PROGRA~1\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\FileCorpus.py", line 143, in addMessage Corpus.Corpus.addMessage(self, message) File "C:\PROGRA~1\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\Corpus.py", line 136, in addMessage obs.onAddMessage(message) File "C:\PROGRA~1\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\storage.py", line 580, in onAddMessage self.train(message) File "C:\PROGRA~1\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\storage.py", line 588, in train self.bayes.learn(message.tokenize(), self.is_spam) File "C:\PROGRA~1\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\classifier.py", line 211, in learn self._add_msg(wordstream, is_spam) File "C:\PROGRA~1\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\classifier.py", line 346, in _add_msg self._wordinfoset(word, record) File "C:\PROGRA~1\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\storage.py", line 279, in _wordinfoset self.db[word] = record.__getstate__() File "C:\Program Files\Python23\lib\shelve.py", line 130, in __setitem__ self.dict[key] = f.getvalue() File "C:\Program Files\Python23\lib\bsddb\__init__.py", line 120, in __setitem__ self.db[key] = value DBRunRecoveryError: (-30982, 'DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error, run database recovery -- fatal region error detected; run recovery') ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Marek Zielinski (marekz) Date: 2003-11-14 15:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=908752 I blew away the databases, stopped and restarted the pop3 service and trained again on stored spam. (Pegasus can create a unix mailbox for me). The problem seems to go away. Perhaps the database was corrupt because of 1.0a6 bug, and the upgrade requires a fresh start with new database? -Marek ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=841819&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Nov 14 18:03:13 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Nov 14 18:03:18 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-842464 ] README.txt documentation Message-ID: Bugs item #842464, was opened at 2003-11-14 17:03 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=842464&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jeff Bauer (jeffbauer) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: README.txt documentation Initial Comment: Minor correction to README.txt: Installation ============ < The first thing you need to do is run "setup.py install" > The first thing you need to do is run "python setup.py install" Or, alternatively, make setup.py executable. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=842464&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Nov 15 06:57:25 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Nov 15 06:57:32 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-842681 ] Menu Buttons for "Suspected Spam" are incomplete Message-ID: Bugs item #842681, was opened at 2003-11-15 11:57 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=842681&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Raven Mask (ravenmask) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Menu Buttons for "Suspected Spam" are incomplete Initial Comment: For items in the "Suspected Spam" folder one needs buttons both for "Delete As Spam" and "Recover from Spam". In practice I never see both buttons, and it is a bit variable which button actually appears - usually "Delete As Spam", but very occasionally "Recover from Spam". I haven't been able to work out the factor causing the different behaviours. I have renamed my "Suspected Spam" folder to "Spam Suspects" (so that it collates in my folder list next to the Spam folder) - could this be the factor? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=842681&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Nov 15 06:57:45 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Nov 15 06:57:48 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-842682 ] Menu Buttons for "Suspected Spam" are incomplete Message-ID: Bugs item #842682, was opened at 2003-11-15 11:57 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=842682&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Raven Mask (ravenmask) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Menu Buttons for "Suspected Spam" are incomplete Initial Comment: For items in the "Suspected Spam" folder one needs buttons both for "Delete As Spam" and "Recover from Spam". In practice I never see both buttons, and it is a bit variable which button actually appears - usually "Delete As Spam", but very occasionally "Recover from Spam". I haven't been able to work out the factor causing the different behaviours. I have renamed my "Suspected Spam" folder to "Spam Suspects" (so that it collates in my folder list next to the Spam folder) - could this be the factor? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=842682&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Nov 15 10:56:04 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Nov 15 10:56:10 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-841819 ] 500 Server error: DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error Message-ID: Bugs item #841819, was opened at 2003-11-13 23:28 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by richiehindle You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=841819&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code 1.0a6 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Marek Zielinski (marekz) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: 500 Server error: DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error Initial Comment: Actually version is 1.0a7 Windows 2000, with Pegasus e-mail software, using the pop3proxy. Updated from 1.0a7, and it worked for a few days. Now any attempt to train using the web interface yields the same error (see below). Restarting the service did not help. Database corrupted? 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\PROGRA~1\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\Dibbler.py", line 453, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "C:\PROGRA~1\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\ProxyUI.py", line 310, in onReview targetCorpus.takeMessage(id, sourceCorpus) File "C:\PROGRA~1\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\Corpus.py", line 201, in takeMessage self.addMessage(msg) File "C:\PROGRA~1\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\FileCorpus.py", line 143, in addMessage Corpus.Corpus.addMessage(self, message) File "C:\PROGRA~1\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\Corpus.py", line 136, in addMessage obs.onAddMessage(message) File "C:\PROGRA~1\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\storage.py", line 580, in onAddMessage self.train(message) File "C:\PROGRA~1\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\storage.py", line 588, in train self.bayes.learn(message.tokenize(), self.is_spam) File "C:\PROGRA~1\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\classifier.py", line 211, in learn self._add_msg(wordstream, is_spam) File "C:\PROGRA~1\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\classifier.py", line 346, in _add_msg self._wordinfoset(word, record) File "C:\PROGRA~1\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\storage.py", line 279, in _wordinfoset self.db[word] = record.__getstate__() File "C:\Program Files\Python23\lib\shelve.py", line 130, in __setitem__ self.dict[key] = f.getvalue() File "C:\Program Files\Python23\lib\bsddb\__init__.py", line 120, in __setitem__ self.db[key] = value DBRunRecoveryError: (-30982, 'DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error, run database recovery -- fatal region error detected; run recovery') ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Date: 2003-11-15 15:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=85414 We don't know what causes this - you might find it comes back, or you might not. I don't think it's specific to 1.0a6, though. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Marek Zielinski (marekz) Date: 2003-11-14 20:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=908752 I blew away the databases, stopped and restarted the pop3 service and trained again on stored spam. (Pegasus can create a unix mailbox for me). The problem seems to go away. Perhaps the database was corrupt because of 1.0a6 bug, and the upgrade requires a fresh start with new database? -Marek ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=841819&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Nov 15 10:59:18 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Nov 15 10:59:24 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-842464 ] README.txt documentation Message-ID: Bugs item #842464, was opened at 2003-11-14 23:03 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by richiehindle You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=842464&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jeff Bauer (jeffbauer) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: README.txt documentation Initial Comment: Minor correction to README.txt: Installation ============ < The first thing you need to do is run "setup.py install" > The first thing you need to do is run "python setup.py install" Or, alternatively, make setup.py executable. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Date: 2003-11-15 15:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=85414 Applied as README.txt 1.59 - many thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=842464&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Nov 15 11:00:15 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Nov 15 11:01:12 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-842464 ] README.txt documentation Message-ID: Bugs item #842464, was opened at 2003-11-14 23:03 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by richiehindle You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=842464&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Accepted Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jeff Bauer (jeffbauer) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: README.txt documentation Initial Comment: Minor correction to README.txt: Installation ============ < The first thing you need to do is run "setup.py install" > The first thing you need to do is run "python setup.py install" Or, alternatively, make setup.py executable. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Date: 2003-11-15 15:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=85414 Applied as README.txt 1.59 - many thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=842464&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Nov 15 12:35:59 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Nov 15 12:36:09 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-842800 ] Error message in Log file and filtering stops Message-ID: Bugs item #842800, was opened at 2003-11-15 11:35 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=842800&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Dave Hiatt (davehiatt) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Error message in Log file and filtering stops Initial Comment: The log file has the message, "Skipping deleted folder". Spam is being scored correctly but is not being moved to SPAM folder. Reconfiguring the filters has no effect. The target folders can be reselected and checked for training, but when control is returned to the Spambayes main administration popup, the SPAM and Not Sure folders continue to be identified as . It's as though the filter has lost track of where or how to know the names of the SPAM and Unsure folders. I believe this may have been started when an Outlook folder was inadvertantly deleted. Spambayes had been working flawlessly for a month, then suddenly the SPAM folder disappeared and I have been unable to get the filters to work again. I have removed the add in and uninstalled SPAMbayes, reinstalled, and everything but to no avail. The only thing I haven't done is to tell it to rebuild the database from scratch due to a lack of enough SPAM to train it. for more info or copies of the log files e-mail davehiatt@hotmail.com thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=842800&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Nov 15 16:55:03 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Nov 15 16:55:09 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-842900 ] Training freezes sb_server 1.07a Message-ID: Bugs item #842900, was opened at 2003-11-15 22:55 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=842900&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Piotr Wajnberg (petevine) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Training freezes sb_server 1.07a Initial Comment: I've just noticed that setting HTTP Authentication to digest causes sb_server to freeze upon training on a message or mbox file. Setting HTTP Authentication to none remedies the problem. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=842900&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Nov 15 21:38:34 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Nov 15 21:38:40 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-842984 ] No browser found Message-ID: Bugs item #842984, was opened at 2003-11-16 02:38 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=842984&group_id=61702 Category: imapfilter Group: Source code 1.0a6 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Bip (bippo312) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: No browser found Initial Comment: Using Mandrake 9.2 and spambayes vsn 1.0a7. I just installed spambayes and was trying to set up the preferences. (mail server, pwd, etc...) so I tried running the web interface. # sb_imapfilter.py -b SpamBayes IMAP Filter Beta1, version 0.1 (September 2003), using SpamBayes IMAP Filter Web Interface Alpha2, version 0.02 and engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003). User interface url is http://localhost:8880/ Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 825, in ? run() File "/usr/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 802, in run Dibbler.run(launchBrowser=launchUI) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 688, in run webbrowser.open_new("http://localhost:%d/" % context._HTTPPort) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/webbrowser.py", line 47, in open_new get().open(url, 1) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/webbrowser.py", line 39, in get raise Error("could not locate runnable browser") webbrowser.Error: could not locate runnable browser .. Couldn't this just notify you that you need to go to 'http://localhost:8880' instead of throwing an error? konqueror is installed and mozilla should be installed. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=842984&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Nov 16 20:55:59 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Nov 16 20:56:06 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-753708 ] Support POP over SSL Message-ID: Feature Requests item #753708, was opened at 2003-06-13 15:17 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=753708&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: rick gregory (rickg17) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Support POP over SSL Initial Comment: Enable POPproxy to proxy a connection to a POP3 server over SSL, supporting either port 110 or 995. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-11-17 14:55 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This is probably of interest/use here: [ 791706 ] POP3 over SSL support for poplib ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-09 20:36 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Two more requests on the list, 6 Sept from "theta sigma" (Mark) and 1 Sept from Ryan Booker. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=753708&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Nov 17 01:49:58 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Nov 17 01:50:14 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-843521 ] error msg on loading Outlook Message-ID: Bugs item #843521, was opened at 2003-11-16 22:49 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=843521&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Bill Van Buren (billvb) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: error msg on loading Outlook Initial Comment: system: win XP Pro, AMD 2.1 GHz, 512 RAM. Outlook 2003 When I launch Outlook 2003, I get the following error message: "There was an error initializing the Spam plugin. Spam filtering has been disabled. Please re-configure and re-enable this plugin. Error details: Could not warch the specified folders" I have reinstalled the plugin, and reconfigured multiple times, but I can't get it to properly initialize, or to check messages when they arrive after I've manually enabled SpamBayes from the configuration menu. It works great when I manually request filtering of a directory though! I look forward to getting it working as intended. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=843521&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Nov 17 04:21:50 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Nov 17 04:21:58 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-843586 ] Spambayes irreparable after accid. deletion Junk folder; Message-ID: Support Requests item #843586, was opened at 2003-11-17 09:21 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=843586&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: v1.0 (example) Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Marc Goossens (mgoossens) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Spambayes irreparable after accid. deletion Junk folder; Initial Comment: Outlook Junk folder configured for SapBayes was accidentally deleted. Now, when trying to "delete as spam", outlook plug-in reports: "Invalid Configuration - You must configure the spam folder". Also filtering no longer works. But Configuration wizard does not start from Spambayes Manager: nothing happens. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=843586&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Nov 17 22:01:12 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Nov 17 22:01:18 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-842984 ] No browser found Message-ID: Bugs item #842984, was opened at 2003-11-16 15:38 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=842984&group_id=61702 Category: imapfilter Group: Source code 1.0a6 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Invalid Priority: 5 Submitted By: Bip (bippo312) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: No browser found Initial Comment: Using Mandrake 9.2 and spambayes vsn 1.0a7. I just installed spambayes and was trying to set up the preferences. (mail server, pwd, etc...) so I tried running the web interface. # sb_imapfilter.py -b SpamBayes IMAP Filter Beta1, version 0.1 (September 2003), using SpamBayes IMAP Filter Web Interface Alpha2, version 0.02 and engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003). User interface url is http://localhost:8880/ Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 825, in ? run() File "/usr/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 802, in run Dibbler.run(launchBrowser=launchUI) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 688, in run webbrowser.open_new("http://localhost:%d/" % context._HTTPPort) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/webbrowser.py", line 47, in open_new get().open(url, 1) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/webbrowser.py", line 39, in get raise Error("could not locate runnable browser") webbrowser.Error: could not locate runnable browser .. Couldn't this just notify you that you need to go to 'http://localhost:8880' instead of throwing an error? konqueror is installed and mozilla should be installed. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-11-18 16:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 By using the "-b" switch, you are requesting that the browser be opened - if you run it without the "-b" switch, then it will give the behaviour you request. As to why the browser doesn't open - this is a python issue rather than a spambayes one (you could try "import webbrowser; webbrowser.open("http://url.here")" from python, and it should give the same results. The help pages for the webbrowser module in python give hints about how to set things up so that a browser correctly opens. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=842984&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Nov 17 22:04:49 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Nov 17 22:07:00 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-842682 ] Menu Buttons for "Suspected Spam" are incomplete Message-ID: Bugs item #842682, was opened at 2003-11-16 00:57 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=842682&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Raven Mask (ravenmask) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Menu Buttons for "Suspected Spam" are incomplete Initial Comment: For items in the "Suspected Spam" folder one needs buttons both for "Delete As Spam" and "Recover from Spam". In practice I never see both buttons, and it is a bit variable which button actually appears - usually "Delete As Spam", but very occasionally "Recover from Spam". I haven't been able to work out the factor causing the different behaviours. I have renamed my "Suspected Spam" folder to "Spam Suspects" (so that it collates in my folder list next to the Spam folder) - could this be the factor? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-11-18 16:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Are you sure you aren't just not seeing one of the buttons? Do you get the little continuator (a little down arrow) beside the last visible button? The name of the folder shouldn't have any effect, and you should always have both buttons available (although both may not fit on the screen at once, depending on your setup). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=842682&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Nov 17 22:14:49 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Nov 17 22:14:56 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-836386 ] assertion failed during classfication Message-ID: Bugs item #836386, was opened at 2003-11-05 23:28 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=836386&group_id=61702 Category: hammie Group: Source code 1.0a6 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Invalid Priority: 5 Submitted By: Uwe Schmitt (rocksportrocker) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: assertion failed during classfication Initial Comment: echo "boost maillinglist microsoft " | sb_filter.py says: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/sb_filter.py", line 187, in ? main() File "/usr/bin/sb_filter.py", line 183, in main action(msg) File "/usr/bin/sb_filter.py", line 120, in filter return h.filter(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/hammie.py", line 109, in filter prob, clues = self._scoremsg(msg, True) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/hammie.py", line 38, in _scoremsg return self.bayes.spamprob(tokenize(msg), evidence) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 158, in chi2_spamprob clues = self._getclues(wordstream) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 395, in _getclues prob = self.probability(record) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 242, in probability assert hamcount <= nham AssertionError ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-11-18 16:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The asserts aren't just there for development - they assert that everything is as it should be. If the assert fails, then something is wrong, and just ignoring the assert (i.e. removing it) isn't at all recommended. In this case, your database has become corrupted - it says that one or more tokens has appeared in more ham than you have trained on (obviously impossible). You can edit the database manually to correct this, but we recommend retraining from scratch. If this reoccurs, we would be very interested to know how to reproduce it - i.e. what training method(s) you are using. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ari Gordon-Schlosberg (regs) Date: 2003-11-11 08:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=9074 I'm seeing the same traceback when using hammie.py: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/local/src/spambayes-1.0a7/hammie.py", line 265, in ? hammiebulk.main() File "/usr/local/src/spambayes-1.0a7/hammiebulk.py", line 220, in main filtered = h.filter(msg) I have noticed that a fresh database fixes the problem. I instrumented classifier.py, inserting this line before line 242: sys.stderr.write("hamcount = %d nham = %d\n"%(hamcount,nham)) With a freshly created database, I'm seeing this: hamcount = 0 nham = 1 hamcount = 0 nham = 1 hamcount = 0 nham = 1 hamcount = 0 nham = 1 hamcount = 0 nham = 1 hamcount = 0 nham = 1 hamcount = 0 nham = 1 hamcount = 0 nham = 1 hamcount = 0 nham = 1 hamcount = 0 nham = 1 hamcount = 0 nham = 1 hamcount = 0 nham = 1 hamcount = 0 nham = 1 hamcount = 0 nham = 1 hamcount = 0 nham = 1 hamcount = 0 nham = 1 hamcount = 0 nham = 1 hamcount = 0 nham = 1 hamcount = 0 nham = 1 hamcount = 0 nham = 1 hamcount = 0 nham = 1 hamcount = 0 nham = 1 hamcount = 0 nham = 1 hamcount = 0 nham = 1 hamcount = 0 nham = 1 hamcount = 0 nham = 1 hamcount = 0 nham = 1 hamcount = 0 nham = 1 hamcount = 0 nham = 1 hamcount = 0 nham = 1 hamcount = 0 nham = 1 hamcount = 0 nham = 1 hamcount = 0 nham = 1 >From .... And classification works. With the broken db, I'm seeing this: hamcount = 1352 nham = 1427 hamcount = 1427 nham = 1427 hamcount = 8 nham = 1427 hamcount = 766 nham = 1427 hamcount = 6 nham = 1427 hamcount = 39 nham = 1427 hamcount = 27 nham = 1427 hamcount = 1318 nham = 1427 hamcount = 18 nham = 1427 hamcount = 869 nham = 1427 hamcount = 1221 nham = 1427 hamcount = 28 nham = 1427 hamcount = 826 nham = 1427 hamcount = 36 nham = 1427 hamcount = 1000 nham = 1427 hamcount = 704 nham = 1427 hamcount = 252 nham = 1427 hamcount = 4 nham = 1427 hamcount = 1667 nham = 1427 Traceback (most recent call last): (... as above) I've removed the asserts, which appear to be used for debugging during development. Any word on when/how this will be fixed? File "/usr/local/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/hammie.py", line 109, in filter prob, clues = self._scoremsg(msg, True) File "/usr/local/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/hammie.py", line 38, in _scoremsg return self.bayes.spamprob(tokenize(msg), evidence) File "/usr/local/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 158, in chi2_spamprob clues = self._getclues(wordstream) File "/usr/local/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 395, in _getclues prob = self.probability(record) File "/usr/local/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 242, in probability assert hamcount <= nham AssertionError ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=836386&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Nov 17 22:19:08 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Nov 17 22:19:12 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-833433 ] Main web page link is broken Message-ID: Bugs item #833433, was opened at 2003-10-31 13:04 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=833433&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: John Villalovos (happycamp) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Main web page link is broken Initial Comment: On main web page: http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/ The link to SF Project page is broken. It should go to something like: http://sourceforge.net/projects/spambayes/ Currently it is going to: http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/sourceforge.net/projects/spambayes/index.html which fails. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-11-18 16:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Fixed, thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=833433&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Nov 17 22:22:28 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Nov 17 22:22:31 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-826954 ] Database corruption after multiple trainings Message-ID: Bugs item #826954, was opened at 2003-10-21 04:59 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=826954&group_id=61702 Category: imapfilter Group: Source code 1.0a6 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jacob Farmer (jpfarmer) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Database corruption after multiple trainings Initial Comment: I've made a few posts about this to the Spambayes mailing list and I'm going to paste those messages for reference. However, in summary: regardless of what data format I use, after several trainings using the -t flag, my database becomes corrupted. I've been able to reproduce this using both a Pickle and Bsddb[3]. Each time, if I remove the DB and retrain from scratch, there isn't a problem. Also, if I just classify, I don't have any corruption problems (that is, if I just train once and after that never train again). The training always completes, and when it moves onto classifying, I get an assertion error. The messages from the mailing list follow. Below the message, I've included a sample sb_imapfilter session transcript. ---------------------------------------- Messages from mailing list: ---------------------------------------- >From "Tony Meyer" Subject RE: [Spambayes] Serious Database Corruption Problems Date Wed, October 15, 2003 6:18 pm To leotune@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx,spambayes@xxxxxx.xxx ------------------------------------------------------ -------------------------- > I'm having a lot of trouble with what I think is database corruption. > I've included the output I get from the program before, but > from what I've read, an assertion error usually means the database is dead. Yes - what this is saying is that you have a token that has appeared in more spam than you have trained, which is obviously impossible. > As the FAQ suggests, I've tried both Bsddb[3] and Pickle formats, but > after a few trainings, I always get this error. If I delete > my databases and start over, then I'm fine for a few additional trainings, > but the same thing happens. It's very strange that this happens with a pickle. To me, that sounds like this is an imapfilter bug, although not one I've seen reported before. > I'm getting a little frusturated with this. Is there > something I can do to keep this from happening? Do you do all your training with "sb_imapfilter.py -t"? Up until the assertion error, does the training always successfully complete? (i.e. it doesn't crash halfway through?) If you run db_expimp.py on your database to convert it to text ("db_expimp.py -e -d hammie.db -f hammie.txt" if it's a pickle) and open it up, what are the ham and spam counts at the top? (I suspect 0 for both). =Tony Meyer -------------------------------------------------- >From jacob-spambayes-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx Subject RE: [Spambayes] Serious Database Corruption Problems Date Wed, October 15, 2003 10:56 pm To spambayes@xxxxxx.xxx ------------------------------------------------------ -------------------------- >> I'm getting a little frusturated with this. Is there >> something I can do to keep this from happening? > > Do you do all your training with "sb_imapfilter.py -t"? Up until the > assertion error, does the training always successfully complete? (i.e. > it doesn't crash halfway through?) Yes, I do all of my training that way. The training always completes, and then the program fails during classification. I've included a typical transcript below. Something worth making note of: it seems like, many times during training, it'll report that messages are trained when there are no new messages in that particular folder. > > If you run db_expimp.py on your database to convert it to text > ("db_expimp.py -e -d hammie.db -f hammie.txt" if it's a pickle) and open > it > up, what are the ham and spam counts at the top? (I suspect 0 for both). suslik% more hammie.txt 311,431, I can send you the whole file if it'd be useful. Thanks, Jacob ---------------------------------------- A sample sb_imapfilter transcript: ---------------------------------------- Something worth noting about the following transcript: for the lines that look like these, the contents of those two folders never changed, so I don't understand why they indicated messages were trained. It doesn't do this with the Inbox. Training ham folder INBOX .*............ 1 trained. Training spam folder INBOX.-Spam *.......................................................................... ............................................................................ ............................................................................ ............................................................................ ............................................................................ .................................................... 1 trained. ---------------------------------------- suslik% ./sb_imapfilter.py -l 5 -c -t -v -d hammie.db SpamBayes IMAP Filter Beta1, version 0.1 (September 2003), using SpamBayes IMAP Filter Web Interface Alpha2, version 0.02 and engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003). Loading state from hammie.db pickle hammie.db is an existing pickle, with 310 ham and 417 spam Loading database hammie.db... Done. Training Training ham folder INBOX.-Wanted ............................................................................ ............................................................................ ............................................................................ ..................................................................... 0 trained. Training ham folder INBOX .*............ 1 trained. Training spam folder INBOX.-Spam *.......................................................................... ............................................................................ ............................................................................ ............................................................................ ............................................................................ ......................................************** 15 trained. Persisting hammie.db as a pickle Training took 35.0596210957 seconds, 16 messages were trained Classifying ................... Classified 0 ham, 0 spam, and 0 unsure. Classifying took 0.656105995178 seconds. Training Training ham folder INBOX.-Wanted ............................................................................ ............................................................................ ............................................................................ ..................................................................... 0 trained. Training ham folder INBOX .*............ 1 trained. Training spam folder INBOX.-Spam *.......................................................................... ............................................................................ ............................................................................ ............................................................................ ............................................................................ .................................................... 1 trained. Persisting hammie.db as a pickle Training took 29.7854119539 seconds, 2 messages were trained Classifying ..................*.Traceback (most recent call last): File "./sb_imapfilter.py", line 824, in ? run() File "./sb_imapfilter.py", line 814, in run imap_filter.Filter() File "./sb_imapfilter.py", line 675, in Filter self.unsure_folder) File "./sb_imapfilter.py", line 594, in Filter evidence=True) File "/u/jpfarmer/lib/python2.3/site- packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 158, in chi2_spamprob clues = self._getclues(wordstream) File "/u/jpfarmer/lib/python2.3/site- packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 395, in _getclues prob = self.probability(record) File "/u/jpfarmer/lib/python2.3/site- packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 245, in probability assert spamcount <= nspam AssertionError ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-11-18 16:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Hopefully it was caused by one of the bugs fixed for 1.0a7, then. Please reopen if it does reoccur with 1.0a7. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jacob Farmer (jpfarmer) Date: 2003-11-08 07:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=890838 The behavior seems to have disappeared in the a7 release. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=826954&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Nov 18 04:47:54 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Nov 18 04:48:02 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-751348 ] Problem registering DLL/OCX Message-ID: Support Requests item #751348, was opened at 2003-06-09 15:22 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by timcoote You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=751348&group_id=61702 Category: Install Problem (example) Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Kathy Gauvin (kmgauvin) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Problem registering DLL/OCX Initial Comment: I got the follwoing error: Unable to register the DLL/OCX: DllRegisterServer failed. Abort Retry Ignore Ignore to proceed anyway(not recommended). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Coote (timcoote) Date: 2003-11-18 09:47 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=574600 I get this with no anti virus s/w on the machine: xp pro sp1, ol 2002 sp2 + salesforce.com add-in clearly this is a bit of a blocker ;-) also, the rollback doesn't work: it doesn't rollback the creation of the install directory. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jeff Sohrt (jsohrt) Date: 2003-09-02 19:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=857533 I got the same problem. If anyone can tell me what to do to fix it, would appreciate it. I have XP Pro with Outlook 2000. I turn off ZoneAlarm and Norton Antivirus (autoprotect = off). I'm thinking maybe I need to try the V006 version -- don't know where to download from. Otherwise on my other XP machine, this plugin is awsome! That one is Outlook 2002 (from Office XP). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Sebastien Groulx (sgroulx) Date: 2003-08-11 16:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=842228 just desable your Anti-virus and the instalation works well ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Michael Graybill (graystarr) Date: 2003-06-11 17:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=340885 I get this same error. And I c annot get it to install! Please help? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: mike dee (miked_187) Date: 2003-06-09 15:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=797254 i had this one too, outlook 2k. had cloudmark spam program installed as an active plugin. had to go to tools|options etc to get to the plugin screen and then uncheck the cloudmark program. exit and close outlook, reinstall went fine. mike ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=751348&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Nov 18 19:07:46 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Nov 18 19:07:56 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-844796 ] SpamBayes as mail manager? Message-ID: Feature Requests item #844796, was opened at 2003-11-19 01:07 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=844796&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Next Release (example) Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: David Klein (cadey) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: SpamBayes as mail manager? Initial Comment: Hello, I'm using the Outlook Addin and it's great, saves me a lot of time ! Will it be possible to use SpamBayes as a mail management system? Our helpdesk team is receiving hundreds of mails a day. It could be really usefull to teach a spambayes base to forward each mail to the right person regarding the words they contain? Of course, to do that, the learning database should be shared by all the support team, I don't know if already possible? That's two requests in one ;-) Thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=844796&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Nov 18 20:01:10 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Nov 18 20:01:17 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-844824 ] MAPI_E_INVALID_ENTRYID when filtering secondary accounts Message-ID: Bugs item #844824, was opened at 2003-11-18 20:01 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=844824&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: John Vottero (jvottero) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: MAPI_E_INVALID_ENTRYID when filtering secondary accounts Initial Comment: I upgraded to V0.81 and email to my secondary accounts isn't being filtered. I have three, Exchange server based accounts, the main one filters fine but, it looks like SpamBayes can't open messages that arrive in the other two Inboxes. The log file shows: Traceback (most recent call last): File "out1.pyz/addin", line 346, in _TimerFunc File "out1.pyz/addin", line 118, in HaveSeenMessage File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 985, in GetField File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 861, in _EnsureObject msgstore.MsgStoreException: MsgStoreException: Exception 0x80040107 (MAPI_E_INVALID_ENTRYID): OLE error 0x80040107 Also, if I pick "SpamBayes->Filter Messages...", then click the "Browse" button, the only folder I can expand is the first one, if I click any of the others, I get a similar error in the spambayes.log file: ** Unable to open child folder - ignoring MsgStoreException: Exception 0x80040107 (MAPI_E_INVALID_ENTRYID): OLE error 0x80040107 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=844824&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Nov 18 22:19:46 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Nov 18 22:19:56 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-804075 ] All mail items non-filterable Message-ID: Bugs item #804075, was opened at 2003-09-11 01:38 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by axelfoley You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=804075&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: All mail items non-filterable Initial Comment: >From the list: I started using SpamBayes last week with the .7x version. I just upgraded to .81, but I'm still having a problem I experienced with .7x. Platform: Windows XP Program: Outlook 2000 I started using the plugin on my wife's profile on the machine and it worked great. I then tried to use it in my profile, and the plugin does not work at all. I try to train the SpamBayes and it fails to see any messages. It finishes the training in a split second and ends up saying it has 0 good message and 0 spam. Trying to get the training to see a message, I selected all my folder to train on, and managed to get 1 message to appear as good. I put the folders back to their proper settings, retrained and got the 0 good 0 spam result again... If I try and delete a message as Spam it always says, "No filterable mail items are selected". I don't know what to do. It still works great on my wife's profile though... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Axel Foley (axelfoley) Date: 2003-11-19 04:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=909220 Found the problem. :) The OE export wizard apparently does its job of exporting but it "forgets" to export ALL the SMTP headers of each mail. If you analyze the imported messages in outlook you will see that every mail exported by OE doesn't have *ANY* SMTP header. This is also documented by MS but still unsolved, check here: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx? scid=kb;en-us;175666. :D Anyway I solved my problem; instead of exporting from OE to Outlook I simply inverted the process. I imported from OE's database using Outlook 2003 import wizard and everything was transferred correctly. A suggestion to the developers: you should give a warning to the users when the plugin skips messages, so one knows what the problem could be, instead of guessing. ;) Anyway I have finished training the plugin and it's doing a fine job (at least until now), great piece of software. ;) Keep up the good job... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Richard Cook (awhig) Date: 2003-11-14 19:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=863989 I'll confirm that my initial entry was dealing with mails that I just imported from Outlook Express. I moved to Outlook 2000 to use Spambayes. Thanks, Rich ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Axel Foley (axelfoley) Date: 2003-11-14 16:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=909220 I can confirm that it is a problem with mails exported from outlook express to Outlook using Outlook Express export wizard. Affected mails appear formally correct, but I haven't analysed headers in details. All the other emails are "filtered" correctly. Maybe some headers are missing in the faulty ones and SpamBayes parser skips them. It's easy to reproduce this behaviour if you want to analyse and correct it. Keep us updated. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tobias Kothe (mr_useless) Date: 2003-09-24 01:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=873198 Same problem here. I just moved my Mails from outlook express to Outlook. Now the training wont find any mails in the folders. The "Delete as spam" wont work either giving the "no filterable items selected" message. But suprisingly all new messages, those which i did not transfer from "outlook express", work fine. I can delete them as spam without any problem. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Richard Cook (awhig) Date: 2003-09-11 07:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=863989 In response to a question from Mark: Yes, all my emails have the regular envelope icon next to them ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=804075&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Nov 19 06:50:12 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Nov 19 06:50:34 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-842682 ] Menu Buttons for "Suspected Spam" are incomplete Message-ID: Bugs item #842682, was opened at 2003-11-15 11:57 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ravenmask You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=842682&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Raven Mask (ravenmask) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Menu Buttons for "Suspected Spam" are incomplete Initial Comment: For items in the "Suspected Spam" folder one needs buttons both for "Delete As Spam" and "Recover from Spam". In practice I never see both buttons, and it is a bit variable which button actually appears - usually "Delete As Spam", but very occasionally "Recover from Spam". I haven't been able to work out the factor causing the different behaviours. I have renamed my "Suspected Spam" folder to "Spam Suspects" (so that it collates in my folder list next to the Spam folder) - could this be the factor? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Raven Mask (ravenmask) Date: 2003-11-19 11:50 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=738323 Oops - you're right! But in self defense I must point out that the order of the SpamBayes buttons is variable - because sometimes I see one, and sometimes the other. This variability may be a function of the last folder I looked at prior to looking at "Spam Suspects" or the previous SpamBayes action that I took - but I'm not sure about this. Anyway, from a UI standpoint this variation is undesirable and guaranteed to confuse! Also, a suggestion: Is it possible to have smaller button labels, such as "Is Spam" and "Not Spam", in order to minimise contention on the button space? I should say that overall I'm most impressed by SpamBayes. It does a nice classification job, it doesn't take too much system resource to run, and the UI is the minimum necessary to do the job. What more could one ask? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-11-18 03:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Are you sure you aren't just not seeing one of the buttons? Do you get the little continuator (a little down arrow) beside the last visible button? The name of the folder shouldn't have any effect, and you should always have both buttons available (although both may not fit on the screen at once, depending on your setup). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=842682&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Nov 19 07:27:46 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Nov 19 07:27:53 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-842682 ] Menu Buttons for "Suspected Spam" are incomplete Message-ID: Bugs item #842682, was opened at 2003-11-15 22:57 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=842682&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Invalid Priority: 5 Submitted By: Raven Mask (ravenmask) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Menu Buttons for "Suspected Spam" are incomplete Initial Comment: For items in the "Suspected Spam" folder one needs buttons both for "Delete As Spam" and "Recover from Spam". In practice I never see both buttons, and it is a bit variable which button actually appears - usually "Delete As Spam", but very occasionally "Recover from Spam". I haven't been able to work out the factor causing the different behaviours. I have renamed my "Suspected Spam" folder to "Spam Suspects" (so that it collates in my folder list next to the Spam folder) - could this be the factor? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-11-19 23:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 We have no control over how Outlook truncates :( ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Raven Mask (ravenmask) Date: 2003-11-19 22:50 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=738323 Oops - you're right! But in self defense I must point out that the order of the SpamBayes buttons is variable - because sometimes I see one, and sometimes the other. This variability may be a function of the last folder I looked at prior to looking at "Spam Suspects" or the previous SpamBayes action that I took - but I'm not sure about this. Anyway, from a UI standpoint this variation is undesirable and guaranteed to confuse! Also, a suggestion: Is it possible to have smaller button labels, such as "Is Spam" and "Not Spam", in order to minimise contention on the button space? I should say that overall I'm most impressed by SpamBayes. It does a nice classification job, it doesn't take too much system resource to run, and the UI is the minimum necessary to do the job. What more could one ask? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-11-18 14:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Are you sure you aren't just not seeing one of the buttons? Do you get the little continuator (a little down arrow) beside the last visible button? The name of the folder shouldn't have any effect, and you should always have both buttons available (although both may not fit on the screen at once, depending on your setup). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=842682&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Nov 19 23:20:49 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Nov 19 23:20:56 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-788845 ] imapfilter training fails Message-ID: Bugs item #788845, was opened at 2003-08-15 05:37 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=788845&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Open >Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tys von Gaza (tvongaza) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: imapfilter training fails Initial Comment: Using latest CVS, Python 2.2.2, connecting to a Courier IMAP server. Web interface of imapfilter can connect and see the imap folders on the server. When I try training (with messages in the TrainSpam folder) I get the following traceback, I am willing to help anyone debug this: [gaza@games gaza]$ python2.2 spambayes/imapfilter.py -v -t SpamBayes IMAP Filter Alpha1, version 0.01 (May 2003), using SpamBayes IMAP Filter Web Interface Alpha1, version 0.01 and engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003). Loading database hammie.db... Loading state from hammie.db database hammie.db is an existing database, with 0 spam and 0 ham Done. Training Training ham folder INBOX.SB.TrainHam 0 trained. Training spam folder INBOX.SB.TrainSpam *.Traceback (most recent call last): File "spambayes/imapfilter.py", line 782, in ? run() File "spambayes/imapfilter.py", line 768, in run imap_filter.Train() File "spambayes/imapfilter.py", line 607, in Train num_spam_trained = folder.Train(self.classifier, True) File "spambayes/imapfilter.py", line 543, in Train msg.Save() File "spambayes/imapfilter.py", line 365, in Save response = imap.uid("FETCH", self.uid, "(FLAGS INTERNALDATE)") File "//usr/lib/python2.2/imaplib.py", line 622, in uid typ, dat = apply(self._simple_command, (name, command) + args) File "//usr/lib/python2.2/imaplib.py", line 925, in _simple_command return self._command_complete(name, apply (self._command, (name,) + args)) File "//usr/lib/python2.2/imaplib.py", line 699, in _command data = '%s %s' % (data, self._checkquote(arg)) File "//usr/lib/python2.2/imaplib.py", line 908, in _checkquote if (arg[0],arg[-1]) in (('(',')'),('"','"')): IndexError: string index out of range ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-11-20 17:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 It's been a long time (I've been away for a lot of it), but I'm finally finding time to work on this one. I've seen something very similar recently, which may (but may not) have been the problem here, too. The 'index out of range' error only occurs if the empty string is passed (as you said) to _checkquote - IMO this is a python bug (I've submitted a report). So, it's using select("") at some point (not select(None), which gives a different result), again as you said. In the other cases I've seen, I believe this has been caused by either (or both) the unsure or spam folder name not being set - so it's left as "", and then messages are tried to be moved into that, which doesn't work. Could this have been the case here? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Julien Cayzac (jcayzac) Date: 2003-10-04 22:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=775162 This is not fixed in 1.0a6. The problem is that _checkquote is invoked with a zero-length argument, so arg[0] and arg[-1] both fail. I tried to patch imaplib by inserting the following snippet before that test: if (len(arg)==0): return arg ...then the ouput (with -i 4) is: Password: 08:47.89 > BGIK1 LOGIN deepmind "#######" 08:49.18 < BGIK1 OK LOGIN Ok. 08:49.18 > BGIK2 SELECT 08:49.18 < BGIK2 NO Mailbox does not exist, or must be subscribed to. 08:49.18 NO response: Mailbox does not exist, or must be subscribed to. Invalid response to select : ('NO', ['Mailbox does not exist, or must be subscribed to.']) i.e., you're using select(None) at some point, which is illegal. Hope it helps. Julien. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-02 13:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I think I have fixed this. If you could try out imapfilter in 1.0a5 (due 04 Sept 03) and let me know if it works, that would be great. It should definately move the error into smtpproxy, rather than imaplib, and it should manage to recover from it, as well. It would be good to know that it still acts correctly though. (IMAP is a terrible protocol. The problem here is still the fundamental one that you can't alter a message on the server). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tys von Gaza (tvongaza) Date: 2003-08-25 19:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=844717 Here is some more using a more verbose debug: [gaza@games gaza]$ python2.2 spambayes/imapfilter.py -v - t -i4 SpamBayes IMAP Filter Alpha1, version 0.01 (May 2003), using SpamBayes IMAP Filter Web Interface Alpha1, version 0.01 and engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003). Loading database hammie.db... Loading state from hammie.db database hammie.db is an existing database, with 0 spam and 0 ham Done. 18:45.14 > FPNB1 LOGIN **** "******" 18:45.19 < FPNB1 OK LOGIN Ok. Training 18:45.19 > FPNB2 SELECT INBOX.SB.TrainHam 18:45.19 < * FLAGS (\Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Recent) 18:45.19 < * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\* \Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen)] Limited 18:45.19 < * 1 EXISTS 18:45.19 < * 0 RECENT 18:45.19 < * OK [UIDVALIDITY 1060841558] Ok 18:45.19 < FPNB2 OK [READ-WRITE] Ok Training ham folder INBOX.SB.TrainHam 18:45.19 > FPNB3 UID SEARCH UNDELETED 18:45.19 < * SEARCH 157 18:45.19 < FPNB3 OK SEARCH done. 18:45.19 > FPNB4 UID FETCH 157 RFC822.HEADER 18:45.19 < * 1 FETCH (UID 157 RFC822.HEADER {2075} 18:45.19 read literal size 2075 18:45.19 < ) 18:45.19 < FPNB4 OK FETCH completed. 18:45.20 > FPNB5 UID FETCH 157 RFC822.PEEK 18:45.20 < FPNB5 NO Error in IMAP command received by server. 18:45.20 NO response: Error in IMAP command received by server. 18:45.20 > FPNB6 UID FETCH 157 RFC822 18:45.20 < * 1 FETCH (UID 157 RFC822 {5442} 18:45.20 read literal size 5442 18:45.20 < ) 18:45.20 < FPNB6 OK FETCH completed. 18:45.22 > FPNB7 UID FETCH 157 (FLAGS INTERNALDATE) 18:45.22 < * 1 FETCH (UID 157 FLAGS (\Seen) INTERNALDATE "19-Aug-2003 10:07:21 -0600") 18:45.23 < FPNB7 OK FETCH completed. 18:45.24 > FPNB8 APPEND INBOX.SB.TrainHam (\Seen) "19- Aug-2003 10:07:21 -0600" {5476} 18:45.24 < + OK 18:45.24 write literal size 5476 18:45.29 < FPNB8 OK [APPENDUID 1060841558 158] APPEND Ok. 18:45.29 > FPNB9 UID STORE 157 +FLAGS.SILENT (\Deleted) 18:45.29 < FPNB9 OK STORE completed. 18:45.29 > FPNB10 UID SEARCH (UNDELETED HEADER X- Spambayes-MailId 1061320725) 18:45.29 < * SEARCH 18:45.29 < * 1 FETCH (FLAGS (\Seen \Deleted)) 18:45.29 < FPNB10 OK SEARCH done. 18:45.29 > FPNB11 UID SEARCH RECENT 18:45.29 < * SEARCH 18:45.29 < FPNB11 OK SEARCH done. *.Traceback (most recent call last): File "spambayes/imapfilter.py", line 782, in ? run() File "spambayes/imapfilter.py", line 768, in run imap_filter.Train() File "spambayes/imapfilter.py", line 594, in Train num_ham_trained = folder.Train(self.classifier, False) File "spambayes/imapfilter.py", line 543, in Train msg.Save() File "spambayes/imapfilter.py", line 365, in Save response = imap.uid("FETCH", self.uid, "(FLAGS INTERNALDATE)") File "//usr/lib/python2.2/imaplib.py", line 622, in uid typ, dat = apply(self._simple_command, (name, command) + args) File "//usr/lib/python2.2/imaplib.py", line 925, in _simple_command return self._command_complete(name, apply (self._command, (name,) + args)) File "//usr/lib/python2.2/imaplib.py", line 699, in _command data = '%s %s' % (data, self._checkquote(arg)) File "//usr/lib/python2.2/imaplib.py", line 908, in _checkquote if (arg[0],arg[-1]) in (('(',')'),('"','"')): IndexError: string index out of range ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-08-19 20:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I have very occasionally seen this too, but whenever I've tried to reproduce it (to fix it) I haven't been able to. Do you get this consistently? If you do, could you run imapfilter with the "-i4" switch and tell me/the list what you get? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=788845&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Nov 20 04:27:59 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Nov 20 04:28:18 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-839648 ] SpamBayes/Rules conflict Message-ID: Bugs item #839648, was opened at 2003-11-10 16:01 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by esargent You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=839648&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tyson Vanek (tvanek) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: SpamBayes/Rules conflict Initial Comment: This is an interesting problem to which I've found a solution, but I'll explain. I have Outlook 2002 checking 4 email accounts. Inside my "Inbox" folder, I have a folder for each of these email accounts. I then have a rule created for each email account that moves messages from the Inbox to the appropriate folder based on which account received the message, a setup I believe to be fairly common among people using Outlook to check multiple accounts. I installed SpamBayes (the Outlook 0081 plug-in) today and went into configuring it. Because I have many rules that move messages all over the place into different folders, I configured SpamBayes' email filtering to watch the "Inbox" folder and marked the "Include Subfolders" checkbox, assuming this would monitor every single piece of email that Outlook retrieves. Then I bounced a known spam message to one of my email accounts. Even with the delayed filtering in place, the offending spam was not moved to the appropriate spam folder. Checking the "Spam Clues" on the offending message revealed a 100% match for spam. Considering I had SpamBayes configured to move spam 90% or higher to the spam folder, it baffled me that this email hadn't been moved. Then I took a look at the log files and figured out what was taking place. When the email originally landed in the "Inbox", SpamBayes properly identifie it as SPAM and attempted to move it to the spam folder. However, my Outlook rule for moving messages received through that account to the sub-folder inbox was pulling the email OUT of the spam folder and placing it in the designated pseudo-inbox folder. As a result of this action, SpamBayes also thought I was retrieving this email from the spam folder, so it also logged an entry that it learned that this email was NOT SPAM and would fail to score future duplicate emails properly. How did I get around all this? Simple. I went back to the filtering options of the plug-in and unchecked the "Inbox" folder. Instead, I opened it up and checked every single folder that exists inside of the "Inbox", but not the "Inbox" itself - and I also kept the "all sub- folders" option checked. This means SpamBayes now only scans the message when it arrives in one of my folders after Outlook rules process it, and everything is working correctly. I hope this makes sense to the developers. I'm sure this is the same scenario being reported by many of your users that utilize rules for managing multiple email accounts. They simply need to ignore the "Inbox" and filter everything else so that SpamBayes doesn't trap the spam until it lands in the rule-specified folder and Outlook doesn't "steal" it from the spam folder. If you need any clarification on this, please let me know. Other than this minor configuration glitch, I LOVE the plug-in so far! Great work - keep it up! Thanks, Tyson ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Erik Sargent (esargent) Date: 2003-11-20 01:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=586922 A suggestion on solving the "Rules Wizard" conflict: How about if you turn "filter with SpamBayes" into a Rule which can then be enabled through the Rules Wizard, which would allow people to do either pre- or post- filter rule processing depending on their individual need or preference. Since Outlook processes the rules in a known, configurable order, this should solve the problems reported. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=839648&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Nov 20 04:34:39 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Nov 20 04:34:51 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-765924 ] Spam / ham statistics Message-ID: Feature Requests item #765924, was opened at 2003-07-04 05:51 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by esargent You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=765924&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Magnus Aycox (mbip) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Spam / ham statistics Initial Comment: Possibility to get statistics on how many mails were received per hour / day and how many of these were spam messages. It would be great if it could be presented both as numbers and graphically (impresses CEO's...). The means to print it as a hard copy would be just swell... ;o) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Erik Sargent (esargent) Date: 2003-11-20 01:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=586922 Quick note on the "impossibility" of tracking false pos/neg. Actually, since an incorrectly classified message already has a header inserted, then you would only flag a "false" if that header existed and was changed. This means you'd have to check for the existence of the header before you processed the Delete/Recover buttons, but it can be done. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-29 21:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Note that the plug-in has basic stats information (cvs version) now, although it's still only on a per session basis (this will no doubt improve at some point). The web interface (for non-plugin users) also now (cvs head) has basic stats, which are persisted between sessions. Any opinions on which statistics would be best to add? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-07-10 21:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 It's not exactly what you have asked for, but as a start, are you aware that in the logs, each time you shut Outlook down it prints a message like: "SpamBayes processed 555 messages, finding 34 spam and 11 unsure" (So you could shut Outlook down each hour/day, to generate this message). It's unlikely that a graphical version would ever be made, but it would be easy enough to throw numbers like this into Excel and get pretty graphs. The number of false positives/negatives is more difficult because SpamBayes doesn't really have any way to know that mail is a fp/fn. It could print the number of times the "delete as spam" and "recover from spam" buttons are used, I guess, but this would include all unsure mail, which aren't exactly fp/fn's. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Jeays (dze27) Date: 2003-07-10 21:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=302748 I'm just another user but I think this would be a great addition. I'd also be interested in: number of false positives (along with percentage of total), number of false negatives (along with percentage of total) and percentage of mail received that is spam. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=765924&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Nov 20 04:46:48 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Nov 20 04:47:09 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-788755 ] Easy-empty Spam, Potential Spam folders Message-ID: Feature Requests item #788755, was opened at 2003-08-14 08:15 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by esargent You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=788755&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Next Release (example) Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Brian Dipert (bdipert) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Easy-empty Spam, Potential Spam folders Initial Comment: I have my spam (Outlook 2K, Windows XP Pro, by the way) going into a folder titled 'Spam' and potential spam going into 'Potential Spam' (original, eh?). Any way your plugin could add 'Empty XXX Folder' to the menu list which pops up when I right-click on these two folders, as occurs now with the Deleted Items folder? That would save me the added steps of selecting all the messages in Spam, moving them to Deleted Items and then emptying THAT folder. I've got Spam set to 7-day message retention, and after that time deletion, but I try to keep my Outlook tidier than that when I have time....... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Erik Sargent (esargent) Date: 2003-11-20 01:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=586922 I don't know if you can add the menu item, but Outlook 2003 does provide a SPAM folder with this feature. (not for potential spam though) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=788755&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Nov 20 09:21:23 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Nov 20 09:21:38 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-765924 ] Spam / ham statistics Message-ID: Feature Requests item #765924, was opened at 2003-07-04 08:51 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kpitt You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=765924&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Magnus Aycox (mbip) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Spam / ham statistics Initial Comment: Possibility to get statistics on how many mails were received per hour / day and how many of these were spam messages. It would be great if it could be presented both as numbers and graphically (impresses CEO's...). The means to print it as a hard copy would be just swell... ;o) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2003-11-20 09:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 The latest CVS plugin actually does include false positives and negatives in the statistics. The definition is this. If a message was classified as Ham and then reclassified by the user as Spam, it is a false negative. If a message was classified as Spam and then reclassified by the user as Ham, it is a false positive. A message that was originally classified as Unsure is never considered a false positive or negative. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Erik Sargent (esargent) Date: 2003-11-20 04:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=586922 Quick note on the "impossibility" of tracking false pos/neg. Actually, since an incorrectly classified message already has a header inserted, then you would only flag a "false" if that header existed and was changed. This means you'd have to check for the existence of the header before you processed the Delete/Recover buttons, but it can be done. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-30 00:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Note that the plug-in has basic stats information (cvs version) now, although it's still only on a per session basis (this will no doubt improve at some point). The web interface (for non-plugin users) also now (cvs head) has basic stats, which are persisted between sessions. Any opinions on which statistics would be best to add? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-07-11 00:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 It's not exactly what you have asked for, but as a start, are you aware that in the logs, each time you shut Outlook down it prints a message like: "SpamBayes processed 555 messages, finding 34 spam and 11 unsure" (So you could shut Outlook down each hour/day, to generate this message). It's unlikely that a graphical version would ever be made, but it would be easy enough to throw numbers like this into Excel and get pretty graphs. The number of false positives/negatives is more difficult because SpamBayes doesn't really have any way to know that mail is a fp/fn. It could print the number of times the "delete as spam" and "recover from spam" buttons are used, I guess, but this would include all unsure mail, which aren't exactly fp/fn's. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Jeays (dze27) Date: 2003-07-11 00:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=302748 I'm just another user but I think this would be a great addition. I'd also be interested in: number of false positives (along with percentage of total), number of false negatives (along with percentage of total) and percentage of mail received that is spam. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=765924&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Nov 20 09:32:00 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Nov 20 09:32:10 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-788755 ] Easy-empty Spam, Potential Spam folders Message-ID: Feature Requests item #788755, was opened at 2003-08-14 11:15 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kpitt You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=788755&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Next Release (example) Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Brian Dipert (bdipert) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Easy-empty Spam, Potential Spam folders Initial Comment: I have my spam (Outlook 2K, Windows XP Pro, by the way) going into a folder titled 'Spam' and potential spam going into 'Potential Spam' (original, eh?). Any way your plugin could add 'Empty XXX Folder' to the menu list which pops up when I right-click on these two folders, as occurs now with the Deleted Items folder? That would save me the added steps of selecting all the messages in Spam, moving them to Deleted Items and then emptying THAT folder. I've got Spam set to 7-day message retention, and after that time deletion, but I try to keep my Outlook tidier than that when I have time....... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2003-11-20 09:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 This actually isn't that difficult to do, and I've already submitted a patch (#831941) to do it for the Spam folder. No decision yet on whether or not it will be included in a future release. It probably isn't a good idea to do this for the Potential Spam folder. These messages are, by definition, ones that SpamBayes is unsure about and need to be looked at individually by the user. If you are getting a lot of messages in Potential Spam that you don't care to review, you might want to consider lowering your spam threshold so that more of these messages go directly into the Spam folder. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Erik Sargent (esargent) Date: 2003-11-20 04:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=586922 I don't know if you can add the menu item, but Outlook 2003 does provide a SPAM folder with this feature. (not for potential spam though) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=788755&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Nov 22 11:29:13 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Nov 22 11:29:17 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-847279 ] NNTP-Filter Message-ID: Feature Requests item #847279, was opened at 2003-11-22 17:29 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=847279&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Martin Rehker (mrehker) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: NNTP-Filter Initial Comment: Did you think about writing an NNTP-Filter which would would allow to apply SpamBayes technique to news? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=847279&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Nov 22 18:17:02 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Nov 22 18:17:19 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-803798 ] MAPI_E_OBJECT_CHANGED error saving spam score Message-ID: Bugs item #803798, was opened at 2003-09-10 15:14 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by andyholtmacc You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=803798&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Andy Holt (andyholtmacc) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: MAPI_E_OBJECT_CHANGED error saving spam score Initial Comment: Although my SpamBayes Outlook plug-in 008.1 seems to be working OK (Win2Ksp3, OL XPsp2), I suspect something isn't right under the covers - perhaps it's now not learning any more. This is what I often (but not always get) for new mails: Unexpected MAPI error saving the spam score for ObjectChangedException: Exception 0x80040109 (MAPI_E_OBJECT_CHANGED): OLE error 0x80040109 Message 'RE: Call 12574 : DAC access toodscommscausescrashonserverandDac itself' had a Spam classification of 'No' Actually, perhaps it's the tagging of messages that isn't working (which I wouldn't notice, since I haven't set anything up to show that). This seems similar to bug 787676 (at least this error message also appears there), but I do not use either Exchange or Hotmail, so I cannot detect whether this is a different issue or not. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Andy Holt (andyholtmacc) Date: 2003-11-22 23:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=863479 Hello Mark, thanks for the reply, sorry for the delay in mine. You are right, the filtering seems to be OK (well, not bad, but that's another story). The spam score doesn't seem to be being saved. I finally got round to adding the Spam score colunm to my Spam folder, and the column is completely empty, for spam mails received since the middle of September, OK before that. I can't think of anything particular that happened on my system around then, but hey it was two months ago. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-10-27 03:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 This is different to 787676. Am I correct in assuming that the filtering of these mail items seems to work fine, but simply the spam score isn't saved? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=803798&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Nov 24 09:24:19 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Nov 24 09:24:23 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-848311 ] sb_imapfilter.py obeys launch_browser Message-ID: Patches item #848311, was opened at 2003-11-24 09:24 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=848311&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Barry A. Warsaw (bwarsaw) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: sb_imapfilter.py obeys launch_browser Initial Comment: Here's a patch to make sb_imapfilter.py obey the html_ui::launch_browser option. This script's -b flag is overloaded both with starting the web server and with launching a browser. I want to start the server but not launch the browser (since I already have Mozilla running). With this patch -b starts the web server, but the browser is launched on the basis of the bayescustomize.ini file. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=848311&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Nov 24 09:27:18 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Nov 24 09:27:21 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-848313 ] Scores, but doesnt move Message-ID: Support Requests item #848313, was opened at 2003-11-24 08:27 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=848313&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Drew Boillot (sicwan) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Scores, but doesnt move Initial Comment: Hello, I have noticed that sometimes SpamBayes will score, and mark the message as read, but fails to move it to the spam folder. This uesally happens after the weekend when i havn't checked this account. I've Increased the deley in wich SpamBayes starts to scan messages, but that still didn't help. I didn't have this problem untill my boss tried to uninstall SpamBayes because he didn't know what it was. (In the process, he some how corrupted my settings file and i had to start over) If anyone has and suggestions, or a fix for this. Please let me know. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=848313&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Nov 24 09:28:23 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Nov 24 09:29:46 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-848314 ] fixes to sb_xmlrpcserver.py Message-ID: Patches item #848314, was opened at 2003-11-24 09:28 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=848314&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Barry A. Warsaw (bwarsaw) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: fixes to sb_xmlrpcserver.py Initial Comment: This patch contains several fixes to sb_xmlrpcserver.py. First, it makes sure that the socket being bound is reusable. Second, it changes XMLHammie.score() so that the float score is returned directly instead of trying to be wrapped in a Binary object. The latter won't work since Binary's expect a string buffer, and besides XMLRPC supports floats directly. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=848314&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Nov 24 09:36:02 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Nov 24 09:36:04 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-848319 ] Ximian Evolution filter scriptlet Message-ID: Patches item #848319, was opened at 2003-11-24 09:36 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=848319&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Barry A. Warsaw (bwarsaw) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Ximian Evolution filter scriptlet Initial Comment: Ximian Evolution lets you define filters which can be run on each message when it arrives, to determine the disposition of the message. The basis for whatever action you define is the return value of the script. Here is a small sb_xmlrpcserver.py client which sends the message Evolution provides on stdin, to the server and returns an sb score. The score is then compared against spam_cutoff and ham_cutoff to return one of three exit values: 0 means ham, 1 means unsure, 2 means spam. A -1 is an error code. This requires my sb_xmlrpcserver.py patch. I call this script sb_score.py. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=848319&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Nov 24 10:37:29 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Nov 24 10:37:34 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-848365 ] Remove subject annotations from message review page Message-ID: Feature Requests item #848365, was opened at 2003-11-24 15:37 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=848365&group_id=61702 Category: Interface Improvements (example) Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Dave Brueck (dbrueck) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Remove subject annotations from message review page Initial Comment: On the message review page in the web interface (Home -> Review), the subject line for messages shows annotations that SB added if such annotations are turned on in the configuration (Home -> Configuration Page -> Header Options -> Classify in subject header). This causes a problem if you leave the raidio boxes to their default values and click Train because the annotation tokens are used as training input (on my system the "subject:spam" token now has a value of 0.997). In addition to removing SB's own annotations from the subject lines, it might be a good idea to change that page so that messages that are classified as spam/ham have their Discard/Defer/Ham/Spam radio button default to Discard or Defer, so that the common task of just reviewing unsure messages does not require the user to also look over those that were classified and decide whether or not they should be included in the training. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=848365&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Nov 24 17:37:38 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Nov 24 17:37:48 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-848622 ] There was an error initializing the Spam plugin Message-ID: Bugs item #848622, was opened at 2003-11-24 14:37 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=848622&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Joe Patterson (josepatterson) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: There was an error initializing the Spam plugin Initial Comment: 'Spam filtering has been disabled. Please re-configure and re-enable this plugin Error details: Could not watch the specified folders' I am running XP with SP1. Outlook 2002. When I installed spambayes and started outlook, it complained that the plugin could not be initialized, and suggested I re-install it. I configured it by hand (the tool bar was there), and now I get the "can't watch" error. If I run the filter by hand, it works, but I have to re- enable the plug-in every time I start outlook. It also does not auto-filter messages when they arrive. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=848622&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Nov 24 22:58:22 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Nov 25 03:01:56 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-848314 ] fixes to sb_xmlrpcserver.py Message-ID: Patches item #848314, was opened at 2003-11-24 09:28 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by bwarsaw You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=848314&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Accepted Priority: 5 Submitted By: Barry A. Warsaw (bwarsaw) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: fixes to sb_xmlrpcserver.py Initial Comment: This patch contains several fixes to sb_xmlrpcserver.py. First, it makes sure that the socket being bound is reusable. Second, it changes XMLHammie.score() so that the float score is returned directly instead of trying to be wrapped in a Binary object. The latter won't work since Binary's expect a string buffer, and besides XMLRPC supports floats directly. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=848314&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Nov 25 01:02:34 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Nov 25 03:02:04 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-848311 ] sb_imapfilter.py obeys launch_browser Message-ID: Patches item #848311, was opened at 2003-11-25 03:24 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=848311&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Barry A. Warsaw (bwarsaw) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: sb_imapfilter.py obeys launch_browser Initial Comment: Here's a patch to make sb_imapfilter.py obey the html_ui::launch_browser option. This script's -b flag is overloaded both with starting the web server and with launching a browser. I want to start the server but not launch the browser (since I already have Mozilla running). With this patch -b starts the web server, but the browser is launched on the basis of the bayescustomize.ini file. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-11-25 19:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This is a bug from older versions of the code that didn't do this (my fault, no doubt :). What about this patch? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Barry A. Warsaw (bwarsaw) Date: 2003-11-25 17:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=12800 My problem was that without the -b option, sb_imapfilter.py exits with the following message: You need to specify both a server and a username. Your patch doesn't change that. So it seems that the -b or launchUI variable is overloaded. I can't suss out what the original intent was, but I think the script should have /some/ behavior where it starts the webserver and no browser. ;) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-11-25 15:50 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I prefer the attached patch, which more closely resembles the way sb_server.py works. At the moment you can already launch the server without the browser - just do "sb_imapfilter.py". My patch makes *that* command observe the config value, and the "-b" switch has the same behaviour as sb_server - it forces the option to True. (So it's a shortcut for -o:html_ui:launch_browser:True or however that new-fangled method works). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=848311&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Nov 24 23:17:34 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Nov 25 03:02:27 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-848311 ] sb_imapfilter.py obeys launch_browser Message-ID: Patches item #848311, was opened at 2003-11-24 09:24 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by bwarsaw You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=848311&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Barry A. Warsaw (bwarsaw) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: sb_imapfilter.py obeys launch_browser Initial Comment: Here's a patch to make sb_imapfilter.py obey the html_ui::launch_browser option. This script's -b flag is overloaded both with starting the web server and with launching a browser. I want to start the server but not launch the browser (since I already have Mozilla running). With this patch -b starts the web server, but the browser is launched on the basis of the bayescustomize.ini file. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Barry A. Warsaw (bwarsaw) Date: 2003-11-24 23:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=12800 My problem was that without the -b option, sb_imapfilter.py exits with the following message: You need to specify both a server and a username. Your patch doesn't change that. So it seems that the -b or launchUI variable is overloaded. I can't suss out what the original intent was, but I think the script should have /some/ behavior where it starts the webserver and no browser. ;) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-11-24 21:50 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I prefer the attached patch, which more closely resembles the way sb_server.py works. At the moment you can already launch the server without the browser - just do "sb_imapfilter.py". My patch makes *that* command observe the config value, and the "-b" switch has the same behaviour as sb_server - it forces the option to True. (So it's a shortcut for -o:html_ui:launch_browser:True or however that new-fangled method works). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=848311&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Nov 24 22:54:31 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Nov 25 03:02:41 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-848319 ] Ximian Evolution filter scriptlet Message-ID: Patches item #848319, was opened at 2003-11-24 09:36 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by bwarsaw You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=848319&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Accepted Priority: 5 Submitted By: Barry A. Warsaw (bwarsaw) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Ximian Evolution filter scriptlet Initial Comment: Ximian Evolution lets you define filters which can be run on each message when it arrives, to determine the disposition of the message. The basis for whatever action you define is the return value of the script. Here is a small sb_xmlrpcserver.py client which sends the message Evolution provides on stdin, to the server and returns an sb score. The score is then compared against spam_cutoff and ham_cutoff to return one of three exit values: 0 means ham, 1 means unsure, 2 means spam. A -1 is an error code. This requires my sb_xmlrpcserver.py patch. I call this script sb_score.py. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Barry A. Warsaw (bwarsaw) Date: 2003-11-24 22:54 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=12800 I went with sb_evoscore.py because, while the code isn't Evolution specific per-se, the docstring is, and the docstring is much longer than the code anyway. :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-11-24 21:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I wonder if sb_score.py is the best name - to me it sounds a bit like it will do what sb_filter.py does. I think sb_xmlscore.py would emphasise that the difference is that it uses sb_xmlrpcserver.py to do the work. Or maybe sb_rpcscore.py or sb_xmlrpcscore.py. But then sb_client.py isn't sb_xmlrpcclient.py, so maybe not ;) Just my 2c. +1 to checking it in, anyway. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=848319&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Nov 24 21:50:41 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Nov 25 05:44:08 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-848311 ] sb_imapfilter.py obeys launch_browser Message-ID: Patches item #848311, was opened at 2003-11-25 03:24 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=848311&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Barry A. Warsaw (bwarsaw) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: sb_imapfilter.py obeys launch_browser Initial Comment: Here's a patch to make sb_imapfilter.py obey the html_ui::launch_browser option. This script's -b flag is overloaded both with starting the web server and with launching a browser. I want to start the server but not launch the browser (since I already have Mozilla running). With this patch -b starts the web server, but the browser is launched on the basis of the bayescustomize.ini file. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-11-25 15:50 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I prefer the attached patch, which more closely resembles the way sb_server.py works. At the moment you can already launch the server without the browser - just do "sb_imapfilter.py". My patch makes *that* command observe the config value, and the "-b" switch has the same behaviour as sb_server - it forces the option to True. (So it's a shortcut for -o:html_ui:launch_browser:True or however that new-fangled method works). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=848311&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Nov 24 21:45:40 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Nov 25 07:03:10 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-848319 ] Ximian Evolution filter scriptlet Message-ID: Patches item #848319, was opened at 2003-11-25 03:36 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=848319&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Barry A. Warsaw (bwarsaw) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Ximian Evolution filter scriptlet Initial Comment: Ximian Evolution lets you define filters which can be run on each message when it arrives, to determine the disposition of the message. The basis for whatever action you define is the return value of the script. Here is a small sb_xmlrpcserver.py client which sends the message Evolution provides on stdin, to the server and returns an sb score. The score is then compared against spam_cutoff and ham_cutoff to return one of three exit values: 0 means ham, 1 means unsure, 2 means spam. A -1 is an error code. This requires my sb_xmlrpcserver.py patch. I call this script sb_score.py. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-11-25 15:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I wonder if sb_score.py is the best name - to me it sounds a bit like it will do what sb_filter.py does. I think sb_xmlscore.py would emphasise that the difference is that it uses sb_xmlrpcserver.py to do the work. Or maybe sb_rpcscore.py or sb_xmlrpcscore.py. But then sb_client.py isn't sb_xmlrpcclient.py, so maybe not ;) Just my 2c. +1 to checking it in, anyway. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=848319&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Nov 25 09:58:51 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Nov 25 09:58:55 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-849004 ] Spambayes stops filtering in Outlook after losing connection Message-ID: Bugs item #849004, was opened at 2003-11-25 09:58 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=849004&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 001-007 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Lou Franco (loumf) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Spambayes stops filtering in Outlook after losing connection Initial Comment: - Background (nothing to do with Spambayes): I connect to Outlook remotely over a VPN and the connection is a little spotty. When it is dropped, the VPN autoredials and Outlook recovers. During this time outlook is usually frozen and sometimes it can take a long time (and sometimes the redialer gives up and I need to manually redial). - SpamBayes Problem: After Outlook reconnects, messages are no longer filtered as they come in the inbox. If I restart Outlook, everything is fine. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=849004&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Nov 25 10:00:03 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Nov 25 10:00:10 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-849004 ] Spambayes stops filtering in Outlook after losing connection Message-ID: Bugs item #849004, was opened at 2003-11-25 09:58 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by loumf You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=849004&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook >Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Lou Franco (loumf) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Spambayes stops filtering in Outlook after losing connection Initial Comment: - Background (nothing to do with Spambayes): I connect to Outlook remotely over a VPN and the connection is a little spotty. When it is dropped, the VPN autoredials and Outlook recovers. During this time outlook is usually frozen and sometimes it can take a long time (and sometimes the redialer gives up and I need to manually redial). - SpamBayes Problem: After Outlook reconnects, messages are no longer filtered as they come in the inbox. If I restart Outlook, everything is fine. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=849004&group_id=61702 From mfjohan at uakron.edu Tue Nov 25 10:03:01 2003 From: mfjohan at uakron.edu (Michael Johanyak) Date: Tue Nov 25 10:03:11 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] Feature Request Message-ID: <004f01c3b365$3ab057d0$bd7ba8c0@johanyak> Greetings. I have a feature request for SpamBayes for Outlook: Allow (as an option) that all spam can be placed automatically in the Deleted Items folder. Great program--just what I was looking for. Mike From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Nov 25 18:12:09 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Nov 25 18:12:18 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-831388 ] message.py ignores header_score_digits setting Message-ID: Bugs item #831388, was opened at 2003-10-27 22:19 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by richiehindle You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=831388&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code - CVS >Status: Closed >Resolution: Accepted Priority: 1 Submitted By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) >Assigned to: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Summary: message.py ignores header_score_digits setting Initial Comment: When message.py inserts the X-Spambayes-Spam- Probability header, it just uses str(prob) to format the probability and ignores the header_score_digits config option. Attached one-line patch takes the probability formatting statement from hammie.py, which handles this correctly. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Date: 2003-11-25 23:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=85414 Checked in as message.py 1.41 - thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2003-10-28 16:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 This doesn't deserve the default Medium priority. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=831388&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Nov 25 19:13:18 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Nov 25 19:13:24 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-824651 ] Japanese (and/or other CJK languages) message support Message-ID: Patches item #824651, was opened at 2003-10-16 21:23 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=824651&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Hatuka*nezumi (hatukanezumi) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Japanese (and/or other CJK languages) message support Initial Comment: Maybe this also applicable to other East-Asian languages. o Unicode'ify text: For example by Japanese message, RFC1468 recommends that ISO/EIC 2022 encoding scheme, with ASCII and multibyte character set both designated to GL, should be used. Original tokenizer generates only bogus meaningless text fragments for Japanese messages. o Concatinate C/J lines. In Japanese (and maybe Chinese) messages, line folding often breaks 'words'. o Bigram of C/J characters. In Japanese (and often Chinese) messages, 'words' are not separated by character such as whitespace. Tokenization to grammatical 'words' will require heuristic algorithms using large corpus. Instead of expensive human-language parser, generate bigram from run of kanji (ideograph for C/J/K) or run of hiragana & katakana (syllabic letters for J). N.B.: - I believe number of database items is roughly O(n^2) for bigram, O(n^3) for trigram,... and O(n^i) for i-gram, where n is size of used character set. On katakana & hiragana n is approximately 100. On kanzi it is approx. 5000 (KS X 1001), 7000 (JIS X 0208), or more (Chinese standards). By C/J messages, 3-or-more-gram will generate very sparse and large database. - Words of single kanzi should not be discarded by tokenizer. Since most of basic kanzi words are of 1 or 2 characters. Words of single hiragana/katakana may be discarded. - As far as I know, in Korean message, phrase (not 'word' but similar) is often separated by whitespace. As run of hangul (syllabic character for K) may not splitted to n-gram. o Punctuation --- what is 'punctuation'? A lot of punctuations, spaces, signs and symbols registered with Unicode Standard are added to punctuation_run_re (for compatibility, some of them are overlapped with subject_words_re). Since many of them are also registered as punctuations or symbols with C/J/K character set standards. Problems: o sb_dbexpimp.py become incompatible. o Only BMP range is supported. Surrogates are not recognized. o Tested by Japanese messages only, not by other East-Asian messages. o No batch tests. This only aims at Japanese support. Configuration: o To support unicode, .spambayesrc must be set: [Tokenizer] replace_nonascii_chars: False ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-11-26 13:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Added the sb_dbexpimp.py patch (v1.3). Will look at the rest, shortly - thanks for your patience! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hatuka*nezumi (hatukanezumi) Date: 2003-11-12 01:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=529503 o db_expimp.py is imcompatible again. It exports / imports data as UTF-8. o Unicode'ifyed sb_server.py. - HTTP charset is UTF-8. - clues in X-Spambayes-Evidences will be MIME header encoded. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hatuka*nezumi (hatukanezumi) Date: 2003-10-29 23:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=529503 OK. I'll test the code untill addition. minor fix: 'replace_nonascii_chars' option works correctly, etc. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-10-21 16:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Just a wee note to say thanks for this, and that someone will get to looking at adding this in, but everyone's pretty busy with other stuff at the moment! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hatuka*nezumi (hatukanezumi) Date: 2003-10-19 23:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=529503 fix for Korean message. Hangul phrases/words can be of 1 or 2 chars. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hatuka*nezumi (hatukanezumi) Date: 2003-10-17 22:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=529503 minor fix. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hatuka*nezumi (hatukanezumi) Date: 2003-10-17 01:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=529503 > ISO/EIC 2022 encoding scheme, with ASCII and > multibyte character set both designated to GL, Not 'designate'. 'Invoke' is correct. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=824651&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Nov 25 19:15:21 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Nov 25 19:15:34 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-849337 ] classifier.py fails on assertion Message-ID: Bugs item #849337, was opened at 2003-11-25 16:15 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=849337&group_id=61702 Category: hammie Group: Source code 1.0a7 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Sean Ahern (ahern) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: classifier.py fails on assertion Initial Comment: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/sb_filter.py", line 187, in ? main() File "/usr/bin/sb_filter.py", line 183, in main action(msg) File "/usr/bin/sb_filter.py", line 120, in filter return h.filter(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/hammie.py", line 109, in filter prob, clues = self._scoremsg(msg, True) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/hammie.py", line 38, in _scoremsg return self.bayes.spamprob(tokenize(msg), evidence) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 158, in chi2_spamprob clues = self._getclues(wordstream) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 397, in _getclues prob = self.probability(record) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 247, in probability assert spamcount <= nspam AssertionError Looking into this more, spamcount is 1679 and nspam is 1678.0. The .hammiedb has only ever been modified by sb_filter.py and sb_mboxtrain.py. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=849337&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Nov 25 19:17:40 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Nov 25 19:17:45 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-849337 ] classifier.py fails on assertion Message-ID: Bugs item #849337, was opened at 2003-11-25 16:15 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ahern You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=849337&group_id=61702 Category: hammie Group: Source code 1.0a7 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Sean Ahern (ahern) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: classifier.py fails on assertion Initial Comment: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/sb_filter.py", line 187, in ? main() File "/usr/bin/sb_filter.py", line 183, in main action(msg) File "/usr/bin/sb_filter.py", line 120, in filter return h.filter(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/hammie.py", line 109, in filter prob, clues = self._scoremsg(msg, True) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/hammie.py", line 38, in _scoremsg return self.bayes.spamprob(tokenize(msg), evidence) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 158, in chi2_spamprob clues = self._getclues(wordstream) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 397, in _getclues prob = self.probability(record) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 247, in probability assert spamcount <= nspam AssertionError Looking into this more, spamcount is 1679 and nspam is 1678.0. The .hammiedb has only ever been modified by sb_filter.py and sb_mboxtrain.py. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Sean Ahern (ahern) Date: 2003-11-25 16:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=49839 Looking through the existing bugs in more detail, it appears that this may be a duplicate of bug 830369. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=849337&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Nov 25 19:39:36 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Nov 25 19:39:46 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-849337 ] classifier.py fails on assertion Message-ID: Bugs item #849337, was opened at 2003-11-26 13:15 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=849337&group_id=61702 Category: hammie Group: Source code 1.0a7 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: Sean Ahern (ahern) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: classifier.py fails on assertion Initial Comment: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/sb_filter.py", line 187, in ? main() File "/usr/bin/sb_filter.py", line 183, in main action(msg) File "/usr/bin/sb_filter.py", line 120, in filter return h.filter(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/hammie.py", line 109, in filter prob, clues = self._scoremsg(msg, True) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/hammie.py", line 38, in _scoremsg return self.bayes.spamprob(tokenize(msg), evidence) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 158, in chi2_spamprob clues = self._getclues(wordstream) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 397, in _getclues prob = self.probability(record) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 247, in probability assert spamcount <= nspam AssertionError Looking into this more, spamcount is 1679 and nspam is 1678.0. The .hammiedb has only ever been modified by sb_filter.py and sb_mboxtrain.py. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-11-26 13:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Yes it is. Please track there. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Sean Ahern (ahern) Date: 2003-11-26 13:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=49839 Looking through the existing bugs in more detail, it appears that this may be a duplicate of bug 830369. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=849337&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Nov 25 19:43:01 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Nov 25 19:43:09 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-830369 ] classify trouble Message-ID: Bugs item #830369, was opened at 2003-10-26 19:55 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=830369&group_id=61702 Category: imapfilter Group: Source code 1.0a6 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: Bip (bippo312) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: classify trouble Initial Comment: I'm using sb_imapfilter.py from 1.0a6 on winXP with python2.3, It's been working fine for a while, but recently it's been giving an assertion error message when I try to classify my inbox. Training seems to work fine. The only thing I did out of the ordinary (I think!) was to erase all the emails in my spam training folder (roughly 1000 emails). Would this cause the problem? C:\Program Files\Python23\Scripts>sb_imapfilter.py -c -p SpamBayes IMAP Filter Beta1, version 0.1 (September 2003), using SpamBayes IMAP Filter Web Interface Alpha2, version 0.02 and engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003). Password: Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\Program Files\Python23 \Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 824, in ? run() File "C:\Program Files\Python23 \Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 814, in run imap_filter.Filter() File "C:\Program Files\Python23 \Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 675, in Filter self.unsure_folder) File "C:\Program Files\Python23 \Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 594, in Filter evidence=True) File "C:\PROGRA~1\PYTHON23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\classifier.py", line 15 8, in chi2_spamprob clues = self._getclues(wordstream) File "C:\PROGRA~1\PYTHON23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\classifier.py", line 39 5, in _getclues prob = self.probability(record) File "C:\PROGRA~1\PYTHON23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\classifier.py", line 24 5, in probability assert spamcount <= nspam AssertionError I stuck in a quick 'print' statement for spamcount and nspam, nspam was 1293, spamcount was 1296.. nspam is probably right, the imap web interface tells me that trained spam = 1293 and trained ham = 178 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-11-26 13:43 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This error means that your database has become corrupted. You can try to fix it, by using db_expimp to convert to text, fixing the counts, and converting back, but it's easiest to retrain from scratch. The error says that you have a token that has appeared in more mail that you have trained on, which is impossible. We are still trying to establish the cause of the database corruption that occaisionally occurs - this is tracked elsewhere. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=830369&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Nov 25 19:59:18 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Nov 25 19:59:24 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-832070 ] bsddb.error: (22, 'Invalid argument') Message-ID: Bugs item #832070, was opened at 2003-10-29 13:28 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=832070&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code 1.0a6 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Stephen Boulet (spboulet) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: bsddb.error: (22, 'Invalid argument') Initial Comment: I'm not able to start sb_server any more from its directory (though it will start from an empty directory): $ Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/sb_server.py", line 101, in ? import spambayes.message File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/message.py", line 149, in ? msginfoDB = MessageInfoDB(message_info_db_name) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/message.py", line 114, in __init__ self.dbm = dbmstorage.open(self.db_name, self.mode) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/dbmstorage.py", line 53, in open return f(*args) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/dbmstorage.py", line 36, in open_best return f(*args) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/dbmstorage.py", line 18, in open_dbhash return bsddb.hashopen(*args) bsddb.error: (22, 'Invalid argument') ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-11-26 13:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 My wife's system (Win98) gets this now, too. I think it may be related to the change in the storage.open_storage code, although I'm not certain. It does appear to be a bug, though. I'll look into this more as soon as I get a chance. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Stephen Boulet (spboulet) Date: 2003-11-01 08:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=6988 This is a wild guess, but I wonder if my problem could be related to changing my linux headers version to 2.4.21 from 2.4.19, recompiling glibc, but not recompiling python. Stephen ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=832070&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Nov 25 20:15:34 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Nov 25 20:15:38 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-832070 ] bsddb.error: (22, 'Invalid argument') Message-ID: Bugs item #832070, was opened at 2003-10-29 13:28 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=832070&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code 1.0a6 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Stephen Boulet (spboulet) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: bsddb.error: (22, 'Invalid argument') Initial Comment: I'm not able to start sb_server any more from its directory (though it will start from an empty directory): $ Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/sb_server.py", line 101, in ? import spambayes.message File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/message.py", line 149, in ? msginfoDB = MessageInfoDB(message_info_db_name) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/message.py", line 114, in __init__ self.dbm = dbmstorage.open(self.db_name, self.mode) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/dbmstorage.py", line 53, in open return f(*args) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/dbmstorage.py", line 36, in open_best return f(*args) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/dbmstorage.py", line 18, in open_dbhash return bsddb.hashopen(*args) bsddb.error: (22, 'Invalid argument') ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-11-26 14:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I believe I have found the problem here, and checked in a fix (dbmstorage.py 1.10). You should be able to apply that change to your copy of dbmstorage.py, or use Python 2.3, or a pickle, until the next release. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-11-26 13:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 My wife's system (Win98) gets this now, too. I think it may be related to the change in the storage.open_storage code, although I'm not certain. It does appear to be a bug, though. I'll look into this more as soon as I get a chance. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Stephen Boulet (spboulet) Date: 2003-11-01 08:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=6988 This is a wild guess, but I wonder if my problem could be related to changing my linux headers version to 2.4.21 from 2.4.19, recompiling glibc, but not recompiling python. Stephen ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=832070&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Nov 25 20:20:49 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Nov 25 20:20:54 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-842900 ] Training freezes sb_server 1.07a Message-ID: Bugs item #842900, was opened at 2003-11-16 10:55 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=842900&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: Piotr Wajnberg (petevine) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Training freezes sb_server 1.07a Initial Comment: I've just noticed that setting HTTP Authentication to digest causes sb_server to freeze upon training on a message or mbox file. Setting HTTP Authentication to none remedies the problem. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-11-26 14:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Dupe of [ 823929 ] Web-based training hangs on auth-digest timeout ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=842900&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Nov 25 20:21:10 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Nov 25 20:21:14 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-823929 ] Web-based training hangs on auth-digest timeout Message-ID: Bugs item #823929, was opened at 2003-10-15 20:07 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=823929&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code 1.0a6 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 6 Submitted By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Assigned to: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Summary: Web-based training hangs on auth-digest timeout Initial Comment: Using auth-digest, log in, go the Review page, wait for the timeout (20 minutes as of 15/10/2003; used to be 1 minute) then hit Train. The browser hangs. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-11-26 14:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting dupe in [ 842900 ] Training freezes sb_server 1.07a ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=823929&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Nov 25 20:23:48 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Nov 25 20:23:56 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-842681 ] Menu Buttons for "Suspected Spam" are incomplete Message-ID: Bugs item #842681, was opened at 2003-11-16 00:57 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=842681&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Invalid Priority: 5 Submitted By: Raven Mask (ravenmask) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Menu Buttons for "Suspected Spam" are incomplete Initial Comment: For items in the "Suspected Spam" folder one needs buttons both for "Delete As Spam" and "Recover from Spam". In practice I never see both buttons, and it is a bit variable which button actually appears - usually "Delete As Spam", but very occasionally "Recover from Spam". I haven't been able to work out the factor causing the different behaviours. I have renamed my "Suspected Spam" folder to "Spam Suspects" (so that it collates in my folder list next to the Spam folder) - could this be the factor? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-11-26 14:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 (I could have sworn that I've answered this exact problem already). Both buttons are there. If you don't have enough room for the whole toolbar, then Outlook will automatically hide one (we can't control which one) or more in a little drop down menu (down arrow kinda thing) at the end of the toolbar. Either access them from there, or move your toolbar so that there's always enough room. The folder name would have no effect. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=842681&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Nov 25 20:28:23 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Nov 25 20:28:32 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-839971 ] Outlook 2002 add-in not registered under WinXP Message-ID: Bugs item #839971, was opened at 2003-11-12 03:21 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=839971&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Bob Alfson (balfson) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook 2002 add-in not registered under WinXP Initial Comment: Running 8.1 with Outlook 2002 on Win2K-SP3, SpamBayes works fine, even though the "Add-ins available" box is empty. With the same setup on WinXP, there's also nothing in the "Add-ins available" box, but I get the message that SpamBayes is not registered. I have reinstalled several times, including a complete uninstall of SpamBayes. I have tried running "regsvr32.exe spambayes_addin.dll" after a fresh install as well as after having brought up Outlook to find that SB was unregistered. I'm stumped. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-11-26 14:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I don't believe that SpamBayes ever appears in the list of add- ins any more, so that isn't relevant here. What is this message that SpamBayes isn't registered? I can't think of what would put up such a message - SpamBayes can't, because it isn't registered, and Outlook doesn't know that SpamBayes exists, so I can't see how it would. Are you sure it doesn't say SpamBayes needs to be "enabled"? (if so, see the FAQ). Do you have any log files that you could attach here? Or give the exact wording of the error message? (And describe what causes it to appear). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=839971&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Nov 25 20:30:29 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Nov 25 20:31:09 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-839648 ] SpamBayes/Rules conflict Message-ID: Bugs item #839648, was opened at 2003-11-11 13:01 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=839648&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tyson Vanek (tvanek) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: SpamBayes/Rules conflict Initial Comment: This is an interesting problem to which I've found a solution, but I'll explain. I have Outlook 2002 checking 4 email accounts. Inside my "Inbox" folder, I have a folder for each of these email accounts. I then have a rule created for each email account that moves messages from the Inbox to the appropriate folder based on which account received the message, a setup I believe to be fairly common among people using Outlook to check multiple accounts. I installed SpamBayes (the Outlook 0081 plug-in) today and went into configuring it. Because I have many rules that move messages all over the place into different folders, I configured SpamBayes' email filtering to watch the "Inbox" folder and marked the "Include Subfolders" checkbox, assuming this would monitor every single piece of email that Outlook retrieves. Then I bounced a known spam message to one of my email accounts. Even with the delayed filtering in place, the offending spam was not moved to the appropriate spam folder. Checking the "Spam Clues" on the offending message revealed a 100% match for spam. Considering I had SpamBayes configured to move spam 90% or higher to the spam folder, it baffled me that this email hadn't been moved. Then I took a look at the log files and figured out what was taking place. When the email originally landed in the "Inbox", SpamBayes properly identifie it as SPAM and attempted to move it to the spam folder. However, my Outlook rule for moving messages received through that account to the sub-folder inbox was pulling the email OUT of the spam folder and placing it in the designated pseudo-inbox folder. As a result of this action, SpamBayes also thought I was retrieving this email from the spam folder, so it also logged an entry that it learned that this email was NOT SPAM and would fail to score future duplicate emails properly. How did I get around all this? Simple. I went back to the filtering options of the plug-in and unchecked the "Inbox" folder. Instead, I opened it up and checked every single folder that exists inside of the "Inbox", but not the "Inbox" itself - and I also kept the "all sub- folders" option checked. This means SpamBayes now only scans the message when it arrives in one of my folders after Outlook rules process it, and everything is working correctly. I hope this makes sense to the developers. I'm sure this is the same scenario being reported by many of your users that utilize rules for managing multiple email accounts. They simply need to ignore the "Inbox" and filter everything else so that SpamBayes doesn't trap the spam until it lands in the rule-specified folder and Outlook doesn't "steal" it from the spam folder. If you need any clarification on this, please let me know. Other than this minor configuration glitch, I LOVE the plug-in so far! Great work - keep it up! Thanks, Tyson ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-11-26 14:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Outlook doesn't expose the necessary 'hooks' to be able to do that, unfortunately (it would make many things easier). Using the 'background filtering' option should also solve this problem, I think. Leaving open in case Mark wants to read this. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Erik Sargent (esargent) Date: 2003-11-20 22:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=586922 A suggestion on solving the "Rules Wizard" conflict: How about if you turn "filter with SpamBayes" into a Rule which can then be enabled through the Rules Wizard, which would allow people to do either pre- or post- filter rule processing depending on their individual need or preference. Since Outlook processes the rules in a known, configurable order, this should solve the problems reported. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=839648&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Nov 25 20:41:02 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Nov 25 20:41:19 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-838599 ] Training wizard is purely wrong Message-ID: Bugs item #838599, was opened at 2003-11-09 12:05 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=838599&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Invalid Priority: 5 Submitted By: Luci Sandor (lucisandor) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Training wizard is purely wrong Initial Comment: When I installed it, I didn't thought to keep spam (as any normal person would do). So I didn't use the wizard (esp. since it doesn't like "deleted mail" folder where some spam might be kept). After one month of using, I saw that I couldn't train it on good messages, since they were kept as ham, but the score for those words was not added to database (correct if I'm wrong). One day I moved the spam from "Deleted" to another folder and I applied the training wizad. Guess what? It erased all the spam training I've provided in the last month. So don't use Training Wizard to train SpamBayes, because the only thing it does is to delete your database. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-11-26 14:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Your database is only 'deleted' if you check the 'rebuild database from scratch' box in the training section of the manager dialog. Otherwise the training is simply added to it. The Wizard is designed for initial setup, not for ongoing use - so it does start from scratch. You should try using the training methods that are available from the manager dialog - or the incremental training - or using the 'delete as spam' and 'recover from spam' buttons. If you want to train on mail that was correctly classified as ham, then you can either use the manager dialog, or you can delete it as spam, and then recover it. There's an existing feature request for a 'train as ham' or 'keep as good' button, which would make this easier. You probably don't need to train it, though, if it was correctly classified. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=838599&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Nov 25 20:43:34 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Nov 25 20:43:37 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-838427 ] IMAP filter gives traceback on start (1.0a7) Message-ID: Bugs item #838427, was opened at 2003-11-09 03:27 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=838427&group_id=61702 Category: imapfilter Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Ilmar Kruis (seaeagle1) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: IMAP filter gives traceback on start (1.0a7) Initial Comment: When starting the imap filter with an other option than - b it gives a traceback: Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600] (C) Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp. D:\Program Files\Python\Scripts>sb_imapfilter.py -b SpamBayes IMAP Filter Beta1, version 0.1 (September 2003), using SpamBayes IMAP Filter Web Interface Alpha2, version 0.02 and engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003). User interface url is http://localhost:8880/ D:\Program Files\Python\Scripts>sb_imapfilter.py -t SpamBayes IMAP Filter Beta1, version 0.1 (September 2003), using SpamBayes IMAP Filter Web Interface Alpha2, version 0.02 and engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003). Traceback (most recent call last): File "D:\Program Files\Python\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 825, in ? run() File "D:\Program Files\Python\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 811, in run imap_filter.Train() File "D:\Program Files\Python\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 633, in Train num_ham_trained = folder.Train(self.classifier, False) File "D:\Program Files\Python\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 558, in Train for msg in self: File "D:\Program Files\Python\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 485, in __iter__ yield self[key] File "D:\Program Files\Python\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 534, in __getite m__ msg.Save() File "D:\Program Files\Python\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 415, in Save self.as_string()) File "D:\PROGRA~1\PYTHON\lib\imaplib.py", line 313, in append return self._simple_command(name, mailbox, flags, date_time) File "D:\PROGRA~1\PYTHON\lib\imaplib.py", line 1000, in _simple_command return self._command_complete(name, self._command (name, *args)) File "D:\PROGRA~1\PYTHON\lib\imaplib.py", line 832, in _command_complete raise self.abort('command: %s => %s' % (name, val)) imaplib.abort: command: APPEND => unexpected response: '* 101 exists' D:\Program Files\Python\Scripts>sb_imapfilter.py -c -t -l 5 SpamBayes IMAP Filter Beta1, version 0.1 (September 2003), using SpamBayes IMAP Filter Web Interface Alpha2, version 0.02 and engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003). Traceback (most recent call last): File "D:\Program Files\Python\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 825, in ? run() File "D:\Program Files\Python\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 811, in run imap_filter.Train() File "D:\Program Files\Python\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 633, in Train num_ham_trained = folder.Train(self.classifier, False) File "D:\Program Files\Python\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 558, in Train for msg in self: File "D:\Program Files\Python\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 485, in __iter__ yield self[key] File "D:\Program Files\Python\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 534, in __getite m__ msg.Save() File "D:\Program Files\Python\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 415, in Save self.as_string()) File "D:\PROGRA~1\PYTHON\lib\imaplib.py", line 313, in append return self._simple_command(name, mailbox, flags, date_time) File "D:\PROGRA~1\PYTHON\lib\imaplib.py", line 1000, in _simple_command return self._command_complete(name, self._command (name, *args)) File "D:\PROGRA~1\PYTHON\lib\imaplib.py", line 832, in _command_complete raise self.abort('command: %s => %s' % (name, val)) imaplib.abort: command: APPEND => unexpected response: '* 102 exists' D:\Program Files\Python\Scripts> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-11-26 14:43 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Would you be able to run imapfilter with -c or -t and the "-i4" switch and attach the output to this? (blank out any private details like username/password/server name). I haven't seen this error before, and I'm not sure why the server would be saying that the message already exists - the longer log will have more details. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=838427&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Nov 25 20:44:16 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Nov 25 20:44:22 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-836788 ] Recover / Delete buttons only work once Message-ID: Bugs item #836788, was opened at 2003-11-06 10:10 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=836788&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 >Status: Closed Resolution: None Priority: 2 Submitted By: Tim Lockwood (browman) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Recover / Delete buttons only work once Initial Comment: "Recover from spam" & "delete from spam" buttons only work once (tested in Spam(Unsure) folder), then they fail to do anything. Various errors in the log file linked to the buttonclick event, see attached. Platform: WinXPHome, OL2000 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-11-26 14:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Closed, as OP says it's fixed. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Lockwood (browman) Date: 2003-11-06 10:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=902775 Update: Managed to get it to work by deleting the spambayes database and ini files and re-creating from scratch. Seems something got corrupted. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=836788&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Nov 25 20:48:01 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Nov 25 20:48:13 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-834606 ] 550 Server Response Possible? Message-ID: Bugs item #834606, was opened at 2003-11-03 05:02 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=834606&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Rejected Priority: 5 Submitted By: a b (hwatkin) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: 550 Server Response Possible? Initial Comment: Would it be possible to add the ability to reject supposed spam with a 550 error response? I believe that Apple Mail can do this from the client level? I currently use the Outlook XP plugin, so my interest would primarily be for that version, although I am sure the proxy version users would also appreciate this feature. Thanks for a great app!!! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-11-26 14:48 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Your client talks to a POP3/IMAP/Exchange/Hotmail server to get mail, which is already sitting on the server. There's nowhere to reject the message to - you could not download it, but it would still be on the server - you could delete it, but that doesn't reject it. You could use spambayes to write a SMTP server (or something similar) that rejected mail on delivery, but by the time clients get involved, it's usually too late, because the delivery has already taken place. I think someone may have done this, actually - try googling for it, if you're interested (although if you don't run your own SMTP server, it won't be of much use). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=834606&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Nov 25 20:48:47 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Nov 25 20:48:51 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-834159 ] Uncaptured Pythonexception Message-ID: Bugs item #834159, was opened at 2003-11-02 04:48 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=834159&group_id=61702 Category: hammie Group: Source code 1.0a6 >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Carsten Nitschke (carstennitschke) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Uncaptured Pythonexception Initial Comment: Hello, I am using Python 2.3, the Spambayes POP3 Proxy Beta 0.3 on a linux system with a standard SuSE 8.2 professional setup. For the last 2 weeks or so it seems that when I have my spambayes proxy running at one point or another there will appear an uncaptured python exception which not only seems to crash the spambayes proxy but also closes down my DSL connection. Along with the spambayes proxy I had only eDonkey or overnet running as well as an open Opera window for the administration of the spambayes proxy. As attachment I include the screen output. I crossed out the names of the pop3servers that are proxied. The first exception is the one that crashes the spambayes proxy and closes the DSL connection. I am able to hit the save & shutdown option from the opera window, but the proxy is not stopped in the shell. The second error and the traceback appear after hitting two times ctrl-c to shut down the crashed server for a restart. I hope you can help. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-11-26 14:48 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Would you be able to try the latest version (1.0a7) and see if that fixes the problem? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=834159&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Nov 25 20:51:18 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Nov 25 20:51:24 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-833346 ] Error upon exiting Outlook Message-ID: Bugs item #833346, was opened at 2003-10-31 10:22 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=833346&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Scott (secclest) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Error upon exiting Outlook Initial Comment: Every time I exit Outlook I am greeted with ?Microsoft Outlook has encountered a problem and needs to close. We are sorry for the inconvenience.? Error signature: AppName: outlook.exe AppVer: 10.0.4510.0 ModName: dccmsp32.dll ModVer: 10.0.2000.929 Offset: 00005346 I am running Windows XP Pro/Outlook XP both with the latest and greatest patches and updates. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-11-26 14:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Could you attach your spambayes log files? The troubleshooting guide has information about how to do this. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=833346&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Nov 25 20:55:28 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Nov 25 20:55:41 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-827122 ] POP server reset after message review Message-ID: Bugs item #827122, was opened at 2003-10-21 09:37 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=827122&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy >Group: Source code - CVS >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Scott Alexander (salex) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: POP server reset after message review Initial Comment: I am using evolution 1.2.2 (from RedHat 9) as my mailer. I recently started using spambayes. I initially used version 1.0a4. Today I upgraded to the version in CVS (from sourceforge). I use POP to read one of my mail accounts. I keep the "real" copy of the mail at home, but grab a copy with "leave on server" set when using evolution at work so as to be able to answer certain mail in a timely manner. At home everything works as expected. At work, after I start sb_server.py, everything works nicely. However, if I go to localhost:8880 and review my messages to update training, the next time evolution downloads my mail, it will download all messages since sb_server.py was started. Then, I will only see new messages until the next time that I do a review. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-11-26 14:55 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 SpamBayes doesn't do any downloading of messages, or any talking to the server. It only *proxies* commands from the mail client. I'm not saying that this doesn't happen, but I am saying that viewing the review page has no effect (at all) on the messages that are on the server. You don't even need to be online to look at the review page. Try and play around with it more, and see what is actually causing the 'reset'. BTW, since you're using cvs, you might be interested in the new sb_evoscore.py script, which is designed to be used (with sb_xmlrpcserver.py) with evolution. (I'm not sure how Barry plans to do training, though). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Scott Alexander (salex) Date: 2003-10-29 05:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=255951 Let me suggest that we close this bug report, I'll do a bit more investigation to figure out more clearly what is going on and open a new report. Stopping and starting does seem to cause it to go into this mode. It seems like arrival of new mail sometimes causes it to stop. I'll need to take some more time to characterize the problem more closely and even to be sure that it is a spambayes bug. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-10-21 10:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Are you sure that this is related to viewing messages in the review page? Doing anything with the review page doesn't touch the POP server *at all* - it works solely with the cached versions of the messages. I can't see how it could be possible that it could effect the behaviour of the POP server, *or* your mail client (which it doesn't touch either). If you don't use the review page at all, but start and stop sb_server, or check (and receive) mail multiple times between starting and stopping it, does that have the same effect? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=827122&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Nov 25 20:59:04 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Nov 25 20:59:09 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-824626 ] sb_filter eats the last character Message-ID: Bugs item #824626, was opened at 2003-10-16 20:32 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=824626&group_id=61702 Category: hammie Group: Source code 1.0a6 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Invalid Priority: 5 Submitted By: Janne Sinkkonen (janne) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: sb_filter eats the last character Initial Comment: With python 2.2.1 (not that it would probably make a difference here): I have a one-liner mail message which I have recurrently feed to sb_filter. At every round sb_filter eats one character from the end of the message. The message is attached. Contrary to what I first thought, it seems to have the trailing newline. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Janne Sinkkonen (janne) Date: 2003-10-16 22:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=12313 Ok, this bug could also be in my Knode. Delete if no-one else has observed. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=824626&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Nov 25 20:59:15 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Nov 25 20:59:19 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-812903 ] pop3proxy stops presenting messages for review Message-ID: Bugs item #812903, was opened at 2003-09-26 18:01 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=812903&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code 1.0a1-1.0a4 >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Richard Jones (richard) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: pop3proxy stops presenting messages for review Initial Comment: I've found that pop3proxy sometimes stops presenting messages for review. Stopping and starting the proxy will cause it to remember those messages and present them for review. Yes, I'll update to the latest release now, just in case this has been fixed... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-11-26 14:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Has it? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=812903&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Nov 25 21:16:25 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Nov 25 21:16:40 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-812903 ] pop3proxy stops presenting messages for review Message-ID: Bugs item #812903, was opened at 2003-09-26 16:01 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by richard You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=812903&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code 1.0a1-1.0a4 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Richard Jones (richard) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: pop3proxy stops presenting messages for review Initial Comment: I've found that pop3proxy sometimes stops presenting messages for review. Stopping and starting the proxy will cause it to remember those messages and present them for review. Yes, I'll update to the latest release now, just in case this has been fixed... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Richard Jones (richard) Date: 2003-11-26 13:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=6405 I have not experienced the same problem, so let's say it's fixed :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-11-26 12:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Has it? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=812903&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Nov 26 03:31:49 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Nov 26 03:31:58 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-824651 ] Japanese (and/or other CJK languages) message support Message-ID: Patches item #824651, was opened at 2003-10-16 17:23 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by hatukanezumi You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=824651&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Hatuka*nezumi (hatukanezumi) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Japanese (and/or other CJK languages) message support Initial Comment: Maybe this also applicable to other East-Asian languages. o Unicode'ify text: For example by Japanese message, RFC1468 recommends that ISO/EIC 2022 encoding scheme, with ASCII and multibyte character set both designated to GL, should be used. Original tokenizer generates only bogus meaningless text fragments for Japanese messages. o Concatinate C/J lines. In Japanese (and maybe Chinese) messages, line folding often breaks 'words'. o Bigram of C/J characters. In Japanese (and often Chinese) messages, 'words' are not separated by character such as whitespace. Tokenization to grammatical 'words' will require heuristic algorithms using large corpus. Instead of expensive human-language parser, generate bigram from run of kanji (ideograph for C/J/K) or run of hiragana & katakana (syllabic letters for J). N.B.: - I believe number of database items is roughly O(n^2) for bigram, O(n^3) for trigram,... and O(n^i) for i-gram, where n is size of used character set. On katakana & hiragana n is approximately 100. On kanzi it is approx. 5000 (KS X 1001), 7000 (JIS X 0208), or more (Chinese standards). By C/J messages, 3-or-more-gram will generate very sparse and large database. - Words of single kanzi should not be discarded by tokenizer. Since most of basic kanzi words are of 1 or 2 characters. Words of single hiragana/katakana may be discarded. - As far as I know, in Korean message, phrase (not 'word' but similar) is often separated by whitespace. As run of hangul (syllabic character for K) may not splitted to n-gram. o Punctuation --- what is 'punctuation'? A lot of punctuations, spaces, signs and symbols registered with Unicode Standard are added to punctuation_run_re (for compatibility, some of them are overlapped with subject_words_re). Since many of them are also registered as punctuations or symbols with C/J/K character set standards. Problems: o sb_dbexpimp.py become incompatible. o Only BMP range is supported. Surrogates are not recognized. o Tested by Japanese messages only, not by other East-Asian messages. o No batch tests. This only aims at Japanese support. Configuration: o To support unicode, .spambayesrc must be set: [Tokenizer] replace_nonascii_chars: False ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Hatuka*nezumi (hatukanezumi) Date: 2003-11-26 17:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=529503 server patch 1.0a7-0.6 o Dibbler performs HTTP charset conversion (to/from internal UTF-8). o New configuration option: [html_ui] http_charset ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-11-26 09:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Added the sb_dbexpimp.py patch (v1.3). Will look at the rest, shortly - thanks for your patience! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hatuka*nezumi (hatukanezumi) Date: 2003-11-11 21:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=529503 o db_expimp.py is imcompatible again. It exports / imports data as UTF-8. o Unicode'ifyed sb_server.py. - HTTP charset is UTF-8. - clues in X-Spambayes-Evidences will be MIME header encoded. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hatuka*nezumi (hatukanezumi) Date: 2003-10-29 19:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=529503 OK. I'll test the code untill addition. minor fix: 'replace_nonascii_chars' option works correctly, etc. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-10-21 12:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Just a wee note to say thanks for this, and that someone will get to looking at adding this in, but everyone's pretty busy with other stuff at the moment! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hatuka*nezumi (hatukanezumi) Date: 2003-10-19 19:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=529503 fix for Korean message. Hangul phrases/words can be of 1 or 2 chars. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hatuka*nezumi (hatukanezumi) Date: 2003-10-17 18:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=529503 minor fix. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hatuka*nezumi (hatukanezumi) Date: 2003-10-16 21:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=529503 > ISO/EIC 2022 encoding scheme, with ASCII and > multibyte character set both designated to GL, Not 'designate'. 'Invoke' is correct. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=824651&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Nov 26 14:38:50 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Nov 26 14:39:01 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-842182 ] email not deleted from server Message-ID: Bugs item #842182, was opened at 2003-11-14 10:56 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by gi234201 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=842182&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Larry Aaronson (gi234201) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: email not deleted from server Initial Comment: Running 0.81 outlook plugin with OutlookXP. Things worked well for a day. The plugin now downloads and processes mail, but does not remove email from the pop server. I'm running my own mail server on Windows Server 2003. Outlook is on the same machine as the server. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Larry Aaronson (gi234201) Date: 2003-11-26 14:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=909259 Quick follow-up. I'm running the source code version now. The problem of emails not being deleted also exists when I check a remote POP server. The mail stays on the server and is downloaded again and again to Outlook when I do a send/receive. IMAP seems to be okay. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=842182&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Nov 26 15:27:18 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Nov 26 15:27:21 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-849847 ] Outlook Addin Build doen't work Message-ID: Support Requests item #849847, was opened at 2003-11-26 21:27 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=849847&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Petrus Wang (petruswang) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Outlook Addin Build doen't work Initial Comment: Hi, I can't get my own build of SpamBayes Outlook addin to work. When registering the DLL I get: * (trace) RC: -1 from spambayes_addin * DllRegisterServer in spambayes_addin.dll failed. Return code was: 0x80040201 spambayes1.log: ----- Traceback (most recent call last): File "", line 10, in ? File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 277, in importHook File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 362, in doimport File "out1.pyz/addin", line 85, in ? File "out1.pyz/win32com.client.gencache", line 507, in EnsureModule File "out1.pyz/win32com.client.gencache", line 279, in MakeModuleForTypelib File "out1.pyz/win32com.client.makepy", line 273, in GenerateFromTypeLibSpec File "out1.pyz/win32com.client.gencache", line 537, in AddModuleToCache File "out1.pyz/win32com.client.gencache", line 616, in _GetModule File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 299, in importHook ImportError: No module named win32com.gen_py.00062FFF-0000-0000-C000- 000000000046x0x9x1 ----- The binary version works fine. The folder "00062FFF-0000-0000-C000- 000000000046x0x9x1" is created in support\gen_py\. I have also tried to copy the same folder from PythonLib (didn't help) and I have tried to register my own spambayes_addin.dll (built directly from source) in the installation folder of the binary version (after unreg. the original dll). Same error. Any suggestions? My system: * WinXP Pro SP1 * Outlook 2002 SP2 * Python 2.3.2 * SpamBayes Outlook addin binary 0081 * SpamBayes source 1.0a7 * Updated McMillan Installer, 5.0b4+ Regards/Petrus ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=849847&group_id=61702 From rmalayter at bai.org Wed Nov 26 19:53:13 2003 From: rmalayter at bai.org (Ryan Malayter) Date: Wed Nov 26 19:53:18 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] Feature Request Message-ID: <792DE28E91F6EA42B4663AE761C41C2A012C3AB1@cliff.bai.org> Outlook already has this option, so there's not much need to recreate it in SpamBayes. Right-click on your deleted items folder, choose properties, and click on the AutoArchive tab. Have Outlook automatically delete all messages older than 1 day, and set up auto-archiving to run every day in outlook. > -----Original Message----- > From: spambayes-bugs-bounces@python.org > [mailto:spambayes-bugs-bounces@python.org] On Behalf Of > Michael Johanyak > Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 9:03 AM > To: spambayes-bugs@python.org > Subject: [spambayes-bugs] Feature Request > > Greetings. I have a feature request for SpamBayes for Outlook: > > Allow (as an option) that all spam can be placed automatically in the > Deleted Items folder. > > Great program--just what I was looking for. > > Mike > > > _______________________________________________ > Spambayes-bugs mailing list > Spambayes-bugs@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes-bugs > From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Nov 27 07:06:20 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Nov 27 07:06:24 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-850207 ] mailbox train does not put trained flag on Maildir messages Message-ID: Bugs item #850207, was opened at 2003-11-27 12:06 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=850207&group_id=61702 Category: hammie Group: Source code 1.0a7 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: David Woakes (woakesd) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: mailbox train does not put trained flag on Maildir messages Initial Comment: I've noticed that after I run sb_mailboxtrain.py on a Maildir format mailbox no flags are put in the headers to say the message has been trained against. I noticed this header was added to mailboxes in mbox format. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=850207&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Nov 27 07:17:13 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Nov 27 07:17:20 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-842182 ] email not deleted from server Message-ID: Bugs item #842182, was opened at 2003-11-15 02:56 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=842182&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Larry Aaronson (gi234201) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: email not deleted from server Initial Comment: Running 0.81 outlook plugin with OutlookXP. Things worked well for a day. The plugin now downloads and processes mail, but does not remove email from the pop server. I'm running my own mail server on Windows Server 2003. Outlook is on the same machine as the server. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-11-27 23:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Can you please attach a log for a session where this happens. I'm hoping there is something in there related. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Larry Aaronson (gi234201) Date: 2003-11-27 06:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=909259 Quick follow-up. I'm running the source code version now. The problem of emails not being deleted also exists when I check a remote POP server. The mail stays on the server and is downloaded again and again to Outlook when I do a send/receive. IMAP seems to be okay. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=842182&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Nov 27 07:20:25 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Nov 27 07:20:29 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-842800 ] Error message in Log file and filtering stops Message-ID: Bugs item #842800, was opened at 2003-11-16 04:35 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=842800&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Dave Hiatt (davehiatt) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Error message in Log file and filtering stops Initial Comment: The log file has the message, "Skipping deleted folder". Spam is being scored correctly but is not being moved to SPAM folder. Reconfiguring the filters has no effect. The target folders can be reselected and checked for training, but when control is returned to the Spambayes main administration popup, the SPAM and Not Sure folders continue to be identified as . It's as though the filter has lost track of where or how to know the names of the SPAM and Unsure folders. I believe this may have been started when an Outlook folder was inadvertantly deleted. Spambayes had been working flawlessly for a month, then suddenly the SPAM folder disappeared and I have been unable to get the filters to work again. I have removed the add in and uninstalled SPAMbayes, reinstalled, and everything but to no avail. The only thing I haven't done is to tell it to rebuild the database from scratch due to a lack of enough SPAM to train it. for more info or copies of the log files e-mail davehiatt@hotmail.com thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-11-27 23:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 When you say "Reconfiguring the filters has no effect", what exactly do you mean. It *should* work again correctly if you go to the "Filter" tab, and specify the Spam folder again. Version 0.8 has a bug that will make the "Config Wizard" fail in this case, and that has already been fixed in the source code. If the Filter tab doesn't work, please add some more info, and re-open this bug. Thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=842800&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Nov 27 07:21:29 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Nov 27 07:21:32 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-841534 ] Failure: toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' Message-ID: Bugs item #841534, was opened at 2003-11-14 03:26 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=841534&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: Joe Stibrich (stibden) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Failure: toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' Initial Comment: Can not get SpamBayes to work on home PC (WIN XP Home) or work PC (Win 2000). Installation defaults wouldn't work, then tried suggestion of using simpler directory name, and installation worked on both PC's, Wizard started with Outlook, and SpamBayes seemed to be working. On next startup of Outlook, however, SpamBayes stopped working (Toolbar was there, but nothing was filtering). Tried the Comm Add-ins options approach, and Spambayes didn't appear in the list. Tried adding it to the list, but nothing happened. Also tried suggested regserv command, appeared to be successfull, but SpamBayes still not working. Here is latest log file: Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\jstibrich\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\jstibrich\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 0 spam and 1 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.81 (September 9, 2003) starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003)) on Windows 5.0.2195 (Service Pack 4) using Python 2.3+ (#46, Aug 6 2003, 16:39:24) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Junk E-Mail Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox' took 2.17597ms FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (- 2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) Deleted the dead popup control - re-creating ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-11-27 23:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 This is a commonly reported bug. We have recently released Version 008 of the addin, which has a number of changes to the toolbar designed to make it more reliable. Initial indications are that they do work much better, so please try upgrading to the latest version. If you still have problems, please re-open this bug, attaching your log file - see the "troubleshooting guide" - installed with SpamBayes, but also online at http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/spambayes/spambayes/Outlook2000/docs/troubleshooting.html. You can also keep up with the latest version by subscribing to the spambayes-announce list - http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes-announce. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=841534&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Nov 28 15:40:37 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Nov 28 15:40:45 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-850886 ] Palm Pilot Sync kills spambayes Message-ID: Bugs item #850886, was opened at 2003-11-28 12:40 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=850886&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: John Baum (jbaum) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Palm Pilot Sync kills spambayes Initial Comment: I just figured out why my toolbar was disappearing. I have a sprint I500 phone (with a palm PDA). I installed the sync software which includes the chapura conduits. If I attempt to run a sync WITHOUT first starting outlook, the sync hangs or acts funky. I reinstalled spambayes and everything is fine again. Sync's with outlook running also work without trashing spambayes. I checked the COM list in tools->options after the install and noticed no entry there. From your troubleshooting guide, it said there should be an entry. I'm running w2k sp4 with Outlook 2002. (Version 10.0, build 2627) BTW, your program rocks :-) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=850886&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Nov 29 03:17:32 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Nov 29 03:17:39 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-824651 ] Japanese (and/or other CJK languages) message support Message-ID: Patches item #824651, was opened at 2003-10-16 17:23 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by hatukanezumi You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=824651&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Hatuka*nezumi (hatukanezumi) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Japanese (and/or other CJK languages) message support Initial Comment: Maybe this also applicable to other East-Asian languages. o Unicode'ify text: For example by Japanese message, RFC1468 recommends that ISO/EIC 2022 encoding scheme, with ASCII and multibyte character set both designated to GL, should be used. Original tokenizer generates only bogus meaningless text fragments for Japanese messages. o Concatinate C/J lines. In Japanese (and maybe Chinese) messages, line folding often breaks 'words'. o Bigram of C/J characters. In Japanese (and often Chinese) messages, 'words' are not separated by character such as whitespace. Tokenization to grammatical 'words' will require heuristic algorithms using large corpus. Instead of expensive human-language parser, generate bigram from run of kanji (ideograph for C/J/K) or run of hiragana & katakana (syllabic letters for J). N.B.: - I believe number of database items is roughly O(n^2) for bigram, O(n^3) for trigram,... and O(n^i) for i-gram, where n is size of used character set. On katakana & hiragana n is approximately 100. On kanzi it is approx. 5000 (KS X 1001), 7000 (JIS X 0208), or more (Chinese standards). By C/J messages, 3-or-more-gram will generate very sparse and large database. - Words of single kanzi should not be discarded by tokenizer. Since most of basic kanzi words are of 1 or 2 characters. Words of single hiragana/katakana may be discarded. - As far as I know, in Korean message, phrase (not 'word' but similar) is often separated by whitespace. As run of hangul (syllabic character for K) may not splitted to n-gram. o Punctuation --- what is 'punctuation'? A lot of punctuations, spaces, signs and symbols registered with Unicode Standard are added to punctuation_run_re (for compatibility, some of them are overlapped with subject_words_re). Since many of them are also registered as punctuations or symbols with C/J/K character set standards. Problems: o sb_dbexpimp.py become incompatible. o Only BMP range is supported. Surrogates are not recognized. o Tested by Japanese messages only, not by other East-Asian messages. o No batch tests. This only aims at Japanese support. Configuration: o To support unicode, .spambayesrc must be set: [Tokenizer] replace_nonascii_chars: False ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Hatuka*nezumi (hatukanezumi) Date: 2003-11-29 17:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=529503 o hammie.py / sb_filter.py / sb_xmlrpcserver.py: - clues in X-Spambayes-Evidence: header will be MIME header encoded. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hatuka*nezumi (hatukanezumi) Date: 2003-11-26 17:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=529503 server patch 1.0a7-0.6 o Dibbler performs HTTP charset conversion (to/from internal UTF-8). o New configuration option: [html_ui] http_charset ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-11-26 09:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Added the sb_dbexpimp.py patch (v1.3). Will look at the rest, shortly - thanks for your patience! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hatuka*nezumi (hatukanezumi) Date: 2003-11-11 21:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=529503 o db_expimp.py is imcompatible again. It exports / imports data as UTF-8. o Unicode'ifyed sb_server.py. - HTTP charset is UTF-8. - clues in X-Spambayes-Evidences will be MIME header encoded. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hatuka*nezumi (hatukanezumi) Date: 2003-10-29 19:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=529503 OK. I'll test the code untill addition. minor fix: 'replace_nonascii_chars' option works correctly, etc. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-10-21 12:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Just a wee note to say thanks for this, and that someone will get to looking at adding this in, but everyone's pretty busy with other stuff at the moment! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hatuka*nezumi (hatukanezumi) Date: 2003-10-19 19:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=529503 fix for Korean message. Hangul phrases/words can be of 1 or 2 chars. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hatuka*nezumi (hatukanezumi) Date: 2003-10-17 18:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=529503 minor fix. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hatuka*nezumi (hatukanezumi) Date: 2003-10-16 21:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=529503 > ISO/EIC 2022 encoding scheme, with ASCII and > multibyte character set both designated to GL, Not 'designate'. 'Invoke' is correct. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=824651&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Nov 30 18:46:16 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Nov 30 18:46:18 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-851785 ] Pop3proxy stores Ham/Spam/Unsure subject line in message cac Message-ID: Bugs item #851785, was opened at 2003-11-30 23:46 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=851785&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code 1.0a7 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Mark Howells (markhowells) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Pop3proxy stores Ham/Spam/Unsure subject line in message cac Initial Comment: The Ham/Spam/Unsure label added by the classifier to the subject line is stored in the message cache. When these cached messages are used as training data, the token subject:unsure (or spam/ham) becomes very spammy/hammy ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=851785&group_id=61702 From jchaines at qwest.net Sat Nov 1 19:36:41 2003 From: jchaines at qwest.net (jchaines) Date: Fri Dec 19 22:32:57 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] Deleted Spambayes but can not reinstall it. Message-ID: I run Mindows XP Professional and Outlook. I uninstalled SpamBayes after using it for nearly three weeks then tried to reinstall it. The download and install go fine but when I open Outlook, there is no evidence of Spambayes; no icons, no junk or suspected junk mailboxes and no mention of SpamBayes in my COM add-ins window under Outlook. I have uninstalled and reinstalled Spambayes several times but it never seems to actually install. Any ideas? Thanks, Jim -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes-bugs/attachments/20031102/64d15666/attachment.html From jrg at bigpond.net.au Thu Nov 6 20:28:23 2003 From: jrg at bigpond.net.au (JM) Date: Fri Dec 19 22:33:03 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] Sudden non-functioning Spambayes Message-ID: Just this morning my SPAMBAYES system stopped working in Outlook 2000. It was almost as if some "virus" or email had deleted my SPAM folder - could this be possible - I have to say that of all the SPAM systems that I have tried SPSAMBAYES was the onyl one that worked 100%. Now even after I create a SPAM folder - SPAM BAYES refuses to register this SPAM folder in its config screen. Even though I set the folder - when I re-visit the page it si gone again. I have even tried to re-install the latest version of SPAMBAYES - but the config screen will not come up. Any help would be reatly appreciated. John Mamutil From jrg at bigpond.net.au Thu Nov 6 20:37:14 2003 From: jrg at bigpond.net.au (JM) Date: Fri Dec 19 22:33:06 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] Sudden non-functioning Spambayes MEMBER login : javinm Message-ID: MEMBER login : javinm Password: fuji602 I tried posting this bug through the site via a member login but the message does not appear to have appeared. Just this morning my SPAMBAYES system stopped working in Outlook 2000. It was almost as if some "virus" or email had deleted my SPAM folder - could this be possible - I have to say that of all the SPAM systems that I have tried SPAMBAYES was the onyl one that worked 100%. Now even after I create a SPAM folder - SPAM BAYES refuses to register this SPAM folder in its config screen. Even though I set the folder - when I re-visit the page it si gone again. I have even tried to re-install the latest version of SPAMBAYES - but the config screen will not come up. I also did a manual regsistration of spambayes using regsvr32 - which succeeded but still won't let SPAMBAYES work. Any help would be greatly appreciated. John Mamutil From michelle.hoffman at tuckerknapp.com Tue Nov 18 11:21:06 2003 From: michelle.hoffman at tuckerknapp.com (Hoffman, Michelle) Date: Fri Dec 19 22:33:09 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] outlook won't open Message-ID: <6A7CD43B32523241A05DC4AFFD25614D70B6FD@tki.tuckerknapp.com> I installed the addin without errors, configured it manually and trained it. Next day, starting Outlook gives the message OUTLOOK exe has generated errors and will be closed by windows. You will need to restart the program. An error log is being created. above. Outlook is then automatically disabled and i can't use it on my notebook...but i can use it on my pc. Hope you can help. mih michelle i. hoffman information systems administrator tuckerknapp | integrated marketing turning ideas into opportunities 1100 E. woodfield road, suite 520, schaumburg, IL 60173 "keep smiling and everyone will wonder what you're up to." - jerry hoffman -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes-bugs/attachments/20031118/f8fd89e3/attachment-0001.html From bmartin at heiskell.com Wed Nov 26 14:26:56 2003 From: bmartin at heiskell.com (Martin, Bruce) Date: Fri Dec 19 22:33:11 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] Windows High Memory Usage w/ SPAMBAYES 008.1 Message-ID: <16F8D15756891C4EA961565331A3B35001879856@JDHEXC01.heiskell.com> A normal Outlook XP client uses around 20Mb of memory, but when I add Spambayes, it takes approximate 3 times that. My mail users are running 60MB. I use Citrix Terminal Servers, so this becomes an issue ( 25 Users = 1.5GB of RAM) I really like your product, and would like to use it, but the memory is killing me, so I had to remove it. Anyway to tighten the memory consumption? Thanks, Bruce Network Adminstrator -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes-bugs/attachments/20031126/d0713fc0/attachment.html