[spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-961019 ] Outlook2K3 spews warnings as it fails to create spam field

[SourceForge.net]

Bugs item #961019, was opened at 2004-05-27 06:28
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=961019&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: Binary 1.0rc1
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 4
Submitted By: Andy Neil (andyneil)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Outlook2K3 spews warnings as it fails to create spam field

Initial Comment:
New Inbox messages get a spam rating of 100% but are 
not moved to "__Spam" folder as expected

Key symptom from log (attached) seems to be "Eeek - 
only expecting one row from IPC.MS.REN.USERFIELDS"
and then "WARNING: We just created the user field in 
folder Mailbox - Andy Neil/IPM_SUBTREE/Inbox, but it 
appears to not exist.  Something is probably wrong with 
DoesFolderHaveOutlookField()"

Config details:
WinXPSP1, user account has local administrator 
privileges.
Outlook 2003 (11.5608.5703) (with full Office 2003 Pro 
install).
NewsGator 2.0.
All Outlook rules have been turned off.
Outlook "Junk E-mail Filtering" set to "No automatic 
filtering".

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2004-07-27 11:43

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

See also:

[ 956834 ] Outlook crashes when accessing SpamBayes functions
<http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=61702&atid=498103&func=detail&aid=956834>

I suspect that these are duplicates, but although they both
have the "only expecting one row" problem, the other
problems seem qutie different.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2004-07-12 19:41

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Note that Richard has done this: the new tracker is:

[ 988624 ] More of Bug no 961019
<https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=988624&group_id=61702>

If you could take a look at it Mark, that would be great.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Richard Deubert (richarddeubert)
Date: 2004-07-10 00:52

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=1079441

I accept your expert view that they are the same.
I have upped the logging level to 5 as sugggested and will 
submit a new bug report with the new log file attached once I 
have a couple of new "spam" mails

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2004-07-09 21:10

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

It's pretty certain that they are the same problems - the
log files are practically identical (same "expecting one
row" then "spam field missing" entries).  The symptoms are
also identical (scored but not moved).  Why do you think
that it's not the same?

Given the two reports, it's possible that the two problems
are related.  In any case, the higher level report that Mark
requested would probably be the most useful thing to get now
(more than that will have to come from him).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Richard Deubert (richarddeubert)
Date: 2004-07-09 20:05

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=1079441

If this really is linked to my bug report (987243) - which I 
question - then it most certainly does affect normal 
operation. In my case Spambayes is not working at all. It 
simply doesn't move any mails - mails that score 100%. 
Perhaps the priority should be reconsidered?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2004-07-09 15:18

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Noting duplicate in [ 987243 ] Spam won't filter

<https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=987243&group_id=61702>

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Andy Neil (andyneil)
Date: 2004-07-09 06:06

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=1050507

After the program did nothing useful for several weeks, I 
uninstalled.  Won't have time to follow up per your 
suggestions.  I understand how all-volunteer projects work in 
terms of prioritization/response time, sorry I won't be able to 
help out.  Good luck.  AN

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2004-06-29 13:30

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

That error is is very interesting, but I don't believe it is
related to spam not being moved.  That error relates to our
attempt at determining if the 'Spam' field exists in the
folder, but should not affect the normal filtering.  You
will see this message once each time SpamBayes starts, and
each time the config dialog is closed.

Your log indicates everything is going normally.  Can you
please go to the SB manager, Advanced->Diagnostics, and set
the log level to "2".  Then restart spambayes, and wait for
the next spam correctly classified, but not moved.  Could
you then please create a *new* bug for that specific issue,
and attach the log.  I want to take over this bug for that
error message you see - but as I mentioned, I'm not
convinced they are related.  I'm lowering the priority on
this, as I also don't believe it will affect normal operation.

Thanks!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=961019&group_id=61702