From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun May 2 22:00:21 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun May 2 22:00:28 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-945227 ] Training error: _handle_text Message-ID: Bugs item #945227, was opened at 2004-04-30 23:25 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=945227&group_id=61702 >Category: None Group: Source code 1.0a9 (0.9) >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jinn Koriech (djinnii) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Training error: _handle_text Initial Comment: I'm using 1.0a9 compiled on Gentoo. I've traced a training problem down to a particular email. Relevant output of (sb_imapfilter.py -t -v -i6) is as follows. I'll keep the message for a while, so if you need more info I can get it for you. 15:42.87 untagged_responses[FETCH] => [('1 (UID 597 RFC822 {2876}', 'Return-Path: \r\nReceived: from nova ([unix socket])\r\n\tby nova (Cyrus v2.1.15) with LMTP; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 21:27:04 +0100\r\nX-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.2\r\nReceived: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r\n\tby nova.hidden-from.you (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51EC3BB442\r\n\tfor ; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 21:27:04 +0100 (BST)\r\nReceived: from localhost\r\n\tby localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-6.2.3)\r\n\tfor user@localhost (single-drop); Sun, 25 Apr 2004 21:27:04 +0100 (BST)\r\nReceived: from MG216122098.user.veloxzone.com.br (MG216122098.user.veloxzone.com.br [200.216.122.98] (may be forged))\r\n\tby hidden-from.you (8.11.7/8.11.7) with SMTP id i3PKNFU01417\r\n\tfor ; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 21:23:20 +0100\r\nDelivered-To: \r\nReceived: from 173.116.16.112 by web517.mail.yahoo.com; Mon, 26 Apr 2004 00:19:10 -0200\r\nMessage-ID: \r\nFrom: "Kurtis Wynn" \r\nTo: user@hidden-from.you\r\nSubject: Complete the online form\r\nDate: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 05:13:10 +0300\r\nMIME-Version: 1.0\r\nContent-Type: text/html;\r\n\tboundary="--36286347126953001862"\r\nX-CS-IP: 106.14.250.116\r\n\r\n----36286347126953001862\r\nContent-Type: text/html;\r\nContent-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit\r\n\r\n\r\n
\r\nMo.rtgage R.ates are at Historic Lows!\r\n

\r\nEven if you\'ve recently closed on a property, now is the time\r\nto check your numbers.\r\n

\r\n*Lowest I.nterest R.ates in Years
\r\n*S.AVE $200-$500 per month
\r\n*Bad C.redit is NOT a problem
\r\n*No Out of Pocket Expense
\r\n

\r\nApply Now\r\n

caldwell preemptor deaconess befuddle slain quick bloodshot gnomonic correlate timon atomic editorial future dieldrin dragonfly wednesday piecemeal cereus hansel sanitary bass manchester shipwreck earthquake pile cockle establish exchequer aberrant documentation betroth whipple austria blake elongate sainthood marinate dogging doghouse glacis asocial coset andy sniffly exterminate crystallographer hayden bide cloven osha humanitarian attribute bracken conduct anorthite carlson parlay emasculate upraise kleenex rout ate tout doric crupper hateful concede decorum deputy footwear vengeful elegy armata upstater attorney hayden prudential gerundive hate aggression cemetery amplify decompression tombstone taint blaze zippy mcgowan abrogate pitt pretend scuba fisherman password tum duff apse bleeker sacrilege pornographer sudan bolshevism midwife kettering affiliate diagrammatic soignee plaintive earn chairperson bill congressman discriminant sunlit baptism kleenex scottish juliet math ailanthus charlottesville \r\n
\r\nre.move
\r\n\r\n\r\n----36286347126953001862--\r\n\r\n'), ')'] 15:42.88 > EDGI121 UID FETCH 597 (FLAGS INTERNALDATE) 15:42.89 < * 1 FETCH (FLAGS (\Seen) UID 597 INTERNALDATE "25-Apr-2004 21:27:04 +0100") 15:42.89 matched r'\* (?P\d+) (?P[A-Z-]+)( (?P.*))?' => ('1', 'FETCH', ' (FLAGS (\Seen) UID 597 INTERNALDATE "25-Apr-2004 21:27:04 +0100")', '(FLAGS (\Seen) UID 597 INTERNALDATE "25-Apr-2004 21:27:04 +0100")') 15:42.89 untagged_responses[FETCH] 0 += ["1 (FLAGS (\Seen) UID 597 INTERNALDATE "25-Apr-2004 21:27:04 +0100")"] 15:42.89 < EDGI121 OK Completed 15:42.89 matched r'(?PEDGI\d+) (?P[A-Z]+) (?P.*)' => ('EDGI121', 'OK', 'Completed') 15:42.89 untagged_responses[FETCH] => ['1 (FLAGS (\Seen) UID 597 INTERNALDATE "25-Apr-2004 21:27:04 +0100")'] *Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 857, in ? run() File "/usr/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 843, in run imap_filter.Train() File "/usr/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 690, in Train num_spam_trained = folder.Train(self.classifier, True) File "/usr/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 601, in Train for msg in self: File "/usr/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 528, in __iter__ yield self[key] File "/usr/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 577, in __getitem__ msg.Save() File "/usr/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 443, in Save self.as_string()) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/message.py", line 277, in as_string return self._force_CRLF(email.Message.Message.as_string(self)) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/email/Message.py", line 130, in as_string g.flatten(self, unixfrom=unixfrom) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/email/Generator.py", line 102, in flatten self._write(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/email/Generator.py", line 130, in _write self._dispatch(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/email/Generator.py", line 156, in _dispatch meth(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/email/Generator.py", line 199, in _handle_text raise TypeError, 'string payload expected: %s' % type(payload) TypeError: string payload expected: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-03 14:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This is a bug with the parsing of the email and has been reported a few times recently. We're working on a fix for this and will hopefully check one in soon. For the moment, I've updated imapfilter to handle this more gracefully, as it should. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=945227&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun May 2 22:04:51 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun May 2 22:05:00 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-941634 ] Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories Message-ID: Bugs item #941634, was opened at 2004-04-25 17:17 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=941634&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0b1 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 9 Submitted By: mrpowell (mrpowell) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories Initial Comment: I uninstalled the Spambayes-outlook-0081 because I could never get it to register as an addin. (consistent error) and tried the latest release 1.0b1 and it failed also. I ran regsvr32.exe outlook_addin.dll as described in the trouble shooting guide and the windows error was that it could not locate a file to execute. This is the same error I get every time I try to activate the .dll. I purged all references to spambayes from the registry before trying the latest fresh install. This is the log from the latest two failed attempts with 1.0.b1: Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.py", line 33, in ? File "win32com\__init__.pyc", line 6, in ? File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pythoncom.pyc", line 2, in ? #@c File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pywintypes.pyc", line 69, in ? File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pywintypes.pyc", line 45, in __import_pywin32_system_module__ ImportError: Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.py", line 33, in ? File "win32com\__init__.pyc", line 6, in ? File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pythoncom.pyc", line 2, in ? #@c File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pywintypes.pyc", line 69, in ? File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pywintypes.pyc", line 45, in __import_pywin32_system_module__ ImportError: Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories What is a 'pywintypes' module and where is it located? Which of my sys.path directories do I have to stick in the freezer before I can copy the 'pywintypes' module into it? Any help will be greatly appreciated as this has become a personal challenge. Marc Powell ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-03 14:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Dupe of [ 941639 ] Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=941634&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun May 2 22:12:08 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun May 2 22:12:18 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-941596 ] sb_imapfilter.py not adding headers / moving messages Message-ID: Bugs item #941596, was opened at 2004-04-25 13:55 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=941596&group_id=61702 >Category: imapfilter >Group: Source code - CVS Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Joe (warehauz) >Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: sb_imapfilter.py not adding headers / moving messages Initial Comment: I've got 1.0b1 installed on a Linux server and got everything configured for IMAP usage, and have trained a few dozen spams & hams. Everything appears to be going well, and when I run "sb_imapfilter.py -t -c" the output looks fine, but the classification isn't fully working - messages aren't moved, and they don't get all the headers added they're supposed to have. Basically, when training (i.e. I manually put a message in the spam_train_folders), it will correctly process the message, and move it to the move_trained_spam_to_folder folder. After manually training I looked up a few words in the database via the web interface to make sure everything is working properly, and it does indeed appear to be. But, when classifying, the output will say for example: Classified 0 ham, 1 spam, and 0 unsure. The message was actually spam, so that's fine - but it left it in the inbox, and didn't add a classification or score header (I've turned those options on). So while the classification is picking the right option, it's not doing anything with the messages. The message remains in the original folder, regardless of it's classification, and only gets the X-Spambayes-Mailid header. I also noticed a minor problem with the training as well, but since the messages are being moved to the proper folder, and the tokens are being added to the training database properly, I'm not concerned about it. I've set include_trained to True, so it should be adding a header to indicate it's trained on that message - but it doesn't. In fact, when it moves the message to the move_trained_*_to_folder folder, even the X-Spambayes-Mailid is gone. Since it's doing the training fine though, I'm not worried - I just suspect it's related to my bigger classification problems. Is this a known problem? Anything I can do to fix/workaround this? It almost seems to me like it's deleting the wrong message (as I understand it, it's supposed to create a second copy of the message with the new headers, and delete the original). FYI, the IMAP server appears to be Courier-IMAP. Here's some lengthy output from a "sb_imapfilter.py -t -c -v -i4" that found & supposedly classified a spam message, but ended up leaving it in the inbox without the classification headers etc: ====== SpamBayes IMAP Filter Version 0.3 (April 2004) and engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004). Loading database /usr/local/spambayes/hammie.db... Done. Training Training ham folder INBOX.HAM 0 trained. Training spam folder INBOX.SPAM 0 trained. Training took 0.0049 seconds, 0 messages were trained Classifying .*. Classified 0 ham, 1 spam, and 0 unsure. Classifying took 0.0689 seconds. Loading state from /usr/local/spambayes/hammie.db database /usr/local/spambayes/hammie.db is an existing database, with 29 spam and 21 ham 09:01.22 > DMNB1 LOGIN "USERNAME" "***PASSWORD***" 09:01.22 < DMNB1 OK LOGIN Ok. 09:01.23 > DMNB2 SELECT INBOX.HAM 09:01.23 < * FLAGS (\Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Recent) 09:01.23 < * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\* \Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen)] Limited 09:01.23 < * 0 EXISTS 09:01.23 < * 0 RECENT 09:01.23 < * OK [UIDVALIDITY 1082777941] Ok 09:01.23 < * OK [MYRIGHTS "acdilrsw"] ACL 09:01.23 < DMNB2 OK [READ-WRITE] Ok 09:01.23 > DMNB3 UID SEARCH UNDELETED 09:01.23 < * SEARCH 09:01.23 < DMNB3 OK SEARCH done. 09:01.23 > DMNB4 CLOSE 09:01.23 < DMNB4 OK mailbox closed. 09:01.23 > DMNB5 SELECT INBOX.SPAM 09:01.23 < * FLAGS (\Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Recent) 09:01.23 < * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\* \Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen)] Limited 09:01.23 < * 0 EXISTS 09:01.23 < * 0 RECENT 09:01.23 < * OK [UIDVALIDITY 1082777941] Ok 09:01.23 < * OK [MYRIGHTS "acdilrsw"] ACL 09:01.23 < DMNB5 OK [READ-WRITE] Ok 09:01.23 > DMNB6 UID SEARCH UNDELETED 09:01.23 < * SEARCH 09:01.23 < DMNB6 OK SEARCH done. 09:01.23 > DMNB7 CLOSE 09:01.23 < DMNB7 OK mailbox closed. 09:01.23 > DMNB8 SELECT INBOX.UNSURE 09:01.23 < * FLAGS (\Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Recent) 09:01.23 < * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\* \Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen)] Limited 09:01.23 < * 0 EXISTS 09:01.23 < * 0 RECENT 09:01.23 < * OK [UIDVALIDITY 1082778026] Ok 09:01.23 < * OK [MYRIGHTS "acdilrsw"] ACL 09:01.23 < DMNB8 OK [READ-WRITE] Ok 09:01.23 > DMNB9 CLOSE 09:01.23 < DMNB9 OK mailbox closed. 09:01.23 > DMNB10 SELECT INBOX 09:01.23 < * FLAGS (\Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Recent) 09:01.23 < * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\* \Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen)] Limited 09:01.23 < * 2 EXISTS 09:01.23 < * 1 RECENT 09:01.23 < * OK [UIDVALIDITY 1082778026] Ok 09:01.23 < * OK [MYRIGHTS "acdilrsw"] ACL 09:01.23 < DMNB10 OK [READ-WRITE] Ok 09:01.23 > DMNB11 UID SEARCH UNDELETED 09:01.23 < * SEARCH 71 72 09:01.23 < DMNB11 OK SEARCH done. 09:01.23 > DMNB12 UID FETCH 71 RFC822.HEADER 09:01.24 < * 1 FETCH (UID 71 RFC822.HEADER {2564} 09:01.24 read literal size 2564 09:01.24 < ) 09:01.24 < DMNB12 OK FETCH completed. 09:01.24 > DMNB13 UID FETCH 72 RFC822.HEADER 09:01.24 < * 2 FETCH (UID 72 RFC822.HEADER {1968} 09:01.24 read literal size 1968 09:01.24 < ) 09:01.24 < DMNB13 OK FETCH completed. 09:01.24 > DMNB14 UID FETCH 72 (BODY.PEEK[]) 09:01.24 < * 2 FETCH (UID 72 BODY[] {3908} 09:01.24 read literal size 3908 09:01.24 < ) 09:01.24 < DMNB14 OK FETCH completed. 09:01.24 > DMNB15 UID FETCH 72 (FLAGS INTERNALDATE) 09:01.25 < * 2 FETCH (UID 72 FLAGS (\Recent) INTERNALDATE "24-Apr-2004 21:07:27 -0400") 09:01.25 < DMNB15 OK FETCH completed. 09:01.25 > DMNB16 APPEND INBOX () "24-Apr-2004 21:07:27 -0400" {3945} 09:01.25 < + OK 09:01.25 write literal size 3945 09:01.26 < DMNB16 OK [APPENDUID 1082778026 73] APPEND Ok. 09:01.26 > DMNB17 UID STORE 72 +FLAGS.SILENT (\Deleted \Seen) 09:01.26 < DMNB17 OK STORE completed. 09:01.26 > DMNB18 UID SEARCH (UNDELETED HEADER X-Spambayes-MailId 1082855341) 09:01.26 < * SEARCH 09:01.26 < * 2 FETCH (FLAGS (\Seen \Deleted \Recent)) 09:01.26 < DMNB18 OK SEARCH done. 09:01.26 > DMNB19 UID SEARCH RECENT 09:01.26 < * SEARCH 72 09:01.26 < DMNB19 OK SEARCH done. 09:01.28 > DMNB20 UID FETCH 72 (FLAGS INTERNALDATE) 09:01.28 < * 2 FETCH (UID 72 FLAGS (\Seen \Deleted \Recent) INTERNALDATE "24-Apr-2004 21:07:27 -0400") 09:01.28 < DMNB20 OK FETCH completed. 09:01.29 > DMNB21 APPEND INBOX.SPAM (\Seen \Deleted) "24-Apr-2004 22:07:20 -0400" {5014} 09:01.29 < + OK 09:01.29 write literal size 5014 09:01.29 < DMNB21 OK [APPENDUID 1082777941 52] APPEND Ok. 09:01.29 > DMNB22 UID STORE 72 +FLAGS.SILENT (\Deleted \Seen) 09:01.30 < DMNB22 OK STORE completed. 09:01.30 > DMNB23 CLOSE 09:01.30 < DMNB23 OK mailbox closed. 09:01.30 > DMNB24 SELECT INBOX.SPAM 09:01.30 < * FLAGS (\Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Recent) 09:01.30 < * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\* \Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen)] Limited 09:01.30 < * 1 EXISTS 09:01.30 < * 0 RECENT 09:01.30 < * OK [UIDVALIDITY 1082777941] Ok 09:01.30 < * OK [MYRIGHTS "acdilrsw"] ACL 09:01.30 < DMNB24 OK [READ-WRITE] Ok 09:01.30 > DMNB25 UID SEARCH (UNDELETED HEADER X-Spambayes-MailId 1082855341) 09:01.30 < * SEARCH 09:01.30 < DMNB25 OK SEARCH done. 09:01.30 > DMNB26 UID SEARCH RECENT 09:01.30 < * SEARCH 09:01.30 < DMNB26 OK SEARCH done. 09:01.30 > DMNB27 UID SEARCH ALL 09:01.30 < * SEARCH 52 09:01.30 < DMNB27 OK SEARCH done. 09:01.30 > DMNB28 SELECT INBOX.SPAM 09:01.30 < * FLAGS (\Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Recent) 09:01.30 < * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\* \Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen)] Limited 09:01.30 < * 1 EXISTS 09:01.30 < * 0 RECENT 09:01.30 < * OK [UIDVALIDITY 1082777941] Ok 09:01.30 < * OK [MYRIGHTS "acdilrsw"] ACL 09:01.30 < DMNB28 OK [READ-WRITE] Ok 09:01.30 > DMNB29 EXPUNGE 09:01.30 < * 1 EXPUNGE 09:01.30 < * 0 EXISTS 09:01.30 < * 0 RECENT 09:01.30 < DMNB29 OK EXPUNGE completed 09:01.30 > DMNB30 SELECT INBOX.UNSURE 09:01.30 < * FLAGS (\Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Recent) 09:01.30 < * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\* \Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen)] Limited 09:01.30 < * 0 EXISTS 09:01.30 < * 0 RECENT 09:01.30 < * OK [UIDVALIDITY 1082778026] Ok 09:01.30 < * OK [MYRIGHTS "acdilrsw"] ACL 09:01.30 < DMNB30 OK [READ-WRITE] Ok 09:01.30 > DMNB31 EXPUNGE 09:01.30 < DMNB31 OK EXPUNGE completed 09:01.30 > DMNB32 SELECT INBOX.HAM 09:01.30 < * FLAGS (\Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Recent) 09:01.30 < * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\* \Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen)] Limited 09:01.30 < * 0 EXISTS 09:01.30 < * 0 RECENT 09:01.30 < * OK [UIDVALIDITY 1082777941] Ok 09:01.30 < * OK [MYRIGHTS "acdilrsw"] ACL 09:01.30 < DMNB32 OK [READ-WRITE] Ok 09:01.30 > DMNB33 EXPUNGE 09:01.31 < DMNB33 OK EXPUNGE completed 09:01.31 > DMNB34 SELECT INBOX.SPAM 09:01.31 < * FLAGS (\Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Recent) 09:01.31 < * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\* \Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen)] Limited 09:01.31 < * 0 EXISTS 09:01.31 < * 0 RECENT 09:01.31 < * OK [UIDVALIDITY 1082777941] Ok 09:01.31 < * OK [MYRIGHTS "acdilrsw"] ACL 09:01.31 < DMNB34 OK [READ-WRITE] Ok 09:01.31 > DMNB35 EXPUNGE 09:01.31 < DMNB35 OK EXPUNGE completed 09:01.31 > DMNB36 LOGOUT 09:01.31 < * BYE Courier-IMAP server shutting down 09:01.31 BYE response: Courier-IMAP server shutting down 09:01.31 < DMNB36 OK LOGOUT completed ====== ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-03 14:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I've checked in the noop() fix. Ideally, the code should enter a loop waiting for the server to hand out the new "EXISTS" response (since one no-op might not be enough). I'll work this up after 1.0 is released - for the moment this should be a reasonable stopgap. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Joe (warehauz) Date: 2004-04-27 14:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=914399 Ok, after posing to the mailing list & working with Tony, this one is resolved ... this IMAP server was not properly returning the new messages in the SEARCH command after the APPEND. The workaround is to issue a NOOP before the subsequent SEARCH. Around line 510 of sb_imapfilter.py, after the self._check(response, 'store') line, add: imap.noop() This issue appears to only affect certain IMAP servers. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=941596&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun May 2 22:42:10 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun May 2 22:42:20 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-941634 ] Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories Message-ID: Bugs item #941634, was opened at 2004-04-25 01:17 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mrpowell You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=941634&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0b1 >Status: Open Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 9 Submitted By: mrpowell (mrpowell) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories Initial Comment: I uninstalled the Spambayes-outlook-0081 because I could never get it to register as an addin. (consistent error) and tried the latest release 1.0b1 and it failed also. I ran regsvr32.exe outlook_addin.dll as described in the trouble shooting guide and the windows error was that it could not locate a file to execute. This is the same error I get every time I try to activate the .dll. I purged all references to spambayes from the registry before trying the latest fresh install. This is the log from the latest two failed attempts with 1.0.b1: Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.py", line 33, in ? File "win32com\__init__.pyc", line 6, in ? File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pythoncom.pyc", line 2, in ? #@c File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pywintypes.pyc", line 69, in ? File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pywintypes.pyc", line 45, in __import_pywin32_system_module__ ImportError: Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.py", line 33, in ? File "win32com\__init__.pyc", line 6, in ? File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pythoncom.pyc", line 2, in ? #@c File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pywintypes.pyc", line 69, in ? File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pywintypes.pyc", line 45, in __import_pywin32_system_module__ ImportError: Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories What is a 'pywintypes' module and where is it located? Which of my sys.path directories do I have to stick in the freezer before I can copy the 'pywintypes' module into it? Any help will be greatly appreciated as this has become a personal challenge. Marc Powell ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: mrpowell (mrpowell) Date: 2004-05-02 22:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1028635 Why was this closed? How does one get some support? Do I have to forget about using this program? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-02 22:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Dupe of [ 941639 ] Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=941634&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun May 2 22:42:58 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun May 2 22:43:05 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-940630 ] SMTP proxy doesnt work Message-ID: Bugs item #940630, was opened at 2004-04-23 22:53 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=940630&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: Binary 1.0b1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: BlackCat (cmelv) >Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: SMTP proxy doesnt work Initial Comment: I just changed my local server to send through SpamBayes' SMTP proxy rather than directly to my ISP (extmail.bigpond.com), so that SpamBayes can be sent learning messages. However my ISP wont accept mail from SpamBytes - every attempt fails with the SMTP error: "501 space seperator provided without argument" It doesnt matter what the message is, or what client originally sent it (whether Outlook 2003 or a simple command line SMTP mailer). If SpamBayes is removed from the loop again, it does back to working perfectly. I have a feeling that someone will tell me that the ISP is not implementing some RFC or other correctly, but that won't help - it's Telstra (Australia's main Telco), who are absolutely NOT going to change anything so that it's users can use SpamBayes!! :-( Is there any chance of a workaround - I don't know SMTP/RFCs or Python well enough to have a go at it myself :-( ? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-03 14:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 You mention trying a command-line mailer - what SMTP command is it failing on? We only change two (RCPT TO and DATA) and just pass the rest on unchanged, and I'm not sure I see how either could be causing this 501. The other possibility is that it's some non-standard command which is getting changed by the proxying - it would be easy enough to put in a workaround for this, but I'd need to know exactly what command it was (including whatever arguments get passed). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=940630&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun May 2 22:49:25 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun May 2 22:49:31 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-939153 ] HTML problem on Relnotes page Message-ID: Bugs item #939153, was opened at 2004-04-21 20:59 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=939153&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: Ken Robertson (kenrob) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: HTML problem on Relnotes page Initial Comment: A very minor matter, but the release notes on the page: http://sourceforge.net/project/shownotes.php? release_id=230697 have bad markup somewhere corrupting the display. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-03 14:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Dupe of [ 939130 ] HTML problem on Relnotes page ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=939153&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun May 2 22:50:10 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun May 2 22:50:17 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-942069 ] 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories Message-ID: Support Requests item #942069, was opened at 2004-04-25 22:48 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mrpowell You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=942069&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: mrpowell (mrpowell) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories Initial Comment: Unable to register addin in Outlook 2000 SR1 9.0.0.5414 / Microsoft Windows 98 4.10.2222 A. I uninstalled the Spambayes-outlook-0081 because I could never get it to register as an addin. (consistent error) and tried the latest release 1.0b1 and it failed also. I ran regsvr32.exe outlook_addin.dll as described in the trouble shooting guide and the windows .dll error was that it could not locate a file to execute. This is the same error I get every time I try to register. I purged all references to spambayes from the registry before trying the latest fresh install. ------------------------------------------------------- This is the log from the latest two failed attempts with 1.0.b1: Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.py", line 33, in ? File "win32com\__init__.pyc", line 6, in ? File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pythoncom.pyc", line 2, in ? #@c File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pywintypes.pyc", line 69, in ? File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pywintypes.pyc", line 45, in __import_pywin32_system_module__ ImportError: Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.py", line 33, in ? File "win32com\__init__.pyc", line 6, in ? File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pythoncom.pyc", line 2, in ? #@c File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pywintypes.pyc", line 69, in ? File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pywintypes.pyc", line 45, in __import_pywin32_system_module__ ImportError: Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories ------------------------------------------------------- Paths: C:\Program Files\SpamBayes\bin D:\Program Files\Microsoft Office\Office C:\WINDOWS\Profiles\Marc Powell\Application Data\Microsoft\Outlook C:\WINDOWS\Application Data\Microsoft\Outlook ------------------------------------------------------- What is a 'pywintypes' module and where is it located? Which of my sys.path directories do I have to stick in the freezer before I can copy the 'pywintypes' module into it? Any help will be greatly appreciated as this has become a personal challenge. Marc Powell A+, Net+. MCP. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: mrpowell (mrpowell) Date: 2004-05-02 22:50 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1028635 Will I get support for this or should I forget about using this program? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=942069&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun May 2 22:50:49 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun May 2 22:50:56 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-935183 ] crash on run Message-ID: Bugs item #935183, was opened at 2004-04-15 08:23 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=935183&group_id=61702 Category: imapfilter Group: Source code 1.0a9 (0.9) >Status: Closed >Resolution: Invalid Priority: 5 Submitted By: Denny Figuerres (figuerres) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: crash on run Initial Comment: inital steps went fine.... I am ready to run "sb_imapfilter.py -c -t -l 5" and it dumps a stack trace... SpamBayes IMAP Filter Version 0.3 (April 2004) and engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004). Traceback (most recent call last): File "E:\Python23\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 913, in ? run() File "E:\Python23\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 903, in run imap_filter.Filter() File "E:\Python23\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 774, in Filter self.unsure_folder) File "E:\Python23\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 688, in Filter for msg in self: File "E:\Python23\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 581, in __iter__ for key in self.keys(): File "E:\Python23\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 599, in keys response = imap.uid("SEARCH", "UNDELETED") File "E:\Python23\lib\imaplib.py", line 697, in uid typ, dat = self._simple_command(name, command, *args) File "E:\Python23\lib\imaplib.py", line 1000, in _simple_command return self._command_complete(name, self._command(name, *args)) File "E:\Python23\lib\imaplib.py", line 837, in _command_complete raise self.error('%s command error: %s %s' % (name, typ, data)) imaplib.error: UID command error: BAD ['command not implemented'] I'm not a Python coder so I'm just gonna guess that response = imap.uid("SEARCH", "UNDELETED") is what it's puking on?? system info: Server is win 2003, current patches etc... imap and mail server is from here: http://www.lumisoft.ee/lsWWW/ENG/Products/WEB_Mai l/webmail_index_eng.aspx?type=info imap server works with Outlook 2003 not yet tested with other clients. Help? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Denny Figuerres (figuerres) Date: 2004-04-21 23:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=175892 false alarm..... the imap server I was trying does not have the command. so it's *NOT* a problem with spambayes. case closed. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Denny Figuerres (figuerres) Date: 2004-04-21 23:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=175892 false alarm..... the imap server I was trying does not have the command. so it's *NOT* a problem with spambayes. case closed. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Denny Figuerres (figuerres) Date: 2004-04-15 10:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=175892 I am trying to determine if this is an imap server bug or a spambayes bug... can anyone help? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=935183&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun May 2 22:53:08 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun May 2 22:53:20 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-898934 ] Bug 807618 still happens in 1.0a9 Message-ID: Bugs item #898934, was opened at 2004-02-18 07:03 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=898934&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Out of Date Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nate S. (nschindler) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Bug 807618 still happens in 1.0a9 Initial Comment: Still having the same issue with dll registration in 1.0a9. The installer doesn't complain, but the COM Add-In fails to load. If "regsvr32 outlook_addin.dll" is run from the SpamBayes directory, it reports failure. This bug seems specific to NT4. I've never had a problem with Win2k. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-03 14:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 No response, so closing. Please reopen (with the requested information) if this still occurs. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-03-16 12:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 What's the exact failure message that you get with regsvr32? In 1.0a9's bin directory (in the directory you installed into) there is a file called "outlook_addin_register.exe". What happens if you run that? Do you get any log files created? If so, attaching them here would help, even if they look innocent (that tells us that certain things *haven't* gone wrong). Is the addin listed in Outlook's list of COM plug-ins? Is it listed in the Help->About Microsoft Outlook->Disabled Items? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=898934&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun May 2 22:55:09 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun May 2 22:55:16 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-887453 ] Crash when training on messages Message-ID: Bugs item #887453, was opened at 2004-01-30 17:53 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=887453&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: Source code 1.0a7 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Out of Date Priority: 5 Submitted By: Frank Solensky (fsolensky) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Crash when training on messages Initial Comment: I've been running into the following error for a day or two now on different messages. While I haven't narrowed it down to a particular message yet, the modules and line numbers appear to be the same each time. Stopping and restarting spambayes several times seems to get the offending message to get out of the way somehow.. Will try to narrow it down a bit more over the weekend if it doesn't ring a familiar bell by then.. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-03 14:55 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 No response, so closing. Please reopen (with the requested information) if this still occurs. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-17 15:57 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Weird. You can use db_dbexpimp.py to convert the db to text, but I doubt that will turn up anything of use (unless it fails, in which case the db must be screwed). You can also use it to convert between various db formats - maybe whichever db this is using isn't good on your machine? Switching to a pickle would solve this, although then you're using a pickle... Which sort of dbm is it using? bsddb? gdbm? (whichdb.py in the contrib directory should answer that). Maybe trying another one would help? (The option to do this isn't exposed via the web interface, IIRC, so you'll have to edit the config file manually). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Frank Solensky (fsolensky) Date: 2004-01-31 13:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=205922 Update: it doesn't appear to be limited to a particular word. I've been marking all messages as 'defer' and admitting a few at a time to see exactly when the crashes occur. The last word displayed has been different each time ("dithered", "ux-50,", "url:draft-ietf-avt-uncomp-video-05"). I'm not sure, but I think that the message that triggers the error may disappear once I've restarted the daemon as well.. If it's the db, are there any tools to look for errors? Or do I have to reinstall and retrain? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Frank Solensky (fsolensky) Date: 2004-01-31 03:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=205922 Here's the last one displayed and a stack trace that went to that window. The web interface shows the same trace as before. --------------------------------- wordinfoget: word= subject:Korean Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/spambayes-1.0a7/scripts/sb_server.py", line 442, in onRetr evidence=True) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 158, in chi2_spamprob clues = self._getclues(wordstream) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 391, in _getclues record = self._wordinfoget(word) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/storage.py", line 260, in _wordinfoget r = self.db.get(word) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/shelve.py", line 65, in get if self.dict.has_key(key): error: (22, 'Invalid argument') ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-01-30 18:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I don't recall seeing this before, but it looks like it's either a problem with a particular token, or that something is wrong with the database. You could try examining which key is giving problems. If you add "print word" before line 259 of storage.py, that will print out the tokens looked up, and the last one before the crash will be the problem one (if it's always the same, otherwise that's probably not the problem). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=887453&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun May 2 22:58:25 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun May 2 22:58:34 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-941634 ] Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories Message-ID: Bugs item #941634, was opened at 2004-04-25 17:17 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=941634&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0b1 >Status: Closed Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 9 Submitted By: mrpowell (mrpowell) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories Initial Comment: I uninstalled the Spambayes-outlook-0081 because I could never get it to register as an addin. (consistent error) and tried the latest release 1.0b1 and it failed also. I ran regsvr32.exe outlook_addin.dll as described in the trouble shooting guide and the windows error was that it could not locate a file to execute. This is the same error I get every time I try to activate the .dll. I purged all references to spambayes from the registry before trying the latest fresh install. This is the log from the latest two failed attempts with 1.0.b1: Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.py", line 33, in ? File "win32com\__init__.pyc", line 6, in ? File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pythoncom.pyc", line 2, in ? #@c File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pywintypes.pyc", line 69, in ? File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pywintypes.pyc", line 45, in __import_pywin32_system_module__ ImportError: Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.py", line 33, in ? File "win32com\__init__.pyc", line 6, in ? File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pythoncom.pyc", line 2, in ? #@c File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pywintypes.pyc", line 69, in ? File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pywintypes.pyc", line 45, in __import_pywin32_system_module__ ImportError: Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories What is a 'pywintypes' module and where is it located? Which of my sys.path directories do I have to stick in the freezer before I can copy the 'pywintypes' module into it? Any help will be greatly appreciated as this has become a personal challenge. Marc Powell ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-03 14:58 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This was closed because it is a duplicate, as the comment says (sorry if "dupe" was unclear, although the resolution clearly says "Duplicate"). Please leave it closed and use tracker #941639 for any comments. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: mrpowell (mrpowell) Date: 2004-05-03 14:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1028635 Why was this closed? How does one get some support? Do I have to forget about using this program? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-03 14:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Dupe of [ 941639 ] Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=941634&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun May 2 23:01:42 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun May 2 23:01:52 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-941639 ] Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories Message-ID: Bugs item #941639, was opened at 2004-04-25 17:42 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=941639&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0b1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 9 Submitted By: mrpowell (mrpowell) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories Initial Comment: Unable to register addin in Outlook 2000 SR1 9.0.0.5414 / Microsoft Windows 98 4.10.2222 A. I uninstalled the Spambayes-outlook-0081 because I could never get it to register as an addin. (consistent error) and tried the latest release 1.0b1 and it failed also. I ran regsvr32.exe outlook_addin.dll as described in the trouble shooting guide and the windows error was that it could not locate a file to execute. This is the same error I get every time I try to install. I purged all references to spambayes from the registry before trying the latest fresh install. This is the log from the latest two failed attempts with 1.0.b1: Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.py", line 33, in ? File "win32com\__init__.pyc", line 6, in ? File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pythoncom.pyc", line 2, in ? #@c File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pywintypes.pyc", line 69, in ? File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pywintypes.pyc", line 45, in __import_pywin32_system_module__ ImportError: Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.py", line 33, in ? File "win32com\__init__.pyc", line 6, in ? File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pythoncom.pyc", line 2, in ? #@c File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pywintypes.pyc", line 69, in ? File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pywintypes.pyc", line 45, in __import_pywin32_system_module__ ImportError: Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories my paths: C:\Program Files\SpamBayes D:\Program Files\Microsoft Office\Office\Outlook.exe C:\WINDOWS\Application Data\Microsoft\Outlook C:\WINDOWS\Profiles\Marc Powell\Application Data\Microsoft\Outlook What is a 'pywintypes' module and where is it located? Which of my sys.path directories do I have to stick in the freezer before I can copy the 'pywintypes' module into it? Any help will be greatly appreciated as this has become a personal challenge. Marc Powell ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-03 15:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The pywintypes module is a file that should be in the spambayes.zip file in the lib directory where spambayes was installed. It's not necessarily a path issue, because the file that's raising the error is the pywintypes.pyc file itself. Do you have Python installed by any chance? If so, is it the build from python.org or the ActiveState one (or another one)? You could try running the plug-in from source and seeing if that works. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=941639&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun May 2 23:30:54 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun May 2 23:31:03 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-941639 ] Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories Message-ID: Bugs item #941639, was opened at 2004-04-25 01:42 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mrpowell You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=941639&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0b1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 9 Submitted By: mrpowell (mrpowell) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories Initial Comment: Unable to register addin in Outlook 2000 SR1 9.0.0.5414 / Microsoft Windows 98 4.10.2222 A. I uninstalled the Spambayes-outlook-0081 because I could never get it to register as an addin. (consistent error) and tried the latest release 1.0b1 and it failed also. I ran regsvr32.exe outlook_addin.dll as described in the trouble shooting guide and the windows error was that it could not locate a file to execute. This is the same error I get every time I try to install. I purged all references to spambayes from the registry before trying the latest fresh install. This is the log from the latest two failed attempts with 1.0.b1: Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.py", line 33, in ? File "win32com\__init__.pyc", line 6, in ? File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pythoncom.pyc", line 2, in ? #@c File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pywintypes.pyc", line 69, in ? File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pywintypes.pyc", line 45, in __import_pywin32_system_module__ ImportError: Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.py", line 33, in ? File "win32com\__init__.pyc", line 6, in ? File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pythoncom.pyc", line 2, in ? #@c File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pywintypes.pyc", line 69, in ? File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pywintypes.pyc", line 45, in __import_pywin32_system_module__ ImportError: Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories my paths: C:\Program Files\SpamBayes D:\Program Files\Microsoft Office\Office\Outlook.exe C:\WINDOWS\Application Data\Microsoft\Outlook C:\WINDOWS\Profiles\Marc Powell\Application Data\Microsoft\Outlook What is a 'pywintypes' module and where is it located? Which of my sys.path directories do I have to stick in the freezer before I can copy the 'pywintypes' module into it? Any help will be greatly appreciated as this has become a personal challenge. Marc Powell ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: mrpowell (mrpowell) Date: 2004-05-02 23:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1028635 Thank you anadelonbrin for responding. I do not have Python installed. Why would the pywintypes.pyc file cause a problem on each and every install from a number of different (fresh) downloads from different mirrors, especially with a total registry crawl to remove all traces of the previous install? "You could try running the plug-in from source and seeing if that works" what do you mean "from source"? Can I replace the pywintypes.pyc file with a known good file? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-02 23:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The pywintypes module is a file that should be in the spambayes.zip file in the lib directory where spambayes was installed. It's not necessarily a path issue, because the file that's raising the error is the pywintypes.pyc file itself. Do you have Python installed by any chance? If so, is it the build from python.org or the ActiveState one (or another one)? You could try running the plug-in from source and seeing if that works. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=941639&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon May 3 12:12:12 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon May 3 12:12:18 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-943116 ] White list for domains/email addresses Message-ID: Feature Requests item #943116, was opened at 2004-04-27 09:04 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by darklaser You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=943116&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: DarkLaser (darklaser) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: White list for domains/email addresses Initial Comment: A nice feature would be to have a domain/email address white list where you could specify email addresses which should be marked as ham without regard to content. It would also be nice to be able to say anything from the domain belonging to the company I work for should also be marked as ham regardless of content. Anyway, my 2bits. Thanks, David ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: DarkLaser (darklaser) Date: 2004-05-03 09:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1030399 After wiping out the training and starting fresh, its been much better. While I still think a white list would be a nice feature enhancment, I'm closing this feature request for the sake of those who would rather it not be an open request. David ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: DarkLaser (darklaser) Date: 2004-04-30 07:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1030399 Tony, of course there is something wrong with the training, we have already sighted that. That?s why in my last post I indicated I was going to start it over (and not use any initial training). I read and understood what it said in the FAQ. We can close this in another day or so after I've gotten Kenney the info he wants, for him to be able to discover why SpamBayes is providing such poor results. Now the reason I thought this feature request should remain open was because I figured someone else may see it and decide its a good idea, build it and present it to the project leader. Yes, I already have message rules in outlook express to put email from specific individuals into specific folders, but the problem the false positive creates is, I have to drag each email out of outlook express, edit and remove 'spam' from the subject, then put it back in outlook express. Quite time consuming. You are right under those circumstances I would be better off without SpamBayes. In the process of requesting the white list feature (which would fix this the majority of my problem), I learned from Kenney that SpamBayes was not performing as it should (based on my training), therefore I should be able to improve my results after starting over on training. Now on to what I?ve got. I asked a coworker to send me an email. I expected it would be a false positive and it was. To provide some privacy for the company I work for, I replaced the domain and ip info with text enclosed by [] explaining what was there. Now for the data: -------------------------------- Original clues for: spam,quarterly review today? (44) Word Probability Times in ham Times in spam *H* 0.01 - - *S* 1.0 - - to:name:david [mylastname] 0.0 156 0 from:addr:[ourdomainname] 0.02 239 11 received:[ouripaddress] 0.09 7 1 from:addr:brian 0.09 2 0 from:name:brian [coworkerslastname] 0.09 2 0 brian 0.27 10 7 would 0.65 71 258 have 0.65 215 791 you. 0.67 38 155 going 0.71 19 91 time 0.72 73 365 received:[ourgatewayipclassa] 0.74 26 144 received:[ourgatewayipclassa+b] 0.74 26 144 received:[ourgatewayipclassa+b+c] 0.74 26 144 received:[ourgatewayipclassa+b+c+d] 0.74 26 144 received:unknown 0.74 26 144 your 0.77 269 1745 like 0.77 56 371 some 0.78 29 199 header:Message-ID:1 0.78 375 2705 subject: 0.79 384 2909 to:2**0 0.8 369 3003 with 0.81 116 948 header:Date:1 0.81 393 3238 header:Return-Path:1 0.81 393 3292 header:To:1 0.81 393 3306 header:From:1 0.81 393 3321 header:Subject:1 0.81 393 3336 header:MIME-Version:1 0.82 344 3047 review 0.85 3 34 to:addr:[ourdomainname] 0.89 193 3248 quarterly 0.91 0 2 subject:review 0.91 0 2 today 0.92 10 244 to:addr:david 0.94 84 2596 done, 0.95 0 4 content-type:multipart/alternative 0.95 53 2211 content-type:text/html 0.96 56 2444 over 0.97 6 350 subject:today 0.98 0 9 spend 0.99 0 42 subject:? 1.0 0 114 -------------------------------- Kenney, let me know if you would like to see any more before I wipe out my training and start over. David ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-04-29 15:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Oh, one other thing - is there any reason that you can't just use your mail client (Outlook Express?) 's rules to implement whitelisting yourself? It's certainly the simple solution and works for most people. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-04-29 15:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 As the FAQ says, we realise that some people want whitelisting. However, none of the developers do, and none have any interest in putting in the considerable effort into developing whitelisting capabilities. As such, this simply won't be added until someone comes along with code in hand. The developers aren't refusing to add it in (as long as it is off by default) but there just isn't any incentive for us to add it. Anyone desperate for the functionality always has the options to (a) write code or (b) pay for a product that does have whitelisting (InBoxer, for example). In any case, as Kenny said, 85% false positives is unbelievably poor. You'd be better off not using spambayes at all! The fp rate should be less than 5% - typically around 1% or lower. Something is clearly wrong with your training. I'd still rather have this closed - if I thought that people would actually see it and not open a new request that would be different, but that doesn't happen. If it says open then we have two places (here and the FAQ) where information collects. Whitelisting is brought up so often that a tracker really isn't necessary, IMO. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: DarkLaser (darklaser) Date: 2004-04-29 12:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1030399 Yes I had stored up spam from the last 8 months incase I came accross a bayesien filter I wanted to train it with, but it all came from this one account. The near 5,000 valid email are all my valid email for this account over the last 5 years. So it should have worked very well I would have thought. Perhaps SpamBayes learns from initial tranning sets differently than from email it processes as it comes in. So perhaps the solution is to remove the past training and just start training from scratch. Yes, I'll wait for a few more false positives, and I'll post them before wiping it out and starting over. David ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-04-29 11:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 It's very unusual to hear from someone who is getting accuracy this poor. Could you upload a copy of the spam clues for a false positive message (before training on it)? Seeing why SpamBayes thought the way it did when it first processed the message would help a lot. I notice that you have far more training data than you have messages that have been processed by SpamBayes, so I assume you had a large initial training set. Is it possible that your training data was not representative of the messages that you are currently receiving? Although there is no proven best training strategy, in general SpamBayes seems to perform best if you initially train with only 5 or 10 of each type of message and then train it up on your current message stream instead of training it on lots of outdated messages. You'll also find that SpamBayes is more responsive to training of new messages when you have fewer messages in the training database. With the large number of messages that you have, it will take a *LOT* of training to overcome existing clues. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: DarkLaser (darklaser) Date: 2004-04-29 06:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1030399 Anadelonbrin, thanks for the url. I had looked for something about white lists, but couldn?t find it. I maintain that a white list would be useful. Perhaps not to some, but very much so for others. I have received maybe 1 or 2 spam claiming to be from someone on the domain for the company I work for in the last year, and never have received any claiming to be from any of my 4 personal domains. However, the current false positive ratio is horrible. Try 85% of my good email is falsely being marked as spam. Look at the number of emails I have trained, with that many trained, I should be getting near perfect results. ------------------------------------------------- Total emails trained: Spam: 9728 Ham: 4939 SpamBayes has processed 546 messages - 4 (1%) good, 538 (99%) spam and 4 (0%) unsure. 29 messages were manually classified as good (23 were false positives). 517 messages were manually classified as spam (0 were false negatives). 2 unsure messages were manually identified as good, and 2 as spam. ------------------------------------------------- Ignoring the unsure messages, out of 27 good emails, 4 were actually marked as good and 23 as spam. That is ridiculous. Perhaps I need to change something in my settings, but the majority of those good emails are from this one domain, so in my case a white list would make a world of difference. If one or two spam a year get through because of a white list, no biggie, I can handle that. That?s a lot easier than having to go manually remove the word 'spam,' from the subject of 85% of my email. I don?t have any experience with python (I?m a perl man myself), otherwise I would look at building a white list to send to the project manager. Anyway, I still think this item should remain on the wish list. Thanks, David ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-04-28 18:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Please see FAQ 6.6: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=943116&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon May 3 13:05:32 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon May 3 13:05:41 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-941639 ] Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories Message-ID: Bugs item #941639, was opened at 2004-04-25 01:42 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kpitt You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=941639&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0b1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 9 Submitted By: mrpowell (mrpowell) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories Initial Comment: Unable to register addin in Outlook 2000 SR1 9.0.0.5414 / Microsoft Windows 98 4.10.2222 A. I uninstalled the Spambayes-outlook-0081 because I could never get it to register as an addin. (consistent error) and tried the latest release 1.0b1 and it failed also. I ran regsvr32.exe outlook_addin.dll as described in the trouble shooting guide and the windows error was that it could not locate a file to execute. This is the same error I get every time I try to install. I purged all references to spambayes from the registry before trying the latest fresh install. This is the log from the latest two failed attempts with 1.0.b1: Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.py", line 33, in ? File "win32com\__init__.pyc", line 6, in ? File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pythoncom.pyc", line 2, in ? #@c File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pywintypes.pyc", line 69, in ? File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pywintypes.pyc", line 45, in __import_pywin32_system_module__ ImportError: Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.py", line 33, in ? File "win32com\__init__.pyc", line 6, in ? File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pythoncom.pyc", line 2, in ? #@c File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pywintypes.pyc", line 69, in ? File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pywintypes.pyc", line 45, in __import_pywin32_system_module__ ImportError: Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories my paths: C:\Program Files\SpamBayes D:\Program Files\Microsoft Office\Office\Outlook.exe C:\WINDOWS\Application Data\Microsoft\Outlook C:\WINDOWS\Profiles\Marc Powell\Application Data\Microsoft\Outlook What is a 'pywintypes' module and where is it located? Which of my sys.path directories do I have to stick in the freezer before I can copy the 'pywintypes' module into it? Any help will be greatly appreciated as this has become a personal challenge. Marc Powell ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-05-03 13:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 The problem is not a corrupted pywintypes.pyc. The pywintypes.pyc must be running correctly for you to get the "isn't in frozen sys.path" exception. The purpose of the .pyc file is to locate and load a related DLL file, which in the case of the SpamBayes install should be named pywintypes23.dll. This file should be installed in the "lib" subdirectory of your SpamBayes installation. Could you attach a directory listing of the files in the SpamBayes "lib" directory? If possible, also attach any SpamBayes log files you can find as describe in the Troubleshooting Guide. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: mrpowell (mrpowell) Date: 2004-05-02 23:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1028635 Thank you anadelonbrin for responding. I do not have Python installed. Why would the pywintypes.pyc file cause a problem on each and every install from a number of different (fresh) downloads from different mirrors, especially with a total registry crawl to remove all traces of the previous install? "You could try running the plug-in from source and seeing if that works" what do you mean "from source"? Can I replace the pywintypes.pyc file with a known good file? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-02 23:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The pywintypes module is a file that should be in the spambayes.zip file in the lib directory where spambayes was installed. It's not necessarily a path issue, because the file that's raising the error is the pywintypes.pyc file itself. Do you have Python installed by any chance? If so, is it the build from python.org or the ActiveState one (or another one)? You could try running the plug-in from source and seeing if that works. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=941639&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon May 3 13:33:09 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon May 3 13:33:14 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-943116 ] White list for domains/email addresses Message-ID: Feature Requests item #943116, was opened at 2004-04-27 12:04 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kpitt You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=943116&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: DarkLaser (darklaser) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: White list for domains/email addresses Initial Comment: A nice feature would be to have a domain/email address white list where you could specify email addresses which should be marked as ham without regard to content. It would also be nice to be able to say anything from the domain belonging to the company I work for should also be marked as ham regardless of content. Anyway, my 2bits. Thanks, David ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-05-03 13:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 It's good to hear that it's working better for you with fresh training data. Even though this is now closed, I thought I'd throw in a little additional explaination based on what I saw in your message clues. There were some strange accuracy- killer clues here: to:addr:[ourdomainname] 0.89 193 3248 This clue indicates that you trained 3248 spam messages sent to [ourdomainname], but only 193 good messages. to:addr:david 0.94 84 2596 Similarly, 2596 spam messages sent to "david" were trained compared to only 84 good messages. It would have taken a *LOT* of training on good messages to overcome these anomalies. header:To:1 0.81 393 3306 header:From:1 0.81 393 3321 header:Subject:1 0.81 393 3336 These indicate that you trained on only 393 good messages that had a To, a From, and a Subject header. There were a couple of other header clues that were similar. Under normal circumstances, these counts should be very close to the total number of spam and ham messages that you have trained. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: DarkLaser (darklaser) Date: 2004-05-03 12:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1030399 After wiping out the training and starting fresh, its been much better. While I still think a white list would be a nice feature enhancment, I'm closing this feature request for the sake of those who would rather it not be an open request. David ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: DarkLaser (darklaser) Date: 2004-04-30 10:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1030399 Tony, of course there is something wrong with the training, we have already sighted that. That?s why in my last post I indicated I was going to start it over (and not use any initial training). I read and understood what it said in the FAQ. We can close this in another day or so after I've gotten Kenney the info he wants, for him to be able to discover why SpamBayes is providing such poor results. Now the reason I thought this feature request should remain open was because I figured someone else may see it and decide its a good idea, build it and present it to the project leader. Yes, I already have message rules in outlook express to put email from specific individuals into specific folders, but the problem the false positive creates is, I have to drag each email out of outlook express, edit and remove 'spam' from the subject, then put it back in outlook express. Quite time consuming. You are right under those circumstances I would be better off without SpamBayes. In the process of requesting the white list feature (which would fix this the majority of my problem), I learned from Kenney that SpamBayes was not performing as it should (based on my training), therefore I should be able to improve my results after starting over on training. Now on to what I?ve got. I asked a coworker to send me an email. I expected it would be a false positive and it was. To provide some privacy for the company I work for, I replaced the domain and ip info with text enclosed by [] explaining what was there. Now for the data: -------------------------------- Original clues for: spam,quarterly review today? (44) Word Probability Times in ham Times in spam *H* 0.01 - - *S* 1.0 - - to:name:david [mylastname] 0.0 156 0 from:addr:[ourdomainname] 0.02 239 11 received:[ouripaddress] 0.09 7 1 from:addr:brian 0.09 2 0 from:name:brian [coworkerslastname] 0.09 2 0 brian 0.27 10 7 would 0.65 71 258 have 0.65 215 791 you. 0.67 38 155 going 0.71 19 91 time 0.72 73 365 received:[ourgatewayipclassa] 0.74 26 144 received:[ourgatewayipclassa+b] 0.74 26 144 received:[ourgatewayipclassa+b+c] 0.74 26 144 received:[ourgatewayipclassa+b+c+d] 0.74 26 144 received:unknown 0.74 26 144 your 0.77 269 1745 like 0.77 56 371 some 0.78 29 199 header:Message-ID:1 0.78 375 2705 subject: 0.79 384 2909 to:2**0 0.8 369 3003 with 0.81 116 948 header:Date:1 0.81 393 3238 header:Return-Path:1 0.81 393 3292 header:To:1 0.81 393 3306 header:From:1 0.81 393 3321 header:Subject:1 0.81 393 3336 header:MIME-Version:1 0.82 344 3047 review 0.85 3 34 to:addr:[ourdomainname] 0.89 193 3248 quarterly 0.91 0 2 subject:review 0.91 0 2 today 0.92 10 244 to:addr:david 0.94 84 2596 done, 0.95 0 4 content-type:multipart/alternative 0.95 53 2211 content-type:text/html 0.96 56 2444 over 0.97 6 350 subject:today 0.98 0 9 spend 0.99 0 42 subject:? 1.0 0 114 -------------------------------- Kenney, let me know if you would like to see any more before I wipe out my training and start over. David ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-04-29 18:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Oh, one other thing - is there any reason that you can't just use your mail client (Outlook Express?) 's rules to implement whitelisting yourself? It's certainly the simple solution and works for most people. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-04-29 18:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 As the FAQ says, we realise that some people want whitelisting. However, none of the developers do, and none have any interest in putting in the considerable effort into developing whitelisting capabilities. As such, this simply won't be added until someone comes along with code in hand. The developers aren't refusing to add it in (as long as it is off by default) but there just isn't any incentive for us to add it. Anyone desperate for the functionality always has the options to (a) write code or (b) pay for a product that does have whitelisting (InBoxer, for example). In any case, as Kenny said, 85% false positives is unbelievably poor. You'd be better off not using spambayes at all! The fp rate should be less than 5% - typically around 1% or lower. Something is clearly wrong with your training. I'd still rather have this closed - if I thought that people would actually see it and not open a new request that would be different, but that doesn't happen. If it says open then we have two places (here and the FAQ) where information collects. Whitelisting is brought up so often that a tracker really isn't necessary, IMO. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: DarkLaser (darklaser) Date: 2004-04-29 15:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1030399 Yes I had stored up spam from the last 8 months incase I came accross a bayesien filter I wanted to train it with, but it all came from this one account. The near 5,000 valid email are all my valid email for this account over the last 5 years. So it should have worked very well I would have thought. Perhaps SpamBayes learns from initial tranning sets differently than from email it processes as it comes in. So perhaps the solution is to remove the past training and just start training from scratch. Yes, I'll wait for a few more false positives, and I'll post them before wiping it out and starting over. David ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-04-29 14:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 It's very unusual to hear from someone who is getting accuracy this poor. Could you upload a copy of the spam clues for a false positive message (before training on it)? Seeing why SpamBayes thought the way it did when it first processed the message would help a lot. I notice that you have far more training data than you have messages that have been processed by SpamBayes, so I assume you had a large initial training set. Is it possible that your training data was not representative of the messages that you are currently receiving? Although there is no proven best training strategy, in general SpamBayes seems to perform best if you initially train with only 5 or 10 of each type of message and then train it up on your current message stream instead of training it on lots of outdated messages. You'll also find that SpamBayes is more responsive to training of new messages when you have fewer messages in the training database. With the large number of messages that you have, it will take a *LOT* of training to overcome existing clues. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: DarkLaser (darklaser) Date: 2004-04-29 09:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1030399 Anadelonbrin, thanks for the url. I had looked for something about white lists, but couldn?t find it. I maintain that a white list would be useful. Perhaps not to some, but very much so for others. I have received maybe 1 or 2 spam claiming to be from someone on the domain for the company I work for in the last year, and never have received any claiming to be from any of my 4 personal domains. However, the current false positive ratio is horrible. Try 85% of my good email is falsely being marked as spam. Look at the number of emails I have trained, with that many trained, I should be getting near perfect results. ------------------------------------------------- Total emails trained: Spam: 9728 Ham: 4939 SpamBayes has processed 546 messages - 4 (1%) good, 538 (99%) spam and 4 (0%) unsure. 29 messages were manually classified as good (23 were false positives). 517 messages were manually classified as spam (0 were false negatives). 2 unsure messages were manually identified as good, and 2 as spam. ------------------------------------------------- Ignoring the unsure messages, out of 27 good emails, 4 were actually marked as good and 23 as spam. That is ridiculous. Perhaps I need to change something in my settings, but the majority of those good emails are from this one domain, so in my case a white list would make a world of difference. If one or two spam a year get through because of a white list, no biggie, I can handle that. That?s a lot easier than having to go manually remove the word 'spam,' from the subject of 85% of my email. I don?t have any experience with python (I?m a perl man myself), otherwise I would look at building a white list to send to the project manager. Anyway, I still think this item should remain on the wish list. Thanks, David ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-04-28 21:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Please see FAQ 6.6: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=943116&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon May 3 15:01:40 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon May 3 15:01:45 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-943116 ] White list for domains/email addresses Message-ID: Feature Requests item #943116, was opened at 2004-04-27 09:04 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by darklaser You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=943116&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: DarkLaser (darklaser) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: White list for domains/email addresses Initial Comment: A nice feature would be to have a domain/email address white list where you could specify email addresses which should be marked as ham without regard to content. It would also be nice to be able to say anything from the domain belonging to the company I work for should also be marked as ham regardless of content. Anyway, my 2bits. Thanks, David ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: DarkLaser (darklaser) Date: 2004-05-03 12:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1030399 That?s interesting. The trainer for SpamBayes must not be working quite right then because here is what I did. I had about 6 months of spam in a dbx file I removed from outlook express, then another 2 months built up in outlook expresses current folders. I trained it on the 6 month spam dbx file, then my 5 year good mail file (which was still in outlook expresses files), then trained the 2 months of spam. What was strange was, the 6 months of spam only took a few minutes to import rules for, then the good email took like an hour or more (I started it, went to lunch [30 min], came back, and it still took 20-30 min), then I trained the 2 months of spam (which is about the same file size as the 6 months), but that one I started running and it took like 2 hours and was still not done, so I let it run over night. In the morning I found my computer with a windows message something to the effect of "Windows has run out of memory, etc etc". But the SpamBayes window claimed it was done and had imported them all (as you saw by the numbers I posted). So I went on with what I was doing. So my assumption is, something in the way SpamBayes tries to train must have screwed up pretty bad, and that was the reason for the numbers all being so far off. Thanks for the help in trying to figure out what was going on. David ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-05-03 10:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 It's good to hear that it's working better for you with fresh training data. Even though this is now closed, I thought I'd throw in a little additional explaination based on what I saw in your message clues. There were some strange accuracy- killer clues here: to:addr:[ourdomainname] 0.89 193 3248 This clue indicates that you trained 3248 spam messages sent to [ourdomainname], but only 193 good messages. to:addr:david 0.94 84 2596 Similarly, 2596 spam messages sent to "david" were trained compared to only 84 good messages. It would have taken a *LOT* of training on good messages to overcome these anomalies. header:To:1 0.81 393 3306 header:From:1 0.81 393 3321 header:Subject:1 0.81 393 3336 These indicate that you trained on only 393 good messages that had a To, a From, and a Subject header. There were a couple of other header clues that were similar. Under normal circumstances, these counts should be very close to the total number of spam and ham messages that you have trained. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: DarkLaser (darklaser) Date: 2004-05-03 09:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1030399 After wiping out the training and starting fresh, its been much better. While I still think a white list would be a nice feature enhancment, I'm closing this feature request for the sake of those who would rather it not be an open request. David ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: DarkLaser (darklaser) Date: 2004-04-30 07:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1030399 Tony, of course there is something wrong with the training, we have already sighted that. That?s why in my last post I indicated I was going to start it over (and not use any initial training). I read and understood what it said in the FAQ. We can close this in another day or so after I've gotten Kenney the info he wants, for him to be able to discover why SpamBayes is providing such poor results. Now the reason I thought this feature request should remain open was because I figured someone else may see it and decide its a good idea, build it and present it to the project leader. Yes, I already have message rules in outlook express to put email from specific individuals into specific folders, but the problem the false positive creates is, I have to drag each email out of outlook express, edit and remove 'spam' from the subject, then put it back in outlook express. Quite time consuming. You are right under those circumstances I would be better off without SpamBayes. In the process of requesting the white list feature (which would fix this the majority of my problem), I learned from Kenney that SpamBayes was not performing as it should (based on my training), therefore I should be able to improve my results after starting over on training. Now on to what I?ve got. I asked a coworker to send me an email. I expected it would be a false positive and it was. To provide some privacy for the company I work for, I replaced the domain and ip info with text enclosed by [] explaining what was there. Now for the data: -------------------------------- Original clues for: spam,quarterly review today? (44) Word Probability Times in ham Times in spam *H* 0.01 - - *S* 1.0 - - to:name:david [mylastname] 0.0 156 0 from:addr:[ourdomainname] 0.02 239 11 received:[ouripaddress] 0.09 7 1 from:addr:brian 0.09 2 0 from:name:brian [coworkerslastname] 0.09 2 0 brian 0.27 10 7 would 0.65 71 258 have 0.65 215 791 you. 0.67 38 155 going 0.71 19 91 time 0.72 73 365 received:[ourgatewayipclassa] 0.74 26 144 received:[ourgatewayipclassa+b] 0.74 26 144 received:[ourgatewayipclassa+b+c] 0.74 26 144 received:[ourgatewayipclassa+b+c+d] 0.74 26 144 received:unknown 0.74 26 144 your 0.77 269 1745 like 0.77 56 371 some 0.78 29 199 header:Message-ID:1 0.78 375 2705 subject: 0.79 384 2909 to:2**0 0.8 369 3003 with 0.81 116 948 header:Date:1 0.81 393 3238 header:Return-Path:1 0.81 393 3292 header:To:1 0.81 393 3306 header:From:1 0.81 393 3321 header:Subject:1 0.81 393 3336 header:MIME-Version:1 0.82 344 3047 review 0.85 3 34 to:addr:[ourdomainname] 0.89 193 3248 quarterly 0.91 0 2 subject:review 0.91 0 2 today 0.92 10 244 to:addr:david 0.94 84 2596 done, 0.95 0 4 content-type:multipart/alternative 0.95 53 2211 content-type:text/html 0.96 56 2444 over 0.97 6 350 subject:today 0.98 0 9 spend 0.99 0 42 subject:? 1.0 0 114 -------------------------------- Kenney, let me know if you would like to see any more before I wipe out my training and start over. David ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-04-29 15:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Oh, one other thing - is there any reason that you can't just use your mail client (Outlook Express?) 's rules to implement whitelisting yourself? It's certainly the simple solution and works for most people. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-04-29 15:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 As the FAQ says, we realise that some people want whitelisting. However, none of the developers do, and none have any interest in putting in the considerable effort into developing whitelisting capabilities. As such, this simply won't be added until someone comes along with code in hand. The developers aren't refusing to add it in (as long as it is off by default) but there just isn't any incentive for us to add it. Anyone desperate for the functionality always has the options to (a) write code or (b) pay for a product that does have whitelisting (InBoxer, for example). In any case, as Kenny said, 85% false positives is unbelievably poor. You'd be better off not using spambayes at all! The fp rate should be less than 5% - typically around 1% or lower. Something is clearly wrong with your training. I'd still rather have this closed - if I thought that people would actually see it and not open a new request that would be different, but that doesn't happen. If it says open then we have two places (here and the FAQ) where information collects. Whitelisting is brought up so often that a tracker really isn't necessary, IMO. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: DarkLaser (darklaser) Date: 2004-04-29 12:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1030399 Yes I had stored up spam from the last 8 months incase I came accross a bayesien filter I wanted to train it with, but it all came from this one account. The near 5,000 valid email are all my valid email for this account over the last 5 years. So it should have worked very well I would have thought. Perhaps SpamBayes learns from initial tranning sets differently than from email it processes as it comes in. So perhaps the solution is to remove the past training and just start training from scratch. Yes, I'll wait for a few more false positives, and I'll post them before wiping it out and starting over. David ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-04-29 11:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 It's very unusual to hear from someone who is getting accuracy this poor. Could you upload a copy of the spam clues for a false positive message (before training on it)? Seeing why SpamBayes thought the way it did when it first processed the message would help a lot. I notice that you have far more training data than you have messages that have been processed by SpamBayes, so I assume you had a large initial training set. Is it possible that your training data was not representative of the messages that you are currently receiving? Although there is no proven best training strategy, in general SpamBayes seems to perform best if you initially train with only 5 or 10 of each type of message and then train it up on your current message stream instead of training it on lots of outdated messages. You'll also find that SpamBayes is more responsive to training of new messages when you have fewer messages in the training database. With the large number of messages that you have, it will take a *LOT* of training to overcome existing clues. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: DarkLaser (darklaser) Date: 2004-04-29 06:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1030399 Anadelonbrin, thanks for the url. I had looked for something about white lists, but couldn?t find it. I maintain that a white list would be useful. Perhaps not to some, but very much so for others. I have received maybe 1 or 2 spam claiming to be from someone on the domain for the company I work for in the last year, and never have received any claiming to be from any of my 4 personal domains. However, the current false positive ratio is horrible. Try 85% of my good email is falsely being marked as spam. Look at the number of emails I have trained, with that many trained, I should be getting near perfect results. ------------------------------------------------- Total emails trained: Spam: 9728 Ham: 4939 SpamBayes has processed 546 messages - 4 (1%) good, 538 (99%) spam and 4 (0%) unsure. 29 messages were manually classified as good (23 were false positives). 517 messages were manually classified as spam (0 were false negatives). 2 unsure messages were manually identified as good, and 2 as spam. ------------------------------------------------- Ignoring the unsure messages, out of 27 good emails, 4 were actually marked as good and 23 as spam. That is ridiculous. Perhaps I need to change something in my settings, but the majority of those good emails are from this one domain, so in my case a white list would make a world of difference. If one or two spam a year get through because of a white list, no biggie, I can handle that. That?s a lot easier than having to go manually remove the word 'spam,' from the subject of 85% of my email. I don?t have any experience with python (I?m a perl man myself), otherwise I would look at building a white list to send to the project manager. Anyway, I still think this item should remain on the wish list. Thanks, David ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-04-28 18:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Please see FAQ 6.6: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=943116&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon May 3 18:27:14 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon May 3 18:27:30 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-918157 ] "Could not watch the specified folders" Message-ID: Bugs item #918157, was opened at 2004-03-17 11:08 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by paulnbwe You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=918157&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Michael Dillon (forge1968) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: "Could not watch the specified folders" Initial Comment: I've been using SpamBayes for quite a while with Outlook 2000, and just upgraded to .9 I'd been watching several Exchange server public folders along with my inbox. Now, with the new version, I get an error on startup that says "There was an error intializing the Spam plugin. Spam filtering has been disabled. Plese re-configure...." etc On the folders I'm watching, I'm not watching the sub- folders, and I'm not doing any background processing. This used to work - now it doesn't. Outlook 2000 SR-1 (9.0.0.5414) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul (paulnbwe) Date: 2004-05-03 17:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1034579 I use it for the same purpose, and had the same problem. Disabling "background filtering" fixed it for me. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=918157&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon May 3 18:38:56 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon May 3 18:39:02 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-918157 ] "Could not watch the specified folders" Message-ID: Bugs item #918157, was opened at 2004-03-18 04:08 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=918157&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Michael Dillon (forge1968) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: "Could not watch the specified folders" Initial Comment: I've been using SpamBayes for quite a while with Outlook 2000, and just upgraded to .9 I'd been watching several Exchange server public folders along with my inbox. Now, with the new version, I get an error on startup that says "There was an error intializing the Spam plugin. Spam filtering has been disabled. Plese re-configure...." etc On the folders I'm watching, I'm not watching the sub- folders, and I'm not doing any background processing. This used to work - now it doesn't. Outlook 2000 SR-1 (9.0.0.5414) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-05-04 08:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Could you please view the SpamBayes troubleshooting guide, and find the information about attaching the log - we really need this log to diagnose. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul (paulnbwe) Date: 2004-05-04 08:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1034579 I use it for the same purpose, and had the same problem. Disabling "background filtering" fixed it for me. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=918157&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon May 3 19:04:33 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon May 3 19:04:42 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-918157 ] "Could not watch the specified folders" Message-ID: Bugs item #918157, was opened at 2004-03-17 11:08 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by paulnbwe You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=918157&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Michael Dillon (forge1968) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: "Could not watch the specified folders" Initial Comment: I've been using SpamBayes for quite a while with Outlook 2000, and just upgraded to .9 I'd been watching several Exchange server public folders along with my inbox. Now, with the new version, I get an error on startup that says "There was an error intializing the Spam plugin. Spam filtering has been disabled. Plese re-configure...." etc On the folders I'm watching, I'm not watching the sub- folders, and I'm not doing any background processing. This used to work - now it doesn't. Outlook 2000 SR-1 (9.0.0.5414) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul (paulnbwe) Date: 2004-05-03 18:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1034579 Warning: option experimental_ham_spam_imbalance_adjustment in section Classifier is deprecated Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\paul.WEBHQ\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\paul.WEBHQ\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 2751 spam and 3726 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin Binary Version 1.0b1 (April 2004) starting (with engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004)) on Windows 5.0.2195 (Service Pack 4) using Python 2.3.3 (#51, Feb 13 2004, 14:39:56) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] ERROR: 'There was an error initializing the Spam plugin.\r\n\r\nSpam filtering has been disabled. Please re-configure\r\nand re-enable this plugin\r\n\r\nError details:\r\nCould not watch the specified folders' Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.pyc", line 1304, in FiltersChanged File "addin.pyc", line 1330, in UpdateFolderHooks File "addin.pyc", line 1395, in _HookFolderEvents File "addin.pyc", line 277, in Init File "msgstore.pyc", line 631, in IsReceiveFolder com_error: (-2147221246, 'Invalid window handle', None, None) Skipping processing of missed messages in folder '1Order', as it is not available Skipping processing of missed messages in folder '2Service', as it is not available Skipping processing of missed messages in folder '5Catch All', as it is not available Skipping processing of missed messages in folder 'Inbox', as it is not available ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-05-03 17:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Could you please view the SpamBayes troubleshooting guide, and find the information about attaching the log - we really need this log to diagnose. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul (paulnbwe) Date: 2004-05-03 17:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1034579 I use it for the same purpose, and had the same problem. Disabling "background filtering" fixed it for me. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=918157&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon May 3 19:31:16 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon May 3 19:31:33 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-918157 ] "Could not watch the specified folders" Message-ID: Bugs item #918157, was opened at 2004-03-18 04:08 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=918157&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Michael Dillon (forge1968) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: "Could not watch the specified folders" Initial Comment: I've been using SpamBayes for quite a while with Outlook 2000, and just upgraded to .9 I'd been watching several Exchange server public folders along with my inbox. Now, with the new version, I get an error on startup that says "There was an error intializing the Spam plugin. Spam filtering has been disabled. Plese re-configure...." etc On the folders I'm watching, I'm not watching the sub- folders, and I'm not doing any background processing. This used to work - now it doesn't. Outlook 2000 SR-1 (9.0.0.5414) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-05-04 09:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I've checked in a fix for this. Thanks Paul! Checking in msgstore.py; new revision: 1.86; previous revision: 1.85 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul (paulnbwe) Date: 2004-05-04 09:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1034579 Warning: option experimental_ham_spam_imbalance_adjustment in section Classifier is deprecated Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\paul.WEBHQ\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\paul.WEBHQ\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 2751 spam and 3726 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin Binary Version 1.0b1 (April 2004) starting (with engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004)) on Windows 5.0.2195 (Service Pack 4) using Python 2.3.3 (#51, Feb 13 2004, 14:39:56) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] ERROR: 'There was an error initializing the Spam plugin.\r\n\r\nSpam filtering has been disabled. Please re-configure\r\nand re-enable this plugin\r\n\r\nError details:\r\nCould not watch the specified folders' Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.pyc", line 1304, in FiltersChanged File "addin.pyc", line 1330, in UpdateFolderHooks File "addin.pyc", line 1395, in _HookFolderEvents File "addin.pyc", line 277, in Init File "msgstore.pyc", line 631, in IsReceiveFolder com_error: (-2147221246, 'Invalid window handle', None, None) Skipping processing of missed messages in folder '1Order', as it is not available Skipping processing of missed messages in folder '2Service', as it is not available Skipping processing of missed messages in folder '5Catch All', as it is not available Skipping processing of missed messages in folder 'Inbox', as it is not available ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-05-04 08:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Could you please view the SpamBayes troubleshooting guide, and find the information about attaching the log - we really need this log to diagnose. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul (paulnbwe) Date: 2004-05-04 08:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1034579 I use it for the same purpose, and had the same problem. Disabling "background filtering" fixed it for me. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=918157&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon May 3 19:49:39 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon May 3 19:49:43 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-938992 ] Allow longer background filtering delays. Message-ID: Bugs item #938992, was opened at 2004-04-21 10:47 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=938992&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0b1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Taed Wynnell (taed) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Allow longer background filtering delays. Initial Comment: I use two different anti-spam programs, SpamNet and SpamBayes. They both do well at different types of messages, so the they do very well when used together. I give SpamNet the first crack at it, and then use SpamBayes background filtering with both delays set to 10 seconds. However, SpamNet sometimes hits heavy load on their servers (especially Monday mornings), and it can take it more than 10 seconds per message. This sometimes causes the two anti-spam programs to step on each other a bit and then messages can end up in the wrong folders. I'd like the ability to set the values to whatever I want, or at least up to 60 seconds. (Thanks!) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-05-04 09:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I'll do this post 1.0 - note that if you open the config file with a text editor, you will be able to set values up to 30 seconds (greater than that, and they will not be accepted). The slight complication is that by extending the range to 60 seconds, the slider control loses "resolution" - ie, the typical user will still want values of 1/1.5/2 seconds, but selecting these on the slider will be much harder when the range is 60 seconds. I see no reason why the slider couldn't still go only to 10 seconds, but the edit box allow you to enter a larger number. This is more intrusive though, so will have to wait until post 1.0 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=938992&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon May 3 19:52:16 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon May 3 19:52:20 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-943956 ] Email left unprocessed in Inbox Message-ID: Bugs item #943956, was opened at 2004-04-29 05:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=943956&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0b1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Ken (kpbass) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Email left unprocessed in Inbox Initial Comment: Intermittently, email appears in the Inbox with no assigned spam value. SpamBayes does not process it at all, unless I pull down th manager and choose "Filter messages/Start filtering. Most of the time, but not invariably, these messages are then identified as spam and moved to the spam folder. Background delay is set at .5 seconds, and no Outlook rule is likely to be involved. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-05-04 09:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 When you next notice this, can you view the log file, and see if it gets any mention at all? If not, increase the verbosity (via "Manager->Advanced->Diagnostics") to 1, and again check the log once it has happened - this should give you more noise regarding timers etc. Then post the relevent sections of the log here. Thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=943956&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon May 3 19:55:44 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon May 3 19:55:48 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-943397 ] Cannot choose more than one Inbox folder to filter Message-ID: Bugs item #943397, was opened at 2004-04-28 10:07 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=943397&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: MH (montyhines) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Cannot choose more than one Inbox folder to filter Initial Comment: I just installed the latest version of Spambayes on my Windows ME laptop with Outlook 2000. It allows me to to filter ONLY my own Inbox filter. I also monitor other Inbox folders of my employees in the office but it will not let me "check" those boxes to filter. I get a message: " Please select a child folder-- top level folders cannot be used". In the earlier version I was able to filter ALL the other Inboxes! What gives? Please help since it is essential that I keep the entire office spam free. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-05-04 09:55 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Is it possible you are trying to filter their entire "personal folders", rather than their inbox? Can you tell me what the folder hierarchy looks like in the folder selector dialog? ie, what is the full "path" to these folders you are trying to monitor? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=943397&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon May 3 19:58:08 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon May 3 19:58:13 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-942734 ] Mail in one folder cannot be moved or deleted Message-ID: Bugs item #942734, was opened at 2004-04-27 11:02 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=942734&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0b1 >Status: Pending >Resolution: Works For Me Priority: 5 Submitted By: Darryl Baker (dpbaker57) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Mail in one folder cannot be moved or deleted Initial Comment: I have one folder I cannot delete, archive, or move data from. This started the second week I was using spambayes. Could they be un-related possibly but since I have been using Outlook for 6 years and Outlook 2000 for almost 4 and this has never happened I am suspicious. I have run the Inbox repair tool on the outlook.pst and nothing changed even after it found something minor to fix. The error popup I get says: The messaging interface has returned an unknown error. If the problem persists restart Outlook. I have several times, rebooted several times, run scanpst.exe several times. Nothing has helped. The only idea I have is Outlook may have crashed while data was being moved. Do you have any ideas? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-05-04 09:58 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I'm afraid I have no ideas, and don't know what to suggest. I doubt it is SpamBayes though - nothing like this has ever been reported, and we only use documented interfaces to MAPI, and never 'directly' touch Outlook's message store. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=942734&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon May 3 19:59:36 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon May 3 19:59:43 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-936529 ] Spambayes has poor performance Message-ID: Bugs item #936529, was opened at 2004-04-17 04:36 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=936529&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Brad Byrd (bbyrd1) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Spambayes has poor performance Initial Comment: I'm running a 2.4ghz P4 prosessor with 512MB of ram and spambayes is running very slow after i upgrade to office xp sp3. However before it ran just fine. Just a side note i'm running Windows XP PRO SP2 RC1 i'm also running the latest (april) release. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-05-04 09:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Brad - did you try Tony's suggestion of doing a full re-train so see if that solved the problem? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-04-23 11:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The log doesn't have any errors in it, but interesting it does show that there is a fairly small amount of ham and spam trained. I wonder whether this is perhaps due to the problem discussed (by me and Tim Peters) on the list recently. If it is, then the two solutions that spring to mind are (a) retrain from a fresh db, because that fixed the problem for both me and Tim, or (b) wait and see if my further investigation into this yields anything. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Brad Byrd (bbyrd1) Date: 2004-04-22 17:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=561013 Ok here is the log file yop requested ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-04-22 11:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Eek. I don't know how that happened, but this got entered into the wrong tracker. Ignore all of that. For *this* problem: we need to see the log file. Please attach it to this tracker. You could also try retraining and seeing if that helps (see recent spambayes mailing list messages with "sloth" in the subject). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-04-22 11:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Interesting. This appears to be a sf-wide change. Not only the page above, but all other release notes on sourceforge no longer work with html tags. I wonder if this was them fixing a bug that allowed it, or introducing a bug doing something else. I'll look into this some more and if necessary change the SpamBayes 1.0a9 and 1.0b1 notes to plain text. For the moment, the release notes are more-or-less the same as the message posted to spambayes-announce (so in the archives for that list) and the changelog is in the archive or in CVS (accessible via the web). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=936529&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon May 3 20:01:32 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon May 3 20:01:36 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-932074 ] outlook doesn't start with spambayes and outlook-addin.y Message-ID: Bugs item #932074, was opened at 2004-04-09 09:02 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=932074&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) >Status: Closed >Resolution: Later Priority: 5 Submitted By: I*igo Serna (inigoserna) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: outlook doesn't start with spambayes and outlook-addin.y Initial Comment: Outlook does not start if I register spambayes and outlook-addin.py (from pywin32-200, win32com/demos). In fact I've written a simple addin - based in outlook-addin.py from win32com/demos) - and If I register mine, outlook does not start. Error dialog shows: Title: Microsoft Visual C++ Runtime Library Body: Runtime Error! Program [path_to_outlook.exe] Abnormal porgram termination Spambayes log file does not exist. I suppose it's spambayes' fault because my own addin and win32com/demos/outlook-addin.py can coexist peacefully. Is this bug related with #924327 maybe? Windows 2000 Spanish with lastest patches MS Office 2000 SR-1 Spanish with lastest patches python-2.3.2 or 2.3.3 from python.org pywin32-200 from sourceforge.net ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-05-04 10:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Yeah, this sucks I'm afraid, and I have no good answer at the moment. You will need to run spambayes from source code (but that should be OK, as you have everything you need to do so) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: I*igo Serna (inigoserna) Date: 2004-04-09 09:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1016614 I have the log now, sorry. It seems there are 2 COM servers and 2 COM clients trying to use MAPI... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=932074&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon May 3 20:06:46 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon May 3 20:06:54 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-931150 ] Unsuported Character Set spams... Message-ID: Bugs item #931150, was opened at 2004-04-08 02:02 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=931150&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Yasser Mondallis (yazmon) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Unsuported Character Set spams... Initial Comment: Ive received a lot of spam that seems to confuse our Exchange\Outlook system that makes something convert the actual content of the email into an attached text file, with the body replaced with 'This message uses a character set that is not supported by the Internet Service. To view the original message content, open the attached message. If the text doesn't display correctly, save the attachment to disk, and then open it using a viewer that can display the original character set.' Only clue is the subject. As the training is being done on the body of the text, the app is getting very confused with these mails. Any chance of making it check the original body? (I know this may or may not be a setup problem here, but it would seem like a good way to get spam to an inbox without detection...) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-05-04 10:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Can you please do a "Show Spam Clues" on one of these messages, and attach the clues here? Please reset the bug status to "Open" when you do. Thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=931150&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon May 3 20:10:19 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon May 3 20:10:28 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-928295 ] Spam Bayes fails to auto-filter Message-ID: Bugs item #928295, was opened at 2004-04-03 00:54 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=928295&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Deleted >Resolution: Out of Date Priority: 5 Submitted By: Yinzer (yinzer) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Spam Bayes fails to auto-filter Initial Comment: Hope I'm doing this correctly. I'm trying to report a bug I'm encountering with Spam Bayes. I have "Enable Spam Bayes" selected. I've trained on Ham & Spam. Manually clicking Filter Spam successfully filters spam at a success rate of about 99%. I just can't get Spam Bayes to filter automatically. It used to work wonderfully, but not any more. Any help you can offer is greatly appreciated. Dan Sparvero dan@spdesign.net ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-05-04 10:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 You are using an old version - please try upgrading. If nothing else, the new version has better logging of the folder names, which may give us a clue. If is possible you have selected the 'wrong' inbox? The 'is temporarily unavailable' message means that Outlook has returned an error indicating you aren't logged on to the server. Please reattach new logs from the recent version, then reset the big status to "Open". Thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=928295&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon May 3 20:13:45 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon May 3 20:13:51 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-924237 ] Outlook Add-in Cannot Initialize Message-ID: Bugs item #924237, was opened at 2004-03-27 08:54 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=924237&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Hank Fay (hankfay) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook Add-in Cannot Initialize Initial Comment: Outlook 2003 patched through today XP SP1 patched through today Error Message: "There was an error initializing the SpamBayes addin Please re-start Oulook and try again." SpamBayes Log: Error connecting to Outlook! Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.pyc", line 1191, in OnConnection File "manager.pyc", line 908, in GetManager File "manager.pyc", line 344, in __init__ File "manager.pyc", line 492, in LocateDataDirectory File "win32com\shell\shell.pyc", line 9, in ? File "win32com\shell\shell.pyc", line 7, in __load ImportError: DLL load failed: The specified procedure could not be found. ERROR: 'There was an error initializing the SpamBayes addin\r\n\r\nPlease re-start Outlook and try again.' Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.pyc", line 1191, in OnConnection File "manager.pyc", line 908, in GetManager File "manager.pyc", line 344, in __init__ File "manager.pyc", line 492, in LocateDataDirectory File "win32com\shell\shell.pyc", line 9, in ? File "win32com\shell\shell.pyc", line 7, in __load ImportError: DLL load failed: The specified procedure could not be found. pythoncom error: Failed to call the universal dispatcher Traceback (most recent call last): File "win32com\universal.pyc", line 173, in dispatch File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 322, in _InvokeEx_ File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 608, in _invokeex_ File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 542, in _invokeex_ File "addin.pyc", line 1227, in OnStartupComplete exceptions.AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'never_configured' ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-05-04 10:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Can you confirm the version of spambayes? I believe that the 1.0b1 release has a fix for this, and should work with ActivePython installed. I'd like to know if this is not true (in which case, please re-open this bug) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hank Fay (hankfay) Date: 2004-03-27 14:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1007388 And after removing Activestate Python, Spambayes worked just fine. So much for my PyDS installation. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hank Fay (hankfay) Date: 2004-03-27 13:50 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1007388 Yes, indeed, I have Activestate Python 2.3 installed. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andy Babinszki (andybab) Date: 2004-03-27 10:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1007452 It seems far too conincidental that I experienced the *identical* symptoms after installing ActiveState's "ActivePython" on my workstation. Restarting Outlook had no positive effect. Everything worked fine again when I removed ActivePython. Are you perchance using ActivePython on the affected workstation? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=924237&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon May 3 20:15:19 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon May 3 20:15:24 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-917586 ] Show data folder on WinXP CZ fails Message-ID: Bugs item #917586, was opened at 2004-03-17 07:34 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=917586&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tomas Valusek (tvalusek) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Show data folder on WinXP CZ fails Initial Comment: I'm using SpamBayes Outlook plugin v 0.9 on WinXP Home Czech Edition with Outlook2002SP2. When I click a "Show data folder" button, the error message shown in attachement appears. I think this is because my Windows username contains czech accented characters, but it's quite common in our area. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-05-04 10:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 No word from reporter, so assuming this works in later versions (as we fixed it!) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-04-26 22:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 This should work fine (as we have already fixed it a few versions ago :) Can you please attach a log from a session then this error is generated - please see the "Troubleshooting Guide" for details on the log. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=917586&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon May 3 20:17:55 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon May 3 20:18:05 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-913617 ] "do you want to save" after "show clues" Message-ID: Bugs item #913617, was opened at 2004-03-11 03:57 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=913617&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) >Status: Closed >Resolution: Wont Fix Priority: 3 Submitted By: Yves Gaffarel (src_be) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: "do you want to save" after "show clues" Initial Comment: When showing the clues for a message, Outlook asks if one wants to save the message. That is very unconvenient (well, rather somehow confusing). This is apparently caused by the method used to display the clues : SpamBayes apparently creates a new message to display the clues. When closing that message, Outlook is actually asking if one wants to save it as a draft (just as when one manually create a new email). Indeed, when one accepts to save it, it is saved as a draft. Good luck ! (and many thanks for SB, it saves me hours of work !) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-05-04 10:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I've looked into this, but can't find a solution :( We need "Don't know how to Fix", but "Wont Fix" is the closest. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=913617&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon May 3 20:19:31 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon May 3 20:19:35 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-912908 ] No filterable items using Franklin Covey Message-ID: Bugs item #912908, was opened at 2004-03-10 04:54 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=912908&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: George Neill (gtneill) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: No filterable items using Franklin Covey Initial Comment: When using Franklin Covey PlanPlus v1 for Outlook, the Delete as Spam button (v9) returns a No filterable mail items are selected. Version 8 worked fine with this plug- in. Franklin PlanPlus uses HTML to create a composite view with calendar, tasks, and items, on a single page. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-05-04 10:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 George - are you able to provide more info here? If you can, please also reset the bug status to "Open". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-03-16 10:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 So you get this error with *any* message that is selected? Could you please attach your most recent log file to this tracker? (The troubleshooting guide explains where to find it). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=912908&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon May 3 20:25:01 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon May 3 20:25:11 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-911734 ] Addin never checks if unavailable folders become available Message-ID: Bugs item #911734, was opened at 2004-03-08 14:10 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=911734&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Randy (rdemars) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) >Summary: Addin never checks if unavailable folders become available Initial Comment: I updates to the latest Outlook addin and have a problem now that I didn?t have with the previous version. When I connect to the Exchange server, Outlook appears to lock up for some time. I get multiple dialog boxes that say that outlook is requesting data from the exchange server. After about 2 minutes, my inbox finally appears, but none of the messages are scored. If I tell Spambayes to filter my inbox, it will then work. The attached log file indicates my folders were not available. I would guess it is some kind of communication timeout. My Outlook configuration is all the same as it was before I upgraded Spambayes, and it worked fine then. Here are my particulars: Windows XP ? all the latest service packs and patches Outlook 2002 SP2 Exchange server 5.5 Gateway 450X laptop Connected to Exchange server over VPN via WIFI and cable modem 2M up/128k down I wouldn?t think the problem was with Spambayes, except that the last version worked fine. It hasn?t worked correctly since I upgraded. I checked to make sure everything is enables, including Spambayes, and the COM addin and about Outlook 2002 stuff you talk about in the troubleshooting guide. Everything is enabled. Seems like some kind of communication issue. I haven?t been back to the office to connect to Exchange directly so I don?t know if the problem will exist when I am connected with 100M Ethernet. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-05-04 10:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 This will be exchange timing out. Once you select 'cancel' from the connection dialog, you will always then get that error for that session. But assuming you *don't* ever press cancel - I can see that exchange may timeout, but that outlook itself would re-try, or in someway handle it more elegantly (eg, popping a dialog asking you if you want to retry). However, SpamBayes isn't that smart - it just gets the error and gives up. Post 1.0, I can see that we could possibly fix this - I think people may be seeing the same base thing in a few exchange server related issues. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-03-16 10:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 >From the list (I asked him to try turning off background filtering, since I couldn't think of anything else that changed with 0.9, unless it's the spam field creation): """No luck. I turned off the background filtering option and the problem still exists. I get the Outlook requester saying it is requesting data from the Exchange server when I start outlook, and also as I switch from tab to tab on the Manager dialog box. If I cancel this, I get a Spambayes message reporting I have a configuration error telling me that my unsure folder is invalid. When I run the wizard to try to fix it, I can browse, but it only sees my Outlook data file (the one that resides on my hard drive) but none of my server-based folders (inbox, etc) It definitely seems like a communication issue somewhere. I don't know what could be different about my configuration, except that we use Exchange 5.5, which is old and temperamental.""" ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=911734&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon May 3 20:44:56 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon May 3 20:45:05 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-909282 ] Recover from Spam leaves message deleted Message-ID: Bugs item #909282, was opened at 2004-03-04 06:26 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=909282&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Ray Schnitzler (schnitz) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Recover from Spam leaves message deleted Initial Comment: When SpamBayes moves a message from, say, my Inbox to my Suspect folder, it effectively leaves a deleted copy in the Inbox. When I "Recover from Spam" on that message, the message is deleted from the Suspect folder, but not undeleted from the Inbox. The same is true if I drag the message back to the Inbox. If I drag the message to a different (non-spam) folder, a copy of the message appears there, undeleted. Any thoughts? Ray Running SpamBayes Outlook Addin Binary Version 0.9 (February 2004) on Windows 2000, with Outlook 2002. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-05-04 10:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 We haven't heard from the original reporter of the bug for some time. Without the requested information, there really isn't much we can do. If anyone does provide further information, please also change the bug status back to "Open". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-03-04 08:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 It sounds like you're using IMAP. Is that correct? Could you please attach a log file that includes this behaviour to this tracker? The troubleshooting guide explains how to find the log files. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=909282&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon May 3 20:47:07 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon May 3 20:47:13 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-904526 ] Large number of emails not automatically filtered Message-ID: Bugs item #904526, was opened at 2004-02-26 07:33 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=904526&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Aaron Rosenfeld (aragorn18) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Large number of emails not automatically filtered Initial Comment: Using Outlook XP, if more than about 6-7 e-mails come in at once, the messages are not automatically filtered and I have to choose Filter Messages from the SpamBayes menu. Background processing does not seem to do anything either. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-05-04 10:47 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 If you leave the missed messages alone, and wait for another new message to come in, does SpamBayes then filter all of the missed messages? Or do these missed messages remain unfiltered until you explicitly filter them? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Michael Sears (msears) Date: 2004-03-13 07:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=995740 Running windows xp and outlook 2003 I see the same problem. ON startup of outlook or when large qty of email comes in not all messages are scored. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=904526&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon May 3 20:47:28 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon May 3 20:47:31 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-922840 ] Score multipart/alternative separately Message-ID: Feature Requests item #922840, was opened at 2004-03-24 16:27 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by leobru You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=922840&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Leonid (leobru) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Score multipart/alternative separately Initial Comment: The amount of spam with multipart/alternative content where the plain text is a piece of prose or such, and the HTML is a UCE, is growing. My proposal is: - compute separate scores as if the text/plain part was empty, and as if the text/html part was empty - to compute the final score, use min(plain_hamscore, html_hamscore) and max(plain_spamscore, html_spamscore) because any disparity is by itself a spam indicator. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Leonid (leobru) Date: 2004-05-03 17:47 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=790676 A 75 Kb long spam message has been observed that scored an exact 0.50 because of that technique. The text/plain part was an enormous list of space-separated random words that happened to include enough "hammy" words in my database to saturate the default 150 word cutoff before the "spammy" ones would have started to prevail. Unless measures are taken, the spammers will learn the trick quickly. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=922840&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon May 3 21:03:37 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon May 3 21:03:57 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-903440 ] Fail to filter public folder Message-ID: Bugs item #903440, was opened at 2004-02-25 00:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=903440&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Rasmus Aaen (raaen) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Fail to filter public folder Initial Comment: If I mark a public folder ("Dns") for filtering, the Outlook addin stops working with the errormessage "Could not watch the specified folders". If my Inbox is the only folder filtered there are no problems. Filtering a public folder used to work in v. 0.81 I noticed that the folder does not have a "Spam" field, but manually creating it does not help. I have "Owner" rights on the public folder. After the error has occurred, the "Select folders" window is empty (see attached image). I have tried uninstalling/installing and deleting settings and database files. Logfile: Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\Rasmus\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\Rasmus\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 0 spam and 0 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin Binary Version 0.9 (February 2004) starting (with engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004)) on Windows 5.0.2195 (Service Pack 4) using Python 2.3.2+ (#49, Oct 23 2003, 15:50:06) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] SpamBayes: Watching (for filtering) in 'Mailbox - Rasmus Aaen/Inbox' ERROR: 'There was an error initializing the Spam plugin.\r\n\r\nSpam filtering has been disabled. Please re-configure\r\nand re-enable this plugin\r\n\r\nError details:\r\nCould not watch the specified folders' Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.pyc", line 1304, in FiltersChanged File "addin.pyc", line 1330, in UpdateFolderHooks File "addin.pyc", line 1358, in _HookFolderEvents File "msgstore.pyc", line 501, in GetFQName File "msgstore.pyc", line 547, in GetParent File "msgstore.pyc", line 527, in _FolderFromMAPIFolder com_error: (-2147467259, 'Unspecified error', None, None) Skipping processing of missed messages in folder 'Inbox', as it is not available Skipping processing of missed messages in folder 'Dns', as it is not available ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-05-04 11:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 This should be fixed in the 1.0b1 release (it has better error handing when fetching the full folder name). If not, please re-open. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-03-12 11:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Hmm. This means my comment is most likely invalid. Back to Mark for the clever figuring out bit :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: DSB (dsbowskill) Date: 2004-03-12 11:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=995952 Back on 1.a09 ... and further fiddling reveals that this problem only seems to occur when background filtering is turned on. This actually happens in v0081 as well, just never had background filter switched on before it seems. Here's the log file for 1.a09 with background filtering OFF: (with various privacy snips!) ---Warning: option experimental_ham_spam_imbalance_adjustment in section Classifier is deprecated Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 3360 spam and 3622 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin Binary Version 0.9 (February 2004) starting (with engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004)) on Windows 5.0.2195 (Service Pack 4) using Python 2.3.2+ (#49, Oct 23 2003, 15:50:06) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] SpamBayes: Watching (for filtering) in 'Mailbox - /Inbox' Folder 'Public Folders/IPM_SUBTREE/All Public Folders/News//Planning// Online' has no field named 'Spam' - creating Warning: failed to create the Outlook user-property in folder 'Public Folders/IPM_SUBTREE/All Public Folders/News//Planning//Online' (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (4096, 'Microsoft Outlook', "You don't have appropriate permission to perform this operation.", None, 0, -2147024891), None) WARNING: We just created the user field in folder Public Folders/IPM_SUBTREE/All Public Folders/News//Planning//Online, but it appears to not exist. Something is probably wrong with DoesFolderHaveOutlookField() SpamBayes: Watching (for filtering) in 'Public Folders/IPM_SUBTREE/All Public Folders/News//Planning//Online' SpamBayes: Watching (for incremental training) in 'Mailbox - /Spam' Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox' took 3.73427ms Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Online' took 144.868ms --- And here's the logfile with background filtering ON. --- SpamBayes: Watching (for filtering) in 'Mailbox - /Inbox' Folder 'Public Folders/IPM_SUBTREE/All Public Folders/News//Planning//Online' has no field named 'Spam' - creating Warning: failed to create the Outlook user-property in folder 'Public Folders/IPM_SUBTREE/All Public Folders/News//Planning//Online' (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (4096, 'Microsoft Outlook', "You don't have appropriate permission to perform this operation.", None, 0, -2147024891), None) WARNING: We just created the user field in folder Public Folders/IPM_SUBTREE/All Public Folders/News//Planning//Online, but it appears to not exist. Something is probably wrong with DoesFolderHaveOutlookField() ERROR: 'There was an error initializing the Spam plugin.\r\n\r\nSpam filtering has been disabled. Please re- configure\r\nand re-enable this plugin\r\n\r\nError details:\r\nCould not watch the specified folders' Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.pyc", line 1304, in FiltersChanged File "addin.pyc", line 1330, in UpdateFolderHooks File "addin.pyc", line 1395, in _HookFolderEvents File "addin.pyc", line 277, in Init File "msgstore.pyc", line 629, in IsReceiveFolder com_error: (-2147221246, 'Invalid window handle', None, None) Spam filtering is disabled - ignoring new message pythoncom error: Python error invoking COM method. Traceback (most recent call last): File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 275, in _Invoke_ File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 280, in _invoke_ File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 608, in _invokeex_ File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 542, in _invokeex_ File "addin.pyc", line 383, in OnItemAdd File "win32com\client\__init__.pyc", line 496, in __getattr__ File "win32com\client\__init__.pyc", line 455, in __getattr__ File "win32com\client\__init__.pyc", line 446, in _ApplyTypes_ pywintypes.com_error: (-2147221233, 'OLE error 0x8004010f', None, None) --- Result! :) Seems to work ok, but not with background filtering. Remember I have 'Editor' priv of the public folder (I can delete the items from it) I am *moving* the spam from the public folder and into a sub- folder on my on mailbox. DSB ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-03-12 11:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Mark: this is presumably a result of SB now trying to create the spam field for all the folders, yes? Could it fail more gracefully here? (I'd write a patch, but I'm not very familiar with this bit of the code). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: DSB (dsbowskill) Date: 2004-03-12 11:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=995952 Forgot to mention ... I am moving the spam OUT of the public folder and into one of my mailbox sub-folders. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: DSB (dsbowskill) Date: 2004-03-12 11:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=995952 Exactly the same problem, though I went back to 0081 in order to fix it. 0081 works, 1.0a9 doesn't. Nothing to do with our exchange server, so this isn't the problem (at least for me). I do get this error in the logfile, which doesn't stop the addin working for 0081, but it does seem to for 1.0a9. (I don't have admin over the public folder I'm filtering, but I am 'Editor' priv. --- Warning: failed to create the Outlook user-property in folder 'Public Folders/IPM_SUBTREE/All Public Folders/News//Planning//Online' (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (4096, 'Microsoft Outlook', "You don't have appropriate permission to perform this operation.", None, 0, -2147024891), None) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Judy Dye (judydye) Date: 2004-03-02 20:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=988571 I have the same problem but it has only occurred since upgrading from Exchange 5.5 to 2003 - perhaps this is causing the problem? Trace SpamBayes Outlook Addin Binary Version 0.9 (February 2004) starting (with engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004)) on Windows 5.0.2195 (Service Pack 4) using Python 2.3.2+ (#49, Oct 23 2003, 15:50:06) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] ERROR: 'There was an error initializing the Spam plugin.\r\n\r\nSpam filtering has been disabled. Please re- configure\r\nand re-enable this plugin\r\n\r\nError details:\r\nCould not watch the specified folders' Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.pyc", line 1304, in FiltersChanged File "addin.pyc", line 1330, in UpdateFolderHooks File "addin.pyc", line 1395, in _HookFolderEvents File "addin.pyc", line 277, in Init File "msgstore.pyc", line 629, in IsReceiveFolder com_error: (-2147221246, 'Invalid window handle', None, None) Skipping processing of missed messages in folder 'Facsimiles', as it is not available Skipping processing of missed messages in folder 'sales', as it is not available Skipping processing of missed messages in folder 'Support', as it is not available Skipping processing of missed messages in folder 'Inbox', as it is not available Hope this helps........ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ladd Nelson (gladdys) Date: 2004-03-02 10:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=840787 I've recently encountered this problem as well. However in my case, I want SpamBayes to move detected spam to the public folder for use by our IT staff. Once the network folder is identified and the "Could not watch the specified folders" message appears, the only way I've been able to clear the error is to retrain SpamBayes through the training wizard which allows me to specify a local folder towards the end of the wizard. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=903440&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon May 3 21:04:52 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon May 3 21:04:55 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-903097 ] Mailbox browser won't add folders Message-ID: Bugs item #903097, was opened at 2004-02-24 10:57 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=903097&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Miguel Le?n (esmiguel) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Mailbox browser won't add folders Initial Comment: Mailbox browse won't add other folders When using the SpamBayes Manager 0.9, using the browse button to browse folders, whether for filtering, won't add the connected mailboxes and folders. The browse window will see all the server mailboxes I am connected to, but will not add (the ok button don't do anything). Only my own. Have verified permissions on all the relevant mailboxes -- and all the mailboxes are browsable in Outlook itself. Environment: Outlook 2002 Windows 2000 Pro Exchange 5.5 Spambayes Outllok Addin Binary Version 0.9 (February 2004) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-05-04 11:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 We haven't heard from the original reporter of the bug for some time. Without the requested information, there really isn't much we can do. If anyone does provide further information, please also change the bug status back to "Open". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-03-16 10:43 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Could you please try this again (to get the log entries), and then attach your most recent logfile to this tracker? The troubleshooting guide explains where to find the log file. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=903097&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon May 3 21:33:47 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon May 3 21:33:52 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-904526 ] Large number of emails not automatically filtered Message-ID: Bugs item #904526, was opened at 2004-02-25 12:33 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by msears You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=904526&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Aaron Rosenfeld (aragorn18) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Large number of emails not automatically filtered Initial Comment: Using Outlook XP, if more than about 6-7 e-mails come in at once, the messages are not automatically filtered and I have to choose Filter Messages from the SpamBayes menu. Background processing does not seem to do anything either. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Michael Sears (msears) Date: 2004-05-03 18:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=995740 At the time messages remained unfiltered and unscored. I can't duplicate the error in the two most recent releases. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-05-03 17:47 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 If you leave the missed messages alone, and wait for another new message to come in, does SpamBayes then filter all of the missed messages? Or do these missed messages remain unfiltered until you explicitly filter them? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Michael Sears (msears) Date: 2004-03-12 12:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=995740 Running windows xp and outlook 2003 I see the same problem. ON startup of outlook or when large qty of email comes in not all messages are scored. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=904526&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon May 3 21:36:33 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon May 3 21:36:38 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-899260 ] UnicodeEncodeError while training Message-ID: Bugs item #899260, was opened at 2004-02-18 12:44 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=899260&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Magnus Bjornsson (mbjornsson) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: UnicodeEncodeError while training Initial Comment: While training the database I got a traceback caused by a UnicodeEncodeError (see attached log file). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-05-04 11:36 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 This has been fixed in the most recent build, by virtue of the fact it uses Python 2.3.3 rather than the "Python 2.3.2+" referenced in the log. I just verified that shutil.copy2 in 2.3.3 handles unicode filenames (and is what was failing in this case) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-03-16 10:50 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This is a result of having a "?" in the path to your data directory (from your name). (I thought we had fixed all the unicode filename errors, but obviously not). Mark, does this mean that shutil can't handle unicode paths? What do we do about this? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=899260&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon May 3 21:40:05 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon May 3 21:40:12 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-899060 ] SpamBayes could not be initialized Error Message-ID: Bugs item #899060, was opened at 2004-02-18 07:40 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=899060&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) >Status: Closed >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: Gregory Engel (gpeangel) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: SpamBayes could not be initialized Error Initial Comment: Upgraded from 081 to 1.0a9. Restart of Outlook 2000 resulted in a "could not initialize" addin error message with a suggestion to restart Outlook. Restarting Outlook did not help. Uninstalling 081 and 1.0a9, reinstalling 1.0a9 did not help. Note: pst file is located on a shared network drive. I was able to upgrade a different box (Outlook 2000, 081 > 1.0a9 upgrade) successfully which has a local pst file. Log file: Error connecting to Outlook! Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.pyc", line 1191, in OnConnection File "manager.pyc", line 908, in GetManager File "manager.pyc", line 344, in __init__ File "manager.pyc", line 492, in LocateDataDirectory File "win32com\shell\shell.pyc", line 9, in ? File "win32com\shell\shell.pyc", line 7, in __load ImportError: DLL load failed: A device attached to the system is not functioning. ERROR: 'There was an error initializing the SpamBayes addin\r\n\r\nPlease re-start Outlook and try again.' Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.pyc", line 1191, in OnConnection File "manager.pyc", line 908, in GetManager File "manager.pyc", line 344, in __init__ File "manager.pyc", line 492, in LocateDataDirectory File "win32com\shell\shell.pyc", line 9, in ? File "win32com\shell\shell.pyc", line 7, in __load ImportError: DLL load failed: A device attached to the system is not functioning. pythoncom error: Failed to call the universal dispatcher Traceback (most recent call last): File "win32com\universal.pyc", line 173, in dispatch File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 322, in _InvokeEx_ File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 608, in _invokeex_ File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 542, in _invokeex_ File "addin.pyc", line 1227, in OnStartupComplete exceptions.AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'never_configured' SpamBayes - Disconnecting from Outlook pythoncom error: Failed to call the universal dispatcher Traceback (most recent call last): File "win32com\universal.pyc", line 173, in dispatch File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 322, in _InvokeEx_ File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 608, in _invokeex_ File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 542, in _invokeex_ File "addin.pyc", line 1409, in OnDisconnection exceptions.AttributeError: OutlookAddin instance has no attribute 'explorers_events' ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-05-04 11:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Tracking this in 881739 fail to work with early shell32.dll ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Gregory Engel (gpeangel) Date: 2004-03-11 09:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=265312 MS KB 297019 does not apply in my case as I am not using exchange server. Simply downloading e-mail from a pop server. Versions prior to 1.0a9 worked just fine with the same arrangement of *.pst files on a network drive. The addin broke with 1.0a9. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-03-08 16:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 >From Mark: This generally means their shell32.dll windows file is out of date - I would like to know the specific symbol in question though - maybe you can ask a reporter to zip up their shell32.dll? Is anyone willing to do this? You could attach it here, or mail it to me or Mark. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Pete Marion (ima_user) Date: 2004-03-07 04:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=923210 "Note: pst file is located on a shared network drive. I was able to upgrade a different box (Outlook 2000, 081 > 1.0a9 upgrade) successfully which has a local pst file." -- Perhaps this is related to the time to access the PST file over the LAN. See below, from MS KB 297019 Additional information here: http://www.microsoft.com/office/ork/2003/three/ch8/OutC03 .htm -- Why Outlook .pst files are unsupported over a LAN or WAN link Behaviors of .pst Files over WAN/LAN Links All operations take longer. Write operations can take approximately four times longer than read operations. Outlook has slower performance than the Exchange Client. Recommendations Microsoft recommends the following solutions, instead of .pst files over a LAN or WAN: Exchange Server with .ost File When you are working over a WAN or LAN, it is better to use the offline folder files (.ost files) to allow the remote client to work without being connected to the server. .ost files support local replication, which means that all folders and their data can be replicated to the .ost, not just e-mail messages, as is the case when you use remote mail. The use of .ost files is therefore more efficient and more useful. .ost files also do not have a dependency on the availability of the Exchange Server computer (except to synchronize new data from the server to the client and vice versa), because the information is cached in the local .ost file. This improves performance because the information being viewed is stored on the local drive while the master copy of the data remains on the server, where it can be accessed and backed up. .ost files also provide data redundancy, which ensures greater integrity and recoverability of the data. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-20 09:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 There was a report that looked like it was the same thing on the list, and I've just had an email from Gregory Warnes with the same problem - SR-1, Windows 2000 Pro. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-19 12:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting dupe in [ 899815 ] Outlook plugin fails to initialize ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=899060&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon May 3 21:42:31 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon May 3 21:42:38 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-890531 ] Changed attachments PR_RECORD_KEY Message-ID: Bugs item #890531, was opened at 2004-02-05 03:17 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=890531&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Wilfried Pohl (wilfried_pohl) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Changed attachments PR_RECORD_KEY Initial Comment: The add-in changes the PR_RECORD_KEY propertiy of the attachments. That confuses other add-ins. Also the add-in sets all MAPI properties of an email (to an unchanged value) and not only adding the userproperties Spam/PT_DOUBLE SpamBayesOriginalFolderStoreID/PT_BINARY SpamBayesOriginalFolderID/PT_BINARY That causes a of lot unnecessary traffic. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-05-04 11:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 We don't change PR_RECORD_KEY. We do move the message, and this has that side effect. We also don't set all properties to an unchanged value - but again, this may be a side-effect of the move. Maybe you could explain your problem a little more? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=890531&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon May 3 21:43:52 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon May 3 21:43:57 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-881754 ] Message Filtering not working and unable to "Delete as Spam" Message-ID: Bugs item #881754, was opened at 2004-01-22 09:11 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=881754&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Out of Date Priority: 5 Submitted By: Timothy Shih (tshihsensicast) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Message Filtering not working and unable to "Delete as Spam" Initial Comment: I am not sure how this occurred, SpamBayes was working fine for me until recently. However, currently SpamBayes no longer filters messages and when I hit the delete as spam button it generates the following error in the log file : pythoncom error: Python error invoking COM method. Traceback (most recent call last): File "out1.pyz/win32com.server.policy", line 275, in _Invoke_ File "out1.pyz/win32com.server.policy", line 280, in _invoke_ File "out1.pyz/win32com.server.policy", line 541, in _invokeex_ File "out1.pyz/addin", line 588, in OnClick File "out1.pyz/addin", line 987, in GetSelectedMessages File "out1.pyz/win32com.client", line 451, in __getattr__ File "out1.pyz/win32com.client", line 445, in _ApplyTypes_ pywintypes.com_error: (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (4096, 'Microsoft Outlook', 'The operation failed.', None, 0, -2147467259), None) I have attempted deleting the application data and uninstalling, then reinstalling SpamBayes to no effect. I have also attempted to register the dll via the command-line, also to no effect. This is on windows XP w/ Outlook 2002 Sp-1, SpamBayes v0.81. I have attached the relevant log file to this report. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-05-04 11:43 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Please upgrade to the latest and open a new bug if you have the same problem - 0.8 is very old, and we have fixed lots. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=881754&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon May 3 21:45:40 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon May 3 21:45:48 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-893357 ] Invalid window handle on recieve folder Message-ID: Bugs item #893357, was opened at 2004-02-09 23:34 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=893357&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 001-007 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Rastislav Wartiak (felcer) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Invalid window handle on recieve folder Initial Comment: In localized version of MS Exchange (Czech) are folder names renamed, including Inbox folder and contain national characters. This might cause this error. *** SpamBayes is NOT enabled, so will not filter incoming mail. *** ERROR enumerating a receive folder - (- 2147221246, 'Invalid window handle', None, None) Traceback (most recent call last): File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dlgcore", line 310, in OnCommand File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dlgcore", line 262, in ApplyHandlingOptionValueError File "out1.pyz/dialogs.processors", line 76, in OnCommand File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dialog_map", line 322, in OnClicked File "out1.pyz/dialogs", line 64, in ShowWizard File "out1.pyz/config_wizard", line 142, in CreateWizardConfig File "out1.pyz/config_wizard", line 49, in InitWizardConfig File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 372, in YieldReceiveFolders File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 337, in GetFolder msgstore.NotFoundException: NotFoundException: Exception 0x8004010a (MAPI_E_OBJECT_DELETED): OLE error 0x8004010a ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-05-04 11:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 This specific error was recently. There are still probably some issues when you delete a SpamBayes folder, but it won't be this one :) Please keep your eye out for the next version. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=893357&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon May 3 22:29:20 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon May 3 22:29:32 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-904526 ] Large number of emails not automatically filtered Message-ID: Bugs item #904526, was opened at 2004-02-25 15:33 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by aragorn18 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=904526&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Aaron Rosenfeld (aragorn18) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Large number of emails not automatically filtered Initial Comment: Using Outlook XP, if more than about 6-7 e-mails come in at once, the messages are not automatically filtered and I have to choose Filter Messages from the SpamBayes menu. Background processing does not seem to do anything either. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Aaron Rosenfeld (aragorn18) Date: 2004-05-03 21:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=970660 New messages are filtered correctly, but the previous ones remain unfiltered. This still happens in the latest version. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Michael Sears (msears) Date: 2004-05-03 20:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=995740 At the time messages remained unfiltered and unscored. I can't duplicate the error in the two most recent releases. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-05-03 19:47 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 If you leave the missed messages alone, and wait for another new message to come in, does SpamBayes then filter all of the missed messages? Or do these missed messages remain unfiltered until you explicitly filter them? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Michael Sears (msears) Date: 2004-03-12 15:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=995740 Running windows xp and outlook 2003 I see the same problem. ON startup of outlook or when large qty of email comes in not all messages are scored. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=904526&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue May 4 02:54:44 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue May 4 02:54:57 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-941639 ] Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories Message-ID: Bugs item #941639, was opened at 2004-04-25 01:42 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mrpowell You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=941639&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0b1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 9 Submitted By: mrpowell (mrpowell) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories Initial Comment: Unable to register addin in Outlook 2000 SR1 9.0.0.5414 / Microsoft Windows 98 4.10.2222 A. I uninstalled the Spambayes-outlook-0081 because I could never get it to register as an addin. (consistent error) and tried the latest release 1.0b1 and it failed also. I ran regsvr32.exe outlook_addin.dll as described in the trouble shooting guide and the windows error was that it could not locate a file to execute. This is the same error I get every time I try to install. I purged all references to spambayes from the registry before trying the latest fresh install. This is the log from the latest two failed attempts with 1.0.b1: Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.py", line 33, in ? File "win32com\__init__.pyc", line 6, in ? File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pythoncom.pyc", line 2, in ? #@c File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pywintypes.pyc", line 69, in ? File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pywintypes.pyc", line 45, in __import_pywin32_system_module__ ImportError: Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.py", line 33, in ? File "win32com\__init__.pyc", line 6, in ? File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pythoncom.pyc", line 2, in ? #@c File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pywintypes.pyc", line 69, in ? File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pywintypes.pyc", line 45, in __import_pywin32_system_module__ ImportError: Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories my paths: C:\Program Files\SpamBayes D:\Program Files\Microsoft Office\Office\Outlook.exe C:\WINDOWS\Application Data\Microsoft\Outlook C:\WINDOWS\Profiles\Marc Powell\Application Data\Microsoft\Outlook What is a 'pywintypes' module and where is it located? Which of my sys.path directories do I have to stick in the freezer before I can copy the 'pywintypes' module into it? Any help will be greatly appreciated as this has become a personal challenge. Marc Powell ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: mrpowell (mrpowell) Date: 2004-05-04 02:54 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1028635 I performed another clean install of a fresh download of 1.0b1 which resulted in the exact exception as before (Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories). The file, pywintypes23.dll. is in the "lib" subdirectory. See the attached file, "c program files SpamBayes.txt"; a printout of the c program files SpamBayes directory. Also attached is the only OUTLOOK_ADDIN_REGISTER.EXE.log for this install. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-05-03 13:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 The problem is not a corrupted pywintypes.pyc. The pywintypes.pyc must be running correctly for you to get the "isn't in frozen sys.path" exception. The purpose of the .pyc file is to locate and load a related DLL file, which in the case of the SpamBayes install should be named pywintypes23.dll. This file should be installed in the "lib" subdirectory of your SpamBayes installation. Could you attach a directory listing of the files in the SpamBayes "lib" directory? If possible, also attach any SpamBayes log files you can find as describe in the Troubleshooting Guide. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: mrpowell (mrpowell) Date: 2004-05-02 23:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1028635 Thank you anadelonbrin for responding. I do not have Python installed. Why would the pywintypes.pyc file cause a problem on each and every install from a number of different (fresh) downloads from different mirrors, especially with a total registry crawl to remove all traces of the previous install? "You could try running the plug-in from source and seeing if that works" what do you mean "from source"? Can I replace the pywintypes.pyc file with a known good file? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-02 23:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The pywintypes module is a file that should be in the spambayes.zip file in the lib directory where spambayes was installed. It's not necessarily a path issue, because the file that's raising the error is the pywintypes.pyc file itself. Do you have Python installed by any chance? If so, is it the build from python.org or the ActiveState one (or another one)? You could try running the plug-in from source and seeing if that works. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=941639&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue May 4 03:13:34 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue May 4 03:13:41 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-941639 ] Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories Message-ID: Bugs item #941639, was opened at 2004-04-25 17:42 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=941639&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0b1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 9 Submitted By: mrpowell (mrpowell) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories Initial Comment: Unable to register addin in Outlook 2000 SR1 9.0.0.5414 / Microsoft Windows 98 4.10.2222 A. I uninstalled the Spambayes-outlook-0081 because I could never get it to register as an addin. (consistent error) and tried the latest release 1.0b1 and it failed also. I ran regsvr32.exe outlook_addin.dll as described in the trouble shooting guide and the windows error was that it could not locate a file to execute. This is the same error I get every time I try to install. I purged all references to spambayes from the registry before trying the latest fresh install. This is the log from the latest two failed attempts with 1.0.b1: Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.py", line 33, in ? File "win32com\__init__.pyc", line 6, in ? File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pythoncom.pyc", line 2, in ? #@c File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pywintypes.pyc", line 69, in ? File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pywintypes.pyc", line 45, in __import_pywin32_system_module__ ImportError: Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.py", line 33, in ? File "win32com\__init__.pyc", line 6, in ? File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pythoncom.pyc", line 2, in ? #@c File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pywintypes.pyc", line 69, in ? File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pywintypes.pyc", line 45, in __import_pywin32_system_module__ ImportError: Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories my paths: C:\Program Files\SpamBayes D:\Program Files\Microsoft Office\Office\Outlook.exe C:\WINDOWS\Application Data\Microsoft\Outlook C:\WINDOWS\Profiles\Marc Powell\Application Data\Microsoft\Outlook What is a 'pywintypes' module and where is it located? Which of my sys.path directories do I have to stick in the freezer before I can copy the 'pywintypes' module into it? Any help will be greatly appreciated as this has become a personal challenge. Marc Powell ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-04 19:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Either something really weird is going on or sys.path has somehow ended up not being what it should by the time pywintypes.py is imported. Either way, I can't think of anything to resolve this apart from building a diagnostic version of the binary (with various debugging statements in pywintypes.py). Kenny/Mark - can you think of anything? By "running from source", I mean running the plug-in from source code rather than from the binary version that the installer installs. You do this by installing Python & pywin32 and using the source distibution of SpamBayes. The website has details. It could certainly make it easier to diagnose (unless the problem didn't exist, which is possible), but is more hassle for you. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: mrpowell (mrpowell) Date: 2004-05-04 18:54 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1028635 I performed another clean install of a fresh download of 1.0b1 which resulted in the exact exception as before (Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories). The file, pywintypes23.dll. is in the "lib" subdirectory. See the attached file, "c program files SpamBayes.txt"; a printout of the c program files SpamBayes directory. Also attached is the only OUTLOOK_ADDIN_REGISTER.EXE.log for this install. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-05-04 05:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 The problem is not a corrupted pywintypes.pyc. The pywintypes.pyc must be running correctly for you to get the "isn't in frozen sys.path" exception. The purpose of the .pyc file is to locate and load a related DLL file, which in the case of the SpamBayes install should be named pywintypes23.dll. This file should be installed in the "lib" subdirectory of your SpamBayes installation. Could you attach a directory listing of the files in the SpamBayes "lib" directory? If possible, also attach any SpamBayes log files you can find as describe in the Troubleshooting Guide. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: mrpowell (mrpowell) Date: 2004-05-03 15:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1028635 Thank you anadelonbrin for responding. I do not have Python installed. Why would the pywintypes.pyc file cause a problem on each and every install from a number of different (fresh) downloads from different mirrors, especially with a total registry crawl to remove all traces of the previous install? "You could try running the plug-in from source and seeing if that works" what do you mean "from source"? Can I replace the pywintypes.pyc file with a known good file? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-03 15:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The pywintypes module is a file that should be in the spambayes.zip file in the lib directory where spambayes was installed. It's not necessarily a path issue, because the file that's raising the error is the pywintypes.pyc file itself. Do you have Python installed by any chance? If so, is it the build from python.org or the ActiveState one (or another one)? You could try running the plug-in from source and seeing if that works. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=941639&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue May 4 03:20:12 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue May 4 03:20:17 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-941639 ] Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories Message-ID: Bugs item #941639, was opened at 2004-04-25 15:42 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=941639&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0b1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 9 Submitted By: mrpowell (mrpowell) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories Initial Comment: Unable to register addin in Outlook 2000 SR1 9.0.0.5414 / Microsoft Windows 98 4.10.2222 A. I uninstalled the Spambayes-outlook-0081 because I could never get it to register as an addin. (consistent error) and tried the latest release 1.0b1 and it failed also. I ran regsvr32.exe outlook_addin.dll as described in the trouble shooting guide and the windows error was that it could not locate a file to execute. This is the same error I get every time I try to install. I purged all references to spambayes from the registry before trying the latest fresh install. This is the log from the latest two failed attempts with 1.0.b1: Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.py", line 33, in ? File "win32com\__init__.pyc", line 6, in ? File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pythoncom.pyc", line 2, in ? #@c File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pywintypes.pyc", line 69, in ? File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pywintypes.pyc", line 45, in __import_pywin32_system_module__ ImportError: Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.py", line 33, in ? File "win32com\__init__.pyc", line 6, in ? File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pythoncom.pyc", line 2, in ? #@c File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pywintypes.pyc", line 69, in ? File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pywintypes.pyc", line 45, in __import_pywin32_system_module__ ImportError: Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories my paths: C:\Program Files\SpamBayes D:\Program Files\Microsoft Office\Office\Outlook.exe C:\WINDOWS\Application Data\Microsoft\Outlook C:\WINDOWS\Profiles\Marc Powell\Application Data\Microsoft\Outlook What is a 'pywintypes' module and where is it located? Which of my sys.path directories do I have to stick in the freezer before I can copy the 'pywintypes' module into it? Any help will be greatly appreciated as this has become a personal challenge. Marc Powell ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-05-04 17:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Here is something I find strange. From OUTLOOK_ADDIN_REGISTER.EXE.log ... File "addin.py", line 33, in ? File "win32com\__init__.pyc", line 6, in ? File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pythoncom.pyc", line 2, in ? #@c Note 2 things: * addin.py and win32com\__init__ do not reference the .zip file. * pythoncom.pyc references the .zip file, and has garbage for the source line. I would expect no source-lines at all. Is almost looks as though the .zip file has been expanded!? I might follow this as a clue... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-04 17:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Either something really weird is going on or sys.path has somehow ended up not being what it should by the time pywintypes.py is imported. Either way, I can't think of anything to resolve this apart from building a diagnostic version of the binary (with various debugging statements in pywintypes.py). Kenny/Mark - can you think of anything? By "running from source", I mean running the plug-in from source code rather than from the binary version that the installer installs. You do this by installing Python & pywin32 and using the source distibution of SpamBayes. The website has details. It could certainly make it easier to diagnose (unless the problem didn't exist, which is possible), but is more hassle for you. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: mrpowell (mrpowell) Date: 2004-05-04 16:54 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1028635 I performed another clean install of a fresh download of 1.0b1 which resulted in the exact exception as before (Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories). The file, pywintypes23.dll. is in the "lib" subdirectory. See the attached file, "c program files SpamBayes.txt"; a printout of the c program files SpamBayes directory. Also attached is the only OUTLOOK_ADDIN_REGISTER.EXE.log for this install. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-05-04 03:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 The problem is not a corrupted pywintypes.pyc. The pywintypes.pyc must be running correctly for you to get the "isn't in frozen sys.path" exception. The purpose of the .pyc file is to locate and load a related DLL file, which in the case of the SpamBayes install should be named pywintypes23.dll. This file should be installed in the "lib" subdirectory of your SpamBayes installation. Could you attach a directory listing of the files in the SpamBayes "lib" directory? If possible, also attach any SpamBayes log files you can find as describe in the Troubleshooting Guide. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: mrpowell (mrpowell) Date: 2004-05-03 13:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1028635 Thank you anadelonbrin for responding. I do not have Python installed. Why would the pywintypes.pyc file cause a problem on each and every install from a number of different (fresh) downloads from different mirrors, especially with a total registry crawl to remove all traces of the previous install? "You could try running the plug-in from source and seeing if that works" what do you mean "from source"? Can I replace the pywintypes.pyc file with a known good file? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-03 13:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The pywintypes module is a file that should be in the spambayes.zip file in the lib directory where spambayes was installed. It's not necessarily a path issue, because the file that's raising the error is the pywintypes.pyc file itself. Do you have Python installed by any chance? If so, is it the build from python.org or the ActiveState one (or another one)? You could try running the plug-in from source and seeing if that works. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=941639&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue May 4 03:21:13 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue May 4 03:21:18 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-941639 ] Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories Message-ID: Bugs item #941639, was opened at 2004-04-25 01:42 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mrpowell You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=941639&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0b1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 9 Submitted By: mrpowell (mrpowell) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories Initial Comment: Unable to register addin in Outlook 2000 SR1 9.0.0.5414 / Microsoft Windows 98 4.10.2222 A. I uninstalled the Spambayes-outlook-0081 because I could never get it to register as an addin. (consistent error) and tried the latest release 1.0b1 and it failed also. I ran regsvr32.exe outlook_addin.dll as described in the trouble shooting guide and the windows error was that it could not locate a file to execute. This is the same error I get every time I try to install. I purged all references to spambayes from the registry before trying the latest fresh install. This is the log from the latest two failed attempts with 1.0.b1: Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.py", line 33, in ? File "win32com\__init__.pyc", line 6, in ? File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pythoncom.pyc", line 2, in ? #@c File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pywintypes.pyc", line 69, in ? File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pywintypes.pyc", line 45, in __import_pywin32_system_module__ ImportError: Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.py", line 33, in ? File "win32com\__init__.pyc", line 6, in ? File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pythoncom.pyc", line 2, in ? #@c File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pywintypes.pyc", line 69, in ? File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pywintypes.pyc", line 45, in __import_pywin32_system_module__ ImportError: Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories my paths: C:\Program Files\SpamBayes D:\Program Files\Microsoft Office\Office\Outlook.exe C:\WINDOWS\Application Data\Microsoft\Outlook C:\WINDOWS\Profiles\Marc Powell\Application Data\Microsoft\Outlook What is a 'pywintypes' module and where is it located? Which of my sys.path directories do I have to stick in the freezer before I can copy the 'pywintypes' module into it? Any help will be greatly appreciated as this has become a personal challenge. Marc Powell ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: mrpowell (mrpowell) Date: 2004-05-04 03:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1028635 OUTLOOK_ADDIN_REGISTER.EXE.log 5/4/04. I wiill try "running from source" if it will help to put this one to bed. speaking of bed... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-05-04 03:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Here is something I find strange. From OUTLOOK_ADDIN_REGISTER.EXE.log ... File "addin.py", line 33, in ? File "win32com\__init__.pyc", line 6, in ? File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pythoncom.pyc", line 2, in ? #@c Note 2 things: * addin.py and win32com\__init__ do not reference the .zip file. * pythoncom.pyc references the .zip file, and has garbage for the source line. I would expect no source-lines at all. Is almost looks as though the .zip file has been expanded!? I might follow this as a clue... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-04 03:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Either something really weird is going on or sys.path has somehow ended up not being what it should by the time pywintypes.py is imported. Either way, I can't think of anything to resolve this apart from building a diagnostic version of the binary (with various debugging statements in pywintypes.py). Kenny/Mark - can you think of anything? By "running from source", I mean running the plug-in from source code rather than from the binary version that the installer installs. You do this by installing Python & pywin32 and using the source distibution of SpamBayes. The website has details. It could certainly make it easier to diagnose (unless the problem didn't exist, which is possible), but is more hassle for you. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: mrpowell (mrpowell) Date: 2004-05-04 02:54 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1028635 I performed another clean install of a fresh download of 1.0b1 which resulted in the exact exception as before (Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories). The file, pywintypes23.dll. is in the "lib" subdirectory. See the attached file, "c program files SpamBayes.txt"; a printout of the c program files SpamBayes directory. Also attached is the only OUTLOOK_ADDIN_REGISTER.EXE.log for this install. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-05-03 13:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 The problem is not a corrupted pywintypes.pyc. The pywintypes.pyc must be running correctly for you to get the "isn't in frozen sys.path" exception. The purpose of the .pyc file is to locate and load a related DLL file, which in the case of the SpamBayes install should be named pywintypes23.dll. This file should be installed in the "lib" subdirectory of your SpamBayes installation. Could you attach a directory listing of the files in the SpamBayes "lib" directory? If possible, also attach any SpamBayes log files you can find as describe in the Troubleshooting Guide. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: mrpowell (mrpowell) Date: 2004-05-02 23:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1028635 Thank you anadelonbrin for responding. I do not have Python installed. Why would the pywintypes.pyc file cause a problem on each and every install from a number of different (fresh) downloads from different mirrors, especially with a total registry crawl to remove all traces of the previous install? "You could try running the plug-in from source and seeing if that works" what do you mean "from source"? Can I replace the pywintypes.pyc file with a known good file? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-02 23:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The pywintypes module is a file that should be in the spambayes.zip file in the lib directory where spambayes was installed. It's not necessarily a path issue, because the file that's raising the error is the pywintypes.pyc file itself. Do you have Python installed by any chance? If so, is it the build from python.org or the ActiveState one (or another one)? You could try running the plug-in from source and seeing if that works. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=941639&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue May 4 03:30:35 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue May 4 03:30:43 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-941639 ] Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories Message-ID: Bugs item #941639, was opened at 2004-04-25 15:42 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=941639&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0b1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 9 Submitted By: mrpowell (mrpowell) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories Initial Comment: Unable to register addin in Outlook 2000 SR1 9.0.0.5414 / Microsoft Windows 98 4.10.2222 A. I uninstalled the Spambayes-outlook-0081 because I could never get it to register as an addin. (consistent error) and tried the latest release 1.0b1 and it failed also. I ran regsvr32.exe outlook_addin.dll as described in the trouble shooting guide and the windows error was that it could not locate a file to execute. This is the same error I get every time I try to install. I purged all references to spambayes from the registry before trying the latest fresh install. This is the log from the latest two failed attempts with 1.0.b1: Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.py", line 33, in ? File "win32com\__init__.pyc", line 6, in ? File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pythoncom.pyc", line 2, in ? #@c File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pywintypes.pyc", line 69, in ? File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pywintypes.pyc", line 45, in __import_pywin32_system_module__ ImportError: Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.py", line 33, in ? File "win32com\__init__.pyc", line 6, in ? File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pythoncom.pyc", line 2, in ? #@c File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pywintypes.pyc", line 69, in ? File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pywintypes.pyc", line 45, in __import_pywin32_system_module__ ImportError: Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories my paths: C:\Program Files\SpamBayes D:\Program Files\Microsoft Office\Office\Outlook.exe C:\WINDOWS\Application Data\Microsoft\Outlook C:\WINDOWS\Profiles\Marc Powell\Application Data\Microsoft\Outlook What is a 'pywintypes' module and where is it located? Which of my sys.path directories do I have to stick in the freezer before I can copy the 'pywintypes' module into it? Any help will be greatly appreciated as this has become a personal challenge. Marc Powell ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-05-04 17:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 If I make a local hack to simulate this error (and change the error text ;), I see: Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.py", line 33, in ? File "win32com\__init__.pyc", line 6, in ? File "pythoncom.pyc", line 2, in ? File "pywintypes.pyc", line 69, in ? File "pywintypes.pyc", line 45, in __import_pywin32_system_module__ ImportError: Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories ['E:\src\spambayes\windows\py2exe\dist\lib\spambayes.zip'] Note there is no source-line shown, and that none of the files reference the .zip file. However, if I replace create a *directory* spambayes.zip, and unzip the contents of the real .zip file into it, here is the exception I get: Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.py", line 33, in ? File "win32com\__init__.pyc", line 6, in ? File "E:\src\spambayes\windows\py2exe\dist\lib\spambayes.zip\pythoncom.pyc", line 2, in ? #@c ... ie, just like in this bug!! mypowell - did you unzip this .zip file? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: mrpowell (mrpowell) Date: 2004-05-04 17:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1028635 OUTLOOK_ADDIN_REGISTER.EXE.log 5/4/04. I wiill try "running from source" if it will help to put this one to bed. speaking of bed... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-05-04 17:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Here is something I find strange. From OUTLOOK_ADDIN_REGISTER.EXE.log ... File "addin.py", line 33, in ? File "win32com\__init__.pyc", line 6, in ? File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pythoncom.pyc", line 2, in ? #@c Note 2 things: * addin.py and win32com\__init__ do not reference the .zip file. * pythoncom.pyc references the .zip file, and has garbage for the source line. I would expect no source-lines at all. Is almost looks as though the .zip file has been expanded!? I might follow this as a clue... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-04 17:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Either something really weird is going on or sys.path has somehow ended up not being what it should by the time pywintypes.py is imported. Either way, I can't think of anything to resolve this apart from building a diagnostic version of the binary (with various debugging statements in pywintypes.py). Kenny/Mark - can you think of anything? By "running from source", I mean running the plug-in from source code rather than from the binary version that the installer installs. You do this by installing Python & pywin32 and using the source distibution of SpamBayes. The website has details. It could certainly make it easier to diagnose (unless the problem didn't exist, which is possible), but is more hassle for you. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: mrpowell (mrpowell) Date: 2004-05-04 16:54 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1028635 I performed another clean install of a fresh download of 1.0b1 which resulted in the exact exception as before (Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories). The file, pywintypes23.dll. is in the "lib" subdirectory. See the attached file, "c program files SpamBayes.txt"; a printout of the c program files SpamBayes directory. Also attached is the only OUTLOOK_ADDIN_REGISTER.EXE.log for this install. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-05-04 03:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 The problem is not a corrupted pywintypes.pyc. The pywintypes.pyc must be running correctly for you to get the "isn't in frozen sys.path" exception. The purpose of the .pyc file is to locate and load a related DLL file, which in the case of the SpamBayes install should be named pywintypes23.dll. This file should be installed in the "lib" subdirectory of your SpamBayes installation. Could you attach a directory listing of the files in the SpamBayes "lib" directory? If possible, also attach any SpamBayes log files you can find as describe in the Troubleshooting Guide. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: mrpowell (mrpowell) Date: 2004-05-03 13:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1028635 Thank you anadelonbrin for responding. I do not have Python installed. Why would the pywintypes.pyc file cause a problem on each and every install from a number of different (fresh) downloads from different mirrors, especially with a total registry crawl to remove all traces of the previous install? "You could try running the plug-in from source and seeing if that works" what do you mean "from source"? Can I replace the pywintypes.pyc file with a known good file? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-03 13:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The pywintypes module is a file that should be in the spambayes.zip file in the lib directory where spambayes was installed. It's not necessarily a path issue, because the file that's raising the error is the pywintypes.pyc file itself. Do you have Python installed by any chance? If so, is it the build from python.org or the ActiveState one (or another one)? You could try running the plug-in from source and seeing if that works. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=941639&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue May 4 03:50:26 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue May 4 03:50:36 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-931150 ] Unsuported Character Set spams... Message-ID: Bugs item #931150, was opened at 2004-04-07 16:02 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by yazmon You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=931150&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) >Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Yasser Mondallis (yazmon) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Unsuported Character Set spams... Initial Comment: Ive received a lot of spam that seems to confuse our Exchange\Outlook system that makes something convert the actual content of the email into an attached text file, with the body replaced with 'This message uses a character set that is not supported by the Internet Service. To view the original message content, open the attached message. If the text doesn't display correctly, save the attachment to disk, and then open it using a viewer that can display the original character set.' Only clue is the subject. As the training is being done on the body of the text, the app is getting very confused with these mails. Any chance of making it check the original body? (I know this may or may not be a setup problem here, but it would seem like a good way to get spam to an inbox without detection...) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Yasser Mondallis (yazmon) Date: 2004-05-04 07:50 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=985659 Spam clues attached. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-05-04 00:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Can you please do a "Show Spam Clues" on one of these messages, and attach the clues here? Please reset the bug status to "Open" when you do. Thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=931150&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue May 4 04:05:22 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue May 4 04:05:33 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-931150 ] Unsuported Character Set spams... Message-ID: Bugs item #931150, was opened at 2004-04-08 02:02 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=931150&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Yasser Mondallis (yazmon) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Unsuported Character Set spams... Initial Comment: Ive received a lot of spam that seems to confuse our Exchange\Outlook system that makes something convert the actual content of the email into an attached text file, with the body replaced with 'This message uses a character set that is not supported by the Internet Service. To view the original message content, open the attached message. If the text doesn't display correctly, save the attachment to disk, and then open it using a viewer that can display the original character set.' Only clue is the subject. As the training is being done on the body of the text, the app is getting very confused with these mails. Any chance of making it check the original body? (I know this may or may not be a setup problem here, but it would seem like a good way to get spam to an inbox without detection...) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-05-04 18:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Can you please forward that spam to mhammond@users.sourceforge.net? Thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Yasser Mondallis (yazmon) Date: 2004-05-04 17:50 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=985659 Spam clues attached. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-05-04 10:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Can you please do a "Show Spam Clues" on one of these messages, and attach the clues here? Please reset the bug status to "Open" when you do. Thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=931150&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue May 4 04:08:35 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue May 4 04:08:48 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-931150 ] Unsuported Character Set spams... Message-ID: Bugs item #931150, was opened at 2004-04-07 16:02 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by yazmon You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=931150&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Yasser Mondallis (yazmon) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Unsuported Character Set spams... Initial Comment: Ive received a lot of spam that seems to confuse our Exchange\Outlook system that makes something convert the actual content of the email into an attached text file, with the body replaced with 'This message uses a character set that is not supported by the Internet Service. To view the original message content, open the attached message. If the text doesn't display correctly, save the attachment to disk, and then open it using a viewer that can display the original character set.' Only clue is the subject. As the training is being done on the body of the text, the app is getting very confused with these mails. Any chance of making it check the original body? (I know this may or may not be a setup problem here, but it would seem like a good way to get spam to an inbox without detection...) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Yasser Mondallis (yazmon) Date: 2004-05-04 08:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=985659 Email sent! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-05-04 08:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Can you please forward that spam to mhammond@users.sourceforge.net? Thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Yasser Mondallis (yazmon) Date: 2004-05-04 07:50 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=985659 Spam clues attached. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-05-04 00:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Can you please do a "Show Spam Clues" on one of these messages, and attach the clues here? Please reset the bug status to "Open" when you do. Thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=931150&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue May 4 05:23:46 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue May 4 05:23:57 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-931150 ] Unsuported Character Set spams... Message-ID: Bugs item #931150, was opened at 2004-04-08 02:02 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=931150&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) Status: Open >Resolution: Later Priority: 5 Submitted By: Yasser Mondallis (yazmon) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Unsuported Character Set spams... Initial Comment: Ive received a lot of spam that seems to confuse our Exchange\Outlook system that makes something convert the actual content of the email into an attached text file, with the body replaced with 'This message uses a character set that is not supported by the Internet Service. To view the original message content, open the attached message. If the text doesn't display correctly, save the attachment to disk, and then open it using a viewer that can display the original character set.' Only clue is the subject. As the training is being done on the body of the text, the app is getting very confused with these mails. Any chance of making it check the original body? (I know this may or may not be a setup problem here, but it would seem like a good way to get spam to an inbox without detection...) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-05-04 19:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Sorry, but this is too hard to fix before 1.0 - it will mean pulling apart all text attachments, and including them in the body. We can do this post 1.0 though. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Yasser Mondallis (yazmon) Date: 2004-05-04 18:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=985659 Email sent! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-05-04 18:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Can you please forward that spam to mhammond@users.sourceforge.net? Thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Yasser Mondallis (yazmon) Date: 2004-05-04 17:50 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=985659 Spam clues attached. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-05-04 10:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Can you please do a "Show Spam Clues" on one of these messages, and attach the clues here? Please reset the bug status to "Open" when you do. Thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=931150&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue May 4 09:53:41 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue May 4 09:53:53 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-941639 ] Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories Message-ID: Bugs item #941639, was opened at 2004-04-25 01:42 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mrpowell You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=941639&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0b1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 9 Submitted By: mrpowell (mrpowell) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories Initial Comment: Unable to register addin in Outlook 2000 SR1 9.0.0.5414 / Microsoft Windows 98 4.10.2222 A. I uninstalled the Spambayes-outlook-0081 because I could never get it to register as an addin. (consistent error) and tried the latest release 1.0b1 and it failed also. I ran regsvr32.exe outlook_addin.dll as described in the trouble shooting guide and the windows error was that it could not locate a file to execute. This is the same error I get every time I try to install. I purged all references to spambayes from the registry before trying the latest fresh install. This is the log from the latest two failed attempts with 1.0.b1: Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.py", line 33, in ? File "win32com\__init__.pyc", line 6, in ? File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pythoncom.pyc", line 2, in ? #@c File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pywintypes.pyc", line 69, in ? File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pywintypes.pyc", line 45, in __import_pywin32_system_module__ ImportError: Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.py", line 33, in ? File "win32com\__init__.pyc", line 6, in ? File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pythoncom.pyc", line 2, in ? #@c File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pywintypes.pyc", line 69, in ? File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pywintypes.pyc", line 45, in __import_pywin32_system_module__ ImportError: Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories my paths: C:\Program Files\SpamBayes D:\Program Files\Microsoft Office\Office\Outlook.exe C:\WINDOWS\Application Data\Microsoft\Outlook C:\WINDOWS\Profiles\Marc Powell\Application Data\Microsoft\Outlook What is a 'pywintypes' module and where is it located? Which of my sys.path directories do I have to stick in the freezer before I can copy the 'pywintypes' module into it? Any help will be greatly appreciated as this has become a personal challenge. Marc Powell ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: mrpowell (mrpowell) Date: 2004-05-04 09:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1028635 No, I did not extract c:\Program Files\SpamBayes\lib\spambayes.zip\. The directory listing [c program files spambayes.txt] of c:\Program Files\SpamBayes\ reflects a totally default install of spambayes-1.0b1.exe with no other programs open. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-05-04 03:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 If I make a local hack to simulate this error (and change the error text ;), I see: Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.py", line 33, in ? File "win32com\__init__.pyc", line 6, in ? File "pythoncom.pyc", line 2, in ? File "pywintypes.pyc", line 69, in ? File "pywintypes.pyc", line 45, in __import_pywin32_system_module__ ImportError: Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories ['E:\src\spambayes\windows\py2exe\dist\lib\spambayes.zip'] Note there is no source-line shown, and that none of the files reference the .zip file. However, if I replace create a *directory* spambayes.zip, and unzip the contents of the real .zip file into it, here is the exception I get: Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.py", line 33, in ? File "win32com\__init__.pyc", line 6, in ? File "E:\src\spambayes\windows\py2exe\dist\lib\spambayes.zip\pythoncom.pyc", line 2, in ? #@c ... ie, just like in this bug!! mypowell - did you unzip this .zip file? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: mrpowell (mrpowell) Date: 2004-05-04 03:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1028635 OUTLOOK_ADDIN_REGISTER.EXE.log 5/4/04. I wiill try "running from source" if it will help to put this one to bed. speaking of bed... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-05-04 03:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Here is something I find strange. From OUTLOOK_ADDIN_REGISTER.EXE.log ... File "addin.py", line 33, in ? File "win32com\__init__.pyc", line 6, in ? File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pythoncom.pyc", line 2, in ? #@c Note 2 things: * addin.py and win32com\__init__ do not reference the .zip file. * pythoncom.pyc references the .zip file, and has garbage for the source line. I would expect no source-lines at all. Is almost looks as though the .zip file has been expanded!? I might follow this as a clue... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-04 03:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Either something really weird is going on or sys.path has somehow ended up not being what it should by the time pywintypes.py is imported. Either way, I can't think of anything to resolve this apart from building a diagnostic version of the binary (with various debugging statements in pywintypes.py). Kenny/Mark - can you think of anything? By "running from source", I mean running the plug-in from source code rather than from the binary version that the installer installs. You do this by installing Python & pywin32 and using the source distibution of SpamBayes. The website has details. It could certainly make it easier to diagnose (unless the problem didn't exist, which is possible), but is more hassle for you. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: mrpowell (mrpowell) Date: 2004-05-04 02:54 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1028635 I performed another clean install of a fresh download of 1.0b1 which resulted in the exact exception as before (Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories). The file, pywintypes23.dll. is in the "lib" subdirectory. See the attached file, "c program files SpamBayes.txt"; a printout of the c program files SpamBayes directory. Also attached is the only OUTLOOK_ADDIN_REGISTER.EXE.log for this install. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-05-03 13:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 The problem is not a corrupted pywintypes.pyc. The pywintypes.pyc must be running correctly for you to get the "isn't in frozen sys.path" exception. The purpose of the .pyc file is to locate and load a related DLL file, which in the case of the SpamBayes install should be named pywintypes23.dll. This file should be installed in the "lib" subdirectory of your SpamBayes installation. Could you attach a directory listing of the files in the SpamBayes "lib" directory? If possible, also attach any SpamBayes log files you can find as describe in the Troubleshooting Guide. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: mrpowell (mrpowell) Date: 2004-05-02 23:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1028635 Thank you anadelonbrin for responding. I do not have Python installed. Why would the pywintypes.pyc file cause a problem on each and every install from a number of different (fresh) downloads from different mirrors, especially with a total registry crawl to remove all traces of the previous install? "You could try running the plug-in from source and seeing if that works" what do you mean "from source"? Can I replace the pywintypes.pyc file with a known good file? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-02 23:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The pywintypes module is a file that should be in the spambayes.zip file in the lib directory where spambayes was installed. It's not necessarily a path issue, because the file that's raising the error is the pywintypes.pyc file itself. Do you have Python installed by any chance? If so, is it the build from python.org or the ActiveState one (or another one)? You could try running the plug-in from source and seeing if that works. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=941639&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue May 4 13:10:12 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue May 4 13:10:36 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-931150 ] Unsuported Character Set spams... Message-ID: Bugs item #931150, was opened at 2004-04-07 16:02 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by yazmon You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=931150&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) Status: Open >Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Yasser Mondallis (yazmon) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Unsuported Character Set spams... Initial Comment: Ive received a lot of spam that seems to confuse our Exchange\Outlook system that makes something convert the actual content of the email into an attached text file, with the body replaced with 'This message uses a character set that is not supported by the Internet Service. To view the original message content, open the attached message. If the text doesn't display correctly, save the attachment to disk, and then open it using a viewer that can display the original character set.' Only clue is the subject. As the training is being done on the body of the text, the app is getting very confused with these mails. Any chance of making it check the original body? (I know this may or may not be a setup problem here, but it would seem like a good way to get spam to an inbox without detection...) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Yasser Mondallis (yazmon) Date: 2004-05-04 17:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=985659 Email sent! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-05-04 09:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Sorry, but this is too hard to fix before 1.0 - it will mean pulling apart all text attachments, and including them in the body. We can do this post 1.0 though. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Yasser Mondallis (yazmon) Date: 2004-05-04 08:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=985659 Email sent! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-05-04 08:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Can you please forward that spam to mhammond@users.sourceforge.net? Thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Yasser Mondallis (yazmon) Date: 2004-05-04 07:50 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=985659 Spam clues attached. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-05-04 00:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Can you please do a "Show Spam Clues" on one of these messages, and attach the clues here? Please reset the bug status to "Open" when you do. Thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=931150&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue May 4 13:11:21 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue May 4 13:11:34 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-931150 ] Unsuported Character Set spams... Message-ID: Bugs item #931150, was opened at 2004-04-07 16:02 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by yazmon You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=931150&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Yasser Mondallis (yazmon) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Unsuported Character Set spams... Initial Comment: Ive received a lot of spam that seems to confuse our Exchange\Outlook system that makes something convert the actual content of the email into an attached text file, with the body replaced with 'This message uses a character set that is not supported by the Internet Service. To view the original message content, open the attached message. If the text doesn't display correctly, save the attachment to disk, and then open it using a viewer that can display the original character set.' Only clue is the subject. As the training is being done on the body of the text, the app is getting very confused with these mails. Any chance of making it check the original body? (I know this may or may not be a setup problem here, but it would seem like a good way to get spam to an inbox without detection...) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Yasser Mondallis (yazmon) Date: 2004-05-04 17:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=985659 Sorry ignore that. Browser mess up... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Yasser Mondallis (yazmon) Date: 2004-05-04 17:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=985659 Email sent! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-05-04 09:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Sorry, but this is too hard to fix before 1.0 - it will mean pulling apart all text attachments, and including them in the body. We can do this post 1.0 though. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Yasser Mondallis (yazmon) Date: 2004-05-04 08:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=985659 Email sent! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-05-04 08:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Can you please forward that spam to mhammond@users.sourceforge.net? Thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Yasser Mondallis (yazmon) Date: 2004-05-04 07:50 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=985659 Spam clues attached. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-05-04 00:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Can you please do a "Show Spam Clues" on one of these messages, and attach the clues here? Please reset the bug status to "Open" when you do. Thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=931150&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue May 4 14:38:22 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue May 4 14:38:33 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-936529 ] Spambayes has poor performance Message-ID: Bugs item #936529, was opened at 2004-04-16 18:36 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by bbyrd1 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=936529&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Brad Byrd (bbyrd1) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Spambayes has poor performance Initial Comment: I'm running a 2.4ghz P4 prosessor with 512MB of ram and spambayes is running very slow after i upgrade to office xp sp3. However before it ran just fine. Just a side note i'm running Windows XP PRO SP2 RC1 i'm also running the latest (april) release. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Brad Byrd (bbyrd1) Date: 2004-05-04 18:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=561013 It still is running on the slow side. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-05-03 23:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Brad - did you try Tony's suggestion of doing a full re-train so see if that solved the problem? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-04-23 01:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The log doesn't have any errors in it, but interesting it does show that there is a fairly small amount of ham and spam trained. I wonder whether this is perhaps due to the problem discussed (by me and Tim Peters) on the list recently. If it is, then the two solutions that spring to mind are (a) retrain from a fresh db, because that fixed the problem for both me and Tim, or (b) wait and see if my further investigation into this yields anything. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Brad Byrd (bbyrd1) Date: 2004-04-22 07:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=561013 Ok here is the log file yop requested ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-04-22 01:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Eek. I don't know how that happened, but this got entered into the wrong tracker. Ignore all of that. For *this* problem: we need to see the log file. Please attach it to this tracker. You could also try retraining and seeing if that helps (see recent spambayes mailing list messages with "sloth" in the subject). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-04-22 01:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Interesting. This appears to be a sf-wide change. Not only the page above, but all other release notes on sourceforge no longer work with html tags. I wonder if this was them fixing a bug that allowed it, or introducing a bug doing something else. I'll look into this some more and if necessary change the SpamBayes 1.0a9 and 1.0b1 notes to plain text. For the moment, the release notes are more-or-less the same as the message posted to spambayes-announce (so in the archives for that list) and the changelog is in the archive or in CVS (accessible via the web). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=936529&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue May 4 19:06:41 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue May 4 19:06:47 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-936529 ] Spambayes has poor performance Message-ID: Bugs item #936529, was opened at 2004-04-17 04:36 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=936529&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Brad Byrd (bbyrd1) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Spambayes has poor performance Initial Comment: I'm running a 2.4ghz P4 prosessor with 512MB of ram and spambayes is running very slow after i upgrade to office xp sp3. However before it ran just fine. Just a side note i'm running Windows XP PRO SP2 RC1 i'm also running the latest (april) release. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-05-05 09:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Can you please qualify "on the slow side"? What exactly is slow, and how slow? How long does it take to train a single message, for example? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Brad Byrd (bbyrd1) Date: 2004-05-05 04:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=561013 It still is running on the slow side. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-05-04 09:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Brad - did you try Tony's suggestion of doing a full re-train so see if that solved the problem? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-04-23 11:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The log doesn't have any errors in it, but interesting it does show that there is a fairly small amount of ham and spam trained. I wonder whether this is perhaps due to the problem discussed (by me and Tim Peters) on the list recently. If it is, then the two solutions that spring to mind are (a) retrain from a fresh db, because that fixed the problem for both me and Tim, or (b) wait and see if my further investigation into this yields anything. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Brad Byrd (bbyrd1) Date: 2004-04-22 17:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=561013 Ok here is the log file yop requested ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-04-22 11:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Eek. I don't know how that happened, but this got entered into the wrong tracker. Ignore all of that. For *this* problem: we need to see the log file. Please attach it to this tracker. You could also try retraining and seeing if that helps (see recent spambayes mailing list messages with "sloth" in the subject). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-04-22 11:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Interesting. This appears to be a sf-wide change. Not only the page above, but all other release notes on sourceforge no longer work with html tags. I wonder if this was them fixing a bug that allowed it, or introducing a bug doing something else. I'll look into this some more and if necessary change the SpamBayes 1.0a9 and 1.0b1 notes to plain text. For the moment, the release notes are more-or-less the same as the message posted to spambayes-announce (so in the archives for that list) and the changelog is in the archive or in CVS (accessible via the web). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=936529&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed May 5 13:29:30 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed May 5 13:29:34 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-948623 ] sb_mboxtrain.py - traceback on bad message Message-ID: Bugs item #948623, was opened at 2004-05-05 13:29 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=948623&group_id=61702 Category: hammie Group: Source code 1.0b1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jeff Balderson (twstdpear) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: sb_mboxtrain.py - traceback on bad message Initial Comment: I'm getting a traceback in sb_mboxtrain.py when updaing the DB. The error occurs with both 1.0b1 and 1.0a7. I've isolated the message that causes the problem in its own mbox, and attached it to this bug report. The traceback (names have been changed to protect the innocent :) follows: [user@host user]$ sb_mboxtrain.py -d /home/user/.hammiedb -s mail/badmail3 Training spam (mail/badmail3): Reading as Unix mbox Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/sb_mboxtrain.py", line 351, in ? main() File "/usr/bin/sb_mboxtrain.py", line 342, in main train(h, s, True, force, trainnew, removetrained) File "/usr/bin/sb_mboxtrain.py", line 266, in train mbox_train(h, path, is_spam, force) File "/usr/bin/sb_mboxtrain.py", line 193, in mbox_train outf.write(msg.as_string(True)) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/email/Message.py", line 109, in as_string g.flatten(self, unixfrom=unixfrom) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/email/Generator.py", line 102, in flatten self._write(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/email/Generator.py", line 130, in _write self._dispatch(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/email/Generator.py", line 156, in _dispatch meth(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/email/Generator.py", line 199, in _handle_text raise TypeError, 'string payload expected: %s' % type(payload) TypeError: string payload expected: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=948623&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed May 5 16:54:14 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed May 5 16:54:21 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-948623 ] sb_mboxtrain.py - traceback on bad message Message-ID: Bugs item #948623, was opened at 2004-05-06 05:29 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=948623&group_id=61702 Category: hammie Group: Source code 1.0b1 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jeff Balderson (twstdpear) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: sb_mboxtrain.py - traceback on bad message Initial Comment: I'm getting a traceback in sb_mboxtrain.py when updaing the DB. The error occurs with both 1.0b1 and 1.0a7. I've isolated the message that causes the problem in its own mbox, and attached it to this bug report. The traceback (names have been changed to protect the innocent :) follows: [user@host user]$ sb_mboxtrain.py -d /home/user/.hammiedb -s mail/badmail3 Training spam (mail/badmail3): Reading as Unix mbox Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/sb_mboxtrain.py", line 351, in ? main() File "/usr/bin/sb_mboxtrain.py", line 342, in main train(h, s, True, force, trainnew, removetrained) File "/usr/bin/sb_mboxtrain.py", line 266, in train mbox_train(h, path, is_spam, force) File "/usr/bin/sb_mboxtrain.py", line 193, in mbox_train outf.write(msg.as_string(True)) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/email/Message.py", line 109, in as_string g.flatten(self, unixfrom=unixfrom) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/email/Generator.py", line 102, in flatten self._write(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/email/Generator.py", line 130, in _write self._dispatch(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/email/Generator.py", line 156, in _dispatch meth(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/email/Generator.py", line 199, in _handle_text raise TypeError, 'string payload expected: %s' % type(payload) TypeError: string payload expected: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-06 08:54 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 There are a few of these about now. The message is multipart but identifies itself as text/plain, so the email package chokes. 1.0rc1 (the announcement should be out today) should have this fixed for all the SpamBayes apps - sb_filter & sb_mboxtrain should handle it even better than sb_server/imapfilter at this stage. I think Skip's fix also allows sb_mboxtrain to continue on in this situation, rather than choke & die. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=948623&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed May 5 22:27:14 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed May 5 22:27:18 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-948930 ] spambayes binary tray dissapeared Message-ID: Bugs item #948930, was opened at 2004-05-06 02:27 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=948930&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: captbuck (captbuck) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: spambayes binary tray dissapeared Initial Comment: I have been trying this product for about a month and it is a very interesting dev. It has worked fine for me and I tried to show a friend of mine how it works on their xp home machine. I first installed the same version I used (spambayes-1.0a9.exe) It seemed to load fine and I right clicked the tray to begin configuring......I am not sure what I did but next thing I knew the tray.... dissapeared.. I tried un installing and reinstalling repeatedly and then down loaded yr latest version but to no avail ...the installer said all okay but the tray has never reappeared... This is used in outlook express on a xp home machine........The traceback log s follows...... Traceback (most recent call last): File "autoconfigure.py", line 791, in ? File "autoconfigure.py", line 742, in offer_to_configure File "autoconfigure.py", line 705, in configure File "autoconfigure.py", line 451, in configure_outlook_express KeyError: 'SMTP Port' Traceback (most recent call last): File "autoconfigure.py", line 791, in ? File "autoconfigure.py", line 742, in offer_to_configure File "autoconfigure.py", line 705, in configure File "autoconfigure.py", line 451, in configure_outlook_express KeyError: 'SMTP Port' I see the error but I am clueless how to resolve it.......... any ideas thankyou , captbuck ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=948930&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu May 6 04:41:38 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu May 6 04:41:48 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-949000 ] Please select child folder - top-level folders can't be used Message-ID: Bugs item #949000, was opened at 2004-05-06 08:41 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=949000&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Source code 1.0b1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: wildpitch (wildpitch) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Please select child folder - top-level folders can't be used Initial Comment: I'm using Outlook and attempting to add and filter a secondary Exchange 2000 mailbox. On adding the additional filter I'm told "Please select child folder - top- level folders can't be used". It could be Outlook / Exchange permissions somewhere along the line, but as I have read / write to the folder in question that shouldn't really be the cause. This is from the Spambayes log... ################################## Can't find folder's parent: MsgStoreException: Exception 0x80070005 (MAPI_E_NO_ACCESS): Access is denied. Eeek - couldn't get the folder to check valid ################################## The first suggestion has been to upgrade to Spambayes Ver 1.0C1, but this too gives me the same error. Other than this annoying glitch, it's working great. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=949000&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri May 7 11:42:46 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri May 7 11:43:05 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-912908 ] No filterable items using Franklin Covey Message-ID: Bugs item #912908, was opened at 2004-03-09 11:54 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by gtneill You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=912908&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: George Neill (gtneill) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: No filterable items using Franklin Covey Initial Comment: When using Franklin Covey PlanPlus v1 for Outlook, the Delete as Spam button (v9) returns a No filterable mail items are selected. Version 8 worked fine with this plug- in. Franklin PlanPlus uses HTML to create a composite view with calendar, tasks, and items, on a single page. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: George Neill (gtneill) Date: 2004-05-07 10:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=195661 Mark, Sorry for the delay in responding. I think the problem is that the web page being displayed sets the calendar as the currently displayed folder for Outlook. In this way, the calendar buttons are displayed on the toolbar. I noticed other apps that use toolbar icons are disabled when the FranklinCovey home page is active. I hope this makes sense. The FC page divides the screen into multple sections with the Calendar, Task List, and Email all available simultaneously. I'm not sure if this behavior can be worked around. Let me know if you have other questions. George ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: George Neill (gtneill) Date: 2004-05-07 10:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=195661 Mark, Sorry for the delay in responding. I think the problem is that the web page being displayed sets the calendar as the currently displayed folder for Outlook. In this way, the calendar buttons are displayed on the toolbar. I noticed other apps that use toolbar icons are disabled when the FranklinCovey home page is active. I hope this makes sense. The FC page divides the screen into multple sections with the Calendar, Task List, and Email all available simultaneously. I'm not sure if this behavior can be worked around. Let me know if you have other questions. George ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-05-03 19:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 George - are you able to provide more info here? If you can, please also reset the bug status to "Open". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-03-15 17:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 So you get this error with *any* message that is selected? Could you please attach your most recent log file to this tracker? (The troubleshooting guide explains where to find it). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=912908&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri May 7 11:42:19 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri May 7 11:47:29 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-912908 ] No filterable items using Franklin Covey Message-ID: Bugs item #912908, was opened at 2004-03-09 11:54 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by gtneill You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=912908&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) >Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: George Neill (gtneill) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: No filterable items using Franklin Covey Initial Comment: When using Franklin Covey PlanPlus v1 for Outlook, the Delete as Spam button (v9) returns a No filterable mail items are selected. Version 8 worked fine with this plug- in. Franklin PlanPlus uses HTML to create a composite view with calendar, tasks, and items, on a single page. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: George Neill (gtneill) Date: 2004-05-07 10:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=195661 Mark, Sorry for the delay in responding. I think the problem is that the web page being displayed sets the calendar as the currently displayed folder for Outlook. In this way, the calendar buttons are displayed on the toolbar. I noticed other apps that use toolbar icons are disabled when the FranklinCovey home page is active. I hope this makes sense. The FC page divides the screen into multple sections with the Calendar, Task List, and Email all available simultaneously. I'm not sure if this behavior can be worked around. Let me know if you have other questions. George ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-05-03 19:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 George - are you able to provide more info here? If you can, please also reset the bug status to "Open". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-03-15 17:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 So you get this error with *any* message that is selected? Could you please attach your most recent log file to this tracker? (The troubleshooting guide explains where to find it). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=912908&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat May 8 14:40:11 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat May 8 14:40:45 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-943956 ] Email left unprocessed in Inbox Message-ID: Bugs item #943956, was opened at 2004-04-28 14:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kpbass You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=943956&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0b1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Ken (kpbass) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Email left unprocessed in Inbox Initial Comment: Intermittently, email appears in the Inbox with no assigned spam value. SpamBayes does not process it at all, unless I pull down th manager and choose "Filter messages/Start filtering. Most of the time, but not invariably, these messages are then identified as spam and moved to the spam folder. Background delay is set at .5 seconds, and no Outlook rule is likely to be involved. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Ken (kpbass) Date: 2004-05-08 13:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1031376 In Outlook, I am using the preview pane, set to mark messages as read after viewing. It seems that when I highlight a spam message before Spambayes has a chance to process that message, it never gets processed at all. This happens when a large number of spam items a re mixed with ham items. I may not always wait untill all processing is done before I highlight a message and read it inthe preview pane, If I then delete it, the highlight drops to the message below it (which may well be spam) and marks it as read. The accidentally highlighted messages are the ones that never get processed. Perhaps this is a case of "works as designed", and I should be more patient. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-05-03 18:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 When you next notice this, can you view the log file, and see if it gets any mention at all? If not, increase the verbosity (via "Manager->Advanced->Diagnostics") to 1, and again check the log once it has happened - this should give you more noise regarding timers etc. Then post the relevent sections of the log here. Thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=943956&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat May 8 23:14:33 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat May 8 23:14:48 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-943956 ] Email left unprocessed in Inbox Message-ID: Bugs item #943956, was opened at 2004-04-29 07:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=943956&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0b1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Ken (kpbass) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Email left unprocessed in Inbox Initial Comment: Intermittently, email appears in the Inbox with no assigned spam value. SpamBayes does not process it at all, unless I pull down th manager and choose "Filter messages/Start filtering. Most of the time, but not invariably, these messages are then identified as spam and moved to the spam folder. Background delay is set at .5 seconds, and no Outlook rule is likely to be involved. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-09 15:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I can confirm that marking a message as read before SpamBayes sees it can (is?) enough to have it ignore the message. (I typically wait for SpamBayes to do it's thing, but I suppose people might not want to do that). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ken (kpbass) Date: 2004-05-09 06:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1031376 In Outlook, I am using the preview pane, set to mark messages as read after viewing. It seems that when I highlight a spam message before Spambayes has a chance to process that message, it never gets processed at all. This happens when a large number of spam items a re mixed with ham items. I may not always wait untill all processing is done before I highlight a message and read it inthe preview pane, If I then delete it, the highlight drops to the message below it (which may well be spam) and marks it as read. The accidentally highlighted messages are the ones that never get processed. Perhaps this is a case of "works as designed", and I should be more patient. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-05-04 11:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 When you next notice this, can you view the log file, and see if it gets any mention at all? If not, increase the verbosity (via "Manager->Advanced->Diagnostics") to 1, and again check the log once it has happened - this should give you more noise regarding timers etc. Then post the relevent sections of the log here. Thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=943956&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun May 9 14:39:29 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun May 9 14:39:35 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-800392 ] Filtered "known-spam" emails don't get added to database Message-ID: Bugs item #800392, was opened at 2003-09-04 11:36 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by grab_rat You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=800392&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Deleted Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Graham Bartlett (grab_rat) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Filtered "known-spam" emails don't get added to database Initial Comment: I don't know if this is a bug or a "feature" - it might belong in RFEs. Anyway... When an email gets recognised by the filter as spam, it gets moved to the "known-spam" folder. However the filter does not seem to train on this email as spam. I don't know why the filter doesn't train on emails it moves itself, when it *does* train on email that I move manually. This has two main effects. Firstly, the filter will not "reinforce" itself against words which are almost certainly spam. For instance, the word "girls" is only scored 0 ham, 2 spam, when in fact the word would be very unlikely to come up in my emails but makes a regular appearance in my spam. This means that some words get scored abnormally low. I don't use an "undecided" folder so I don't know how well the filter detects "known-ham" emails, but I would guess it would have a similar problem on scoring ham emails. Secondly, the filter will not detect new words appearing in spams. If an email is detected as spam, all words appearing in it should be trained on, otherwise when spams come in featuring the new words alone, they will not be recognised as such. A classic example here would be the emails selling diet supplements - if I train my filter to see "glucosamine" and "vitamin" as spam, and then I receive a spam featuring those two words and also "echinacea", the filter should learn that "echinacea" is also likely to be connected to spams. When I next get an email selling only echinacea, it'll then be correctly detected as spam. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-17 03:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The main reason for this is that this (along with training all non-spam, which presumably is also wanted) would mean that the "train on everything" regime was being used. Testing has shown that this is not a particularly effective technique to use. Training only on mistakes (false positives, false negatives, unsures) appears to be a much more effective technique (despite what common sense might indicate). As such, this is the technique that the interface makes most simple. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Graham Bartlett (grab_rat) Date: 2003-09-04 11:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=633868 One comment to follow up. I know it's possible to collect a bunch of spam in the "known-spam" folder and then train on it all. However (a) this is inconvenient; (b) if it's known that this needs doing then you may as well do it as soon as the spam is detected; and (c) this will count spams twice if they've made it through the filter and been moved manually by me, instead of being moved automatically by the filter. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=800392&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun May 9 14:39:46 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun May 9 14:39:50 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-800392 ] Filtered "known-spam" emails don't get added to database Message-ID: Bugs item #800392, was opened at 2003-09-04 11:36 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by grab_rat You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=800392&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Deleted >Resolution: Rejected Priority: 5 Submitted By: Graham Bartlett (grab_rat) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Filtered "known-spam" emails don't get added to database Initial Comment: I don't know if this is a bug or a "feature" - it might belong in RFEs. Anyway... When an email gets recognised by the filter as spam, it gets moved to the "known-spam" folder. However the filter does not seem to train on this email as spam. I don't know why the filter doesn't train on emails it moves itself, when it *does* train on email that I move manually. This has two main effects. Firstly, the filter will not "reinforce" itself against words which are almost certainly spam. For instance, the word "girls" is only scored 0 ham, 2 spam, when in fact the word would be very unlikely to come up in my emails but makes a regular appearance in my spam. This means that some words get scored abnormally low. I don't use an "undecided" folder so I don't know how well the filter detects "known-ham" emails, but I would guess it would have a similar problem on scoring ham emails. Secondly, the filter will not detect new words appearing in spams. If an email is detected as spam, all words appearing in it should be trained on, otherwise when spams come in featuring the new words alone, they will not be recognised as such. A classic example here would be the emails selling diet supplements - if I train my filter to see "glucosamine" and "vitamin" as spam, and then I receive a spam featuring those two words and also "echinacea", the filter should learn that "echinacea" is also likely to be connected to spams. When I next get an email selling only echinacea, it'll then be correctly detected as spam. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-17 03:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The main reason for this is that this (along with training all non-spam, which presumably is also wanted) would mean that the "train on everything" regime was being used. Testing has shown that this is not a particularly effective technique to use. Training only on mistakes (false positives, false negatives, unsures) appears to be a much more effective technique (despite what common sense might indicate). As such, this is the technique that the interface makes most simple. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Graham Bartlett (grab_rat) Date: 2003-09-04 11:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=633868 One comment to follow up. I know it's possible to collect a bunch of spam in the "known-spam" folder and then train on it all. However (a) this is inconvenient; (b) if it's known that this needs doing then you may as well do it as soon as the spam is detected; and (c) this will count spams twice if they've made it through the filter and been moved manually by me, instead of being moved automatically by the filter. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=800392&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon May 10 16:19:50 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon May 10 16:19:58 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-942262 ] TypeError: string payload expected: Message-ID: Bugs item #942262, was opened at 2004-04-26 05:09 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jcondit You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=942262&group_id=61702 Category: hammie Group: Binary 1.0b1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Steven Knight (stevenknight) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: TypeError: string payload expected: Initial Comment: Both messages in the attached file cause both 1.0a7 and 1.0b1 to die with the following output: $ sb_mboxtrain.py -d ~/.hammie.db -s ~/Mail/unsure Training spam (/home/knight/Mail/unsure): Reading as Unix mbox Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/local/bin/sb_mboxtrain.py", line 351, in ? main() File "/usr/local/bin/sb_mboxtrain.py", line 342, in main train(h, s, True, force, trainnew, removetrained) File "/usr/local/bin/sb_mboxtrain.py", line 266, in train mbox_train(h, path, is_spam, force) File "/usr/local/bin/sb_mboxtrain.py", line 193, in mbox_train outf.write(msg.as_string(True)) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/email/Message.py", line 107, in as_string g.flatten(self, unixfrom=unixfrom) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/email/Generator.py", line 100, in flatten self._write(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/email/Generator.py", line 128, in _write self._dispatch(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/email/Generator.py", line 154, in _dispatch meth(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/email/Generator.py", line 212, in _handle_text raise TypeError, 'string payload expected: %s' % type(payload) TypeError: string payload expected: This is on a pretty vanilla Red Hat 9 system running Python 2.2. If you need any more info, let me know. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jeremy Condit (jcondit) Date: 2004-05-10 13:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=190757 I get the same error on a FreeBSD system running Python 2.2.2. It occurs in both 1.0a7 and 1.0b1.1. I winnowed down my corpus of spam until I found the message that was causing the bug. Deleting this message from my spam mailbox eliminated the error. You can get a copy of the offending spam here: http://bantha.org/~jcondit/badspam.txt ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Leo Heska (joiner) Date: 2004-04-26 05:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1029402 I got what appears to be the same error with a different presentation. The below came from SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Version 1.0b1 (April 2004), running on Windows 2000 Professional: X-Nonspam: None X-Spambayes-Exception: Traceback (most recent call last): . File "sb_server.pyc", line 474, in onRetr . File "spambayes\message.pyc", line 262, in asTokens . File "spambayes\message.pyc", line 277, in as_string . File "email\Message.pyc", line 130, in as_string . File "email\Generator.pyc", line 102, in flatten . File "email\Generator.pyc", line 130, in _write . File "email\Generator.pyc", line 156, in _dispatch . File "email\Generator.pyc", line 199, in _handle_text .TypeError: string payload expected: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=942262&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue May 11 04:17:30 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue May 11 04:17:44 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-951781 ] Undo function for plug-in Message-ID: Feature Requests item #951781, was opened at 2004-05-11 20:17 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=951781&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Priority: 1 Submitted By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Undo function for plug-in Initial Comment: >From spambayes@python.org (Nigel Cross): """ Please consider this in the future: - Undo function I often click the "Recover" button with a selection of spam, or vice versa, and worry about the effect I have had on future filtering. Ideally there would be an Undo function under the SpamBayes menu that would allow the last action to be reversed (i.e. moving all of the messages back and reversing the changes made to the database). I realize this is not a v1.0 thing, but it would be good for a later release. Keep up the good work! """ While you can of course undo this (almost) by finding those messages and clicking the opposite button, an undo would be simpler. I'm not sure how it would be triggered, though - an 'undo' button would be a bit of a waste of space, and I imagine hooking into the Edit menu's Undo would be extremely difficult. IAC, opening a feature request since it seems reasonable, and so can collect dust here . ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=951781&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue May 11 09:19:12 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue May 11 09:19:34 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-903440 ] Fail to filter public folder Message-ID: Bugs item #903440, was opened at 2004-02-24 13:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by zanthony You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=903440&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Rasmus Aaen (raaen) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Fail to filter public folder Initial Comment: If I mark a public folder ("Dns") for filtering, the Outlook addin stops working with the errormessage "Could not watch the specified folders". If my Inbox is the only folder filtered there are no problems. Filtering a public folder used to work in v. 0.81 I noticed that the folder does not have a "Spam" field, but manually creating it does not help. I have "Owner" rights on the public folder. After the error has occurred, the "Select folders" window is empty (see attached image). I have tried uninstalling/installing and deleting settings and database files. Logfile: Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\Rasmus\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\Rasmus\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 0 spam and 0 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin Binary Version 0.9 (February 2004) starting (with engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004)) on Windows 5.0.2195 (Service Pack 4) using Python 2.3.2+ (#49, Oct 23 2003, 15:50:06) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] SpamBayes: Watching (for filtering) in 'Mailbox - Rasmus Aaen/Inbox' ERROR: 'There was an error initializing the Spam plugin.\r\n\r\nSpam filtering has been disabled. Please re-configure\r\nand re-enable this plugin\r\n\r\nError details:\r\nCould not watch the specified folders' Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.pyc", line 1304, in FiltersChanged File "addin.pyc", line 1330, in UpdateFolderHooks File "addin.pyc", line 1358, in _HookFolderEvents File "msgstore.pyc", line 501, in GetFQName File "msgstore.pyc", line 547, in GetParent File "msgstore.pyc", line 527, in _FolderFromMAPIFolder com_error: (-2147467259, 'Unspecified error', None, None) Skipping processing of missed messages in folder 'Inbox', as it is not available Skipping processing of missed messages in folder 'Dns', as it is not available ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: zanthony (zanthony) Date: 2004-05-11 13:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1004452 The problem doesn't seem to be fixed with 1.0b1 for me, assuming, that is, that the problem I am experieicing is the same one documented here. I am unable to mark both my personal Inbox and another account's Inbox (for which I have full rights) to be monitored at the same time. Both are available in my Folder List simulataneously. This worked in .0081 but hasn't since. In the last version I was simply unable to close the Manager dialog with the other account's Inbox selected also, now I get an error stating 'Please select a child-folder - top-level folders can't be used' and am unable to even select it. Can this bug be re-opened, or should this be opened as a separate issue? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-05-04 01:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 This should be fixed in the 1.0b1 release (it has better error handing when fetching the full folder name). If not, please re-open. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-03-12 00:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Hmm. This means my comment is most likely invalid. Back to Mark for the clever figuring out bit :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: DSB (dsbowskill) Date: 2004-03-12 00:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=995952 Back on 1.a09 ... and further fiddling reveals that this problem only seems to occur when background filtering is turned on. This actually happens in v0081 as well, just never had background filter switched on before it seems. Here's the log file for 1.a09 with background filtering OFF: (with various privacy snips!) ---Warning: option experimental_ham_spam_imbalance_adjustment in section Classifier is deprecated Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 3360 spam and 3622 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin Binary Version 0.9 (February 2004) starting (with engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004)) on Windows 5.0.2195 (Service Pack 4) using Python 2.3.2+ (#49, Oct 23 2003, 15:50:06) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] SpamBayes: Watching (for filtering) in 'Mailbox - /Inbox' Folder 'Public Folders/IPM_SUBTREE/All Public Folders/News//Planning// Online' has no field named 'Spam' - creating Warning: failed to create the Outlook user-property in folder 'Public Folders/IPM_SUBTREE/All Public Folders/News//Planning//Online' (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (4096, 'Microsoft Outlook', "You don't have appropriate permission to perform this operation.", None, 0, -2147024891), None) WARNING: We just created the user field in folder Public Folders/IPM_SUBTREE/All Public Folders/News//Planning//Online, but it appears to not exist. Something is probably wrong with DoesFolderHaveOutlookField() SpamBayes: Watching (for filtering) in 'Public Folders/IPM_SUBTREE/All Public Folders/News//Planning//Online' SpamBayes: Watching (for incremental training) in 'Mailbox - /Spam' Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox' took 3.73427ms Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Online' took 144.868ms --- And here's the logfile with background filtering ON. --- SpamBayes: Watching (for filtering) in 'Mailbox - /Inbox' Folder 'Public Folders/IPM_SUBTREE/All Public Folders/News//Planning//Online' has no field named 'Spam' - creating Warning: failed to create the Outlook user-property in folder 'Public Folders/IPM_SUBTREE/All Public Folders/News//Planning//Online' (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (4096, 'Microsoft Outlook', "You don't have appropriate permission to perform this operation.", None, 0, -2147024891), None) WARNING: We just created the user field in folder Public Folders/IPM_SUBTREE/All Public Folders/News//Planning//Online, but it appears to not exist. Something is probably wrong with DoesFolderHaveOutlookField() ERROR: 'There was an error initializing the Spam plugin.\r\n\r\nSpam filtering has been disabled. Please re- configure\r\nand re-enable this plugin\r\n\r\nError details:\r\nCould not watch the specified folders' Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.pyc", line 1304, in FiltersChanged File "addin.pyc", line 1330, in UpdateFolderHooks File "addin.pyc", line 1395, in _HookFolderEvents File "addin.pyc", line 277, in Init File "msgstore.pyc", line 629, in IsReceiveFolder com_error: (-2147221246, 'Invalid window handle', None, None) Spam filtering is disabled - ignoring new message pythoncom error: Python error invoking COM method. Traceback (most recent call last): File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 275, in _Invoke_ File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 280, in _invoke_ File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 608, in _invokeex_ File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 542, in _invokeex_ File "addin.pyc", line 383, in OnItemAdd File "win32com\client\__init__.pyc", line 496, in __getattr__ File "win32com\client\__init__.pyc", line 455, in __getattr__ File "win32com\client\__init__.pyc", line 446, in _ApplyTypes_ pywintypes.com_error: (-2147221233, 'OLE error 0x8004010f', None, None) --- Result! :) Seems to work ok, but not with background filtering. Remember I have 'Editor' priv of the public folder (I can delete the items from it) I am *moving* the spam from the public folder and into a sub- folder on my on mailbox. DSB ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-03-12 00:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Mark: this is presumably a result of SB now trying to create the spam field for all the folders, yes? Could it fail more gracefully here? (I'd write a patch, but I'm not very familiar with this bit of the code). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: DSB (dsbowskill) Date: 2004-03-12 00:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=995952 Forgot to mention ... I am moving the spam OUT of the public folder and into one of my mailbox sub-folders. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: DSB (dsbowskill) Date: 2004-03-12 00:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=995952 Exactly the same problem, though I went back to 0081 in order to fix it. 0081 works, 1.0a9 doesn't. Nothing to do with our exchange server, so this isn't the problem (at least for me). I do get this error in the logfile, which doesn't stop the addin working for 0081, but it does seem to for 1.0a9. (I don't have admin over the public folder I'm filtering, but I am 'Editor' priv. --- Warning: failed to create the Outlook user-property in folder 'Public Folders/IPM_SUBTREE/All Public Folders/News//Planning//Online' (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (4096, 'Microsoft Outlook', "You don't have appropriate permission to perform this operation.", None, 0, -2147024891), None) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Judy Dye (judydye) Date: 2004-03-02 09:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=988571 I have the same problem but it has only occurred since upgrading from Exchange 5.5 to 2003 - perhaps this is causing the problem? Trace SpamBayes Outlook Addin Binary Version 0.9 (February 2004) starting (with engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004)) on Windows 5.0.2195 (Service Pack 4) using Python 2.3.2+ (#49, Oct 23 2003, 15:50:06) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] ERROR: 'There was an error initializing the Spam plugin.\r\n\r\nSpam filtering has been disabled. Please re- configure\r\nand re-enable this plugin\r\n\r\nError details:\r\nCould not watch the specified folders' Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.pyc", line 1304, in FiltersChanged File "addin.pyc", line 1330, in UpdateFolderHooks File "addin.pyc", line 1395, in _HookFolderEvents File "addin.pyc", line 277, in Init File "msgstore.pyc", line 629, in IsReceiveFolder com_error: (-2147221246, 'Invalid window handle', None, None) Skipping processing of missed messages in folder 'Facsimiles', as it is not available Skipping processing of missed messages in folder 'sales', as it is not available Skipping processing of missed messages in folder 'Support', as it is not available Skipping processing of missed messages in folder 'Inbox', as it is not available Hope this helps........ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ladd Nelson (gladdys) Date: 2004-03-01 23:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=840787 I've recently encountered this problem as well. However in my case, I want SpamBayes to move detected spam to the public folder for use by our IT staff. Once the network folder is identified and the "Could not watch the specified folders" message appears, the only way I've been able to clear the error is to retrain SpamBayes through the training wizard which allows me to specify a local folder towards the end of the wizard. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=903440&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue May 11 22:34:26 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue May 11 22:34:36 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-949000 ] Please select child folder - top-level folders can't be used Message-ID: Bugs item #949000, was opened at 2004-05-06 20:41 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=949000&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Source code 1.0b1 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: wildpitch (wildpitch) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Please select child folder - top-level folders can't be used Initial Comment: I'm using Outlook and attempting to add and filter a secondary Exchange 2000 mailbox. On adding the additional filter I'm told "Please select child folder - top- level folders can't be used". It could be Outlook / Exchange permissions somewhere along the line, but as I have read / write to the folder in question that shouldn't really be the cause. This is from the Spambayes log... ################################## Can't find folder's parent: MsgStoreException: Exception 0x80070005 (MAPI_E_NO_ACCESS): Access is denied. Eeek - couldn't get the folder to check valid ################################## The first suggestion has been to upgrade to Spambayes Ver 1.0C1, but this too gives me the same error. Other than this annoying glitch, it's working great. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-12 14:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Dupe of [ 943397 ] Cannot choose more than one Inbox folder to filter ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=949000&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue May 11 22:34:49 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue May 11 22:34:58 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-943397 ] Cannot choose more than one Inbox folder to filter Message-ID: Bugs item #943397, was opened at 2004-04-28 12:07 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=943397&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: MH (montyhines) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Cannot choose more than one Inbox folder to filter Initial Comment: I just installed the latest version of Spambayes on my Windows ME laptop with Outlook 2000. It allows me to to filter ONLY my own Inbox filter. I also monitor other Inbox folders of my employees in the office but it will not let me "check" those boxes to filter. I get a message: " Please select a child folder-- top level folders cannot be used". In the earlier version I was able to filter ALL the other Inboxes! What gives? Please help since it is essential that I keep the entire office spam free. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-12 14:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting dupe in [ 949000 ] Please select child folder - top-level folders can't be used ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-05-04 11:55 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Is it possible you are trying to filter their entire "personal folders", rather than their inbox? Can you tell me what the folder hierarchy looks like in the folder selector dialog? ie, what is the full "path" to these folders you are trying to monitor? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=943397&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue May 11 22:35:24 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue May 11 22:35:34 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-943397 ] Cannot choose more than one Inbox folder to filter Message-ID: Bugs item #943397, was opened at 2004-04-28 12:07 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=943397&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: MH (montyhines) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Cannot choose more than one Inbox folder to filter Initial Comment: I just installed the latest version of Spambayes on my Windows ME laptop with Outlook 2000. It allows me to to filter ONLY my own Inbox filter. I also monitor other Inbox folders of my employees in the office but it will not let me "check" those boxes to filter. I get a message: " Please select a child folder-- top level folders cannot be used". In the earlier version I was able to filter ALL the other Inboxes! What gives? Please help since it is essential that I keep the entire office spam free. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-12 14:35 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I've checked in a fix for this. It should appear in 1.0rc2/1.0. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-12 14:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting dupe in [ 949000 ] Please select child folder - top-level folders can't be used ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-05-04 11:55 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Is it possible you are trying to filter their entire "personal folders", rather than their inbox? Can you tell me what the folder hierarchy looks like in the folder selector dialog? ie, what is the full "path" to these folders you are trying to monitor? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=943397&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue May 11 22:40:07 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue May 11 22:40:25 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-903440 ] Fail to filter public folder Message-ID: Bugs item #903440, was opened at 2004-02-25 02:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=903440&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Rasmus Aaen (raaen) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Fail to filter public folder Initial Comment: If I mark a public folder ("Dns") for filtering, the Outlook addin stops working with the errormessage "Could not watch the specified folders". If my Inbox is the only folder filtered there are no problems. Filtering a public folder used to work in v. 0.81 I noticed that the folder does not have a "Spam" field, but manually creating it does not help. I have "Owner" rights on the public folder. After the error has occurred, the "Select folders" window is empty (see attached image). I have tried uninstalling/installing and deleting settings and database files. Logfile: Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\Rasmus\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\Rasmus\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 0 spam and 0 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin Binary Version 0.9 (February 2004) starting (with engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004)) on Windows 5.0.2195 (Service Pack 4) using Python 2.3.2+ (#49, Oct 23 2003, 15:50:06) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] SpamBayes: Watching (for filtering) in 'Mailbox - Rasmus Aaen/Inbox' ERROR: 'There was an error initializing the Spam plugin.\r\n\r\nSpam filtering has been disabled. Please re-configure\r\nand re-enable this plugin\r\n\r\nError details:\r\nCould not watch the specified folders' Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.pyc", line 1304, in FiltersChanged File "addin.pyc", line 1330, in UpdateFolderHooks File "addin.pyc", line 1358, in _HookFolderEvents File "msgstore.pyc", line 501, in GetFQName File "msgstore.pyc", line 547, in GetParent File "msgstore.pyc", line 527, in _FolderFromMAPIFolder com_error: (-2147467259, 'Unspecified error', None, None) Skipping processing of missed messages in folder 'Inbox', as it is not available Skipping processing of missed messages in folder 'Dns', as it is not available ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-12 14:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 zanthony's bug is not the same as this. It is, however, the same as: [ 943397 ] Cannot choose more than one Inbox folder to filter Happily, this has just been fixed & closed, so this should be resolved in the next release (1.0rc2 or 1.0). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: zanthony (zanthony) Date: 2004-05-12 01:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1004452 The problem doesn't seem to be fixed with 1.0b1 for me, assuming, that is, that the problem I am experieicing is the same one documented here. I am unable to mark both my personal Inbox and another account's Inbox (for which I have full rights) to be monitored at the same time. Both are available in my Folder List simulataneously. This worked in .0081 but hasn't since. In the last version I was simply unable to close the Manager dialog with the other account's Inbox selected also, now I get an error stating 'Please select a child-folder - top-level folders can't be used' and am unable to even select it. Can this bug be re-opened, or should this be opened as a separate issue? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-05-04 13:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 This should be fixed in the 1.0b1 release (it has better error handing when fetching the full folder name). If not, please re-open. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-03-12 13:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Hmm. This means my comment is most likely invalid. Back to Mark for the clever figuring out bit :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: DSB (dsbowskill) Date: 2004-03-12 13:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=995952 Back on 1.a09 ... and further fiddling reveals that this problem only seems to occur when background filtering is turned on. This actually happens in v0081 as well, just never had background filter switched on before it seems. Here's the log file for 1.a09 with background filtering OFF: (with various privacy snips!) ---Warning: option experimental_ham_spam_imbalance_adjustment in section Classifier is deprecated Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 3360 spam and 3622 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin Binary Version 0.9 (February 2004) starting (with engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004)) on Windows 5.0.2195 (Service Pack 4) using Python 2.3.2+ (#49, Oct 23 2003, 15:50:06) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] SpamBayes: Watching (for filtering) in 'Mailbox - /Inbox' Folder 'Public Folders/IPM_SUBTREE/All Public Folders/News//Planning// Online' has no field named 'Spam' - creating Warning: failed to create the Outlook user-property in folder 'Public Folders/IPM_SUBTREE/All Public Folders/News//Planning//Online' (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (4096, 'Microsoft Outlook', "You don't have appropriate permission to perform this operation.", None, 0, -2147024891), None) WARNING: We just created the user field in folder Public Folders/IPM_SUBTREE/All Public Folders/News//Planning//Online, but it appears to not exist. Something is probably wrong with DoesFolderHaveOutlookField() SpamBayes: Watching (for filtering) in 'Public Folders/IPM_SUBTREE/All Public Folders/News//Planning//Online' SpamBayes: Watching (for incremental training) in 'Mailbox - /Spam' Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox' took 3.73427ms Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Online' took 144.868ms --- And here's the logfile with background filtering ON. --- SpamBayes: Watching (for filtering) in 'Mailbox - /Inbox' Folder 'Public Folders/IPM_SUBTREE/All Public Folders/News//Planning//Online' has no field named 'Spam' - creating Warning: failed to create the Outlook user-property in folder 'Public Folders/IPM_SUBTREE/All Public Folders/News//Planning//Online' (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (4096, 'Microsoft Outlook', "You don't have appropriate permission to perform this operation.", None, 0, -2147024891), None) WARNING: We just created the user field in folder Public Folders/IPM_SUBTREE/All Public Folders/News//Planning//Online, but it appears to not exist. Something is probably wrong with DoesFolderHaveOutlookField() ERROR: 'There was an error initializing the Spam plugin.\r\n\r\nSpam filtering has been disabled. Please re- configure\r\nand re-enable this plugin\r\n\r\nError details:\r\nCould not watch the specified folders' Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.pyc", line 1304, in FiltersChanged File "addin.pyc", line 1330, in UpdateFolderHooks File "addin.pyc", line 1395, in _HookFolderEvents File "addin.pyc", line 277, in Init File "msgstore.pyc", line 629, in IsReceiveFolder com_error: (-2147221246, 'Invalid window handle', None, None) Spam filtering is disabled - ignoring new message pythoncom error: Python error invoking COM method. Traceback (most recent call last): File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 275, in _Invoke_ File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 280, in _invoke_ File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 608, in _invokeex_ File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 542, in _invokeex_ File "addin.pyc", line 383, in OnItemAdd File "win32com\client\__init__.pyc", line 496, in __getattr__ File "win32com\client\__init__.pyc", line 455, in __getattr__ File "win32com\client\__init__.pyc", line 446, in _ApplyTypes_ pywintypes.com_error: (-2147221233, 'OLE error 0x8004010f', None, None) --- Result! :) Seems to work ok, but not with background filtering. Remember I have 'Editor' priv of the public folder (I can delete the items from it) I am *moving* the spam from the public folder and into a sub- folder on my on mailbox. DSB ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-03-12 13:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Mark: this is presumably a result of SB now trying to create the spam field for all the folders, yes? Could it fail more gracefully here? (I'd write a patch, but I'm not very familiar with this bit of the code). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: DSB (dsbowskill) Date: 2004-03-12 13:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=995952 Forgot to mention ... I am moving the spam OUT of the public folder and into one of my mailbox sub-folders. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: DSB (dsbowskill) Date: 2004-03-12 13:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=995952 Exactly the same problem, though I went back to 0081 in order to fix it. 0081 works, 1.0a9 doesn't. Nothing to do with our exchange server, so this isn't the problem (at least for me). I do get this error in the logfile, which doesn't stop the addin working for 0081, but it does seem to for 1.0a9. (I don't have admin over the public folder I'm filtering, but I am 'Editor' priv. --- Warning: failed to create the Outlook user-property in folder 'Public Folders/IPM_SUBTREE/All Public Folders/News//Planning//Online' (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (4096, 'Microsoft Outlook', "You don't have appropriate permission to perform this operation.", None, 0, -2147024891), None) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Judy Dye (judydye) Date: 2004-03-02 22:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=988571 I have the same problem but it has only occurred since upgrading from Exchange 5.5 to 2003 - perhaps this is causing the problem? Trace SpamBayes Outlook Addin Binary Version 0.9 (February 2004) starting (with engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004)) on Windows 5.0.2195 (Service Pack 4) using Python 2.3.2+ (#49, Oct 23 2003, 15:50:06) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] ERROR: 'There was an error initializing the Spam plugin.\r\n\r\nSpam filtering has been disabled. Please re- configure\r\nand re-enable this plugin\r\n\r\nError details:\r\nCould not watch the specified folders' Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.pyc", line 1304, in FiltersChanged File "addin.pyc", line 1330, in UpdateFolderHooks File "addin.pyc", line 1395, in _HookFolderEvents File "addin.pyc", line 277, in Init File "msgstore.pyc", line 629, in IsReceiveFolder com_error: (-2147221246, 'Invalid window handle', None, None) Skipping processing of missed messages in folder 'Facsimiles', as it is not available Skipping processing of missed messages in folder 'sales', as it is not available Skipping processing of missed messages in folder 'Support', as it is not available Skipping processing of missed messages in folder 'Inbox', as it is not available Hope this helps........ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ladd Nelson (gladdys) Date: 2004-03-02 12:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=840787 I've recently encountered this problem as well. However in my case, I want SpamBayes to move detected spam to the public folder for use by our IT staff. Once the network folder is identified and the "Could not watch the specified folders" message appears, the only way I've been able to clear the error is to retrain SpamBayes through the training wizard which allows me to specify a local folder towards the end of the wizard. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=903440&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed May 12 00:11:01 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed May 12 00:11:09 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-936529 ] Spambayes has poor performance Message-ID: Bugs item #936529, was opened at 2004-04-16 18:36 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by bbyrd1 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=936529&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Brad Byrd (bbyrd1) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Spambayes has poor performance Initial Comment: I'm running a 2.4ghz P4 prosessor with 512MB of ram and spambayes is running very slow after i upgrade to office xp sp3. However before it ran just fine. Just a side note i'm running Windows XP PRO SP2 RC1 i'm also running the latest (april) release. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Brad Byrd (bbyrd1) Date: 2004-05-12 04:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=561013 It sometimes takes 2 or more seconds on a single message however when i go to send or recive it can be 30 seconds or more. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-05-04 23:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Can you please qualify "on the slow side"? What exactly is slow, and how slow? How long does it take to train a single message, for example? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Brad Byrd (bbyrd1) Date: 2004-05-04 18:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=561013 It still is running on the slow side. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-05-03 23:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Brad - did you try Tony's suggestion of doing a full re-train so see if that solved the problem? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-04-23 01:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The log doesn't have any errors in it, but interesting it does show that there is a fairly small amount of ham and spam trained. I wonder whether this is perhaps due to the problem discussed (by me and Tim Peters) on the list recently. If it is, then the two solutions that spring to mind are (a) retrain from a fresh db, because that fixed the problem for both me and Tim, or (b) wait and see if my further investigation into this yields anything. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Brad Byrd (bbyrd1) Date: 2004-04-22 07:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=561013 Ok here is the log file yop requested ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-04-22 01:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Eek. I don't know how that happened, but this got entered into the wrong tracker. Ignore all of that. For *this* problem: we need to see the log file. Please attach it to this tracker. You could also try retraining and seeing if that helps (see recent spambayes mailing list messages with "sloth" in the subject). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-04-22 01:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Interesting. This appears to be a sf-wide change. Not only the page above, but all other release notes on sourceforge no longer work with html tags. I wonder if this was them fixing a bug that allowed it, or introducing a bug doing something else. I'll look into this some more and if necessary change the SpamBayes 1.0a9 and 1.0b1 notes to plain text. For the moment, the release notes are more-or-less the same as the message posted to spambayes-announce (so in the archives for that list) and the changelog is in the archive or in CVS (accessible via the web). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=936529&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed May 12 02:57:14 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed May 12 02:57:34 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-903440 ] Fail to filter public folder Message-ID: Bugs item #903440, was opened at 2004-02-24 13:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by judydye You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=903440&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Rasmus Aaen (raaen) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Fail to filter public folder Initial Comment: If I mark a public folder ("Dns") for filtering, the Outlook addin stops working with the errormessage "Could not watch the specified folders". If my Inbox is the only folder filtered there are no problems. Filtering a public folder used to work in v. 0.81 I noticed that the folder does not have a "Spam" field, but manually creating it does not help. I have "Owner" rights on the public folder. After the error has occurred, the "Select folders" window is empty (see attached image). I have tried uninstalling/installing and deleting settings and database files. Logfile: Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\Rasmus\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\Rasmus\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 0 spam and 0 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin Binary Version 0.9 (February 2004) starting (with engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004)) on Windows 5.0.2195 (Service Pack 4) using Python 2.3.2+ (#49, Oct 23 2003, 15:50:06) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] SpamBayes: Watching (for filtering) in 'Mailbox - Rasmus Aaen/Inbox' ERROR: 'There was an error initializing the Spam plugin.\r\n\r\nSpam filtering has been disabled. Please re-configure\r\nand re-enable this plugin\r\n\r\nError details:\r\nCould not watch the specified folders' Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.pyc", line 1304, in FiltersChanged File "addin.pyc", line 1330, in UpdateFolderHooks File "addin.pyc", line 1358, in _HookFolderEvents File "msgstore.pyc", line 501, in GetFQName File "msgstore.pyc", line 547, in GetParent File "msgstore.pyc", line 527, in _FolderFromMAPIFolder com_error: (-2147467259, 'Unspecified error', None, None) Skipping processing of missed messages in folder 'Inbox', as it is not available Skipping processing of missed messages in folder 'Dns', as it is not available ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Judy Dye (judydye) Date: 2004-05-12 06:57 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=988571 I am still getting the original problem - see my entry 2004-03- 02 even with 1.0b1. I've reverted back to 0.81 which is the latest version when things work. HTH ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-12 02:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 zanthony's bug is not the same as this. It is, however, the same as: [ 943397 ] Cannot choose more than one Inbox folder to filter Happily, this has just been fixed & closed, so this should be resolved in the next release (1.0rc2 or 1.0). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: zanthony (zanthony) Date: 2004-05-11 13:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1004452 The problem doesn't seem to be fixed with 1.0b1 for me, assuming, that is, that the problem I am experieicing is the same one documented here. I am unable to mark both my personal Inbox and another account's Inbox (for which I have full rights) to be monitored at the same time. Both are available in my Folder List simulataneously. This worked in .0081 but hasn't since. In the last version I was simply unable to close the Manager dialog with the other account's Inbox selected also, now I get an error stating 'Please select a child-folder - top-level folders can't be used' and am unable to even select it. Can this bug be re-opened, or should this be opened as a separate issue? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-05-04 01:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 This should be fixed in the 1.0b1 release (it has better error handing when fetching the full folder name). If not, please re-open. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-03-12 00:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Hmm. This means my comment is most likely invalid. Back to Mark for the clever figuring out bit :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: DSB (dsbowskill) Date: 2004-03-12 00:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=995952 Back on 1.a09 ... and further fiddling reveals that this problem only seems to occur when background filtering is turned on. This actually happens in v0081 as well, just never had background filter switched on before it seems. Here's the log file for 1.a09 with background filtering OFF: (with various privacy snips!) ---Warning: option experimental_ham_spam_imbalance_adjustment in section Classifier is deprecated Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 3360 spam and 3622 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin Binary Version 0.9 (February 2004) starting (with engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004)) on Windows 5.0.2195 (Service Pack 4) using Python 2.3.2+ (#49, Oct 23 2003, 15:50:06) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] SpamBayes: Watching (for filtering) in 'Mailbox - /Inbox' Folder 'Public Folders/IPM_SUBTREE/All Public Folders/News//Planning// Online' has no field named 'Spam' - creating Warning: failed to create the Outlook user-property in folder 'Public Folders/IPM_SUBTREE/All Public Folders/News//Planning//Online' (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (4096, 'Microsoft Outlook', "You don't have appropriate permission to perform this operation.", None, 0, -2147024891), None) WARNING: We just created the user field in folder Public Folders/IPM_SUBTREE/All Public Folders/News//Planning//Online, but it appears to not exist. Something is probably wrong with DoesFolderHaveOutlookField() SpamBayes: Watching (for filtering) in 'Public Folders/IPM_SUBTREE/All Public Folders/News//Planning//Online' SpamBayes: Watching (for incremental training) in 'Mailbox - /Spam' Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox' took 3.73427ms Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Online' took 144.868ms --- And here's the logfile with background filtering ON. --- SpamBayes: Watching (for filtering) in 'Mailbox - /Inbox' Folder 'Public Folders/IPM_SUBTREE/All Public Folders/News//Planning//Online' has no field named 'Spam' - creating Warning: failed to create the Outlook user-property in folder 'Public Folders/IPM_SUBTREE/All Public Folders/News//Planning//Online' (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (4096, 'Microsoft Outlook', "You don't have appropriate permission to perform this operation.", None, 0, -2147024891), None) WARNING: We just created the user field in folder Public Folders/IPM_SUBTREE/All Public Folders/News//Planning//Online, but it appears to not exist. Something is probably wrong with DoesFolderHaveOutlookField() ERROR: 'There was an error initializing the Spam plugin.\r\n\r\nSpam filtering has been disabled. Please re- configure\r\nand re-enable this plugin\r\n\r\nError details:\r\nCould not watch the specified folders' Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.pyc", line 1304, in FiltersChanged File "addin.pyc", line 1330, in UpdateFolderHooks File "addin.pyc", line 1395, in _HookFolderEvents File "addin.pyc", line 277, in Init File "msgstore.pyc", line 629, in IsReceiveFolder com_error: (-2147221246, 'Invalid window handle', None, None) Spam filtering is disabled - ignoring new message pythoncom error: Python error invoking COM method. Traceback (most recent call last): File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 275, in _Invoke_ File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 280, in _invoke_ File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 608, in _invokeex_ File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 542, in _invokeex_ File "addin.pyc", line 383, in OnItemAdd File "win32com\client\__init__.pyc", line 496, in __getattr__ File "win32com\client\__init__.pyc", line 455, in __getattr__ File "win32com\client\__init__.pyc", line 446, in _ApplyTypes_ pywintypes.com_error: (-2147221233, 'OLE error 0x8004010f', None, None) --- Result! :) Seems to work ok, but not with background filtering. Remember I have 'Editor' priv of the public folder (I can delete the items from it) I am *moving* the spam from the public folder and into a sub- folder on my on mailbox. DSB ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-03-12 00:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Mark: this is presumably a result of SB now trying to create the spam field for all the folders, yes? Could it fail more gracefully here? (I'd write a patch, but I'm not very familiar with this bit of the code). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: DSB (dsbowskill) Date: 2004-03-12 00:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=995952 Forgot to mention ... I am moving the spam OUT of the public folder and into one of my mailbox sub-folders. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: DSB (dsbowskill) Date: 2004-03-12 00:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=995952 Exactly the same problem, though I went back to 0081 in order to fix it. 0081 works, 1.0a9 doesn't. Nothing to do with our exchange server, so this isn't the problem (at least for me). I do get this error in the logfile, which doesn't stop the addin working for 0081, but it does seem to for 1.0a9. (I don't have admin over the public folder I'm filtering, but I am 'Editor' priv. --- Warning: failed to create the Outlook user-property in folder 'Public Folders/IPM_SUBTREE/All Public Folders/News//Planning//Online' (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (4096, 'Microsoft Outlook', "You don't have appropriate permission to perform this operation.", None, 0, -2147024891), None) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Judy Dye (judydye) Date: 2004-03-02 09:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=988571 I have the same problem but it has only occurred since upgrading from Exchange 5.5 to 2003 - perhaps this is causing the problem? Trace SpamBayes Outlook Addin Binary Version 0.9 (February 2004) starting (with engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004)) on Windows 5.0.2195 (Service Pack 4) using Python 2.3.2+ (#49, Oct 23 2003, 15:50:06) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] ERROR: 'There was an error initializing the Spam plugin.\r\n\r\nSpam filtering has been disabled. Please re- configure\r\nand re-enable this plugin\r\n\r\nError details:\r\nCould not watch the specified folders' Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.pyc", line 1304, in FiltersChanged File "addin.pyc", line 1330, in UpdateFolderHooks File "addin.pyc", line 1395, in _HookFolderEvents File "addin.pyc", line 277, in Init File "msgstore.pyc", line 629, in IsReceiveFolder com_error: (-2147221246, 'Invalid window handle', None, None) Skipping processing of missed messages in folder 'Facsimiles', as it is not available Skipping processing of missed messages in folder 'sales', as it is not available Skipping processing of missed messages in folder 'Support', as it is not available Skipping processing of missed messages in folder 'Inbox', as it is not available Hope this helps........ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ladd Nelson (gladdys) Date: 2004-03-01 23:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=840787 I've recently encountered this problem as well. However in my case, I want SpamBayes to move detected spam to the public folder for use by our IT staff. Once the network folder is identified and the "Could not watch the specified folders" message appears, the only way I've been able to clear the error is to retrain SpamBayes through the training wizard which allows me to specify a local folder towards the end of the wizard. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=903440&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed May 12 17:31:50 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed May 12 17:31:56 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-952873 ] crash outlook 2002 & corrupt .pst after KB840374 Message-ID: Bugs item #952873, was opened at 2004-05-12 14:31 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=952873&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0b1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Michael L. Metts (mmetts) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: crash outlook 2002 & corrupt .pst after KB840374 Initial Comment: i'm running Windows XP pro (sp1) and Outlook 2002 (sp3). as of yesterday, i had Spambayes 1.0b1 plugin running without incident. i installed this fix from Microsoft: Security Update for Windows XP (KB840374) whereupon: 1) Outlook failed repeatedly claiming that SpamBayes was the cause. 2) Outlook disabled Spambayes. 3) found .pst corrupt. unable to send/receive email. 4) attempted to repair .pst to no avail. attempted install-over of SpamBayes to no avail. 5) uninstalled SpamBayes and KB840374. still, unable to recover .pst. 6) created new .pst and performed selective import from the old .pst. 7) grepped entire harddrive and registry for remaining traces of SpamBayes and deleted. i would like to continue to use SpamBayes *and* trust the Microsoft security fixes. thoughts? thanks, Mike ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=952873&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed May 12 17:51:43 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed May 12 17:52:08 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-903440 ] Fail to filter public folder Message-ID: Bugs item #903440, was opened at 2004-02-25 02:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=903440&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) >Status: Open >Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Rasmus Aaen (raaen) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Fail to filter public folder Initial Comment: If I mark a public folder ("Dns") for filtering, the Outlook addin stops working with the errormessage "Could not watch the specified folders". If my Inbox is the only folder filtered there are no problems. Filtering a public folder used to work in v. 0.81 I noticed that the folder does not have a "Spam" field, but manually creating it does not help. I have "Owner" rights on the public folder. After the error has occurred, the "Select folders" window is empty (see attached image). I have tried uninstalling/installing and deleting settings and database files. Logfile: Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\Rasmus\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\Rasmus\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 0 spam and 0 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin Binary Version 0.9 (February 2004) starting (with engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004)) on Windows 5.0.2195 (Service Pack 4) using Python 2.3.2+ (#49, Oct 23 2003, 15:50:06) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] SpamBayes: Watching (for filtering) in 'Mailbox - Rasmus Aaen/Inbox' ERROR: 'There was an error initializing the Spam plugin.\r\n\r\nSpam filtering has been disabled. Please re-configure\r\nand re-enable this plugin\r\n\r\nError details:\r\nCould not watch the specified folders' Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.pyc", line 1304, in FiltersChanged File "addin.pyc", line 1330, in UpdateFolderHooks File "addin.pyc", line 1358, in _HookFolderEvents File "msgstore.pyc", line 501, in GetFQName File "msgstore.pyc", line 547, in GetParent File "msgstore.pyc", line 527, in _FolderFromMAPIFolder com_error: (-2147467259, 'Unspecified error', None, None) Skipping processing of missed messages in folder 'Inbox', as it is not available Skipping processing of missed messages in folder 'Dns', as it is not available ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-13 09:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 jduydye: dsbowskill's comment of 3-12 says that this does not occur with background filtering off. Did you try that? Did you have the same experience? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Judy Dye (judydye) Date: 2004-05-12 18:57 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=988571 I am still getting the original problem - see my entry 2004-03- 02 even with 1.0b1. I've reverted back to 0.81 which is the latest version when things work. HTH ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-12 14:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 zanthony's bug is not the same as this. It is, however, the same as: [ 943397 ] Cannot choose more than one Inbox folder to filter Happily, this has just been fixed & closed, so this should be resolved in the next release (1.0rc2 or 1.0). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: zanthony (zanthony) Date: 2004-05-12 01:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1004452 The problem doesn't seem to be fixed with 1.0b1 for me, assuming, that is, that the problem I am experieicing is the same one documented here. I am unable to mark both my personal Inbox and another account's Inbox (for which I have full rights) to be monitored at the same time. Both are available in my Folder List simulataneously. This worked in .0081 but hasn't since. In the last version I was simply unable to close the Manager dialog with the other account's Inbox selected also, now I get an error stating 'Please select a child-folder - top-level folders can't be used' and am unable to even select it. Can this bug be re-opened, or should this be opened as a separate issue? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-05-04 13:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 This should be fixed in the 1.0b1 release (it has better error handing when fetching the full folder name). If not, please re-open. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-03-12 13:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Hmm. This means my comment is most likely invalid. Back to Mark for the clever figuring out bit :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: DSB (dsbowskill) Date: 2004-03-12 13:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=995952 Back on 1.a09 ... and further fiddling reveals that this problem only seems to occur when background filtering is turned on. This actually happens in v0081 as well, just never had background filter switched on before it seems. Here's the log file for 1.a09 with background filtering OFF: (with various privacy snips!) ---Warning: option experimental_ham_spam_imbalance_adjustment in section Classifier is deprecated Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 3360 spam and 3622 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin Binary Version 0.9 (February 2004) starting (with engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004)) on Windows 5.0.2195 (Service Pack 4) using Python 2.3.2+ (#49, Oct 23 2003, 15:50:06) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] SpamBayes: Watching (for filtering) in 'Mailbox - /Inbox' Folder 'Public Folders/IPM_SUBTREE/All Public Folders/News//Planning// Online' has no field named 'Spam' - creating Warning: failed to create the Outlook user-property in folder 'Public Folders/IPM_SUBTREE/All Public Folders/News//Planning//Online' (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (4096, 'Microsoft Outlook', "You don't have appropriate permission to perform this operation.", None, 0, -2147024891), None) WARNING: We just created the user field in folder Public Folders/IPM_SUBTREE/All Public Folders/News//Planning//Online, but it appears to not exist. Something is probably wrong with DoesFolderHaveOutlookField() SpamBayes: Watching (for filtering) in 'Public Folders/IPM_SUBTREE/All Public Folders/News//Planning//Online' SpamBayes: Watching (for incremental training) in 'Mailbox - /Spam' Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox' took 3.73427ms Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Online' took 144.868ms --- And here's the logfile with background filtering ON. --- SpamBayes: Watching (for filtering) in 'Mailbox - /Inbox' Folder 'Public Folders/IPM_SUBTREE/All Public Folders/News//Planning//Online' has no field named 'Spam' - creating Warning: failed to create the Outlook user-property in folder 'Public Folders/IPM_SUBTREE/All Public Folders/News//Planning//Online' (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (4096, 'Microsoft Outlook', "You don't have appropriate permission to perform this operation.", None, 0, -2147024891), None) WARNING: We just created the user field in folder Public Folders/IPM_SUBTREE/All Public Folders/News//Planning//Online, but it appears to not exist. Something is probably wrong with DoesFolderHaveOutlookField() ERROR: 'There was an error initializing the Spam plugin.\r\n\r\nSpam filtering has been disabled. Please re- configure\r\nand re-enable this plugin\r\n\r\nError details:\r\nCould not watch the specified folders' Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.pyc", line 1304, in FiltersChanged File "addin.pyc", line 1330, in UpdateFolderHooks File "addin.pyc", line 1395, in _HookFolderEvents File "addin.pyc", line 277, in Init File "msgstore.pyc", line 629, in IsReceiveFolder com_error: (-2147221246, 'Invalid window handle', None, None) Spam filtering is disabled - ignoring new message pythoncom error: Python error invoking COM method. Traceback (most recent call last): File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 275, in _Invoke_ File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 280, in _invoke_ File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 608, in _invokeex_ File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 542, in _invokeex_ File "addin.pyc", line 383, in OnItemAdd File "win32com\client\__init__.pyc", line 496, in __getattr__ File "win32com\client\__init__.pyc", line 455, in __getattr__ File "win32com\client\__init__.pyc", line 446, in _ApplyTypes_ pywintypes.com_error: (-2147221233, 'OLE error 0x8004010f', None, None) --- Result! :) Seems to work ok, but not with background filtering. Remember I have 'Editor' priv of the public folder (I can delete the items from it) I am *moving* the spam from the public folder and into a sub- folder on my on mailbox. DSB ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-03-12 13:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Mark: this is presumably a result of SB now trying to create the spam field for all the folders, yes? Could it fail more gracefully here? (I'd write a patch, but I'm not very familiar with this bit of the code). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: DSB (dsbowskill) Date: 2004-03-12 13:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=995952 Forgot to mention ... I am moving the spam OUT of the public folder and into one of my mailbox sub-folders. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: DSB (dsbowskill) Date: 2004-03-12 13:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=995952 Exactly the same problem, though I went back to 0081 in order to fix it. 0081 works, 1.0a9 doesn't. Nothing to do with our exchange server, so this isn't the problem (at least for me). I do get this error in the logfile, which doesn't stop the addin working for 0081, but it does seem to for 1.0a9. (I don't have admin over the public folder I'm filtering, but I am 'Editor' priv. --- Warning: failed to create the Outlook user-property in folder 'Public Folders/IPM_SUBTREE/All Public Folders/News//Planning//Online' (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (4096, 'Microsoft Outlook', "You don't have appropriate permission to perform this operation.", None, 0, -2147024891), None) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Judy Dye (judydye) Date: 2004-03-02 22:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=988571 I have the same problem but it has only occurred since upgrading from Exchange 5.5 to 2003 - perhaps this is causing the problem? Trace SpamBayes Outlook Addin Binary Version 0.9 (February 2004) starting (with engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004)) on Windows 5.0.2195 (Service Pack 4) using Python 2.3.2+ (#49, Oct 23 2003, 15:50:06) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] ERROR: 'There was an error initializing the Spam plugin.\r\n\r\nSpam filtering has been disabled. Please re- configure\r\nand re-enable this plugin\r\n\r\nError details:\r\nCould not watch the specified folders' Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.pyc", line 1304, in FiltersChanged File "addin.pyc", line 1330, in UpdateFolderHooks File "addin.pyc", line 1395, in _HookFolderEvents File "addin.pyc", line 277, in Init File "msgstore.pyc", line 629, in IsReceiveFolder com_error: (-2147221246, 'Invalid window handle', None, None) Skipping processing of missed messages in folder 'Facsimiles', as it is not available Skipping processing of missed messages in folder 'sales', as it is not available Skipping processing of missed messages in folder 'Support', as it is not available Skipping processing of missed messages in folder 'Inbox', as it is not available Hope this helps........ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ladd Nelson (gladdys) Date: 2004-03-02 12:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=840787 I've recently encountered this problem as well. However in my case, I want SpamBayes to move detected spam to the public folder for use by our IT staff. Once the network folder is identified and the "Could not watch the specified folders" message appears, the only way I've been able to clear the error is to retrain SpamBayes through the training wizard which allows me to specify a local folder towards the end of the wizard. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=903440&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu May 13 03:04:11 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu May 13 03:04:57 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-903440 ] Fail to filter public folder Message-ID: Bugs item #903440, was opened at 2004-02-24 13:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by judydye You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=903440&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Rasmus Aaen (raaen) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Fail to filter public folder Initial Comment: If I mark a public folder ("Dns") for filtering, the Outlook addin stops working with the errormessage "Could not watch the specified folders". If my Inbox is the only folder filtered there are no problems. Filtering a public folder used to work in v. 0.81 I noticed that the folder does not have a "Spam" field, but manually creating it does not help. I have "Owner" rights on the public folder. After the error has occurred, the "Select folders" window is empty (see attached image). I have tried uninstalling/installing and deleting settings and database files. Logfile: Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\Rasmus\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\Rasmus\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 0 spam and 0 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin Binary Version 0.9 (February 2004) starting (with engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004)) on Windows 5.0.2195 (Service Pack 4) using Python 2.3.2+ (#49, Oct 23 2003, 15:50:06) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] SpamBayes: Watching (for filtering) in 'Mailbox - Rasmus Aaen/Inbox' ERROR: 'There was an error initializing the Spam plugin.\r\n\r\nSpam filtering has been disabled. Please re-configure\r\nand re-enable this plugin\r\n\r\nError details:\r\nCould not watch the specified folders' Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.pyc", line 1304, in FiltersChanged File "addin.pyc", line 1330, in UpdateFolderHooks File "addin.pyc", line 1358, in _HookFolderEvents File "msgstore.pyc", line 501, in GetFQName File "msgstore.pyc", line 547, in GetParent File "msgstore.pyc", line 527, in _FolderFromMAPIFolder com_error: (-2147467259, 'Unspecified error', None, None) Skipping processing of missed messages in folder 'Inbox', as it is not available Skipping processing of missed messages in folder 'Dns', as it is not available ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Judy Dye (judydye) Date: 2004-05-13 07:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=988571 Sorry but it does also happen with background filtering off. I get the same error:- File "addin.pyc", line 1304, in FiltersChanged File "addin.pyc", line 1330, in UpdateFolderHooks File "addin.pyc", line 1395, in _HookFolderEvents File "addin.pyc", line 277, in Init File "msgstore.pyc", line 629, in IsReceiveFolder com_error: (-2147221246, 'Invalid window handle', None, None) I have administrator rights and am trying to remove items from a variety of Public folders (Sales, Support, Facsimiles) into a Public Spam folder HTH ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-12 21:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 jduydye: dsbowskill's comment of 3-12 says that this does not occur with background filtering off. Did you try that? Did you have the same experience? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Judy Dye (judydye) Date: 2004-05-12 06:57 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=988571 I am still getting the original problem - see my entry 2004-03- 02 even with 1.0b1. I've reverted back to 0.81 which is the latest version when things work. HTH ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-12 02:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 zanthony's bug is not the same as this. It is, however, the same as: [ 943397 ] Cannot choose more than one Inbox folder to filter Happily, this has just been fixed & closed, so this should be resolved in the next release (1.0rc2 or 1.0). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: zanthony (zanthony) Date: 2004-05-11 13:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1004452 The problem doesn't seem to be fixed with 1.0b1 for me, assuming, that is, that the problem I am experieicing is the same one documented here. I am unable to mark both my personal Inbox and another account's Inbox (for which I have full rights) to be monitored at the same time. Both are available in my Folder List simulataneously. This worked in .0081 but hasn't since. In the last version I was simply unable to close the Manager dialog with the other account's Inbox selected also, now I get an error stating 'Please select a child-folder - top-level folders can't be used' and am unable to even select it. Can this bug be re-opened, or should this be opened as a separate issue? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-05-04 01:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 This should be fixed in the 1.0b1 release (it has better error handing when fetching the full folder name). If not, please re-open. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-03-12 00:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Hmm. This means my comment is most likely invalid. Back to Mark for the clever figuring out bit :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: DSB (dsbowskill) Date: 2004-03-12 00:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=995952 Back on 1.a09 ... and further fiddling reveals that this problem only seems to occur when background filtering is turned on. This actually happens in v0081 as well, just never had background filter switched on before it seems. Here's the log file for 1.a09 with background filtering OFF: (with various privacy snips!) ---Warning: option experimental_ham_spam_imbalance_adjustment in section Classifier is deprecated Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 3360 spam and 3622 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin Binary Version 0.9 (February 2004) starting (with engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004)) on Windows 5.0.2195 (Service Pack 4) using Python 2.3.2+ (#49, Oct 23 2003, 15:50:06) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] SpamBayes: Watching (for filtering) in 'Mailbox - /Inbox' Folder 'Public Folders/IPM_SUBTREE/All Public Folders/News//Planning// Online' has no field named 'Spam' - creating Warning: failed to create the Outlook user-property in folder 'Public Folders/IPM_SUBTREE/All Public Folders/News//Planning//Online' (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (4096, 'Microsoft Outlook', "You don't have appropriate permission to perform this operation.", None, 0, -2147024891), None) WARNING: We just created the user field in folder Public Folders/IPM_SUBTREE/All Public Folders/News//Planning//Online, but it appears to not exist. Something is probably wrong with DoesFolderHaveOutlookField() SpamBayes: Watching (for filtering) in 'Public Folders/IPM_SUBTREE/All Public Folders/News//Planning//Online' SpamBayes: Watching (for incremental training) in 'Mailbox - /Spam' Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox' took 3.73427ms Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Online' took 144.868ms --- And here's the logfile with background filtering ON. --- SpamBayes: Watching (for filtering) in 'Mailbox - /Inbox' Folder 'Public Folders/IPM_SUBTREE/All Public Folders/News//Planning//Online' has no field named 'Spam' - creating Warning: failed to create the Outlook user-property in folder 'Public Folders/IPM_SUBTREE/All Public Folders/News//Planning//Online' (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (4096, 'Microsoft Outlook', "You don't have appropriate permission to perform this operation.", None, 0, -2147024891), None) WARNING: We just created the user field in folder Public Folders/IPM_SUBTREE/All Public Folders/News//Planning//Online, but it appears to not exist. Something is probably wrong with DoesFolderHaveOutlookField() ERROR: 'There was an error initializing the Spam plugin.\r\n\r\nSpam filtering has been disabled. Please re- configure\r\nand re-enable this plugin\r\n\r\nError details:\r\nCould not watch the specified folders' Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.pyc", line 1304, in FiltersChanged File "addin.pyc", line 1330, in UpdateFolderHooks File "addin.pyc", line 1395, in _HookFolderEvents File "addin.pyc", line 277, in Init File "msgstore.pyc", line 629, in IsReceiveFolder com_error: (-2147221246, 'Invalid window handle', None, None) Spam filtering is disabled - ignoring new message pythoncom error: Python error invoking COM method. Traceback (most recent call last): File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 275, in _Invoke_ File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 280, in _invoke_ File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 608, in _invokeex_ File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 542, in _invokeex_ File "addin.pyc", line 383, in OnItemAdd File "win32com\client\__init__.pyc", line 496, in __getattr__ File "win32com\client\__init__.pyc", line 455, in __getattr__ File "win32com\client\__init__.pyc", line 446, in _ApplyTypes_ pywintypes.com_error: (-2147221233, 'OLE error 0x8004010f', None, None) --- Result! :) Seems to work ok, but not with background filtering. Remember I have 'Editor' priv of the public folder (I can delete the items from it) I am *moving* the spam from the public folder and into a sub- folder on my on mailbox. DSB ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-03-12 00:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Mark: this is presumably a result of SB now trying to create the spam field for all the folders, yes? Could it fail more gracefully here? (I'd write a patch, but I'm not very familiar with this bit of the code). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: DSB (dsbowskill) Date: 2004-03-12 00:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=995952 Forgot to mention ... I am moving the spam OUT of the public folder and into one of my mailbox sub-folders. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: DSB (dsbowskill) Date: 2004-03-12 00:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=995952 Exactly the same problem, though I went back to 0081 in order to fix it. 0081 works, 1.0a9 doesn't. Nothing to do with our exchange server, so this isn't the problem (at least for me). I do get this error in the logfile, which doesn't stop the addin working for 0081, but it does seem to for 1.0a9. (I don't have admin over the public folder I'm filtering, but I am 'Editor' priv. --- Warning: failed to create the Outlook user-property in folder 'Public Folders/IPM_SUBTREE/All Public Folders/News//Planning//Online' (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (4096, 'Microsoft Outlook', "You don't have appropriate permission to perform this operation.", None, 0, -2147024891), None) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Judy Dye (judydye) Date: 2004-03-02 09:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=988571 I have the same problem but it has only occurred since upgrading from Exchange 5.5 to 2003 - perhaps this is causing the problem? Trace SpamBayes Outlook Addin Binary Version 0.9 (February 2004) starting (with engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004)) on Windows 5.0.2195 (Service Pack 4) using Python 2.3.2+ (#49, Oct 23 2003, 15:50:06) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] ERROR: 'There was an error initializing the Spam plugin.\r\n\r\nSpam filtering has been disabled. Please re- configure\r\nand re-enable this plugin\r\n\r\nError details:\r\nCould not watch the specified folders' Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.pyc", line 1304, in FiltersChanged File "addin.pyc", line 1330, in UpdateFolderHooks File "addin.pyc", line 1395, in _HookFolderEvents File "addin.pyc", line 277, in Init File "msgstore.pyc", line 629, in IsReceiveFolder com_error: (-2147221246, 'Invalid window handle', None, None) Skipping processing of missed messages in folder 'Facsimiles', as it is not available Skipping processing of missed messages in folder 'sales', as it is not available Skipping processing of missed messages in folder 'Support', as it is not available Skipping processing of missed messages in folder 'Inbox', as it is not available Hope this helps........ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ladd Nelson (gladdys) Date: 2004-03-01 23:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=840787 I've recently encountered this problem as well. However in my case, I want SpamBayes to move detected spam to the public folder for use by our IT staff. Once the network folder is identified and the "Could not watch the specified folders" message appears, the only way I've been able to clear the error is to retrain SpamBayes through the training wizard which allows me to specify a local folder towards the end of the wizard. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=903440&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu May 13 19:43:18 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu May 13 19:46:21 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-952873 ] crash outlook 2002 & corrupt .pst after KB840374 Message-ID: Bugs item #952873, was opened at 2004-05-12 17:31 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by tim_one You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=952873&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0b1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Michael L. Metts (mmetts) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: crash outlook 2002 & corrupt .pst after KB840374 Initial Comment: i'm running Windows XP pro (sp1) and Outlook 2002 (sp3). as of yesterday, i had Spambayes 1.0b1 plugin running without incident. i installed this fix from Microsoft: Security Update for Windows XP (KB840374) whereupon: 1) Outlook failed repeatedly claiming that SpamBayes was the cause. 2) Outlook disabled Spambayes. 3) found .pst corrupt. unable to send/receive email. 4) attempted to repair .pst to no avail. attempted install-over of SpamBayes to no avail. 5) uninstalled SpamBayes and KB840374. still, unable to recover .pst. 6) created new .pst and performed selective import from the old .pst. 7) grepped entire harddrive and registry for remaining traces of SpamBayes and deleted. i would like to continue to use SpamBayes *and* trust the Microsoft security fixes. thoughts? thanks, Mike ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2004-05-13 19:43 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 My thought is that no causal connection has been demonstrated, just temporal proximity. Since KB840374 was aimed at fixing a vulnerability in XP's Help and Support Center component, it's kinda hard to concoct a plausible causal connection too -- although since all of MS's code is secret, we have no way to know what the patch really did. As another data point, I installed KB840374 two days ago, with no visible effect of any kind on Outlook or SpamBayes. This was also on XP Pro SP1, but Outlook 2003. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=952873&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu May 13 20:06:16 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu May 13 20:06:48 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-952873 ] crash outlook 2002 & corrupt .pst after KB840374 Message-ID: Bugs item #952873, was opened at 2004-05-13 09:31 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=952873&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0b1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Michael L. Metts (mmetts) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: crash outlook 2002 & corrupt .pst after KB840374 Initial Comment: i'm running Windows XP pro (sp1) and Outlook 2002 (sp3). as of yesterday, i had Spambayes 1.0b1 plugin running without incident. i installed this fix from Microsoft: Security Update for Windows XP (KB840374) whereupon: 1) Outlook failed repeatedly claiming that SpamBayes was the cause. 2) Outlook disabled Spambayes. 3) found .pst corrupt. unable to send/receive email. 4) attempted to repair .pst to no avail. attempted install-over of SpamBayes to no avail. 5) uninstalled SpamBayes and KB840374. still, unable to recover .pst. 6) created new .pst and performed selective import from the old .pst. 7) grepped entire harddrive and registry for remaining traces of SpamBayes and deleted. i would like to continue to use SpamBayes *and* trust the Microsoft security fixes. thoughts? thanks, Mike ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-14 12:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 FWIW, I'm also using XP Pro SP1 and Outlook 2002 (SP3) and have installed KB840374 and have had no troubles. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2004-05-14 11:43 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 My thought is that no causal connection has been demonstrated, just temporal proximity. Since KB840374 was aimed at fixing a vulnerability in XP's Help and Support Center component, it's kinda hard to concoct a plausible causal connection too -- although since all of MS's code is secret, we have no way to know what the patch really did. As another data point, I installed KB840374 two days ago, with no visible effect of any kind on Outlook or SpamBayes. This was also on XP Pro SP1, but Outlook 2003. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=952873&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu May 13 20:28:14 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu May 13 20:30:40 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-952873 ] crash outlook 2002 & corrupt .pst after KB840374 Message-ID: Bugs item #952873, was opened at 2004-05-12 14:31 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mmetts You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=952873&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0b1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Michael L. Metts (mmetts) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: crash outlook 2002 & corrupt .pst after KB840374 Initial Comment: i'm running Windows XP pro (sp1) and Outlook 2002 (sp3). as of yesterday, i had Spambayes 1.0b1 plugin running without incident. i installed this fix from Microsoft: Security Update for Windows XP (KB840374) whereupon: 1) Outlook failed repeatedly claiming that SpamBayes was the cause. 2) Outlook disabled Spambayes. 3) found .pst corrupt. unable to send/receive email. 4) attempted to repair .pst to no avail. attempted install-over of SpamBayes to no avail. 5) uninstalled SpamBayes and KB840374. still, unable to recover .pst. 6) created new .pst and performed selective import from the old .pst. 7) grepped entire harddrive and registry for remaining traces of SpamBayes and deleted. i would like to continue to use SpamBayes *and* trust the Microsoft security fixes. thoughts? thanks, Mike ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Michael L. Metts (mmetts) Date: 2004-05-13 17:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1040631 thanks guys, in retrospect, I would tend to agree with the assement that there's probably no causal link with KB840374. probably re-apply it and then re- install SpamBayes next week. the worst outcome would be a re-install of MS Office ... something I would truly hate. also, fyi: 1) I am running the latest commercial release of the PGP plug-in for Outlook and 2) my XP Pro installation is over a year old now -- in my long experience with Windows, strange (very strange) things start happening around now and a total wipe & re-install is usually indicated. :( but, I'm resisting on that one. Mike ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-13 17:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 FWIW, I'm also using XP Pro SP1 and Outlook 2002 (SP3) and have installed KB840374 and have had no troubles. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2004-05-13 16:43 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 My thought is that no causal connection has been demonstrated, just temporal proximity. Since KB840374 was aimed at fixing a vulnerability in XP's Help and Support Center component, it's kinda hard to concoct a plausible causal connection too -- although since all of MS's code is secret, we have no way to know what the patch really did. As another data point, I installed KB840374 two days ago, with no visible effect of any kind on Outlook or SpamBayes. This was also on XP Pro SP1, but Outlook 2003. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=952873&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu May 13 20:40:32 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu May 13 20:41:14 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-952873 ] crash outlook 2002 & corrupt .pst after KB840374 Message-ID: Bugs item #952873, was opened at 2004-05-13 07:31 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=952873&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0b1 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Works For Me Priority: 5 Submitted By: Michael L. Metts (mmetts) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: crash outlook 2002 & corrupt .pst after KB840374 Initial Comment: i'm running Windows XP pro (sp1) and Outlook 2002 (sp3). as of yesterday, i had Spambayes 1.0b1 plugin running without incident. i installed this fix from Microsoft: Security Update for Windows XP (KB840374) whereupon: 1) Outlook failed repeatedly claiming that SpamBayes was the cause. 2) Outlook disabled Spambayes. 3) found .pst corrupt. unable to send/receive email. 4) attempted to repair .pst to no avail. attempted install-over of SpamBayes to no avail. 5) uninstalled SpamBayes and KB840374. still, unable to recover .pst. 6) created new .pst and performed selective import from the old .pst. 7) grepped entire harddrive and registry for remaining traces of SpamBayes and deleted. i would like to continue to use SpamBayes *and* trust the Microsoft security fixes. thoughts? thanks, Mike ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-05-14 10:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Closing - thanks everyone. Regarding the PGP extension. I'm not sure what the "latest commercial" version is like, but I know from both personal experience and other users that a year or so ago, the PGP plugin was completely unstable, causing regular crashes. Simply disabling that plugin solved all those stability issues (thereby allowing you to enable it just to decode a message, then quickly disable again!) I would have having a good look at that plugin too :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Michael L. Metts (mmetts) Date: 2004-05-14 10:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1040631 thanks guys, in retrospect, I would tend to agree with the assement that there's probably no causal link with KB840374. probably re-apply it and then re- install SpamBayes next week. the worst outcome would be a re-install of MS Office ... something I would truly hate. also, fyi: 1) I am running the latest commercial release of the PGP plug-in for Outlook and 2) my XP Pro installation is over a year old now -- in my long experience with Windows, strange (very strange) things start happening around now and a total wipe & re-install is usually indicated. :( but, I'm resisting on that one. Mike ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-14 10:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 FWIW, I'm also using XP Pro SP1 and Outlook 2002 (SP3) and have installed KB840374 and have had no troubles. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2004-05-14 09:43 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 My thought is that no causal connection has been demonstrated, just temporal proximity. Since KB840374 was aimed at fixing a vulnerability in XP's Help and Support Center component, it's kinda hard to concoct a plausible causal connection too -- although since all of MS's code is secret, we have no way to know what the patch really did. As another data point, I installed KB840374 two days ago, with no visible effect of any kind on Outlook or SpamBayes. This was also on XP Pro SP1, but Outlook 2003. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=952873&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri May 14 11:19:15 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri May 14 11:19:26 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-954031 ] Plugin failed to initialize Message-ID: Bugs item #954031, was opened at 2004-05-14 11:19 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=954031&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Michael Carr (korggy) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Plugin failed to initialize Initial Comment: When I start Outlook, I get a message that the SpamBayes plugin failed to initialize. Logfile is attached... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=954031&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri May 14 14:00:48 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri May 14 14:00:55 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-804364 ] Outlook hangs when receiving messages Message-ID: Bugs item #804364, was opened at 2003-09-11 20:37 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by lokety You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=804364&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Derek Stapleton (dstapleton) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook hangs when receiving messages Initial Comment: Using Windows 98, Outlook 2000 SP3, Pentium II-350, 128MB RAM, Spambayes Outlook Addin 0.81. Outlook rules move messages from the Inbox to three folders. Spambayes is configured to watch three folders. Approximately 80% of the time when an email comes in to be filtered, Outlook hangs and the only way to clear it is to End Task. I have tried both enabling and disabling the filter timer but have the same results. Disabling Spambayes eliminates the problem. I have attached a log file. The first portion of the file is the log immediately after Outlook hanging and being shut down. This portion of the log doesn't show the email that was coming in to be filtered. The second portion of the file is the log after I have restarted Outlook. This portion does show the email that was coming in when Outlook hung. When working, Spambayes is properly identifying up to 97 percent of the spam I receive over three accounts. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Teng-Yan Loke (lokety) Date: 2004-05-15 02:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1038472 I'm also suffering from this bug. Microsoft Windows XP SP1, Outlook 2000 SP3, McAfee VirusScan and PGP Mail plugins. My Outlook checks about 5 POP accounts. When will this be resolved? I've uninstalled SpamBayes but I'm hoping to use it again. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Derek Stapleton (dstapleton) Date: 2003-09-18 19:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=864221 Update: The problem seems to be linked to checking multiple email accounts with Outlook. When checking only one account, everything works fine. When checking two or more, thinkgs go downhill from there. I have uninstalled and hope for a new version soon. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=804364&group_id=61702 From jtoebbe at physics.emory.edu Fri May 14 14:11:44 2004 From: jtoebbe at physics.emory.edu (Jonathan S. Toebbe) Date: Fri May 14 14:11:48 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] X-Spambayes-Exception problem Message-ID: <200405141411.44695.jtoebbe@physics.emory.edu> I've been running Spambayes for a while with great success. Recently, several messages, identified as spam through the web interface, get through my mailer's filter because no X-Spambayes-Classification: spam header is added to the message. Instead, they have: X-Spambayes-Exception: exceptions.UnicodeError(ASCII decoding error: ordinal not in range(128)) in append() at /usr/lib/python2.2/email/Header.py line 230: ustr = unicode(s, incodec) Several of them appear to have strange characters throughout the spam (weird encoding?), others are plain text. Spambayes id's them as spam, but somehow fails to tag them as such... Advice? Jon PS- Thanks for a great program -- in spite of this bug, the spam that reaches my inbox is down 90% or better. Keep up the good work! -- Jonathan S. Toebbe Department of Physics; Emory University Atlanta, GA 30322 "We're sorry, but the number you have dialed is imaginary. Please rotate your phone ninety degrees and try again. Thank you." From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri May 14 14:33:27 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri May 14 14:33:36 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-804364 ] Outlook hangs when receiving messages Message-ID: Bugs item #804364, was opened at 2003-09-11 07:37 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jjarrett You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=804364&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Derek Stapleton (dstapleton) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook hangs when receiving messages Initial Comment: Using Windows 98, Outlook 2000 SP3, Pentium II-350, 128MB RAM, Spambayes Outlook Addin 0.81. Outlook rules move messages from the Inbox to three folders. Spambayes is configured to watch three folders. Approximately 80% of the time when an email comes in to be filtered, Outlook hangs and the only way to clear it is to End Task. I have tried both enabling and disabling the filter timer but have the same results. Disabling Spambayes eliminates the problem. I have attached a log file. The first portion of the file is the log immediately after Outlook hanging and being shut down. This portion of the log doesn't show the email that was coming in to be filtered. The second portion of the file is the log after I have restarted Outlook. This portion does show the email that was coming in when Outlook hung. When working, Spambayes is properly identifying up to 97 percent of the spam I receive over three accounts. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: John Jarrett (jjarrett) Date: 2004-05-14 13:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=899118 Derek, Set SpamBayes to only filter the INBOX. Once I did that -- and got rid of McAfee -- it doesn't hang any more. I dropped it back down to a half-second and everything works fine. I get a couple hundred spam emails a day and only one gets filtered out before it gets caught every couple of days (ie, a spam makes it to a filtered folder a couple times a week). It was hanging and requiring an End Task/restart of Outlook 2000 a couple of times a day, every day, before I set it to only check for spam on the inbox. hth, John ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Teng-Yan Loke (lokety) Date: 2004-05-14 13:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1038472 I'm also suffering from this bug. Microsoft Windows XP SP1, Outlook 2000 SP3, McAfee VirusScan and PGP Mail plugins. My Outlook checks about 5 POP accounts. When will this be resolved? I've uninstalled SpamBayes but I'm hoping to use it again. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Derek Stapleton (dstapleton) Date: 2003-09-18 06:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=864221 Update: The problem seems to be linked to checking multiple email accounts with Outlook. When checking only one account, everything works fine. When checking two or more, thinkgs go downhill from there. I have uninstalled and hope for a new version soon. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=804364&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun May 16 00:02:09 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun May 16 00:02:15 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-796129 ] 'Keep as Good' Button Message-ID: Feature Requests item #796129, was opened at 2003-08-28 05:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=796129&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Andreas Unterste (aunterste) >Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: 'Keep as Good' Button Initial Comment: I use my InBox as storage for the good mail (in order to use outlooks rules for further moving and classification). When a message arrives with a relatively high spam score, but below the threshold, I think a button 'Keep as Good' would be useful which trains SpamBayes that this is ham. The only other way to achieve that at the moment is to move the message somewhere and trigger the set of the SpamScore to 0% by moving it back into the InBox. Something right next to the 'Delete as Spam'. Otherwise: TERRIFIC PRODUCT !!!!! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-16 16:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 See also the comments in the thread starting here: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes-dev/2004-May/002847.html I'll write a patch for this at some point and we can see how things go, and maybe this can be added to a released version at some point. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Oscar Olsson (sdx) Date: 2004-01-13 12:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=170398 I also missed this button, since it is initially hard to train it for good messages, since a new inbox is normally polluted by spam. It would be more convenient than moving good mail temporarily to a separate Ham folder. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=796129&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon May 17 10:29:46 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon May 17 10:29:50 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-955286 ] Unable to enable Spam Bayes Message-ID: Bugs item #955286, was opened at 2004-05-17 09:29 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=955286&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Punkrulz (punkrulz) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Unable to enable Spam Bayes Initial Comment: Hey guys, I have introduced my boss to Spam Bayes. I have walked him through the configuration. He went through and tried creating a folder called "Crap", and that wouldn't work. He went through and created the directory on Outlook, and pointed spam bayes to go there. However, he is completely unable to tick the "Enable" box to enable Spam Bayes. It is completely greyed out. Under filtering status he gets an error message, but can't read it completely. Can you guys help? Attached is the log file... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=955286&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon May 17 12:52:47 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon May 17 12:52:51 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-955347 ] SpamBayes stop working after installing new version. Message-ID: Support Requests item #955347, was opened at 2004-05-17 11:52 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=955347&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Doug (djpratt) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: SpamBayes stop working after installing new version. Initial Comment: I don't know if this is a bug or if I screwed something up. Windows XP with all the updates, Outlook 2002, SpamBayes 1.0b1, two users/accounts that use email on this machine. Log information is at the bottom of this email. Here is my problem; I originally started with an older version of SpamBayes (don?t recall the version but I downloaded 6-8 months ago) and it worked like a charm for me and my wife. I saw that there was a newer version so I uninstalled the old version and installed the new one. It still work fine for me but when my wife logs in and goes to Outlook, the two SpamBayes button are there but they are not functional. It doesn?t do anything when you click on them. I tried to use the troubleshooting guide but it?s over my head. I did note on my wife side, COM add-ins is empty (no files listed or checked). I would appreciate it if you can help me solve this problem. Best Regards, Doug Pratt Warning: option experimental_ham_spam_imbalance_adjustment in section Classifier is deprecated Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\Douglas J. Pratt\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\Douglas J. Pratt\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 281 spam and 1314 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin Binary Version 1.0b1 (April 2004) starting (with engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004)) on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1) using Python 2.3.3 (#51, Feb 13 2004, 14:39:56) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] SpamBayes: Watching (for filtering) in 'Personal Folders/Inbox' SpamBayes: Watching (for incremental training) in 'Personal Folders/Spam' Processing missed spam in folder 'Inbox' by starting a timer FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (- 2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) The above toolbar message is common - recreating the toolbar... Saving configuration -> C:\Documents and Settings\Douglas J. Pratt\Application Data\SpamBayes\Outlook.ini SpamBayes: Watching (for filtering) in 'Personal Folders/Inbox' SpamBayes: Watching (for incremental training) in 'Personal Folders/Spam' Saving configuration -> C:\Documents and Settings\Douglas J. Pratt\Application Data\SpamBayes\Outlook.ini SpamBayes: Watching (for filtering) in 'Personal Folders/Inbox' SpamBayes: Watching (for incremental training) in 'Personal Folders/Spam' Message 'Auto-response for your message to the "Spambayes" mailing list' in 'Personal Folders/Inbox' had a Spam classification of 'No' ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=955347&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon May 17 13:03:10 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon May 17 13:03:19 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-955352 ] When checking for newer updates in SpamBayes Manager... Message-ID: Bugs item #955352, was opened at 2004-05-17 10:03 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=955352&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Source code 1.0b1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: J (jkbla) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: When checking for newer updates in SpamBayes Manager... Initial Comment: I was checking for newer updates from 1.0b1. I came across 1.0rc1 and have loaded it. It looks like by deleting the 1.0b1 first from add and remove in w2k, I reset the database. Well maybe I should have just installed over the 1.0b1 using the newer 1.0rc1, would this make sense and keep the old databases intact? Should I copy the current database and then use it by replacing the newly loaded one when I update? Is there a bug where it does not locate the newer versions from the SpamBayes Manager menu? Is it possible to get some information on how not lose the database next time and how to update the proper way. Thanks and it is working pretty good :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=955352&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon May 17 16:25:58 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon May 17 16:26:04 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-955442 ] default_bayes_customize.ini not handled right Message-ID: Bugs item #955442, was opened at 2004-05-17 20:25 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=955442&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Source code 1.0b1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Steven Tolkin (stolkin) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: default_bayes_customize.ini not handled right Initial Comment: After I upgraded from an old version I saw this line in the log: Warning: option experimental_ham_spam_imbalance_adjustment in section Classifier is deprecated So I found the file default_bayes_customize.ini in my data directory, and removed the offedning line. But then I wondered why I did not get a new version of default_bayes_customize.ini as part of the install. (I ran the *.exe installer.) Based on what is in the source file for default_bayes_customize.ini I expected there woul dbe a copy of it written into my program directory, i.e. \program files\spambayes\ . But there wasn't! I think that is wrong. # This is the INI file for the *Bayes Engine* as used by the Outlook addin. # It is NOT where configuration information is stored for the addin - see # "[Profile Name].ini" for these settings. # Only options which Outlook requires different from the SpamBayes # defaults are listed here. Thus, there will be very few in the installed # version, but you may list any configuration option valid for the SpamBayes # engine in this file. Again, these are different from the Outlook addin # configuration options. # This file exists in the SpamBayes program directory, and may optionally # exist in the SpamBayes data directory. If you wish to make changes to # the default options, setting the option in a file in your data directory # will persist even when SpamBayes is upgraded. If you change the version in # the SpamBayes program directory, it will be upgraded along with SpamBayes, # so your changes will be lost. Options in the data directory file have # precedence over the app directory file. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=955442&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon May 17 16:53:24 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon May 17 16:53:34 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-955286 ] Unable to enable Spam Bayes Message-ID: Bugs item #955286, was opened at 2004-05-18 02:29 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=955286&group_id=61702 >Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Punkrulz (punkrulz) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Unable to enable Spam Bayes Initial Comment: Hey guys, I have introduced my boss to Spam Bayes. I have walked him through the configuration. He went through and tried creating a folder called "Crap", and that wouldn't work. He went through and created the directory on Outlook, and pointed spam bayes to go there. However, he is completely unable to tick the "Enable" box to enable Spam Bayes. It is completely greyed out. Under filtering status he gets an error message, but can't read it completely. Can you guys help? Attached is the log file... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-18 08:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The log mostly has a lot of stuff from the wizard (it looks like it was run 3 or 4 times?). We really need to know what the status messages above the enable box say. The filter status probably just has the folders being watched (the log seems to indicate that they are all fine), which is why the message doesn't all fit (because there are so many folders). What's in the "training database status" box above that? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=955286&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon May 17 17:19:51 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon May 17 17:20:03 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-955442 ] default_bayes_customize.ini not handled right Message-ID: Bugs item #955442, was opened at 2004-05-18 08:25 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=955442&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Source code 1.0b1 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Steven Tolkin (stolkin) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: default_bayes_customize.ini not handled right Initial Comment: After I upgraded from an old version I saw this line in the log: Warning: option experimental_ham_spam_imbalance_adjustment in section Classifier is deprecated So I found the file default_bayes_customize.ini in my data directory, and removed the offedning line. But then I wondered why I did not get a new version of default_bayes_customize.ini as part of the install. (I ran the *.exe installer.) Based on what is in the source file for default_bayes_customize.ini I expected there woul dbe a copy of it written into my program directory, i.e. \program files\spambayes\ . But there wasn't! I think that is wrong. # This is the INI file for the *Bayes Engine* as used by the Outlook addin. # It is NOT where configuration information is stored for the addin - see # "[Profile Name].ini" for these settings. # Only options which Outlook requires different from the SpamBayes # defaults are listed here. Thus, there will be very few in the installed # version, but you may list any configuration option valid for the SpamBayes # engine in this file. Again, these are different from the Outlook addin # configuration options. # This file exists in the SpamBayes program directory, and may optionally # exist in the SpamBayes data directory. If you wish to make changes to # the default options, setting the option in a file in your data directory # will persist even when SpamBayes is upgraded. If you change the version in # the SpamBayes program directory, it will be upgraded along with SpamBayes, # so your changes will be lost. Options in the data directory file have # precedence over the app directory file. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-18 09:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 You're correct - there should have been a copy installed into the /Program Files/SpamBayes directory, and wasn't. I've checked in a fix for this, so it will be from the next version (1.0rc2/1.0). Note that you'd still end up with the warning message anyway, though, because the installer leaves everything in the data directory alone (deliberately), and that's where there was the deprecated option (which does nothing even enabled these days anyway). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=955442&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon May 17 17:26:56 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon May 17 17:27:12 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-955352 ] When checking for newer updates in SpamBayes Manager... Message-ID: Bugs item #955352, was opened at 2004-05-18 05:03 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=955352&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Source code 1.0b1 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: J (jkbla) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: When checking for newer updates in SpamBayes Manager... Initial Comment: I was checking for newer updates from 1.0b1. I came across 1.0rc1 and have loaded it. It looks like by deleting the 1.0b1 first from add and remove in w2k, I reset the database. Well maybe I should have just installed over the 1.0b1 using the newer 1.0rc1, would this make sense and keep the old databases intact? Should I copy the current database and then use it by replacing the newly loaded one when I update? Is there a bug where it does not locate the newer versions from the SpamBayes Manager menu? Is it possible to get some information on how not lose the database next time and how to update the proper way. Thanks and it is working pretty good :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-18 09:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 1.0rc1 hasn't actually been announced yet, and so the page that the version checker checks hadn't been changed. I've done that now, so it should now report 1.0rc1 as the most recent version. Installing/Uninstalling/Reinstalling SpamBayes does not touch the database in any way at all. If you do have trouble next time, please send us your log file and we should be able to explain what has happened. As long as you don't manually delete your data directory, all the configuration and training should be untouched. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=955352&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon May 17 17:33:25 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon May 17 17:33:32 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-955347 ] SpamBayes stop working after installing new version. Message-ID: Support Requests item #955347, was opened at 2004-05-18 04:52 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=955347&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Doug (djpratt) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: SpamBayes stop working after installing new version. Initial Comment: I don't know if this is a bug or if I screwed something up. Windows XP with all the updates, Outlook 2002, SpamBayes 1.0b1, two users/accounts that use email on this machine. Log information is at the bottom of this email. Here is my problem; I originally started with an older version of SpamBayes (don?t recall the version but I downloaded 6-8 months ago) and it worked like a charm for me and my wife. I saw that there was a newer version so I uninstalled the old version and installed the new one. It still work fine for me but when my wife logs in and goes to Outlook, the two SpamBayes button are there but they are not functional. It doesn?t do anything when you click on them. I tried to use the troubleshooting guide but it?s over my head. I did note on my wife side, COM add-ins is empty (no files listed or checked). I would appreciate it if you can help me solve this problem. Best Regards, Doug Pratt Warning: option experimental_ham_spam_imbalance_adjustment in section Classifier is deprecated Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\Douglas J. Pratt\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\Douglas J. Pratt\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 281 spam and 1314 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin Binary Version 1.0b1 (April 2004) starting (with engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004)) on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1) using Python 2.3.3 (#51, Feb 13 2004, 14:39:56) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] SpamBayes: Watching (for filtering) in 'Personal Folders/Inbox' SpamBayes: Watching (for incremental training) in 'Personal Folders/Spam' Processing missed spam in folder 'Inbox' by starting a timer FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (- 2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) The above toolbar message is common - recreating the toolbar... Saving configuration -> C:\Documents and Settings\Douglas J. Pratt\Application Data\SpamBayes\Outlook.ini SpamBayes: Watching (for filtering) in 'Personal Folders/Inbox' SpamBayes: Watching (for incremental training) in 'Personal Folders/Spam' Saving configuration -> C:\Documents and Settings\Douglas J. Pratt\Application Data\SpamBayes\Outlook.ini SpamBayes: Watching (for filtering) in 'Personal Folders/Inbox' SpamBayes: Watching (for incremental training) in 'Personal Folders/Spam' Message 'Auto-response for your message to the "Spambayes" mailing list' in 'Personal Folders/Inbox' had a Spam classification of 'No' ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-18 09:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Perhaps what has happened here is that SpamBayes isn't installed for your wife's account. The old versions of SB installed for all users, but there were problems with this, so new ones just install for the user running the installer. There are two ways around this - either run the installer when logged in with your wife's account, or install for all users manually - see the online version of the troubleshooting guide for details about how to do that. If SB is installed for all users, then it won't appear in the COM addins list for either of you. If this the case, then are you sure that the log you've attached is for your wife's account and not yours? The username looks male, and there aren't any errors in it. It's possible that Outlook has disabled the plug-in on your wife's account - try doing Help->About Microsoft Outlook->Disabled Items and seeing if SpamBayes is listed there. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=955347&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue May 18 05:47:12 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue May 18 05:47:24 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-955758 ] Blocks Folder with ':' in the name Message-ID: Bugs item #955758, was opened at 2004-05-18 11:47 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=955758&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Martin Preishuber (preisl) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Blocks Folder with ':' in the name Initial Comment: I have one mailbox named ':Lastprognose VPL' (Note the colon at the beginning). After adding the Folder I get the message "Spam Bayes configuration broken" ... If I start outlook for the 2nd time, I don't get any error, but I can't access this mailbox. My own mailbox and a second mailbox work fine. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=955758&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue May 18 09:01:54 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue May 18 09:01:58 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-955892 ] Train button should be on top Message-ID: Feature Requests item #955892, was opened at 2004-05-18 16:01 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=955892&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Harri Pesonen (fuerte) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Train button should be on top Initial Comment: In Review messages view, the Train button should be on top, not on bottom, so that you don't have to scroll to the bottom every time, if you want to train just the Unsure and discard everything else by default. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=955892&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue May 18 18:18:06 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue May 18 18:18:13 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-954031 ] Plugin failed to initialize Message-ID: Bugs item #954031, was opened at 2004-05-14 11:19 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by korggy You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=954031&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Michael Carr (korggy) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Plugin failed to initialize Initial Comment: When I start Outlook, I get a message that the SpamBayes plugin failed to initialize. Logfile is attached... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Michael Carr (korggy) Date: 2004-05-18 18:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=916069 I resolved this problem myself. A required DLL (shfolder.dll) was missing from the \windows\system32 directory. Once I replaced the file, SpamBayes began working again. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=954031&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue May 18 18:38:07 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue May 18 18:38:13 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-954031 ] Plugin failed to initialize Message-ID: Bugs item #954031, was opened at 2004-05-15 03:19 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=954031&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) >Status: Closed >Resolution: Invalid Priority: 5 Submitted By: Michael Carr (korggy) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Plugin failed to initialize Initial Comment: When I start Outlook, I get a message that the SpamBayes plugin failed to initialize. Logfile is attached... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-19 10:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Thanks for entering in the resolution - it's much better than when reports are just left hanging! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Michael Carr (korggy) Date: 2004-05-19 10:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=916069 I resolved this problem myself. A required DLL (shfolder.dll) was missing from the \windows\system32 directory. Once I replaced the file, SpamBayes began working again. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=954031&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue May 18 18:49:15 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue May 18 18:49:25 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-955758 ] Blocks Folder with ':' in the name Message-ID: Bugs item #955758, was opened at 2004-05-18 21:47 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=955758&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Martin Preishuber (preisl) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Blocks Folder with ':' in the name Initial Comment: I have one mailbox named ':Lastprognose VPL' (Note the colon at the beginning). After adding the Folder I get the message "Spam Bayes configuration broken" ... If I start outlook for the 2nd time, I don't get any error, but I can't access this mailbox. My own mailbox and a second mailbox work fine. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-19 10:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 It's highly unlikely to be the same, because SpamBayes doesn't use the name at all - it uses Outlook's "entry id" and "store id" (big long numbers that uniquely identify the folder, basically). Certainly I can have a folder called ":Lastprognose VPL" and SpamBayes works fine filtering it (just checked). Could you attach your log file? It should have more information about what is going wrong. It's probably some trouble accessing that folder, for some other reason. The exact error message (nothing in spambayes prints out the word "broken") would help, too. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=955758&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed May 19 12:16:40 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed May 19 12:16:50 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-956834 ] Outlook crashes when accessing SpamBayes functions Message-ID: Bugs item #956834, was opened at 2004-05-19 12:16 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=956834&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Hans Otten (haotten) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook crashes when accessing SpamBayes functions Initial Comment: I have been using Spambayes for a while and when I upgraded to the 0.8 release everything worked fine until I highlighted an email that spambayes had not caught and clicked on the "Delete as Spam" button. Outlook crashed and I had to restart. Then I discovered if I try to access any SpamBayes function Outlook immediatly crashes. I just upgraded to rc1 and the same thing still occurs. Please note that the SpamBayes is still properly removing the spam. I have attached the log file, where I noticed several Eeek statements and the following error : only expecting one row from IPC.MS.REN.USERFIELDS ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=956834&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed May 19 15:15:17 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed May 19 15:15:32 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-788755 ] Easy-empty Spam, Potential Spam folders Message-ID: Feature Requests item #788755, was opened at 2003-08-14 10:15 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by krowell You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=788755&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Next Release (example) Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Brian Dipert (bdipert) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Easy-empty Spam, Potential Spam folders Initial Comment: I have my spam (Outlook 2K, Windows XP Pro, by the way) going into a folder titled 'Spam' and potential spam going into 'Potential Spam' (original, eh?). Any way your plugin could add 'Empty XXX Folder' to the menu list which pops up when I right-click on these two folders, as occurs now with the Deleted Items folder? That would save me the added steps of selecting all the messages in Spam, moving them to Deleted Items and then emptying THAT folder. I've got Spam set to 7-day message retention, and after that time deletion, but I try to keep my Outlook tidier than that when I have time....... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: govnah (krowell) Date: 2004-05-19 14:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1045513 I want to officially request that the "delete spam" feature be added to the official release. I would really like that feature as well... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Brian Dipert (bdipert) Date: 2003-12-18 18:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=838657 Thanks, but I'm actually set (and I have NO clue why my last reply showed up four separate times!!!). After posting the last reply, I browsed through the message log and found the Visual Basic script that someone else posted earlier this year. It works great; I've also turned off the preview pane in Potential Spam and Spam folders (didn't realize before now that this was per-folder selectable, not a global setting). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2003-12-18 17:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 First you'll need to be running the plugin from source instead of the binary. If you're not already running from source then the steps involved are: * uninstall binary plug-in * install Python 2.3.2+ (http://www.python.org/2.3.2/) * install the win32all Python extensions (http://starship.python.net/crew/mhammond/win32/Downloads .html) * get a copy of the source from CVS or download it from here (http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/spambayes/spambayes- 1.0a7.zip?download) and extract it * register the source version of the plugin by running "addin.py --register" in the Outlook2000 subdirectory of the source Once you have the plugin up and running from source, get a copy of Larry Wall's patch utility (http://gnuwin32.sourceforge.net/packages/patch.htm) and download the latest copy of the patch file from the referenced patch number. Put the empty_spam.patch file in the Outlook2000 subdirectory and run the following command: patch -i empty_spam.patch Hopefully this will apply the patch to the correct locations in your version of the source. Then restart Outlook and you should have it. Note that the Empty Spam Folder command is on the SpamBayes menu, not the right-click menu. If you do undertake this and get it running, please let me know how it works for you and if it solves your problem. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Brian Dipert (bdipert) Date: 2003-12-18 17:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=838657 Kenny, How do I roll your patch into my existing v0.81? I'd desperately love to be able to do this, as simply previewing some of these spam messages (which happens automatically when I select them to move them to Deleted Messages) indicates to the server that's sent the junk that my email address is alive (via GIF image load, etc). Regards, Brian ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Brian Dipert (bdipert) Date: 2003-12-18 16:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=838657 Kenny, How do I roll your patch into my existing v0.81? I'd desperately love to be able to do this, as simply previewing some of these spam messages (which happens automatically when I select them to move them to Deleted Messages) indicates to the server that's sent the junk that my email address is alive (via GIF image load, etc). Regards, Brian ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Brian Dipert (bdipert) Date: 2003-12-18 16:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=838657 Kenny, How do I roll your patch into my existing v0.81? I'd desperately love to be able to do this, as simply previewing some of these spam messages (which happens automatically when I select them to move them to Deleted Messages) indicates to the server that's sent the junk that my email address is alive (via GIF image load, etc). Regards, Brian ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Brian Dipert (bdipert) Date: 2003-12-18 16:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=838657 Kenny, How do I roll your patch into my existing v0.81? I'd desperately love to be able to do this, as simply previewing some of these spam messages (which happens automatically when I select them to move them to Deleted Messages) indicates to the server that's sent the junk that my email address is alive (via GIF image load, etc). Regards, Brian ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2003-11-20 09:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 This actually isn't that difficult to do, and I've already submitted a patch (#831941) to do it for the Spam folder. No decision yet on whether or not it will be included in a future release. It probably isn't a good idea to do this for the Potential Spam folder. These messages are, by definition, ones that SpamBayes is unsure about and need to be looked at individually by the user. If you are getting a lot of messages in Potential Spam that you don't care to review, you might want to consider lowering your spam threshold so that more of these messages go directly into the Spam folder. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Erik Sargent (esargent) Date: 2003-11-20 04:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=586922 I don't know if you can add the menu item, but Outlook 2003 does provide a SPAM folder with this feature. (not for potential spam though) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=788755&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed May 19 15:57:41 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed May 19 15:57:57 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-788755 ] Easy-empty Spam, Potential Spam folders Message-ID: Feature Requests item #788755, was opened at 2003-08-14 11:15 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kpitt You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=788755&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Next Release (example) Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Brian Dipert (bdipert) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Easy-empty Spam, Potential Spam folders Initial Comment: I have my spam (Outlook 2K, Windows XP Pro, by the way) going into a folder titled 'Spam' and potential spam going into 'Potential Spam' (original, eh?). Any way your plugin could add 'Empty XXX Folder' to the menu list which pops up when I right-click on these two folders, as occurs now with the Deleted Items folder? That would save me the added steps of selecting all the messages in Spam, moving them to Deleted Items and then emptying THAT folder. I've got Spam set to 7-day message retention, and after that time deletion, but I try to keep my Outlook tidier than that when I have time....... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-05-19 15:57 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 We're in a feature freeze right now until we get the final 1.0 release out. Once we begin work on new features for 1.1, we will consider including this. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: govnah (krowell) Date: 2004-05-19 15:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1045513 I want to officially request that the "delete spam" feature be added to the official release. I would really like that feature as well... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Brian Dipert (bdipert) Date: 2003-12-18 18:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=838657 Thanks, but I'm actually set (and I have NO clue why my last reply showed up four separate times!!!). After posting the last reply, I browsed through the message log and found the Visual Basic script that someone else posted earlier this year. It works great; I've also turned off the preview pane in Potential Spam and Spam folders (didn't realize before now that this was per-folder selectable, not a global setting). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2003-12-18 17:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 First you'll need to be running the plugin from source instead of the binary. If you're not already running from source then the steps involved are: * uninstall binary plug-in * install Python 2.3.2+ (http://www.python.org/2.3.2/) * install the win32all Python extensions (http://starship.python.net/crew/mhammond/win32/Downloads .html) * get a copy of the source from CVS or download it from here (http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/spambayes/spambayes- 1.0a7.zip?download) and extract it * register the source version of the plugin by running "addin.py --register" in the Outlook2000 subdirectory of the source Once you have the plugin up and running from source, get a copy of Larry Wall's patch utility (http://gnuwin32.sourceforge.net/packages/patch.htm) and download the latest copy of the patch file from the referenced patch number. Put the empty_spam.patch file in the Outlook2000 subdirectory and run the following command: patch -i empty_spam.patch Hopefully this will apply the patch to the correct locations in your version of the source. Then restart Outlook and you should have it. Note that the Empty Spam Folder command is on the SpamBayes menu, not the right-click menu. If you do undertake this and get it running, please let me know how it works for you and if it solves your problem. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Brian Dipert (bdipert) Date: 2003-12-18 17:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=838657 Kenny, How do I roll your patch into my existing v0.81? I'd desperately love to be able to do this, as simply previewing some of these spam messages (which happens automatically when I select them to move them to Deleted Messages) indicates to the server that's sent the junk that my email address is alive (via GIF image load, etc). Regards, Brian ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Brian Dipert (bdipert) Date: 2003-12-18 16:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=838657 Kenny, How do I roll your patch into my existing v0.81? I'd desperately love to be able to do this, as simply previewing some of these spam messages (which happens automatically when I select them to move them to Deleted Messages) indicates to the server that's sent the junk that my email address is alive (via GIF image load, etc). Regards, Brian ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Brian Dipert (bdipert) Date: 2003-12-18 16:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=838657 Kenny, How do I roll your patch into my existing v0.81? I'd desperately love to be able to do this, as simply previewing some of these spam messages (which happens automatically when I select them to move them to Deleted Messages) indicates to the server that's sent the junk that my email address is alive (via GIF image load, etc). Regards, Brian ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Brian Dipert (bdipert) Date: 2003-12-18 16:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=838657 Kenny, How do I roll your patch into my existing v0.81? I'd desperately love to be able to do this, as simply previewing some of these spam messages (which happens automatically when I select them to move them to Deleted Messages) indicates to the server that's sent the junk that my email address is alive (via GIF image load, etc). Regards, Brian ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2003-11-20 09:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 This actually isn't that difficult to do, and I've already submitted a patch (#831941) to do it for the Spam folder. No decision yet on whether or not it will be included in a future release. It probably isn't a good idea to do this for the Potential Spam folder. These messages are, by definition, ones that SpamBayes is unsure about and need to be looked at individually by the user. If you are getting a lot of messages in Potential Spam that you don't care to review, you might want to consider lowering your spam threshold so that more of these messages go directly into the Spam folder. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Erik Sargent (esargent) Date: 2003-11-20 04:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=586922 I don't know if you can add the menu item, but Outlook 2003 does provide a SPAM folder with this feature. (not for potential spam though) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=788755&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu May 20 17:21:05 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu May 20 17:21:15 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-957666 ] Plug-in (toolbar) won't appear after install Message-ID: Bugs item #957666, was opened at 2004-05-20 16:21 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=957666&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Kathy (ksuchy) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Plug-in (toolbar) won't appear after install Initial Comment: 1) Outlook 2002 (SP-2); Windows XP. Outlook is on an Exchange Server. 2) Installed spambayes-1.0rc1.exe. Everything seemed to install fine. 3) Started Outlook. No configuration window for SpamBayes appeared; no toolbars show. 4) Went to Tools/Options/Other/Advanced/COM Add-ins and tried to add outlook dll file from SpamBayes folder, but nothing happens. 5) Checked About Outlook/Disabled Items ... nothing listed there. 6) Tried installing again ... same problem. 7) Ran Detect and Repair of Outlook. No help. Where do I go from here? I have about 6 computers on our network that are experiencing this exact same problem, while about 15 users have experienced no problem with the SpamBayes install. Thanks very much for your help ... Kathy Suchy ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=957666&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu May 20 17:26:07 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu May 20 17:26:13 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-957666 ] Plug-in (toolbar) won't appear after install Message-ID: Bugs item #957666, was opened at 2004-05-20 16:21 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ksuchy You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=957666&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None >Priority: 7 Submitted By: Kathy (ksuchy) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Plug-in (toolbar) won't appear after install Initial Comment: 1) Outlook 2002 (SP-2); Windows XP. Outlook is on an Exchange Server. 2) Installed spambayes-1.0rc1.exe. Everything seemed to install fine. 3) Started Outlook. No configuration window for SpamBayes appeared; no toolbars show. 4) Went to Tools/Options/Other/Advanced/COM Add-ins and tried to add outlook dll file from SpamBayes folder, but nothing happens. 5) Checked About Outlook/Disabled Items ... nothing listed there. 6) Tried installing again ... same problem. 7) Ran Detect and Repair of Outlook. No help. Where do I go from here? I have about 6 computers on our network that are experiencing this exact same problem, while about 15 users have experienced no problem with the SpamBayes install. Thanks very much for your help ... Kathy Suchy ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Kathy (ksuchy) Date: 2004-05-20 16:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1046287 Forgot to mention: on some (emphasis on "some") of these installs, SpamBayes does not recognize that Outlook is installed. I check the Outlook box and tell it to install anyway. It appears to install just fine. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=957666&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu May 20 17:41:46 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu May 20 17:42:06 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-957666 ] Plug-in (toolbar) won't appear after install Message-ID: Bugs item #957666, was opened at 2004-05-21 09:21 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=957666&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 7 Submitted By: Kathy (ksuchy) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Plug-in (toolbar) won't appear after install Initial Comment: 1) Outlook 2002 (SP-2); Windows XP. Outlook is on an Exchange Server. 2) Installed spambayes-1.0rc1.exe. Everything seemed to install fine. 3) Started Outlook. No configuration window for SpamBayes appeared; no toolbars show. 4) Went to Tools/Options/Other/Advanced/COM Add-ins and tried to add outlook dll file from SpamBayes folder, but nothing happens. 5) Checked About Outlook/Disabled Items ... nothing listed there. 6) Tried installing again ... same problem. 7) Ran Detect and Repair of Outlook. No help. Where do I go from here? I have about 6 computers on our network that are experiencing this exact same problem, while about 15 users have experienced no problem with the SpamBayes install. Thanks very much for your help ... Kathy Suchy ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-21 09:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The log has an "access denied" error when trying to register the plug-in. Maybe you could try increasing the pemissions of the user (temporarily) and rerunning the installer? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kathy (ksuchy) Date: 2004-05-21 09:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1046287 Forgot to mention: on some (emphasis on "some") of these installs, SpamBayes does not recognize that Outlook is installed. I check the Outlook box and tell it to install anyway. It appears to install just fine. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=957666&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu May 20 17:59:53 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu May 20 17:59:59 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-957666 ] Plug-in (toolbar) won't appear after install Message-ID: Bugs item #957666, was opened at 2004-05-20 16:21 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ksuchy You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=957666&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 7 Submitted By: Kathy (ksuchy) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Plug-in (toolbar) won't appear after install Initial Comment: 1) Outlook 2002 (SP-2); Windows XP. Outlook is on an Exchange Server. 2) Installed spambayes-1.0rc1.exe. Everything seemed to install fine. 3) Started Outlook. No configuration window for SpamBayes appeared; no toolbars show. 4) Went to Tools/Options/Other/Advanced/COM Add-ins and tried to add outlook dll file from SpamBayes folder, but nothing happens. 5) Checked About Outlook/Disabled Items ... nothing listed there. 6) Tried installing again ... same problem. 7) Ran Detect and Repair of Outlook. No help. Where do I go from here? I have about 6 computers on our network that are experiencing this exact same problem, while about 15 users have experienced no problem with the SpamBayes install. Thanks very much for your help ... Kathy Suchy ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Kathy (ksuchy) Date: 2004-05-20 16:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1046287 THANK YOU ANADELONBRIN!!! That was EXACTLY what I needed to do. I added the user to the administrator group and then re-ran the install. It worked like a charm. Then went back in and removed them as administrator. Thanks so very much for your help!!! Kathy ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-20 16:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The log has an "access denied" error when trying to register the plug-in. Maybe you could try increasing the pemissions of the user (temporarily) and rerunning the installer? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kathy (ksuchy) Date: 2004-05-20 16:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1046287 Forgot to mention: on some (emphasis on "some") of these installs, SpamBayes does not recognize that Outlook is installed. I check the Outlook box and tell it to install anyway. It appears to install just fine. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=957666&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu May 20 18:12:22 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu May 20 18:12:28 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-957707 ] Mail items are always filtered automatically Message-ID: Bugs item #957707, was opened at 2004-05-20 22:12 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=957707&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Source code 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Steven Tolkin (stolkin) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Mail items are always filtered automatically Initial Comment: I have configured SpamBayes to run the Outlook Addin 1.0rc1 in background, with start delay of 2 seconds, and delay of either 1 or 0 seconds. (I tried both trying to solve the problem reported here.) When spam email arrives it sometimes, but not always, is filtered and then moved to my spamkeep or spam_maybe folders. Other times I have to manually invoke "filter messages" for something to happen. They have not been filtered, e.g. switching to another folder does not cause them to move. I think that once I have manually filtered in an Outlook session later emails will be filtered automatically. This behavior happened with my older (about 1 year old) SpamBayes. But now I notice the additional bad effect: if I archive a folder (e.g. my spamkeep folder -- I keep it in case I need to retrain) the messages are archived, but they do not *seem* to move until I click on another folder. This behavior is new, and undesirable. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=957707&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu May 20 18:14:14 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu May 20 18:14:25 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-957707 ] Mail items are NOT always filtered automatically Message-ID: Bugs item #957707, was opened at 2004-05-20 22:12 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by stolkin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=957707&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Source code 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Steven Tolkin (stolkin) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) >Summary: Mail items are NOT always filtered automatically Initial Comment: I have configured SpamBayes to run the Outlook Addin 1.0rc1 in background, with start delay of 2 seconds, and delay of either 1 or 0 seconds. (I tried both trying to solve the problem reported here.) When spam email arrives it sometimes, but not always, is filtered and then moved to my spamkeep or spam_maybe folders. Other times I have to manually invoke "filter messages" for something to happen. They have not been filtered, e.g. switching to another folder does not cause them to move. I think that once I have manually filtered in an Outlook session later emails will be filtered automatically. This behavior happened with my older (about 1 year old) SpamBayes. But now I notice the additional bad effect: if I archive a folder (e.g. my spamkeep folder -- I keep it in case I need to retrain) the messages are archived, but they do not *seem* to move until I click on another folder. This behavior is new, and undesirable. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=957707&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu May 20 19:49:57 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu May 20 19:50:03 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-957746 ] Spambayes Fedora Core 2 Message-ID: Support Requests item #957746, was opened at 2004-05-21 01:49 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=957746&group_id=61702 Category: Install Problem (example) Group: v1.0 (example) Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Steffan Henke (shenke) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Spambayes Fedora Core 2 Initial Comment: I just upgraded FC1 to FC2, which includes python- 2.3.3-6. Updated my spambayes, tried the rc and cvs tree. Deleted and re-created the old .hammiedb, created .spambayesrc according to the docs. Now, every time I pipe an email through sb_filter.py, all I get is: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/sb_filter.py", line 257, in ? main() File "/usr/bin/sb_filter.py", line 248, in main action(msg) File "/usr/bin/sb_filter.py", line 180, in filter return self.h.filter(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site- packages/spambayes/hammie.py", line 109, in filter prob, clues = self._scoremsg(msg, True) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site- packages/spambayes/hammie.py", line 38, in _scoremsg return self.bayes.spamprob(tokenize(msg), evidence) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site- packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 190, in chi2_spamprob clues = self._getclues(wordstream) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site- packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 493, in _getclues tup = self._worddistanceget(word) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site- packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 508, in _worddistanceget prob = self.probability(record) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site- packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 311, in probability assert spamcount <= nspam AssertionError I am pretty clueless as far as python is concerned, so I don't see what is wrong here. sb_mboxtrain.py and stuff works as before, it's just sb_filter that gives problems which is a bad thing since I want to call it from a procmail recipe. Any help would be much appreciated. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=957746&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu May 20 21:52:36 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu May 20 21:52:59 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-957666 ] Plug-in (toolbar) won't appear after install Message-ID: Bugs item #957666, was opened at 2004-05-21 09:21 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=957666&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc1 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 7 Submitted By: Kathy (ksuchy) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Plug-in (toolbar) won't appear after install Initial Comment: 1) Outlook 2002 (SP-2); Windows XP. Outlook is on an Exchange Server. 2) Installed spambayes-1.0rc1.exe. Everything seemed to install fine. 3) Started Outlook. No configuration window for SpamBayes appeared; no toolbars show. 4) Went to Tools/Options/Other/Advanced/COM Add-ins and tried to add outlook dll file from SpamBayes folder, but nothing happens. 5) Checked About Outlook/Disabled Items ... nothing listed there. 6) Tried installing again ... same problem. 7) Ran Detect and Repair of Outlook. No help. Where do I go from here? I have about 6 computers on our network that are experiencing this exact same problem, while about 15 users have experienced no problem with the SpamBayes install. Thanks very much for your help ... Kathy Suchy ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-21 13:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 No worries, glad to help. Closing. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kathy (ksuchy) Date: 2004-05-21 09:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1046287 THANK YOU ANADELONBRIN!!! That was EXACTLY what I needed to do. I added the user to the administrator group and then re-ran the install. It worked like a charm. Then went back in and removed them as administrator. Thanks so very much for your help!!! Kathy ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-21 09:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The log has an "access denied" error when trying to register the plug-in. Maybe you could try increasing the pemissions of the user (temporarily) and rerunning the installer? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kathy (ksuchy) Date: 2004-05-21 09:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1046287 Forgot to mention: on some (emphasis on "some") of these installs, SpamBayes does not recognize that Outlook is installed. I check the Outlook box and tell it to install anyway. It appears to install just fine. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=957666&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri May 21 05:11:35 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri May 21 14:47:56 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-955758 ] Blocks Folder with ':' in the name Message-ID: Bugs item #955758, was opened at 2004-05-18 11:47 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by preisl You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=955758&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Martin Preishuber (preisl) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Blocks Folder with ':' in the name Initial Comment: I have one mailbox named ':Lastprognose VPL' (Note the colon at the beginning). After adding the Folder I get the message "Spam Bayes configuration broken" ... If I start outlook for the 2nd time, I don't get any error, but I can't access this mailbox. My own mailbox and a second mailbox work fine. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Martin Preishuber (preisl) Date: 2004-05-21 11:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=29575 My mistake, the first message is 'There appears to be a problem with the SpamBayes configuration\r\n\r\nPlease select the SpamBayes manager, and run the\r\nConfiguration Wizard to reconfigure the filter.' as seen in the log file ... I can access the mailbox after adding it. If I restart outlook, I can't access it any more. spambayes2.log is the log file which has been created during adding the mailbox, spambayes1.log is the one, when I tried to access it the second time. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-19 00:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 It's highly unlikely to be the same, because SpamBayes doesn't use the name at all - it uses Outlook's "entry id" and "store id" (big long numbers that uniquely identify the folder, basically). Certainly I can have a folder called ":Lastprognose VPL" and SpamBayes works fine filtering it (just checked). Could you attach your log file? It should have more information about what is going wrong. It's probably some trouble accessing that folder, for some other reason. The exact error message (nothing in spambayes prints out the word "broken") would help, too. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=955758&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri May 21 17:17:49 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri May 21 17:17:57 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-958265 ] a problem with the SpamBayes configuration Message-ID: Bugs item #958265, was opened at 2004-05-21 21:17 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=958265&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Source code 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Steven Tolkin (stolkin) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: a problem with the SpamBayes configuration Initial Comment: One time when I was first starting Outlook I got the message: There appears to be a problem with the SpamBayes configuration Please select the SpamBayes manager, and run the Configuration Wizard to reconfigure the filter. 1. Shouldn't the message also suggest: "Look in the log for more details." 2. What problem actually caused this message? Was it the fact that one of my timer values was zero? If this is invalid or bogus in some way, I think it should be prevented when I try to set it, rather than a day later when I restart outlook. If it is something else, please note that I had a few days earlier upgrades to 1.0rc1 from a year old version, and had not rebuilt the database. I have since rebuilt the database. If it is purely transient error, perhaps due to Outlook being busy, the message should suggest this, rather the rather time consuming "Configuration Wizard". Excerpt from the log: ****************************************** ******** The timer is enabled, but one of the timer intervals values is zero You must set both intervals before the timer will enable SpamBayes: Watching (for filtering) in 'Mailbox - Tolkin, Steve/_home' ****************************************** ******** The timer is enabled, but one of the timer intervals values is zero You must set both intervals before the timer will enable SpamBayes: Watching (for filtering) in 'Mailbox - Tolkin, Steve/Inbox' SpamBayes: Watching (for incremental training) in 'Mailbox - Tolkin, Steve/InboxMyMisc/spamkeep' Message '[ spambayes-Bugs-957707 ] Mail items are NOT always filtered automatically' in 'Mailbox - Tolkin, Steve/Inbox' had a Spam classification of 'No' FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (- 2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) The above toolbar message is common - recreating the toolbar... Error finding the MAPI folders for a folder switch event ERROR: 'There appears to be a problem with the SpamBayes configuration\r\n\r\nPlease select the SpamBayes manager, and run the\r\nConfiguration Wizard to reconfigure the filter.' Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.pyc", line 1087, in OnFolderSwitch File "msgstore.pyc", line 348, in GetFolder C:\Program Files\SpamBayes\lib\spambayes.zip\msgstore.py:126: FutureWarning: %u/%o/%x/%X of negative int will return a signed string in Python 2.4 and up MsgStoreException: MsgStoreException: Exception 0x80040115 (MAPI_E_NETWORK_ERROR): OLE error 0x80040115 ERROR: 'There appears to be a problem with the SpamBayes configuration\r\n\r\nPlease select the SpamBayes manager, and run the\r\nConfiguration Wizard to reconfigure the filter.' Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.pyc", line 1087, in OnFolderSwitch File "msgstore.pyc", line 348, in GetFolder MsgStoreException: MsgStoreException: Exception 0x80040115 (MAPI_E_NETWORK_ERROR): OLE error 0x80040115 Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.pyc", line 1087, in OnFolderSwitch File "msgstore.pyc", line 348, in GetFolder MsgStoreException: MsgStoreException: Exception 0x80040115 (MAPI_E_NETWORK_ERROR): OLE error 0x80040115 Ignoring OnCommand for 65535 GetNextPage with current 0 IDD_WIZARD_WELCOME Back button switching to page 0 Ignoring OnCommand for 65535 Ignoring OnCommand for 65535 Ignoring OnCommand for 65535 GetNextPage with current 0 IDD_WIZARD_WELCOME Cancelling wizard Saving configuration -> C:\Documents and Settings\A071046\Application Data\SpamBayes\Default Outlook Profile.ini ****************************************** ******** The timer is enabled, but one of the timer intervals values is zero You must set both intervals before the timer will enable SpamBayes: Watching (for filtering) in 'Mailbox - Tolkin, Steve/_home' ****************************************** ******** The timer is enabled, but one of the timer intervals values is zero You must set both intervals before the timer will enable ... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=958265&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri May 21 08:55:33 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat May 22 07:30:26 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-957989 ] Black- and white list for email addresses Message-ID: Feature Requests item #957989, was opened at 2004-05-21 14:55 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=957989&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Next Release (example) Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Thomas (horseman-sf) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Black- and white list for email addresses Initial Comment: Hello is it possible to implement the possibility for implementation of address lists for good senders and bad senders? Thomas ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=957989&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri May 21 09:53:06 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat May 22 07:30:34 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-958015 ] German language Message-ID: Feature Requests item #958015, was opened at 2004-05-21 15:53 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=958015&group_id=61702 Category: Interface Improvements (example) Group: Next Release (example) Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Thomas (horseman-sf) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: German language Initial Comment: Hello is there any plan to translate user interface to german language? Thomas ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=958015&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat May 22 08:18:04 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat May 22 08:18:09 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-958480 ] Statistics are working correctly Message-ID: Bugs item #958480, was opened at 2004-05-22 12:18 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=958480&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: Binary 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Graham Reeds (grahamr_home) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Statistics are working correctly Initial Comment: I recently installed SpamBayes. Very good program - decided to up the possible spam level since I am on a few technical periodical mailinglists and a couple were classified as possible spam (17% & 19% respectively) so put the possible spam limit to 20. I then clicked on Advanced and noticed that SpamBayes statistics claimed to have processed only 158 emails. I have a SpamBayes folder (seperate from my SAProxy folder) that has 951 items in it. Apart from that everything is hunky-dory. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=958480&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat May 22 09:29:35 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat May 22 09:29:42 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-958500 ] Error when modifying configuration Message-ID: Bugs item #958500, was opened at 2004-05-22 06:29 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=958500&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: RAWright (rawright) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Error when modifying configuration Initial Comment: While trying to change the configuration to enable tagging headers with Spam or Ham annotations, the following error is returned: 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "spambayes\Dibbler.pyc", line 461, in found_terminator File "spambayes\UserInterface.pyc", line 770, in onChangeopts File "spambayes\ProxyUI.pyc", line 731, in verifyInput File "spambayes\UserInterface.pyc", line 862, in verifyInput File "spambayes\OptionsClass.pyc", line 585, in convert File "spambayes\OptionsClass.pyc", line 266, in convert AttributeError: 'tuple' object has no attribute 'split' This function was working perfectly until this morning. Last night I spent considerable time installing the latest security patches for Outlook Express 6 and Internet Explorer 6 (among other patches), and I suspect that something in these updates is interfering with the operation of SpamBayes. My OS is Win2K Server, SP4, in case that matters. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=958500&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat May 22 09:47:35 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat May 22 09:47:38 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-958506 ] Fetching mail not always happens Message-ID: Bugs item #958506, was opened at 2004-05-22 15:47 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=958506&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jos (be037446) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Fetching mail not always happens Initial Comment: I'm using the Opera 7.50 mail client in combination with the Spambayes proxy. I notice that Opera is not always fetching e-mails although there are e-mails waiting at my ISP. I have 4 account divided over 2 ISP and it happens with all 4 of them but never together. It's a very irregular pattern. When I change the e-mail configuration to fetch e-mails directly from the ISP instead of passing the proxy, there is no problem at all. So, I assume there is a problem with the Spambayes proxy. I also tried the Mozilla e-mail client Thunderbird and I have the same problems there. So, it isn't related to Opera alone. Before that, I always used the Outlook plug-in and never had a problem. Any ideas ? Kind regards, Jos. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=958506&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat May 22 21:23:28 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat May 22 21:23:41 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-957989 ] Black- and white list for email addresses Message-ID: Feature Requests item #957989, was opened at 2004-05-22 00:55 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=957989&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Next Release (example) >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Thomas (horseman-sf) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Black- and white list for email addresses Initial Comment: Hello is it possible to implement the possibility for implementation of address lists for good senders and bad senders? Thomas ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-23 13:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Please read FAQ 6.6 for a summary of the extensive discussion of this topic: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=957989&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat May 22 21:24:58 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat May 22 21:25:06 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-958015 ] German language Message-ID: Feature Requests item #958015, was opened at 2004-05-22 01:53 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=958015&group_id=61702 Category: Interface Improvements (example) Group: Next Release (example) Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Thomas (horseman-sf) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: German language Initial Comment: Hello is there any plan to translate user interface to german language? Thomas ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-23 13:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Translation efforts have been mentioned a little recently. Basically the status is that the existing developers are quite happy to assist with any work necessary to facilitate translation, but don't have the time/skills to actually do the translation work. What this means is that if anyone steps up to translate the ui into language x, then it'll happen. Otherwise it won't. If you're interested in providing a German one, please let us know. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=958015&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat May 22 21:26:21 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat May 22 21:26:25 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-958480 ] Statistics are working correctly Message-ID: Bugs item #958480, was opened at 2004-05-23 00:18 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=958480&group_id=61702 >Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc1 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Later Priority: 5 Submitted By: Graham Reeds (grahamr_home) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Statistics are working correctly Initial Comment: I recently installed SpamBayes. Very good program - decided to up the possible spam level since I am on a few technical periodical mailinglists and a couple were classified as possible spam (17% & 19% respectively) so put the possible spam limit to 20. I then clicked on Advanced and noticed that SpamBayes statistics claimed to have processed only 158 emails. I have a SpamBayes folder (seperate from my SAProxy folder) that has 951 items in it. Apart from that everything is hunky-dory. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-23 13:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The Outlook plug-in's statistics are currently not persistent over Outlook sessions - i.e. they will be reset each time you close & open Outlook. This will be addressed at some point in the future. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=958480&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun May 23 23:05:33 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun May 23 23:05:43 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-955892 ] Train button should be on top Message-ID: Feature Requests item #955892, was opened at 2004-05-19 01:01 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=955892&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Harri Pesonen (fuerte) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Train button should be on top Initial Comment: In Review messages view, the Train button should be on top, not on bottom, so that you don't have to scroll to the bottom every time, if you want to train just the Unsure and discard everything else by default. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-24 15:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Dupe (close enough) of [ 917107 ] Extra train buttons on review page ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=955892&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun May 23 23:05:57 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun May 23 23:06:04 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-917107 ] Extra train buttons on review page Message-ID: Feature Requests item #917107, was opened at 2004-03-16 18:57 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=917107&group_id=61702 Category: Interface Improvements (example) Group: None Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Extra train buttons on review page Initial Comment: >From personal email: """ I've finally installed the latest SpamBayes version, and the change of ordering is a big help. However, one more suggestion: there should be a "train" button under all three sections, not just at the bottom. Thus it's not necessary to scroll all the way down after looking at just the unsure or ham messages. """ I agree with this, so if someone wants to get around to adding the extra buttons, that would be cool :) I'm not sure if it's just adding the extra html, since maybe the dynamic creation of the page will throw things off (not sure at all). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-24 15:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 See also: [ 955892 ] Train button should be on top ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-03-18 11:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Good point! I hadn't thought of that. There hasn't been a clamouring for this anyway, so I'll close it, and refer anyone that asks to the closed tracker :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Date: 2004-03-18 11:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=85414 Adding copies of the Train button would work, but FWIW I don't think it's a good idea. It's not obvious whether each button would submit the whole page, or just the section it was immediately underneath, or all the sections above it. Maybe changing the text could help, but if it says "Train all" or something then than only makes you wonder what the alternative is... then you end up adding "Train this section" buttons and the whole thing becomes overengineered. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=917107&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun May 23 23:07:44 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun May 23 23:07:50 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-917107 ] Extra train buttons on review page Message-ID: Feature Requests item #917107, was opened at 2004-03-16 18:57 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=917107&group_id=61702 Category: Interface Improvements (example) Group: None >Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Extra train buttons on review page Initial Comment: >From personal email: """ I've finally installed the latest SpamBayes version, and the change of ordering is a big help. However, one more suggestion: there should be a "train" button under all three sections, not just at the bottom. Thus it's not necessary to scroll all the way down after looking at just the unsure or ham messages. """ I agree with this, so if someone wants to get around to adding the extra buttons, that would be cool :) I'm not sure if it's just adding the extra html, since maybe the dynamic creation of the page will throw things off (not sure at all). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-24 15:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Reopening, at least temporarily. Richie (if you're about), what about just one more "train" button, at the top of the page (above any messages)? This is requested every now and then, because lots of people just do the unsures and trust whatever default setting they have for ham/spam, so don't want to scroll down. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-24 15:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 See also: [ 955892 ] Train button should be on top ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-03-18 11:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Good point! I hadn't thought of that. There hasn't been a clamouring for this anyway, so I'll close it, and refer anyone that asks to the closed tracker :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Date: 2004-03-18 11:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=85414 Adding copies of the Train button would work, but FWIW I don't think it's a good idea. It's not obvious whether each button would submit the whole page, or just the section it was immediately underneath, or all the sections above it. Maybe changing the text could help, but if it says "Train all" or something then than only makes you wonder what the alternative is... then you end up adding "Train this section" buttons and the whole thing becomes overengineered. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=917107&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon May 24 02:27:15 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon May 24 02:27:21 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-958015 ] German language Message-ID: Feature Requests item #958015, was opened at 2004-05-21 15:53 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by horseman-sf You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=958015&group_id=61702 Category: Interface Improvements (example) Group: Next Release (example) Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Thomas (horseman-sf) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: German language Initial Comment: Hello is there any plan to translate user interface to german language? Thomas ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Thomas (horseman-sf) Date: 2004-05-24 08:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1046743 Hello at the moment I?ll test SpamBayes. If I take a decission to use it permanently I can spend time of translation. But the question is how? Where can I find the literals and text to translate? Is there a tecnical solution that SpamBayes provide other languages? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-23 03:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Translation efforts have been mentioned a little recently. Basically the status is that the existing developers are quite happy to assist with any work necessary to facilitate translation, but don't have the time/skills to actually do the translation work. What this means is that if anyone steps up to translate the ui into language x, then it'll happen. Otherwise it won't. If you're interested in providing a German one, please let us know. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=958015&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon May 24 02:30:24 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon May 24 02:30:36 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-958015 ] German language Message-ID: Feature Requests item #958015, was opened at 2004-05-22 01:53 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=958015&group_id=61702 Category: Interface Improvements (example) Group: Next Release (example) Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Thomas (horseman-sf) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: German language Initial Comment: Hello is there any plan to translate user interface to german language? Thomas ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-24 18:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Other than the documentation, the text is mostly in either the ui.html file (for sb_server/sb_imapfilter), or in the various dialog definition files (for the Outlook plug-in). Working out exactly how the technical side of things would work is the contribution that the existing developers would make. Anyway, let us know when you decide if you're interested or not. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Thomas (horseman-sf) Date: 2004-05-24 18:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1046743 Hello at the moment I?ll test SpamBayes. If I take a decission to use it permanently I can spend time of translation. But the question is how? Where can I find the literals and text to translate? Is there a tecnical solution that SpamBayes provide other languages? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-23 13:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Translation efforts have been mentioned a little recently. Basically the status is that the existing developers are quite happy to assist with any work necessary to facilitate translation, but don't have the time/skills to actually do the translation work. What this means is that if anyone steps up to translate the ui into language x, then it'll happen. Otherwise it won't. If you're interested in providing a German one, please let us know. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=958015&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon May 24 03:41:50 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon May 24 03:42:01 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-943702 ] sb hangs outlook (except when offline) Message-ID: Bugs item #943702, was opened at 2004-04-28 15:10 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by src_be You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=943702&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook >Group: Binary 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 7 Submitted By: Yves Gaffarel (src_be) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: sb hangs outlook (except when offline) Initial Comment: I can start Outlook in "connect" mode or "offline". When SpamBayes is enabled, Outlook hangs when it is started in "connect" mode. All other combination works well : is SB is disabled or Outlook is started "offline", everything works well. In "connect" mode, when starting with SB disabled, I have no problem when I later enable SB. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=943702&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon May 24 03:44:49 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon May 24 03:44:56 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-943702 ] sb hangs outlook (except when offline) Message-ID: Bugs item #943702, was opened at 2004-04-28 15:10 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by src_be You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=943702&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 7 Submitted By: Yves Gaffarel (src_be) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: sb hangs outlook (except when offline) Initial Comment: I can start Outlook in "connect" mode or "offline". When SpamBayes is enabled, Outlook hangs when it is started in "connect" mode. All other combination works well : is SB is disabled or Outlook is started "offline", everything works well. In "connect" mode, when starting with SB disabled, I have no problem when I later enable SB. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Yves Gaffarel (src_be) Date: 2004-05-24 09:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=545313 Problem was initially reported against 1.0b1. It is still occuring after installation of 1.0rc1. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=943702&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon May 24 12:48:55 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon May 24 12:49:06 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-959560 ] access denied Message-ID: Bugs item #959560, was opened at 2004-05-24 11:48 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=959560&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: cindyp (cindyp) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: access denied Initial Comment: After installing there was an error initializing so I went into Spam Bayes Manager and configured it (including enabling) and went through training, etc. It still does not appear to working. It seems that it is not able to watch my inbox because access is denied. Log is attached. I am running Outlook 2000, Exchange Server w/ Small Business Server 4.5. Thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=959560&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon May 24 18:23:39 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon May 24 18:23:47 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-828669 ] Toolbars refuse to work after reset Message-ID: Bugs item #828669, was opened at 2003-10-22 22:27 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by pfbpaul You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=828669&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: William Hughes (w_hughes) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Toolbars refuse to work after reset Initial Comment: I noticed the toolbar was not working and followed your instructions about removing it and then I checked the log file for an error. See the attached log file. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul (pfbpaul) Date: 2004-05-24 16:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1048938 I too am down with SpamBayes because of this. I have completely uninstalled and reinstalled both SpamBayes and Outlook, and the "dead" toolbars still exist. I am getting no spam filtering either. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Owen Mathias (jesse_custer) Date: 2003-12-15 14:35 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=931849 I have the same issue. Tried everything. Uploaded a log to the list. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: William Hughes (w_hughes) Date: 2003-11-03 16:58 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=892918 Another interesting tidbit: Throughout the day I randomly try the toolbar to see if it works, but it never does. However today, on one occasion it did it work. It has not worked since. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: William Hughes (w_hughes) Date: 2003-11-01 10:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=892918 I sent the db file to your other address. I retrained the db. however I don't know if it was successful as the Dialog box said "Saving: Writing database" but it never changed the msg. I don't know if this is typical behavior or not. After doing this there appears to be no change in the functioning of the program, meaning that it is still filtering spam although my guess is that it is somehow not doing it as effectively as it should becuase the number of spam msgs that are appearing in my inbox is significant (approx 20) as opposed to 3 or 4 when it was working flawlessly. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-10-30 22:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 mhammond at users.sourceforge.net should be fine. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: William Hughes (w_hughes) Date: 2003-10-30 21:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=892918 I just learned that the max file size is 256K and this file is almost 1 meg zipped. I could not locate an email address to send it to you directly. Please advise. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: William Hughes (w_hughes) Date: 2003-10-30 21:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=892918 For some reason I got an invalid file type error when submitting the db file using its original name so I am trying it again zipped. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: William Hughes (w_hughes) Date: 2003-10-30 21:47 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=892918 Here is the file you requested. However you should know that I the first thing I did after I tried all the toolbar fixets was to retrain the database. It had no effect. I am going to retrain it now. Do you want a copy of the db file after I train it? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-10-26 16:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 This appears to be a duplicate of https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=807217&group_id=61702&atid=498103, which mentions the same error that appears in your log. The only solution I know of at the moment is to go to the "Training" tab, and do a complete re-train. If you could possibly attach a copy of your "default_bayes_database.db" before you do this, I would appreciate it - either mail it directly to me, or attach it here. However, that doesn't explain why you can't use the toolbars. The only reference to the toolbars is "Creating new SpamBayes toolbar to host our buttons", which is what we expect after clobbering outcmd.dat. Are there any messages regarding toolbars in subsequent startups? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: William Hughes (w_hughes) Date: 2003-10-26 12:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=892918 Toolbar Still Does Not Work...This problem developed while I was running version 6.xx. I installed the latest version avaliable. No change in symptoms. I closed Outlook and deleted the file outlook.dat and rebooted the computer. Symptoms remain the same: It is filtering messages but the toolbar does not work. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: William Hughes (w_hughes) Date: 2003-10-24 10:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=892918 Here is some more information. SpamBayes is filtering messages. The toolbar does not work. I have tried all the fixets listed including deleting the file outlook.dat. Toolbar still does not work. If there are tests you would like me to run to help, please let me know. w_hughes ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=828669&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue May 25 03:21:41 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue May 25 03:21:45 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-959937 ] "Invalid server" message not always correct Message-ID: Bugs item #959937, was opened at 2004-05-25 19:21 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=959937&group_id=61702 Category: imapfilter Group: Source code - CVS Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: "Invalid server" message not always correct Initial Comment: sb_imapfilter prints out an "invalid server" message if anything (i.e. "except:") goes wrong with IMAP initialisation. More care should be taken to print out an accurate message. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=959937&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue May 25 11:01:12 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue May 25 11:01:25 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-957746 ] Spambayes Fedora Core 2 Message-ID: Support Requests item #957746, was opened at 2004-05-21 01:49 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by shenke You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=957746&group_id=61702 Category: Install Problem (example) Group: v1.0 (example) >Status: Deleted Priority: 5 Submitted By: Steffan Henke (shenke) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Spambayes Fedora Core 2 Initial Comment: I just upgraded FC1 to FC2, which includes python- 2.3.3-6. Updated my spambayes, tried the rc and cvs tree. Deleted and re-created the old .hammiedb, created .spambayesrc according to the docs. Now, every time I pipe an email through sb_filter.py, all I get is: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/sb_filter.py", line 257, in ? main() File "/usr/bin/sb_filter.py", line 248, in main action(msg) File "/usr/bin/sb_filter.py", line 180, in filter return self.h.filter(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site- packages/spambayes/hammie.py", line 109, in filter prob, clues = self._scoremsg(msg, True) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site- packages/spambayes/hammie.py", line 38, in _scoremsg return self.bayes.spamprob(tokenize(msg), evidence) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site- packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 190, in chi2_spamprob clues = self._getclues(wordstream) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site- packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 493, in _getclues tup = self._worddistanceget(word) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site- packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 508, in _worddistanceget prob = self.probability(record) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site- packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 311, in probability assert spamcount <= nspam AssertionError I am pretty clueless as far as python is concerned, so I don't see what is wrong here. sb_mboxtrain.py and stuff works as before, it's just sb_filter that gives problems which is a bad thing since I want to call it from a procmail recipe. Any help would be much appreciated. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=957746&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue May 25 12:31:00 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue May 25 12:31:11 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-960241 ] SpamBayes COM Add-in Box will not stay checked... Message-ID: Bugs item #960241, was opened at 2004-05-25 10:30 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=960241&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Source code 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Paul (pfbpaul) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: SpamBayes COM Add-in Box will not stay checked... Initial Comment: I have been struggling with getting SpamBayes working again. I've been using it for many months with little problems, but recently it stopped filtering, and the menu bars became dead. I've tried all sorts of variations on the following: 1. Removing and reinstalling SpamBayes 2. Removing and reinstalling dowlevel SpamBayes 3. Removing and reinstalling all of outlook 4. Removing \Documents and Settings\{username} \Application Data\Microsoft\Outlook\outcmd.dat (this did remove the dead menu bars, which never reinstall now) 5. Checking for the log file. (exists and attached, contains only: Registered: SpamBayes.OutlookAddin Registration complete.) No filtering. No menu bars. The SpamBayes check box appears (unchecked) in the Options->Other- >Advanced_Options->COM_ADINS menu, but WILL NOT STAY CHECKED. Every time I check the box, I click o.k., then next time I go in it is unchecked again. I'm at a loss... Any help would be appreciated. I'm being buried by a mountain of SPAM :( ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=960241&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue May 25 12:45:44 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue May 25 12:49:17 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-960241 ] SpamBayes COM Add-in Box will not stay checked... Message-ID: Bugs item #960241, was opened at 2004-05-25 10:30 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by pfbpaul You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=960241&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Source code 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Paul (pfbpaul) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: SpamBayes COM Add-in Box will not stay checked... Initial Comment: I have been struggling with getting SpamBayes working again. I've been using it for many months with little problems, but recently it stopped filtering, and the menu bars became dead. I've tried all sorts of variations on the following: 1. Removing and reinstalling SpamBayes 2. Removing and reinstalling dowlevel SpamBayes 3. Removing and reinstalling all of outlook 4. Removing \Documents and Settings\{username} \Application Data\Microsoft\Outlook\outcmd.dat (this did remove the dead menu bars, which never reinstall now) 5. Checking for the log file. (exists and attached, contains only: Registered: SpamBayes.OutlookAddin Registration complete.) No filtering. No menu bars. The SpamBayes check box appears (unchecked) in the Options->Other- >Advanced_Options->COM_ADINS menu, but WILL NOT STAY CHECKED. Every time I check the box, I click o.k., then next time I go in it is unchecked again. I'm at a loss... Any help would be appreciated. I'm being buried by a mountain of SPAM :( ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Paul (pfbpaul) Date: 2004-05-25 10:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1048938 Running Office 2003, Windows XP, SpamBayes 1.0RC1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=960241&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue May 25 18:53:33 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue May 25 18:53:39 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-942262 ] TypeError: string payload expected: Message-ID: Bugs item #942262, was opened at 2004-04-26 05:09 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by twoodcock You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=942262&group_id=61702 Category: hammie Group: Binary 1.0b1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Steven Knight (stevenknight) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: TypeError: string payload expected: Initial Comment: Both messages in the attached file cause both 1.0a7 and 1.0b1 to die with the following output: $ sb_mboxtrain.py -d ~/.hammie.db -s ~/Mail/unsure Training spam (/home/knight/Mail/unsure): Reading as Unix mbox Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/local/bin/sb_mboxtrain.py", line 351, in ? main() File "/usr/local/bin/sb_mboxtrain.py", line 342, in main train(h, s, True, force, trainnew, removetrained) File "/usr/local/bin/sb_mboxtrain.py", line 266, in train mbox_train(h, path, is_spam, force) File "/usr/local/bin/sb_mboxtrain.py", line 193, in mbox_train outf.write(msg.as_string(True)) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/email/Message.py", line 107, in as_string g.flatten(self, unixfrom=unixfrom) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/email/Generator.py", line 100, in flatten self._write(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/email/Generator.py", line 128, in _write self._dispatch(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/email/Generator.py", line 154, in _dispatch meth(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/email/Generator.py", line 212, in _handle_text raise TypeError, 'string payload expected: %s' % type(payload) TypeError: string payload expected: This is on a pretty vanilla Red Hat 9 system running Python 2.2. If you need any more info, let me know. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Woodcock (twoodcock) Date: 2004-05-25 15:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1049836 I found this too, and, with a little experimentation, found that it was the Content-Type line in the email that made the difference. Something does not like the following: Content-Type: text/html; boundary="--1474828438272566" If you change that to Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--1474828438272566" It processes without errors. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jeremy Condit (jcondit) Date: 2004-05-10 13:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=190757 I get the same error on a FreeBSD system running Python 2.2.2. It occurs in both 1.0a7 and 1.0b1.1. I winnowed down my corpus of spam until I found the message that was causing the bug. Deleting this message from my spam mailbox eliminated the error. You can get a copy of the offending spam here: http://bantha.org/~jcondit/badspam.txt ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Leo Heska (joiner) Date: 2004-04-26 05:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1029402 I got what appears to be the same error with a different presentation. The below came from SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Version 1.0b1 (April 2004), running on Windows 2000 Professional: X-Nonspam: None X-Spambayes-Exception: Traceback (most recent call last): . File "sb_server.pyc", line 474, in onRetr . File "spambayes\message.pyc", line 262, in asTokens . File "spambayes\message.pyc", line 277, in as_string . File "email\Message.pyc", line 130, in as_string . File "email\Generator.pyc", line 102, in flatten . File "email\Generator.pyc", line 130, in _write . File "email\Generator.pyc", line 156, in _dispatch . File "email\Generator.pyc", line 199, in _handle_text .TypeError: string payload expected: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=942262&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue May 25 19:07:41 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue May 25 19:07:58 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-960241 ] SpamBayes COM Add-in Box will not stay checked... Message-ID: Bugs item #960241, was opened at 2004-05-26 04:30 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=960241&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Source code 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Paul (pfbpaul) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: SpamBayes COM Add-in Box will not stay checked... Initial Comment: I have been struggling with getting SpamBayes working again. I've been using it for many months with little problems, but recently it stopped filtering, and the menu bars became dead. I've tried all sorts of variations on the following: 1. Removing and reinstalling SpamBayes 2. Removing and reinstalling dowlevel SpamBayes 3. Removing and reinstalling all of outlook 4. Removing \Documents and Settings\{username} \Application Data\Microsoft\Outlook\outcmd.dat (this did remove the dead menu bars, which never reinstall now) 5. Checking for the log file. (exists and attached, contains only: Registered: SpamBayes.OutlookAddin Registration complete.) No filtering. No menu bars. The SpamBayes check box appears (unchecked) in the Options->Other- >Advanced_Options->COM_ADINS menu, but WILL NOT STAY CHECKED. Every time I check the box, I click o.k., then next time I go in it is unchecked again. I'm at a loss... Any help would be appreciated. I'm being buried by a mountain of SPAM :( ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-26 11:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Outlook 2003 has a "disabled items" list - have you checked to see if SpamBayes is there? You get to it via Help->About Microsoft Outlook->Disabled Items. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul (pfbpaul) Date: 2004-05-26 04:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1048938 Running Office 2003, Windows XP, SpamBayes 1.0RC1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=960241&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue May 25 19:19:54 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue May 25 19:20:03 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-942262 ] TypeError: string payload expected: Message-ID: Bugs item #942262, was opened at 2004-04-27 00:09 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=942262&group_id=61702 Category: hammie Group: Binary 1.0b1 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Steven Knight (stevenknight) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: TypeError: string payload expected: Initial Comment: Both messages in the attached file cause both 1.0a7 and 1.0b1 to die with the following output: $ sb_mboxtrain.py -d ~/.hammie.db -s ~/Mail/unsure Training spam (/home/knight/Mail/unsure): Reading as Unix mbox Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/local/bin/sb_mboxtrain.py", line 351, in ? main() File "/usr/local/bin/sb_mboxtrain.py", line 342, in main train(h, s, True, force, trainnew, removetrained) File "/usr/local/bin/sb_mboxtrain.py", line 266, in train mbox_train(h, path, is_spam, force) File "/usr/local/bin/sb_mboxtrain.py", line 193, in mbox_train outf.write(msg.as_string(True)) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/email/Message.py", line 107, in as_string g.flatten(self, unixfrom=unixfrom) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/email/Generator.py", line 100, in flatten self._write(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/email/Generator.py", line 128, in _write self._dispatch(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/email/Generator.py", line 154, in _dispatch meth(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/email/Generator.py", line 212, in _handle_text raise TypeError, 'string payload expected: %s' % type(payload) TypeError: string payload expected: This is on a pretty vanilla Red Hat 9 system running Python 2.2. If you need any more info, let me know. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-26 11:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 For the short term, I've checked in the fix that was applied to sb_filter (in 1.0rc1) to sb_mboxtrain, which should fix this. For the medium term, we'll (after 1.0) switch sb_filter and sb_mboxtrain over to using the spambayes Message class (like sb_imapfilter, sb_server and sb_pop3dnd) so that fixes like this only need to be applied in one place. For the long term, Python 2.4's email package (2.5, IIRC) handles malformed messages much more gracefully. This will be used for binary releases, and will work with people running the source with Python 2.4. We might bundle bits of the code for 2.2/2.3 users; I'm not sure. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Woodcock (twoodcock) Date: 2004-05-26 10:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1049836 I found this too, and, with a little experimentation, found that it was the Content-Type line in the email that made the difference. Something does not like the following: Content-Type: text/html; boundary="--1474828438272566" If you change that to Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--1474828438272566" It processes without errors. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jeremy Condit (jcondit) Date: 2004-05-11 08:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=190757 I get the same error on a FreeBSD system running Python 2.2.2. It occurs in both 1.0a7 and 1.0b1.1. I winnowed down my corpus of spam until I found the message that was causing the bug. Deleting this message from my spam mailbox eliminated the error. You can get a copy of the offending spam here: http://bantha.org/~jcondit/badspam.txt ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Leo Heska (joiner) Date: 2004-04-27 00:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1029402 I got what appears to be the same error with a different presentation. The below came from SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Version 1.0b1 (April 2004), running on Windows 2000 Professional: X-Nonspam: None X-Spambayes-Exception: Traceback (most recent call last): . File "sb_server.pyc", line 474, in onRetr . File "spambayes\message.pyc", line 262, in asTokens . File "spambayes\message.pyc", line 277, in as_string . File "email\Message.pyc", line 130, in as_string . File "email\Generator.pyc", line 102, in flatten . File "email\Generator.pyc", line 130, in _write . File "email\Generator.pyc", line 156, in _dispatch . File "email\Generator.pyc", line 199, in _handle_text .TypeError: string payload expected: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=942262&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue May 25 19:22:30 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue May 25 19:22:37 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-959560 ] access denied Message-ID: Bugs item #959560, was opened at 2004-05-25 04:48 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=959560&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: cindyp (cindyp) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: access denied Initial Comment: After installing there was an error initializing so I went into Spam Bayes Manager and configured it (including enabling) and went through training, etc. It still does not appear to working. It seems that it is not able to watch my inbox because access is denied. Log is attached. I am running Outlook 2000, Exchange Server w/ Small Business Server 4.5. Thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-26 11:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 What sort of access do you have to that mailbox? Owner? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=959560&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue May 25 19:26:31 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue May 25 19:26:38 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-958506 ] Fetching mail not always happens Message-ID: Bugs item #958506, was opened at 2004-05-23 01:47 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=958506&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jos (be037446) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Fetching mail not always happens Initial Comment: I'm using the Opera 7.50 mail client in combination with the Spambayes proxy. I notice that Opera is not always fetching e-mails although there are e-mails waiting at my ISP. I have 4 account divided over 2 ISP and it happens with all 4 of them but never together. It's a very irregular pattern. When I change the e-mail configuration to fetch e-mails directly from the ISP instead of passing the proxy, there is no problem at all. So, I assume there is a problem with the Spambayes proxy. I also tried the Mozilla e-mail client Thunderbird and I have the same problems there. So, it isn't related to Opera alone. Before that, I always used the Outlook plug-in and never had a problem. Any ideas ? Kind regards, Jos. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-26 11:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 It would be very odd if this was the proxy - all it does is proxy (i.e. directly pass the commands through), unless it's doing a RETR (or sometimes TOP) command, when it classifies the message. To not fetch the messages, I presume that the mail client is getting back a 0 response from the LIST, which is just proxied. If you set the [globals]verbose option to True ('-o globals:verbose:True' on the command line should do, or in your bayescustomise), then you should get a _pop3proxy.log file created that logs the POP3 conversation. Could you do that and attach a copy here that covers a time when this happens? (Check the log for any confidential data; I can't remember what it does with username/passwords). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=958506&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue May 25 19:37:54 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue May 25 19:37:59 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-960241 ] SpamBayes COM Add-in Box will not stay checked... Message-ID: Bugs item #960241, was opened at 2004-05-25 10:30 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by pfbpaul You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=960241&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Source code 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Paul (pfbpaul) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: SpamBayes COM Add-in Box will not stay checked... Initial Comment: I have been struggling with getting SpamBayes working again. I've been using it for many months with little problems, but recently it stopped filtering, and the menu bars became dead. I've tried all sorts of variations on the following: 1. Removing and reinstalling SpamBayes 2. Removing and reinstalling dowlevel SpamBayes 3. Removing and reinstalling all of outlook 4. Removing \Documents and Settings\{username} \Application Data\Microsoft\Outlook\outcmd.dat (this did remove the dead menu bars, which never reinstall now) 5. Checking for the log file. (exists and attached, contains only: Registered: SpamBayes.OutlookAddin Registration complete.) No filtering. No menu bars. The SpamBayes check box appears (unchecked) in the Options->Other- >Advanced_Options->COM_ADINS menu, but WILL NOT STAY CHECKED. Every time I check the box, I click o.k., then next time I go in it is unchecked again. I'm at a loss... Any help would be appreciated. I'm being buried by a mountain of SPAM :( ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Paul (pfbpaul) Date: 2004-05-25 17:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1048938 Thanks! That was it! How/Why it became disabled, I have no idea. Beat my head against this problem for two days, so I appreciate the help! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-25 17:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Outlook 2003 has a "disabled items" list - have you checked to see if SpamBayes is there? You get to it via Help->About Microsoft Outlook->Disabled Items. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul (pfbpaul) Date: 2004-05-25 10:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1048938 Running Office 2003, Windows XP, SpamBayes 1.0RC1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=960241&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue May 25 19:59:42 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue May 25 19:59:48 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-960241 ] SpamBayes COM Add-in Box will not stay checked... Message-ID: Bugs item #960241, was opened at 2004-05-26 04:30 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=960241&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Source code 1.0rc1 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Paul (pfbpaul) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: SpamBayes COM Add-in Box will not stay checked... Initial Comment: I have been struggling with getting SpamBayes working again. I've been using it for many months with little problems, but recently it stopped filtering, and the menu bars became dead. I've tried all sorts of variations on the following: 1. Removing and reinstalling SpamBayes 2. Removing and reinstalling dowlevel SpamBayes 3. Removing and reinstalling all of outlook 4. Removing \Documents and Settings\{username} \Application Data\Microsoft\Outlook\outcmd.dat (this did remove the dead menu bars, which never reinstall now) 5. Checking for the log file. (exists and attached, contains only: Registered: SpamBayes.OutlookAddin Registration complete.) No filtering. No menu bars. The SpamBayes check box appears (unchecked) in the Options->Other- >Advanced_Options->COM_ADINS menu, but WILL NOT STAY CHECKED. Every time I check the box, I click o.k., then next time I go in it is unchecked again. I'm at a loss... Any help would be appreciated. I'm being buried by a mountain of SPAM :( ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-26 11:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Outlook disables plug-ins seemingly whenever it feels like it :) One specific time, though, seems to be when Outlook is updated - maybe that was the cause. Anyway, glad it's fixed :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul (pfbpaul) Date: 2004-05-26 11:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1048938 Thanks! That was it! How/Why it became disabled, I have no idea. Beat my head against this problem for two days, so I appreciate the help! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-26 11:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Outlook 2003 has a "disabled items" list - have you checked to see if SpamBayes is there? You get to it via Help->About Microsoft Outlook->Disabled Items. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul (pfbpaul) Date: 2004-05-26 04:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1048938 Running Office 2003, Windows XP, SpamBayes 1.0RC1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=960241&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed May 26 03:17:08 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed May 26 03:17:13 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-960610 ] URL checking in classifier.py fails (patch included) Message-ID: Bugs item #960610, was opened at 2004-05-26 07:17 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=960610&group_id=61702 Category: hammie Group: Source code 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Janne Sinkkonen (janne) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: URL checking in classifier.py fails (patch included) Initial Comment: The mistyped URL 'http:///www.pascal-network.org/' (I think) makes classifier.py to crash. I have the experimental URL checking options on. The attached patch cures the problem, although I think it would be better to change the URL parsing regexp. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=960610&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed May 26 03:44:50 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed May 26 03:45:13 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-957707 ] Mail items are NOT always filtered automatically Message-ID: Bugs item #957707, was opened at 2004-05-20 17:12 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by huxley75 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=957707&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Source code 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Steven Tolkin (stolkin) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Mail items are NOT always filtered automatically Initial Comment: I have configured SpamBayes to run the Outlook Addin 1.0rc1 in background, with start delay of 2 seconds, and delay of either 1 or 0 seconds. (I tried both trying to solve the problem reported here.) When spam email arrives it sometimes, but not always, is filtered and then moved to my spamkeep or spam_maybe folders. Other times I have to manually invoke "filter messages" for something to happen. They have not been filtered, e.g. switching to another folder does not cause them to move. I think that once I have manually filtered in an Outlook session later emails will be filtered automatically. This behavior happened with my older (about 1 year old) SpamBayes. But now I notice the additional bad effect: if I archive a folder (e.g. my spamkeep folder -- I keep it in case I need to retrain) the messages are archived, but they do not *seem* to move until I click on another folder. This behavior is new, and undesirable. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Anthony Parcero (huxley75) Date: 2004-05-26 02:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=159242 I'm having a similar problem with my Outlook plugin, as well. I'm using Outlook 2K on WinXP and the problem just started cropping up (I've been running previous versions of SpamBayes without a hitch until I upgraded to v1.0b1, when I first noticed the issue). Looking at the SpamBayes log, I found: "Bayes database initialized with 779 spam and 1337 good messages *** - message database has 2095 messages - bayes has 2116 - something is screwey" in the log. I had noticed that SpamBayes wasn't adding new spam to its training database (I had gotten up to over 1000 spam in the Junk E-Mail folder but it never registered above 800 spam). There is also a "Folders/Junk Suspects - pythoncom error: Python error invoking COM method." error, "The timer is enabled, but one of the timer intervals values is zero You must set both intervals before the timer will enable", and a number of similar "'DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error, run database recovery -- fatal region error detected;" throughout the log file. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=957707&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed May 26 06:24:21 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed May 26 06:24:35 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-960706 ] cannot select mail folders Message-ID: Bugs item #960706, was opened at 2004-05-26 11:24 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=960706&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nigel Atkinson (nigel_atkinson) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: cannot select mail folders Initial Comment: When attempting to select a mail folder for filtering in a second mailbox I receive the following error message: "Please select a child folder - top-level folders can not be used." As you can see in the screenshot the folder that I have selected is not a top level folder. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=960706&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed May 26 10:44:47 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed May 26 10:44:56 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-960881 ] Add spam reporting capabilities Message-ID: Feature Requests item #960881, was opened at 2004-05-26 10:44 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=960881&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: scott thomson (sthomson2003) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Add spam reporting capabilities Initial Comment: It would be awesome to be able to report spam directly from the outlook plugin. This could work well if the mail servers have spamassasin on them (in my case I use outlook/exchange but it passes through a Linux box running SA first with a ham and a spam folder for users to report to). Or you could set it up so you could report e-mails to a third party. This would simplify including headers in your e-mail dramatically as well. I love SpamBayes as is as well, I reccomend it to anyone who asks about spam filtering where I work. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=960881&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed May 26 13:18:16 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed May 26 13:18:49 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-960241 ] SpamBayes COM Add-in Box will not stay checked... Message-ID: Bugs item #960241, was opened at 2004-05-25 10:30 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by pfbpaul You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=960241&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Source code 1.0rc1 >Status: Open >Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Paul (pfbpaul) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: SpamBayes COM Add-in Box will not stay checked... Initial Comment: I have been struggling with getting SpamBayes working again. I've been using it for many months with little problems, but recently it stopped filtering, and the menu bars became dead. I've tried all sorts of variations on the following: 1. Removing and reinstalling SpamBayes 2. Removing and reinstalling dowlevel SpamBayes 3. Removing and reinstalling all of outlook 4. Removing \Documents and Settings\{username} \Application Data\Microsoft\Outlook\outcmd.dat (this did remove the dead menu bars, which never reinstall now) 5. Checking for the log file. (exists and attached, contains only: Registered: SpamBayes.OutlookAddin Registration complete.) No filtering. No menu bars. The SpamBayes check box appears (unchecked) in the Options->Other- >Advanced_Options->COM_ADINS menu, but WILL NOT STAY CHECKED. Every time I check the box, I click o.k., then next time I go in it is unchecked again. I'm at a loss... Any help would be appreciated. I'm being buried by a mountain of SPAM :( ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Paul (pfbpaul) Date: 2004-05-26 11:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1048938 As a thought, might be worth adding to the troubleshooting guide... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-25 17:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Outlook disables plug-ins seemingly whenever it feels like it :) One specific time, though, seems to be when Outlook is updated - maybe that was the cause. Anyway, glad it's fixed :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul (pfbpaul) Date: 2004-05-25 17:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1048938 Thanks! That was it! How/Why it became disabled, I have no idea. Beat my head against this problem for two days, so I appreciate the help! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-25 17:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Outlook 2003 has a "disabled items" list - have you checked to see if SpamBayes is there? You get to it via Help->About Microsoft Outlook->Disabled Items. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul (pfbpaul) Date: 2004-05-25 10:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1048938 Running Office 2003, Windows XP, SpamBayes 1.0RC1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=960241&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed May 26 14:28:09 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed May 26 14:28:30 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-961019 ] Outlook2K3 spam rated but not moved Message-ID: Bugs item #961019, was opened at 2004-05-26 11:28 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=961019&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Andy Neil (andyneil) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook2K3 spam rated but not moved Initial Comment: New Inbox messages get a spam rating of 100% but are not moved to "__Spam" folder as expected Key symptom from log (attached) seems to be "Eeek - only expecting one row from IPC.MS.REN.USERFIELDS" and then "WARNING: We just created the user field in folder Mailbox - Andy Neil/IPM_SUBTREE/Inbox, but it appears to not exist. Something is probably wrong with DoesFolderHaveOutlookField()" Config details: WinXPSP1, user account has local administrator privileges. Outlook 2003 (11.5608.5703) (with full Office 2003 Pro install). NewsGator 2.0. All Outlook rules have been turned off. Outlook "Junk E-mail Filtering" set to "No automatic filtering". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=961019&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed May 26 15:57:22 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed May 26 15:57:28 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-961077 ] "Delete as Spam" deletes too many messages when multiclicked Message-ID: Bugs item #961077, was opened at 2004-05-26 15:57 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=961077&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Drew (denimskater) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: "Delete as Spam" deletes too many messages when multiclicked Initial Comment: In "spam suspects" folder, double-clicking on the Delete As Spam deletes three messages. Clicking rapidly N times results in some number of messages >N being deleted. 100% repeatable on my system. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=961077&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed May 26 16:18:52 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed May 26 16:19:01 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-917107 ] Extra train buttons on review page Message-ID: Feature Requests item #917107, was opened at 2004-03-16 05:57 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by richiehindle You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=917107&group_id=61702 Category: Interface Improvements (example) Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Extra train buttons on review page Initial Comment: >From personal email: """ I've finally installed the latest SpamBayes version, and the change of ordering is a big help. However, one more suggestion: there should be a "train" button under all three sections, not just at the bottom. Thus it's not necessary to scroll all the way down after looking at just the unsure or ham messages. """ I agree with this, so if someone wants to get around to adding the extra buttons, that would be cool :) I'm not sure if it's just adding the extra html, since maybe the dynamic creation of the page will throw things off (not sure at all). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Date: 2004-05-26 20:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=85414 I think it's a bad idea to encourage people to train without even looking at what they're training on. Mistakes will get reinforced without people's knowledge. But maybe the customer is always right; I don't know. Attached is a patch to add another train button at the top of the list. I don't want to commit it because I think it's bad UI design... Tony, you have a much better idea than I do about how people use the UI, so I'll leave it up to you (and anyone else with an opinion 8-) whether you commit it or not. copping-out-passing-the-buck-call-it-what-you-will-ly yrs, Richie ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-24 03:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Reopening, at least temporarily. Richie (if you're about), what about just one more "train" button, at the top of the page (above any messages)? This is requested every now and then, because lots of people just do the unsures and trust whatever default setting they have for ham/spam, so don't want to scroll down. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-24 03:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 See also: [ 955892 ] Train button should be on top ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-03-17 22:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Good point! I hadn't thought of that. There hasn't been a clamouring for this anyway, so I'll close it, and refer anyone that asks to the closed tracker :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Date: 2004-03-17 22:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=85414 Adding copies of the Train button would work, but FWIW I don't think it's a good idea. It's not obvious whether each button would submit the whole page, or just the section it was immediately underneath, or all the sections above it. Maybe changing the text could help, but if it says "Train all" or something then than only makes you wonder what the alternative is... then you end up adding "Train this section" buttons and the whole thing becomes overengineered. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=917107&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed May 26 17:56:44 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed May 26 17:56:59 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-960706 ] cannot select mail folders Message-ID: Bugs item #960706, was opened at 2004-05-26 22:24 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=960706&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc1 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nigel Atkinson (nigel_atkinson) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: cannot select mail folders Initial Comment: When attempting to select a mail folder for filtering in a second mailbox I receive the following error message: "Please select a child folder - top-level folders can not be used." As you can see in the screenshot the folder that I have selected is not a top level folder. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-27 09:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Thanks for your report. This bug has previously been reported, and has already been fixed in the source-code - so you can expect to see the fix in the next binary release. You may wish to subscribe to the spambayes-announce list to see when each version is released - details at http://mail.python.org/mailman-21/listinfo/spambayes-announce If you are technically minded, you may like to run from the CVS version of the source-code, and you should find the fix immediately - see the main SpamBayes pages for details. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=960706&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed May 26 17:58:31 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed May 26 17:58:42 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-960881 ] Add spam reporting capabilities Message-ID: Feature Requests item #960881, was opened at 2004-05-27 02:44 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=960881&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: scott thomson (sthomson2003) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Add spam reporting capabilities Initial Comment: It would be awesome to be able to report spam directly from the outlook plugin. This could work well if the mail servers have spamassasin on them (in my case I use outlook/exchange but it passes through a Linux box running SA first with a ham and a spam folder for users to report to). Or you could set it up so you could report e-mails to a third party. This would simplify including headers in your e-mail dramatically as well. I love SpamBayes as is as well, I reccomend it to anyone who asks about spam filtering where I work. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-27 09:58 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Who are you reporting spam to? Would you want to set up an email address and have all spam automatically forwarded to that address? Can't you do this with Outlook rules already? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=960881&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed May 26 18:02:34 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed May 26 18:02:38 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-960241 ] SpamBayes COM Add-in Box will not stay checked... Message-ID: Bugs item #960241, was opened at 2004-05-26 04:30 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=960241&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Source code 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Paul (pfbpaul) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: SpamBayes COM Add-in Box will not stay checked... Initial Comment: I have been struggling with getting SpamBayes working again. I've been using it for many months with little problems, but recently it stopped filtering, and the menu bars became dead. I've tried all sorts of variations on the following: 1. Removing and reinstalling SpamBayes 2. Removing and reinstalling dowlevel SpamBayes 3. Removing and reinstalling all of outlook 4. Removing \Documents and Settings\{username} \Application Data\Microsoft\Outlook\outcmd.dat (this did remove the dead menu bars, which never reinstall now) 5. Checking for the log file. (exists and attached, contains only: Registered: SpamBayes.OutlookAddin Registration complete.) No filtering. No menu bars. The SpamBayes check box appears (unchecked) in the Options->Other- >Advanced_Options->COM_ADINS menu, but WILL NOT STAY CHECKED. Every time I check the box, I click o.k., then next time I go in it is unchecked again. I'm at a loss... Any help would be appreciated. I'm being buried by a mountain of SPAM :( ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-27 10:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 It's already there! Is there some way the troubleshooting guide could be rearranged/changed so that it was easier to find? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul (pfbpaul) Date: 2004-05-27 05:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1048938 As a thought, might be worth adding to the troubleshooting guide... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-26 11:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Outlook disables plug-ins seemingly whenever it feels like it :) One specific time, though, seems to be when Outlook is updated - maybe that was the cause. Anyway, glad it's fixed :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul (pfbpaul) Date: 2004-05-26 11:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1048938 Thanks! That was it! How/Why it became disabled, I have no idea. Beat my head against this problem for two days, so I appreciate the help! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-26 11:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Outlook 2003 has a "disabled items" list - have you checked to see if SpamBayes is there? You get to it via Help->About Microsoft Outlook->Disabled Items. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul (pfbpaul) Date: 2004-05-26 04:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1048938 Running Office 2003, Windows XP, SpamBayes 1.0RC1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=960241&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu May 27 09:50:11 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu May 27 09:50:49 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-765924 ] Spam / ham statistics Message-ID: Feature Requests item #765924, was opened at 2003-07-04 08:51 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mulpinsf You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=765924&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Magnus Aycox (mbip) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Spam / ham statistics Initial Comment: Possibility to get statistics on how many mails were received per hour / day and how many of these were spam messages. It would be great if it could be presented both as numbers and graphically (impresses CEO's...). The means to print it as a hard copy would be just swell... ;o) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Murilo Pinto (mulpinsf) Date: 2004-05-27 09:50 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=378491 I'd like to have a tiny button in the Outlook toolbar showing how many spams(red)/ham(blue) SB processed in that session. Hovering the mouse at it would give % in the "pop- up" comment. If clicked, it could open a "page" with more detailed stats, as per hour/day/month/hour of the day/day of the week/accounts/year. Outstanding antispam, btw. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-03-13 03:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting dupe in [ 915260 ] Statistics ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2003-11-20 10:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 The latest CVS plugin actually does include false positives and negatives in the statistics. The definition is this. If a message was classified as Ham and then reclassified by the user as Spam, it is a false negative. If a message was classified as Spam and then reclassified by the user as Ham, it is a false positive. A message that was originally classified as Unsure is never considered a false positive or negative. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Erik Sargent (esargent) Date: 2003-11-20 05:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=586922 Quick note on the "impossibility" of tracking false pos/neg. Actually, since an incorrectly classified message already has a header inserted, then you would only flag a "false" if that header existed and was changed. This means you'd have to check for the existence of the header before you processed the Delete/Recover buttons, but it can be done. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-30 00:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Note that the plug-in has basic stats information (cvs version) now, although it's still only on a per session basis (this will no doubt improve at some point). The web interface (for non-plugin users) also now (cvs head) has basic stats, which are persisted between sessions. Any opinions on which statistics would be best to add? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-07-11 00:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 It's not exactly what you have asked for, but as a start, are you aware that in the logs, each time you shut Outlook down it prints a message like: "SpamBayes processed 555 messages, finding 34 spam and 11 unsure" (So you could shut Outlook down each hour/day, to generate this message). It's unlikely that a graphical version would ever be made, but it would be easy enough to throw numbers like this into Excel and get pretty graphs. The number of false positives/negatives is more difficult because SpamBayes doesn't really have any way to know that mail is a fp/fn. It could print the number of times the "delete as spam" and "recover from spam" buttons are used, I guess, but this would include all unsure mail, which aren't exactly fp/fn's. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Jeays (dze27) Date: 2003-07-11 00:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=302748 I'm just another user but I think this would be a great addition. I'd also be interested in: number of false positives (along with percentage of total), number of false negatives (along with percentage of total) and percentage of mail received that is spam. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=765924&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu May 27 10:13:01 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu May 27 10:13:10 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-960241 ] SpamBayes COM Add-in Box will not stay checked... Message-ID: Bugs item #960241, was opened at 2004-05-25 10:30 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by pfbpaul You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=960241&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Source code 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Paul (pfbpaul) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: SpamBayes COM Add-in Box will not stay checked... Initial Comment: I have been struggling with getting SpamBayes working again. I've been using it for many months with little problems, but recently it stopped filtering, and the menu bars became dead. I've tried all sorts of variations on the following: 1. Removing and reinstalling SpamBayes 2. Removing and reinstalling dowlevel SpamBayes 3. Removing and reinstalling all of outlook 4. Removing \Documents and Settings\{username} \Application Data\Microsoft\Outlook\outcmd.dat (this did remove the dead menu bars, which never reinstall now) 5. Checking for the log file. (exists and attached, contains only: Registered: SpamBayes.OutlookAddin Registration complete.) No filtering. No menu bars. The SpamBayes check box appears (unchecked) in the Options->Other- >Advanced_Options->COM_ADINS menu, but WILL NOT STAY CHECKED. Every time I check the box, I click o.k., then next time I go in it is unchecked again. I'm at a loss... Any help would be appreciated. I'm being buried by a mountain of SPAM :( ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Paul (pfbpaul) Date: 2004-05-27 08:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1048938 Maybe I'm not seeing it... Troubleshooting guide for Windows (http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/*checkout*/spambay es/spambayes/Outlook2000/docs/troubleshooting.html? rev=HEAD&content-type=text/html) describes looking in the COM add-in section to determine if the SpamBayes is enabled, but I can not find any reference to the Help->About Microsoft Outlook->Disabled Items screen. I would suggest placing it in the section that starts off with "Check that Outlook shows the addin as enabled" ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-26 16:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 It's already there! Is there some way the troubleshooting guide could be rearranged/changed so that it was easier to find? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul (pfbpaul) Date: 2004-05-26 11:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1048938 As a thought, might be worth adding to the troubleshooting guide... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-25 17:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Outlook disables plug-ins seemingly whenever it feels like it :) One specific time, though, seems to be when Outlook is updated - maybe that was the cause. Anyway, glad it's fixed :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul (pfbpaul) Date: 2004-05-25 17:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1048938 Thanks! That was it! How/Why it became disabled, I have no idea. Beat my head against this problem for two days, so I appreciate the help! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-25 17:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Outlook 2003 has a "disabled items" list - have you checked to see if SpamBayes is there? You get to it via Help->About Microsoft Outlook->Disabled Items. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul (pfbpaul) Date: 2004-05-25 10:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1048938 Running Office 2003, Windows XP, SpamBayes 1.0RC1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=960241&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu May 27 10:13:56 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu May 27 10:14:01 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-960241 ] SpamBayes COM Add-in Box will not stay checked... Message-ID: Bugs item #960241, was opened at 2004-05-25 10:30 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by pfbpaul You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=960241&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Source code 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Paul (pfbpaul) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: SpamBayes COM Add-in Box will not stay checked... Initial Comment: I have been struggling with getting SpamBayes working again. I've been using it for many months with little problems, but recently it stopped filtering, and the menu bars became dead. I've tried all sorts of variations on the following: 1. Removing and reinstalling SpamBayes 2. Removing and reinstalling dowlevel SpamBayes 3. Removing and reinstalling all of outlook 4. Removing \Documents and Settings\{username} \Application Data\Microsoft\Outlook\outcmd.dat (this did remove the dead menu bars, which never reinstall now) 5. Checking for the log file. (exists and attached, contains only: Registered: SpamBayes.OutlookAddin Registration complete.) No filtering. No menu bars. The SpamBayes check box appears (unchecked) in the Options->Other- >Advanced_Options->COM_ADINS menu, but WILL NOT STAY CHECKED. Every time I check the box, I click o.k., then next time I go in it is unchecked again. I'm at a loss... Any help would be appreciated. I'm being buried by a mountain of SPAM :( ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Paul (pfbpaul) Date: 2004-05-27 08:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1048938 Maybe I'm not seeing it... Troubleshooting guide for Windows (http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/*checkout*/spambay es/spambayes/Outlook2000/docs/troubleshooting.html? rev=HEAD&content-type=text/html) describes looking in the COM add-in section to determine if the SpamBayes is enabled, but I can not find any reference to the Help->About Microsoft Outlook->Disabled Items screen. I would suggest placing it in the section that starts off with "Check that Outlook shows the addin as enabled" ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul (pfbpaul) Date: 2004-05-27 08:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1048938 Maybe I'm not seeing it... Troubleshooting guide for Windows (http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/*checkout*/spambay es/spambayes/Outlook2000/docs/troubleshooting.html? rev=HEAD&content-type=text/html) describes looking in the COM add-in section to determine if the SpamBayes is enabled, but I can not find any reference to the Help->About Microsoft Outlook->Disabled Items screen. I would suggest placing it in the section that starts off with "Check that Outlook shows the addin as enabled" ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-26 16:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 It's already there! Is there some way the troubleshooting guide could be rearranged/changed so that it was easier to find? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul (pfbpaul) Date: 2004-05-26 11:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1048938 As a thought, might be worth adding to the troubleshooting guide... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-25 17:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Outlook disables plug-ins seemingly whenever it feels like it :) One specific time, though, seems to be when Outlook is updated - maybe that was the cause. Anyway, glad it's fixed :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul (pfbpaul) Date: 2004-05-25 17:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1048938 Thanks! That was it! How/Why it became disabled, I have no idea. Beat my head against this problem for two days, so I appreciate the help! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-25 17:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Outlook 2003 has a "disabled items" list - have you checked to see if SpamBayes is there? You get to it via Help->About Microsoft Outlook->Disabled Items. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul (pfbpaul) Date: 2004-05-25 10:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1048938 Running Office 2003, Windows XP, SpamBayes 1.0RC1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=960241&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu May 27 10:16:02 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu May 27 10:16:07 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-960241 ] SpamBayes COM Add-in Box will not stay checked... Message-ID: Bugs item #960241, was opened at 2004-05-25 10:30 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by pfbpaul You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=960241&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Source code 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Paul (pfbpaul) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: SpamBayes COM Add-in Box will not stay checked... Initial Comment: I have been struggling with getting SpamBayes working again. I've been using it for many months with little problems, but recently it stopped filtering, and the menu bars became dead. I've tried all sorts of variations on the following: 1. Removing and reinstalling SpamBayes 2. Removing and reinstalling dowlevel SpamBayes 3. Removing and reinstalling all of outlook 4. Removing \Documents and Settings\{username} \Application Data\Microsoft\Outlook\outcmd.dat (this did remove the dead menu bars, which never reinstall now) 5. Checking for the log file. (exists and attached, contains only: Registered: SpamBayes.OutlookAddin Registration complete.) No filtering. No menu bars. The SpamBayes check box appears (unchecked) in the Options->Other- >Advanced_Options->COM_ADINS menu, but WILL NOT STAY CHECKED. Every time I check the box, I click o.k., then next time I go in it is unchecked again. I'm at a loss... Any help would be appreciated. I'm being buried by a mountain of SPAM :( ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Paul (pfbpaul) Date: 2004-05-27 08:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1048938 Sorry, I'm blind. I see it now. I was just skipping that entire section when reading, as it says "If you are running Outlook 2002...", which I am not. Typo? Should be Outlook 2003? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul (pfbpaul) Date: 2004-05-27 08:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1048938 Maybe I'm not seeing it... Troubleshooting guide for Windows (http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/*checkout*/spambay es/spambayes/Outlook2000/docs/troubleshooting.html? rev=HEAD&content-type=text/html) describes looking in the COM add-in section to determine if the SpamBayes is enabled, but I can not find any reference to the Help->About Microsoft Outlook->Disabled Items screen. I would suggest placing it in the section that starts off with "Check that Outlook shows the addin as enabled" ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul (pfbpaul) Date: 2004-05-27 08:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1048938 Maybe I'm not seeing it... Troubleshooting guide for Windows (http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/*checkout*/spambay es/spambayes/Outlook2000/docs/troubleshooting.html? rev=HEAD&content-type=text/html) describes looking in the COM add-in section to determine if the SpamBayes is enabled, but I can not find any reference to the Help->About Microsoft Outlook->Disabled Items screen. I would suggest placing it in the section that starts off with "Check that Outlook shows the addin as enabled" ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-26 16:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 It's already there! Is there some way the troubleshooting guide could be rearranged/changed so that it was easier to find? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul (pfbpaul) Date: 2004-05-26 11:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1048938 As a thought, might be worth adding to the troubleshooting guide... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-25 17:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Outlook disables plug-ins seemingly whenever it feels like it :) One specific time, though, seems to be when Outlook is updated - maybe that was the cause. Anyway, glad it's fixed :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul (pfbpaul) Date: 2004-05-25 17:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1048938 Thanks! That was it! How/Why it became disabled, I have no idea. Beat my head against this problem for two days, so I appreciate the help! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-25 17:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Outlook 2003 has a "disabled items" list - have you checked to see if SpamBayes is there? You get to it via Help->About Microsoft Outlook->Disabled Items. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul (pfbpaul) Date: 2004-05-25 10:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1048938 Running Office 2003, Windows XP, SpamBayes 1.0RC1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=960241&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu May 27 10:37:16 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu May 27 10:37:22 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-960241 ] SpamBayes COM Add-in Box will not stay checked... Message-ID: Bugs item #960241, was opened at 2004-05-25 12:30 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kpitt You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=960241&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Source code 1.0rc1 >Status: Closed Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Paul (pfbpaul) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: SpamBayes COM Add-in Box will not stay checked... Initial Comment: I have been struggling with getting SpamBayes working again. I've been using it for many months with little problems, but recently it stopped filtering, and the menu bars became dead. I've tried all sorts of variations on the following: 1. Removing and reinstalling SpamBayes 2. Removing and reinstalling dowlevel SpamBayes 3. Removing and reinstalling all of outlook 4. Removing \Documents and Settings\{username} \Application Data\Microsoft\Outlook\outcmd.dat (this did remove the dead menu bars, which never reinstall now) 5. Checking for the log file. (exists and attached, contains only: Registered: SpamBayes.OutlookAddin Registration complete.) No filtering. No menu bars. The SpamBayes check box appears (unchecked) in the Options->Other- >Advanced_Options->COM_ADINS menu, but WILL NOT STAY CHECKED. Every time I check the box, I click o.k., then next time I go in it is unchecked again. I'm at a loss... Any help would be appreciated. I'm being buried by a mountain of SPAM :( ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-05-27 10:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Changed "Outlook 2002" in the disabled items to "Outlook XP/2002/2003" because it is relevant to all of these versions. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul (pfbpaul) Date: 2004-05-27 10:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1048938 Sorry, I'm blind. I see it now. I was just skipping that entire section when reading, as it says "If you are running Outlook 2002...", which I am not. Typo? Should be Outlook 2003? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul (pfbpaul) Date: 2004-05-27 10:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1048938 Maybe I'm not seeing it... Troubleshooting guide for Windows (http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/*checkout*/spambay es/spambayes/Outlook2000/docs/troubleshooting.html? rev=HEAD&content-type=text/html) describes looking in the COM add-in section to determine if the SpamBayes is enabled, but I can not find any reference to the Help->About Microsoft Outlook->Disabled Items screen. I would suggest placing it in the section that starts off with "Check that Outlook shows the addin as enabled" ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul (pfbpaul) Date: 2004-05-27 10:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1048938 Maybe I'm not seeing it... Troubleshooting guide for Windows (http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/*checkout*/spambay es/spambayes/Outlook2000/docs/troubleshooting.html? rev=HEAD&content-type=text/html) describes looking in the COM add-in section to determine if the SpamBayes is enabled, but I can not find any reference to the Help->About Microsoft Outlook->Disabled Items screen. I would suggest placing it in the section that starts off with "Check that Outlook shows the addin as enabled" ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-26 18:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 It's already there! Is there some way the troubleshooting guide could be rearranged/changed so that it was easier to find? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul (pfbpaul) Date: 2004-05-26 13:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1048938 As a thought, might be worth adding to the troubleshooting guide... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-25 19:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Outlook disables plug-ins seemingly whenever it feels like it :) One specific time, though, seems to be when Outlook is updated - maybe that was the cause. Anyway, glad it's fixed :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul (pfbpaul) Date: 2004-05-25 19:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1048938 Thanks! That was it! How/Why it became disabled, I have no idea. Beat my head against this problem for two days, so I appreciate the help! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-25 19:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Outlook 2003 has a "disabled items" list - have you checked to see if SpamBayes is there? You get to it via Help->About Microsoft Outlook->Disabled Items. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul (pfbpaul) Date: 2004-05-25 12:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1048938 Running Office 2003, Windows XP, SpamBayes 1.0RC1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=960241&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu May 27 13:10:17 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu May 27 13:10:55 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-958506 ] Fetching mail not always happens Message-ID: Bugs item #958506, was opened at 2004-05-22 15:47 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by be037446 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=958506&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jos (be037446) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Fetching mail not always happens Initial Comment: I'm using the Opera 7.50 mail client in combination with the Spambayes proxy. I notice that Opera is not always fetching e-mails although there are e-mails waiting at my ISP. I have 4 account divided over 2 ISP and it happens with all 4 of them but never together. It's a very irregular pattern. When I change the e-mail configuration to fetch e-mails directly from the ISP instead of passing the proxy, there is no problem at all. So, I assume there is a problem with the Spambayes proxy. I also tried the Mozilla e-mail client Thunderbird and I have the same problems there. So, it isn't related to Opera alone. Before that, I always used the Outlook plug-in and never had a problem. Any ideas ? Kind regards, Jos. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Jos (be037446) Date: 2004-05-27 19:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1047380 See the attach file. There are indeed messages waiting but they aren't fetched. It's funny but it always happens with the same accounts. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-26 01:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 It would be very odd if this was the proxy - all it does is proxy (i.e. directly pass the commands through), unless it's doing a RETR (or sometimes TOP) command, when it classifies the message. To not fetch the messages, I presume that the mail client is getting back a 0 response from the LIST, which is just proxied. If you set the [globals]verbose option to True ('-o globals:verbose:True' on the command line should do, or in your bayescustomise), then you should get a _pop3proxy.log file created that logs the POP3 conversation. Could you do that and attach a copy here that covers a time when this happens? (Check the log for any confidential data; I can't remember what it does with username/passwords). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=958506&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu May 27 13:30:51 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu May 27 13:30:55 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-961713 ] server error when trying to change Statistics Options Message-ID: Bugs item #961713, was opened at 2004-05-27 17:30 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=961713&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Binary 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: psage (psage) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: server error when trying to change Statistics Options Initial Comment: Attempting to change the Ham cutoff or Spam cutoff statistic options and pressing Save produces the following error on this version and on the previous version of Spambayes proxy for Windows: 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "spambayes\Dibbler.pyc", line 461, in found_terminator File "spambayes\UserInterface.pyc", line 770, in onChangeopts File "spambayes\ProxyUI.pyc", line 731, in verifyInput File "spambayes\UserInterface.pyc", line 862, in verifyInput File "spambayes\OptionsClass.pyc", line 585, in convert File "spambayes\OptionsClass.pyc", line 266, in convert AttributeError: 'tuple' object has no attribute 'split' ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=961713&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu May 27 15:02:13 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu May 27 15:02:29 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-956834 ] Outlook crashes when accessing SpamBayes functions Message-ID: Bugs item #956834, was opened at 2004-05-19 09:16 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by bcurtis You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=956834&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Hans Otten (haotten) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook crashes when accessing SpamBayes functions Initial Comment: I have been using Spambayes for a while and when I upgraded to the 0.8 release everything worked fine until I highlighted an email that spambayes had not caught and clicked on the "Delete as Spam" button. Outlook crashed and I had to restart. Then I discovered if I try to access any SpamBayes function Outlook immediatly crashes. I just upgraded to rc1 and the same thing still occurs. Please note that the SpamBayes is still properly removing the spam. I have attached the log file, where I noticed several Eeek statements and the following error : only expecting one row from IPC.MS.REN.USERFIELDS ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Benjamin Curtis (bcurtis) Date: 2004-05-27 12:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=11944 I am also experiencing this problem. 1.0rc1 binary with Outlook 2003 using Exchange. It sorts out spam just fine, but if I click on the SpamBayes drop-down menu button from the toolbar Outlook crashes (every time). Great product otherwise! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=956834&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu May 27 15:27:55 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu May 27 15:28:11 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-958506 ] Fetching mail not always happens Message-ID: Bugs item #958506, was opened at 2004-05-22 09:47 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kpitt You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=958506&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jos (be037446) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Fetching mail not always happens Initial Comment: I'm using the Opera 7.50 mail client in combination with the Spambayes proxy. I notice that Opera is not always fetching e-mails although there are e-mails waiting at my ISP. I have 4 account divided over 2 ISP and it happens with all 4 of them but never together. It's a very irregular pattern. When I change the e-mail configuration to fetch e-mails directly from the ISP instead of passing the proxy, there is no problem at all. So, I assume there is a problem with the Spambayes proxy. I also tried the Mozilla e-mail client Thunderbird and I have the same problems there. So, it isn't related to Opera alone. Before that, I always used the Outlook plug-in and never had a problem. Any ideas ? Kind regards, Jos. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-05-27 15:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Do you have Opera configured to leave messages on the server? I'm only so-so at reading POP3 logs, especially with the two accounts intermixed, but this is what it looks like to me: 1. successful log in to acct be35926 2. stat command reports 14 total messages 3. mail client downloads the list of identifiers for the 14 messages 4. client assumedly determines that all of the listed identifiers have been previously downloaded so it doesn't download them again ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jos (be037446) Date: 2004-05-27 13:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1047380 See the attach file. There are indeed messages waiting but they aren't fetched. It's funny but it always happens with the same accounts. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-25 19:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 It would be very odd if this was the proxy - all it does is proxy (i.e. directly pass the commands through), unless it's doing a RETR (or sometimes TOP) command, when it classifies the message. To not fetch the messages, I presume that the mail client is getting back a 0 response from the LIST, which is just proxied. If you set the [globals]verbose option to True ('-o globals:verbose:True' on the command line should do, or in your bayescustomise), then you should get a _pop3proxy.log file created that logs the POP3 conversation. Could you do that and attach a copy here that covers a time when this happens? (Check the log for any confidential data; I can't remember what it does with username/passwords). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=958506&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri May 28 06:45:22 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri May 28 06:45:32 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-962138 ] Error initializing: failed to load bayes database Message-ID: Bugs item #962138, was opened at 2004-05-28 10:45 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=962138&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Raf (rafkinnaer) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Error initializing: failed to load bayes database Initial Comment: Running Win2000 SP4 fully patched, Outlook 2000 SP3. After installing the binary and starting Outlook, I get an error message : "There was an error initializing the Spam plugin. Spam filtering has been disabled. Please re-configure and re- enable this plugin. Error details:Failed to load bayes database. I tried rebooting and restarting Outlook (Spambayes is the only add-in) to no avail. The included spambayeslog1 reports a DBFileExistsError. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=962138&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri May 28 10:45:34 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri May 28 10:45:53 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-962249 ] Would love to see action on this Message-ID: Feature Requests item #962249, was opened at 2004-05-28 09:45 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=962249&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Keegan Staker (kstaker) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Would love to see action on this Initial Comment: Until now i was unaware that this really is not functional for non-technical users with IMAP boxes. I've pushed this program to everyone I know, but am now realizing that if a user is using an IMAP box, and clicks on "recover from spam" in his suspects folder, that message will not return to its normal inbox. This is very troublesome and I'd love to see progress on this. I am only watching one inbox. it would be nice if messages returned to that particular inbox when "Recover from Spam" was clicked. Keegan ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=962249&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri May 28 10:46:01 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri May 28 10:46:07 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-962249 ] Would love to see action on this Message-ID: Feature Requests item #962249, was opened at 2004-05-28 09:45 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by kstaker You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=962249&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Deleted Priority: 5 Submitted By: Keegan Staker (kstaker) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Would love to see action on this Initial Comment: Until now i was unaware that this really is not functional for non-technical users with IMAP boxes. I've pushed this program to everyone I know, but am now realizing that if a user is using an IMAP box, and clicks on "recover from spam" in his suspects folder, that message will not return to its normal inbox. This is very troublesome and I'd love to see progress on this. I am only watching one inbox. it would be nice if messages returned to that particular inbox when "Recover from Spam" was clicked. Keegan ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=962249&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri May 28 10:48:29 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri May 28 10:48:56 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-786212 ] Recover from Spam moves email back to wrong inbox folder Message-ID: Bugs item #786212, was opened at 2003-08-10 06:08 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kstaker You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=786212&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Philipp Gruenig (otomi) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Recover from Spam moves email back to wrong inbox folder Initial Comment: Hi In my OutlookXP the function "Recover from Spam" from within my Unsure Imap-Folder moves the mail back to the wrong Inbox(POP3) Folder. I have 2 mail accounts in Outlook. One Imap Inbox Folder and one Pop3 Inbox Folder under Personal Folders. Spambayes runs only for the imap-account. Filter is configured only for the imap-Inbox. Unsure and Spam Folders are on the Imap. The "Recover from Spam" should move the mails back to the Imap-Inbox but instead it moves them to the Pop3-Inbox under Personal Folders. Spambayes Version is Outlook Addin Binary version 0.7 Regards ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Keegan Staker (kstaker) Date: 2004-05-28 09:48 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1051943 Until now i was unaware that this really is not functional for non-technical users with IMAP boxes. I've pushed this program to everyone I know, but am now realizing that if a user is using an IMAP box, and clicks on "recover from spam" in his suspects folder, that message will not return to its normal inbox. This is very troublesome and I'd love to see progress on this. I am only watching one inbox. it would be nice if messages returned to that particular inbox when "Recover from Spam" was clicked instead of his Personal Folders inbox. Thanks, Keegan ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jose Gutirrez (image57) Date: 2003-10-29 14:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=686578 i think the key here is the following line in my log: Unable to determine source folder for message 'comments...' - restoring to Inbox Recovering to folder 'Inbox' and ham training message 'comments...' - Training on message 'comments...' - trained as good ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-16 00:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Opps. Think, Tony, think! I recovered a message that hadn't been scored before it was 'deleted as spam', so I presume that is why. Still, it would probably be a good idea to save the info for messages that don't have it, when deleting as spam. (I think maybe another tracker has this request). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-16 00:43 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I can repro this with my spam folder in a pst and the other folders on Exchange. Never noticed before, since I usually only filter the Inbox. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-07 21:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I can't repro this, for either hotmail, imap or pop test accounts. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-08-25 18:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Thanks, but unfortunately the log doesn't have what I thought it did. However, I am guessing the problem is that we can't save properties on the IMAP message. I have just opened another bug https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=794992&group_id=61702&atid=498103, which when fixed should also solve this. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Philipp Gruenig (otomi) Date: 2003-08-25 08:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=841583 This is a commonly reported bug that unfortunately we don't know how to fix at this stage. If you follow the "troubleshooting guide" - installed with SpamBayes, but also online at http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/spambayes/spambayes/Outlook2000/docs/troubleshooting.html. You will find instructions for resetting the toolbars, which generally fixes all toolbar related issues. If it doesn't, please reopen this bug giving further details. We hope to have this working better in future versions, so if it continues to give you trouble, please subscribe to the spambayes-announce list - http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes-announce. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-08-25 01:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Could you please attach a log for a session where you tried this (and set the status back to Open)? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=786212&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri May 28 11:52:32 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri May 28 11:52:40 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-962291 ] Server connexion refused Message-ID: Bugs item #962291, was opened at 2004-05-28 17:52 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=962291&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: LesHauSsebons (leshaussebons) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Server connexion refused Initial Comment: Used 9 version since today, installed the 1.0 release candidate, with same settings. Now when I try to connect to the spambayes server ( local ) , it returns me a "connexion refused" message, for any of the pop account proxies I have setted ( nothing changes on the client computers ) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=962291&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri May 28 11:56:43 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri May 28 11:56:48 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-962291 ] WinXP / Server connexion refused Message-ID: Bugs item #962291, was opened at 2004-05-28 17:52 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by leshaussebons You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=962291&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: LesHauSsebons (leshaussebons) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) >Summary: WinXP / Server connexion refused Initial Comment: Used 9 version since today, installed the 1.0 release candidate, with same settings. Now when I try to connect to the spambayes server ( local ) , it returns me a "connexion refused" message, for any of the pop account proxies I have setted ( nothing changes on the client computers ) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=962291&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri May 28 16:19:39 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri May 28 16:19:55 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-962429 ] Cannot monitor inboxes Message-ID: Bugs item #962429, was opened at 2004-05-28 13:19 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=962429&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: PeteForsyth (peteforsyth) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Cannot monitor inboxes Initial Comment: Not sure whether this is related to bugs previously reported. Under Outlook 2000, using an Exchange 5.5 server, I have an exchange profile that monitors its own mailbox, and is also set to monitor several shared mailboxes on the exchange server. Using spambayes 1.0a9, I set Spambayes to monitor the Inboxes in each of the email boxes. It did not appear to work with the additional mailboxes (although it works fine with the user's own mailbox.) I upgraded to spambayes 1.0rc1, and now the problem becomes more clear: when I go to set what boxes it monitors, and check off any inbox BESIDES the user's own inbox, I get an error message (and the check mark doesn't "stick"): "Please select a child folder; top-level folders cannot be used." However, I believe this IS a child folder- I am choosing the "Inbox", not the name of the mailbox that appears above it in the hierarchy. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=962429&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat May 29 03:14:40 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat May 29 03:14:47 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-958506 ] Fetching mail not always happens Message-ID: Bugs item #958506, was opened at 2004-05-22 15:47 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by be037446 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=958506&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jos (be037446) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Fetching mail not always happens Initial Comment: I'm using the Opera 7.50 mail client in combination with the Spambayes proxy. I notice that Opera is not always fetching e-mails although there are e-mails waiting at my ISP. I have 4 account divided over 2 ISP and it happens with all 4 of them but never together. It's a very irregular pattern. When I change the e-mail configuration to fetch e-mails directly from the ISP instead of passing the proxy, there is no problem at all. So, I assume there is a problem with the Spambayes proxy. I also tried the Mozilla e-mail client Thunderbird and I have the same problems there. So, it isn't related to Opera alone. Before that, I always used the Outlook plug-in and never had a problem. Any ideas ? Kind regards, Jos. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Jos (be037446) Date: 2004-05-29 09:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1047380 No, as I want to use Opera to be my primary mail client, I don't leave the messages on the server. But I have the same problem with the Mozilla e-mail client which is configured to leave the messages on the server. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-05-27 21:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Do you have Opera configured to leave messages on the server? I'm only so-so at reading POP3 logs, especially with the two accounts intermixed, but this is what it looks like to me: 1. successful log in to acct be35926 2. stat command reports 14 total messages 3. mail client downloads the list of identifiers for the 14 messages 4. client assumedly determines that all of the listed identifiers have been previously downloaded so it doesn't download them again ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jos (be037446) Date: 2004-05-27 19:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1047380 See the attach file. There are indeed messages waiting but they aren't fetched. It's funny but it always happens with the same accounts. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-26 01:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 It would be very odd if this was the proxy - all it does is proxy (i.e. directly pass the commands through), unless it's doing a RETR (or sometimes TOP) command, when it classifies the message. To not fetch the messages, I presume that the mail client is getting back a 0 response from the LIST, which is just proxied. If you set the [globals]verbose option to True ('-o globals:verbose:True' on the command line should do, or in your bayescustomise), then you should get a _pop3proxy.log file created that logs the POP3 conversation. Could you do that and attach a copy here that covers a time when this happens? (Check the log for any confidential data; I can't remember what it does with username/passwords). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=958506&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat May 29 07:06:13 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat May 29 07:06:19 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-962693 ] mozilla/thunderbird/netscape profile dir detection Message-ID: Patches item #962693, was opened at 2004-05-29 21:06 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=962693&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: alch (alch) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: mozilla/thunderbird/netscape profile dir detection Initial Comment: Hi, Fistly thanks a lot for you excellent project. It serves me as a reference in development of Clamwin Antivirus (clamwin.net). As I started to implement POP3 proxy for virus scanning, obviously I decided to adapt code from spambayes. I was able to improve Mozilla/Thinderbird/Netscape mail client detection and developed a scrip (MozRegistry.py) that parses Mozilla's registry.dat and finds the default profile location. Also there were some minor bugs in autoconfigure.py regarding Outlook Express SMTP port (not always present) and Mozilla's spam folders. I attach a zip farchive with the patch and MozRegistry.py script. It hasn't been thoroughly tested yet, but I thought you may find it useful before the 1.0 release. Regards, Alch ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=962693&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat May 29 17:09:47 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat May 29 17:10:06 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-962911 ] Outlook Mail Folders Font Size Message-ID: Bugs item #962911, was opened at 2004-05-29 23:09 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=962911&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Stefan Goebel (stgoebel) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook Mail Folders Font Size Initial Comment: After starting Outlook the first click on any SpamBayes toolbar icon (either Delete As Spam or Recover From Spam) decreases the font size of the mail folders in the navigation pane, other fonts sizes are not affected. The font size will be normal after restarting Outlook. I'm using Outlook 2003 on Win XP Pro. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=962911&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun May 30 09:57:34 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun May 30 09:57:37 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-963134 ] sb_mboxtrain.py fails to output some messages Message-ID: Bugs item #963134, was opened at 2004-05-30 08:57 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=963134&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: Source code 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Doug Hellmann (doughellmann) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: sb_mboxtrain.py fails to output some messages Initial Comment: Apparently some messages which can be processed by sb_mboxtrain.py cannot be converted back to text to be written to the output file. An example traceback is: Training spam (/path/to/mailbox): Reading as Unix mbox 270Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/local/bin/sb_mboxtrain.py", line 315, in ? main() File "/usr/local/bin/sb_mboxtrain.py", line 306, in main train(h, s, True, force, trainnew, removetrained) File "/usr/local/bin/sb_mboxtrain.py", line 230, in train mbox_train(h, path, is_spam, force) File "/usr/local/bin/sb_mboxtrain.py", line 162, in mbox_train outf.write(msg.as_string(True)) File "/usr/local/lib/python2.3/email/Message.py", line 130, in as_string g.flatten(self, unixfrom=unixfrom) File "/usr/local/lib/python2.3/email/Generator.py", line 102, in flatten self._write(msg) File "/usr/local/lib/python2.3/email/Generator.py", line 130, in _write self._dispatch(msg) File "/usr/local/lib/python2.3/email/Generator.py", line 156, in _dispatch meth(msg) File "/usr/local/lib/python2.3/email/Generator.py", line 199, in _handle_text raise TypeError, 'string payload expected: %s' % type(payload) TypeError: string payload expected: See attached for an mbox will several sample messages that produce this problem and a (overly) simple patch to sb_mboxtrain.py that at least works around the problem. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=963134&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun May 30 10:05:50 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun May 30 10:06:09 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-963136 ] Outlook.exe process not terminated Message-ID: Bugs item #963136, was opened at 2004-05-30 16:05 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=963136&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Steve Shultz (shultz) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook.exe process not terminated Initial Comment: After installing Spambayes 1.0rc1, I noticed I couldn't delete some Spambayes log files in my temp folder. I opened the task manager and saw 4 (four) "Outlook.exe" processes idling (but reserving memory) in the list. Terminating those processes freed the log files and allowed me to delete them safely. It seems I can open Oulook 2003 infinite times, everything works perfectly and Spamnayes IS doing its work, but when I close Outlook, the process still remains active and uses up my RAM. Eventually, after an afternoon of work, WinXP told me I had not enough memory to continue working (1 Gb RAM installed...). Please solve this one, or I have to leave the project for something less memory-hungry!!! :((( ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=963136&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun May 30 15:10:29 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun May 30 15:10:42 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-963136 ] Outlook.exe process not terminated Message-ID: Bugs item #963136, was opened at 2004-05-30 10:05 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by tim_one You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=963136&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Steve Shultz (shultz) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook.exe process not terminated Initial Comment: After installing Spambayes 1.0rc1, I noticed I couldn't delete some Spambayes log files in my temp folder. I opened the task manager and saw 4 (four) "Outlook.exe" processes idling (but reserving memory) in the list. Terminating those processes freed the log files and allowed me to delete them safely. It seems I can open Oulook 2003 infinite times, everything works perfectly and Spamnayes IS doing its work, but when I close Outlook, the process still remains active and uses up my RAM. Eventually, after an afternoon of work, WinXP told me I had not enough memory to continue working (1 Gb RAM installed...). Please solve this one, or I have to leave the project for something less memory-hungry!!! :((( ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2004-05-30 15:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 Sorry, I doubt this has anything to do with SpamBayes. All installations of Outlook I've used, on all flavors of Windows, have a habit of not shutting down completely from time to time, and regardless of whether SpamBayes is installed. Many people have reported the same. In fact, do some googling and you'll find lots of reports of this, along with superstitious advice; e.g., http://www2.sunysuffolk.edu/mandias/tips/outlook_trouble.ht ml My brand new OL2003 on my brand new WinXP Pro SP1 box failed to shut down the first time I brought it up, and that happened many additional times in the week before I installed SpamBayes on this box. It still doesn't shut down sometimes, but I can't predict when it will or won't, and it doesn't seem to be any more or less frequent than before I installed SB. Likewise for Outlook crashes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=963136&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun May 30 18:37:43 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun May 30 18:38:02 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-963136 ] Outlook.exe process not terminated Message-ID: Bugs item #963136, was opened at 2004-05-30 16:05 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by shultz You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=963136&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Steve Shultz (shultz) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook.exe process not terminated Initial Comment: After installing Spambayes 1.0rc1, I noticed I couldn't delete some Spambayes log files in my temp folder. I opened the task manager and saw 4 (four) "Outlook.exe" processes idling (but reserving memory) in the list. Terminating those processes freed the log files and allowed me to delete them safely. It seems I can open Oulook 2003 infinite times, everything works perfectly and Spamnayes IS doing its work, but when I close Outlook, the process still remains active and uses up my RAM. Eventually, after an afternoon of work, WinXP told me I had not enough memory to continue working (1 Gb RAM installed...). Please solve this one, or I have to leave the project for something less memory-hungry!!! :((( ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Steve Shultz (shultz) Date: 2004-05-31 00:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=706922 I'm sorry Tim, but I never experienced this strange behaviour in Outlook 2003 before installing Spambayes, so you must be wrong: it's Spambayes related. ;) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2004-05-30 21:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 Sorry, I doubt this has anything to do with SpamBayes. All installations of Outlook I've used, on all flavors of Windows, have a habit of not shutting down completely from time to time, and regardless of whether SpamBayes is installed. Many people have reported the same. In fact, do some googling and you'll find lots of reports of this, along with superstitious advice; e.g., http://www2.sunysuffolk.edu/mandias/tips/outlook_trouble.ht ml My brand new OL2003 on my brand new WinXP Pro SP1 box failed to shut down the first time I brought it up, and that happened many additional times in the week before I installed SpamBayes on this box. It still doesn't shut down sometimes, but I can't predict when it will or won't, and it doesn't seem to be any more or less frequent than before I installed SB. Likewise for Outlook crashes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=963136&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun May 30 19:24:37 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun May 30 19:24:44 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-962429 ] Cannot monitor inboxes Message-ID: Bugs item #962429, was opened at 2004-05-29 08:19 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=962429&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: PeteForsyth (peteforsyth) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Cannot monitor inboxes Initial Comment: Not sure whether this is related to bugs previously reported. Under Outlook 2000, using an Exchange 5.5 server, I have an exchange profile that monitors its own mailbox, and is also set to monitor several shared mailboxes on the exchange server. Using spambayes 1.0a9, I set Spambayes to monitor the Inboxes in each of the email boxes. It did not appear to work with the additional mailboxes (although it works fine with the user's own mailbox.) I upgraded to spambayes 1.0rc1, and now the problem becomes more clear: when I go to set what boxes it monitors, and check off any inbox BESIDES the user's own inbox, I get an error message (and the check mark doesn't "stick"): "Please select a child folder; top-level folders cannot be used." However, I believe this IS a child folder- I am choosing the "Inbox", not the name of the mailbox that appears above it in the hierarchy. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-31 11:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Thanks for your report. This bug has previously been reported, and has already been fixed in the source-code - so you can expect to see the fix in the next binary release. You may wish to subscribe to the spambayes-announce list to see when each version is released - details at http://mail.python.org/mailman-21/listinfo/spambayes-announce If you are technically minded, you may like to run from the CVS version of the source-code, and you should find the fix immediately - see the main SpamBayes pages for details. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=962429&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun May 30 19:27:24 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun May 30 19:27:30 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-963134 ] sb_mboxtrain.py fails to output some messages Message-ID: Bugs item #963134, was opened at 2004-05-31 01:57 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=963134&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: Source code 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Doug Hellmann (doughellmann) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: sb_mboxtrain.py fails to output some messages Initial Comment: Apparently some messages which can be processed by sb_mboxtrain.py cannot be converted back to text to be written to the output file. An example traceback is: Training spam (/path/to/mailbox): Reading as Unix mbox 270Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/local/bin/sb_mboxtrain.py", line 315, in ? main() File "/usr/local/bin/sb_mboxtrain.py", line 306, in main train(h, s, True, force, trainnew, removetrained) File "/usr/local/bin/sb_mboxtrain.py", line 230, in train mbox_train(h, path, is_spam, force) File "/usr/local/bin/sb_mboxtrain.py", line 162, in mbox_train outf.write(msg.as_string(True)) File "/usr/local/lib/python2.3/email/Message.py", line 130, in as_string g.flatten(self, unixfrom=unixfrom) File "/usr/local/lib/python2.3/email/Generator.py", line 102, in flatten self._write(msg) File "/usr/local/lib/python2.3/email/Generator.py", line 130, in _write self._dispatch(msg) File "/usr/local/lib/python2.3/email/Generator.py", line 156, in _dispatch meth(msg) File "/usr/local/lib/python2.3/email/Generator.py", line 199, in _handle_text raise TypeError, 'string payload expected: %s' % type(payload) TypeError: string payload expected: See attached for an mbox will several sample messages that produce this problem and a (overly) simple patch to sb_mboxtrain.py that at least works around the problem. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-31 11:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This particular problem (the one that raises TypeError) is handled by mboxtrain in cvs, so will not be a problem from the next release. Longer term, the Python email package 2.5 (in Python 2.4) is much better at handling malformed messges, so that will solve a lot of these problems (assuming that you can move to that, or that we bundle the necessary bit). What mboxtrain actually does when it fails is another issue, though, which I'm not at all qualified to decide. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=963134&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun May 30 19:32:03 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun May 30 19:32:10 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-963136 ] Outlook.exe process not terminated Message-ID: Bugs item #963136, was opened at 2004-05-30 10:05 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by tim_one You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=963136&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Steve Shultz (shultz) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook.exe process not terminated Initial Comment: After installing Spambayes 1.0rc1, I noticed I couldn't delete some Spambayes log files in my temp folder. I opened the task manager and saw 4 (four) "Outlook.exe" processes idling (but reserving memory) in the list. Terminating those processes freed the log files and allowed me to delete them safely. It seems I can open Oulook 2003 infinite times, everything works perfectly and Spamnayes IS doing its work, but when I close Outlook, the process still remains active and uses up my RAM. Eventually, after an afternoon of work, WinXP told me I had not enough memory to continue working (1 Gb RAM installed...). Please solve this one, or I have to leave the project for something less memory-hungry!!! :((( ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2004-05-30 19:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 Well, you wouldn't know it unless you *looked* for it. Depending on how much training you've done and msgs you've scored, Outlook may require a lot more memory when SpamBayes is installed. So you can leave a lot more wedged non-SpamBayes stale Outlooks around than you can leave wedged with-SpamBayes stale Outlooks around. Just for fun, uninstall SpamBayes and pay attention to Task Manager for a week. If you never see Outlook sticking around then, that would indeed implicate SpamBayes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Steve Shultz (shultz) Date: 2004-05-30 18:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=706922 I'm sorry Tim, but I never experienced this strange behaviour in Outlook 2003 before installing Spambayes, so you must be wrong: it's Spambayes related. ;) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2004-05-30 15:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 Sorry, I doubt this has anything to do with SpamBayes. All installations of Outlook I've used, on all flavors of Windows, have a habit of not shutting down completely from time to time, and regardless of whether SpamBayes is installed. Many people have reported the same. In fact, do some googling and you'll find lots of reports of this, along with superstitious advice; e.g., http://www2.sunysuffolk.edu/mandias/tips/outlook_trouble.ht ml My brand new OL2003 on my brand new WinXP Pro SP1 box failed to shut down the first time I brought it up, and that happened many additional times in the week before I installed SpamBayes on this box. It still doesn't shut down sometimes, but I can't predict when it will or won't, and it doesn't seem to be any more or less frequent than before I installed SB. Likewise for Outlook crashes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=963136&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun May 30 20:25:06 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun May 30 20:25:19 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-963136 ] Outlook.exe process not terminated Message-ID: Bugs item #963136, was opened at 2004-05-30 16:05 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by shultz You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=963136&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Steve Shultz (shultz) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook.exe process not terminated Initial Comment: After installing Spambayes 1.0rc1, I noticed I couldn't delete some Spambayes log files in my temp folder. I opened the task manager and saw 4 (four) "Outlook.exe" processes idling (but reserving memory) in the list. Terminating those processes freed the log files and allowed me to delete them safely. It seems I can open Oulook 2003 infinite times, everything works perfectly and Spamnayes IS doing its work, but when I close Outlook, the process still remains active and uses up my RAM. Eventually, after an afternoon of work, WinXP told me I had not enough memory to continue working (1 Gb RAM installed...). Please solve this one, or I have to leave the project for something less memory-hungry!!! :((( ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Steve Shultz (shultz) Date: 2004-05-31 02:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=706922 It seems Outlook was to be blamed for this strange behaviour, you were right! After following the first step in the page you linked, the problem disappeared... Weird, but If I uninstall then reinstall Spambayes, the problem is back... renaming those .dat files eliminates the problem again. Maybe Spambayes modifies some of those files incorrectly when installed? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2004-05-31 01:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 Well, you wouldn't know it unless you *looked* for it. Depending on how much training you've done and msgs you've scored, Outlook may require a lot more memory when SpamBayes is installed. So you can leave a lot more wedged non-SpamBayes stale Outlooks around than you can leave wedged with-SpamBayes stale Outlooks around. Just for fun, uninstall SpamBayes and pay attention to Task Manager for a week. If you never see Outlook sticking around then, that would indeed implicate SpamBayes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Steve Shultz (shultz) Date: 2004-05-31 00:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=706922 I'm sorry Tim, but I never experienced this strange behaviour in Outlook 2003 before installing Spambayes, so you must be wrong: it's Spambayes related. ;) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2004-05-30 21:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 Sorry, I doubt this has anything to do with SpamBayes. All installations of Outlook I've used, on all flavors of Windows, have a habit of not shutting down completely from time to time, and regardless of whether SpamBayes is installed. Many people have reported the same. In fact, do some googling and you'll find lots of reports of this, along with superstitious advice; e.g., http://www2.sunysuffolk.edu/mandias/tips/outlook_trouble.ht ml My brand new OL2003 on my brand new WinXP Pro SP1 box failed to shut down the first time I brought it up, and that happened many additional times in the week before I installed SpamBayes on this box. It still doesn't shut down sometimes, but I can't predict when it will or won't, and it doesn't seem to be any more or less frequent than before I installed SB. Likewise for Outlook crashes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=963136&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun May 30 21:17:53 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun May 30 21:18:07 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-963136 ] Outlook.exe process not terminated Message-ID: Bugs item #963136, was opened at 2004-05-30 10:05 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by tim_one You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=963136&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Steve Shultz (shultz) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook.exe process not terminated Initial Comment: After installing Spambayes 1.0rc1, I noticed I couldn't delete some Spambayes log files in my temp folder. I opened the task manager and saw 4 (four) "Outlook.exe" processes idling (but reserving memory) in the list. Terminating those processes freed the log files and allowed me to delete them safely. It seems I can open Oulook 2003 infinite times, everything works perfectly and Spamnayes IS doing its work, but when I close Outlook, the process still remains active and uses up my RAM. Eventually, after an afternoon of work, WinXP told me I had not enough memory to continue working (1 Gb RAM installed...). Please solve this one, or I have to leave the project for something less memory-hungry!!! :((( ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2004-05-30 21:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 I wouldn't believe it unless you tried it 20 times in a row with the same outcomes each time. I've been puzzling over Outlook shutdown hangs for (literally) years, and as I said before, I still can't predict them. We never write to Outlook's .dat files, neither at installation time nor any other time. Outlook writes those itself. Alas, because the source code for Outlook is secret, we don't know what's in those files, or why, or how Outlook manages to corrupt them. Well, I know what's in extend.dat: it's a copy of registry entries related to Outlook. Why Outlook writes them into a little file instead of looking up values in the registry is beyond me, though. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Steve Shultz (shultz) Date: 2004-05-30 20:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=706922 It seems Outlook was to be blamed for this strange behaviour, you were right! After following the first step in the page you linked, the problem disappeared... Weird, but If I uninstall then reinstall Spambayes, the problem is back... renaming those .dat files eliminates the problem again. Maybe Spambayes modifies some of those files incorrectly when installed? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2004-05-30 19:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 Well, you wouldn't know it unless you *looked* for it. Depending on how much training you've done and msgs you've scored, Outlook may require a lot more memory when SpamBayes is installed. So you can leave a lot more wedged non-SpamBayes stale Outlooks around than you can leave wedged with-SpamBayes stale Outlooks around. Just for fun, uninstall SpamBayes and pay attention to Task Manager for a week. If you never see Outlook sticking around then, that would indeed implicate SpamBayes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Steve Shultz (shultz) Date: 2004-05-30 18:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=706922 I'm sorry Tim, but I never experienced this strange behaviour in Outlook 2003 before installing Spambayes, so you must be wrong: it's Spambayes related. ;) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2004-05-30 15:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 Sorry, I doubt this has anything to do with SpamBayes. All installations of Outlook I've used, on all flavors of Windows, have a habit of not shutting down completely from time to time, and regardless of whether SpamBayes is installed. Many people have reported the same. In fact, do some googling and you'll find lots of reports of this, along with superstitious advice; e.g., http://www2.sunysuffolk.edu/mandias/tips/outlook_trouble.ht ml My brand new OL2003 on my brand new WinXP Pro SP1 box failed to shut down the first time I brought it up, and that happened many additional times in the week before I installed SpamBayes on this box. It still doesn't shut down sometimes, but I can't predict when it will or won't, and it doesn't seem to be any more or less frequent than before I installed SB. Likewise for Outlook crashes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=963136&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon May 31 19:15:34 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon May 31 19:15:40 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-962693 ] mozilla/thunderbird/netscape profile dir detection Message-ID: Patches item #962693, was opened at 2004-05-29 23:06 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=962693&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: alch (alch) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: mozilla/thunderbird/netscape profile dir detection Initial Comment: Hi, Fistly thanks a lot for you excellent project. It serves me as a reference in development of Clamwin Antivirus (clamwin.net). As I started to implement POP3 proxy for virus scanning, obviously I decided to adapt code from spambayes. I was able to improve Mozilla/Thinderbird/Netscape mail client detection and developed a scrip (MozRegistry.py) that parses Mozilla's registry.dat and finds the default profile location. Also there were some minor bugs in autoconfigure.py regarding Outlook Express SMTP port (not always present) and Mozilla's spam folders. I attach a zip farchive with the patch and MozRegistry.py script. It hasn't been thoroughly tested yet, but I thought you may find it useful before the 1.0 release. Regards, Alch ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-06-01 11:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Thanks! I've checked in the fixes, although the the improved Mozilla (etc) stuff. Since MozRegistry.py is GPL'd, I don't think that we can include it with the SpamBayes dist (of course, IANAL). Thanks for the offer, though. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=962693&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon May 31 19:26:10 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon May 31 19:26:17 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-958506 ] Fetching mail not always happens Message-ID: Bugs item #958506, was opened at 2004-05-23 01:47 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=958506&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jos (be037446) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Fetching mail not always happens Initial Comment: I'm using the Opera 7.50 mail client in combination with the Spambayes proxy. I notice that Opera is not always fetching e-mails although there are e-mails waiting at my ISP. I have 4 account divided over 2 ISP and it happens with all 4 of them but never together. It's a very irregular pattern. When I change the e-mail configuration to fetch e-mails directly from the ISP instead of passing the proxy, there is no problem at all. So, I assume there is a problem with the Spambayes proxy. I also tried the Mozilla e-mail client Thunderbird and I have the same problems there. So, it isn't related to Opera alone. Before that, I always used the Outlook plug-in and never had a problem. Any ideas ? Kind regards, Jos. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-06-01 11:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Yes, it is hard to read with the two accounts (three at the top) intermixed. It definately does see that there are 14/3 messages, and gets the uidl for each. Then the log ends with two "REPR 1" commands (I presume one for each account). The log should then have the REPR responses (the whole body of the message, but the octet count), which it doesn't. I'm not sure why the log stops, though - I can't see how it would stop without some error occuring. Do you get any error in the log? Or any error in Opera? (like a timeout, or something?) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jos (be037446) Date: 2004-05-29 19:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1047380 No, as I want to use Opera to be my primary mail client, I don't leave the messages on the server. But I have the same problem with the Mozilla e-mail client which is configured to leave the messages on the server. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-05-28 07:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Do you have Opera configured to leave messages on the server? I'm only so-so at reading POP3 logs, especially with the two accounts intermixed, but this is what it looks like to me: 1. successful log in to acct be35926 2. stat command reports 14 total messages 3. mail client downloads the list of identifiers for the 14 messages 4. client assumedly determines that all of the listed identifiers have been previously downloaded so it doesn't download them again ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jos (be037446) Date: 2004-05-28 05:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1047380 See the attach file. There are indeed messages waiting but they aren't fetched. It's funny but it always happens with the same accounts. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-26 11:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 It would be very odd if this was the proxy - all it does is proxy (i.e. directly pass the commands through), unless it's doing a RETR (or sometimes TOP) command, when it classifies the message. To not fetch the messages, I presume that the mail client is getting back a 0 response from the LIST, which is just proxied. If you set the [globals]verbose option to True ('-o globals:verbose:True' on the command line should do, or in your bayescustomise), then you should get a _pop3proxy.log file created that logs the POP3 conversation. Could you do that and attach a copy here that covers a time when this happens? (Check the log for any confidential data; I can't remember what it does with username/passwords). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=958506&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon May 31 19:28:07 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon May 31 19:28:12 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-962291 ] WinXP / Server connexion refused Message-ID: Bugs item #962291, was opened at 2004-05-29 03:52 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=962291&group_id=61702 >Category: pop3proxy >Group: Binary 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: LesHauSsebons (leshaussebons) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: WinXP / Server connexion refused Initial Comment: Used 9 version since today, installed the 1.0 release candidate, with same settings. Now when I try to connect to the spambayes server ( local ) , it returns me a "connexion refused" message, for any of the pop account proxies I have setted ( nothing changes on the client computers ) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-06-01 11:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 If you open the configuration page, does it still have the server values there? Could you attach your log file to this tracker? The troubleshooting guide explains where to find that. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=962291&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon May 31 19:32:28 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon May 31 19:36:19 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-962138 ] Error initializing: failed to load bayes database Message-ID: Bugs item #962138, was opened at 2004-05-28 22:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=962138&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Raf (rafkinnaer) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Error initializing: failed to load bayes database Initial Comment: Running Win2000 SP4 fully patched, Outlook 2000 SP3. After installing the binary and starting Outlook, I get an error message : "There was an error initializing the Spam plugin. Spam filtering has been disabled. Please re-configure and re- enable this plugin. Error details:Failed to load bayes database. I tried rebooting and restarting Outlook (Spambayes is the only add-in) to no avail. The included spambayeslog1 reports a DBFileExistsError. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-06-01 11:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Does the file actually exist? It would be called "default_bayes_database.db" and be in your data directory - with Win2K this is something like C:\Documents and Settings\{username}\Application Data\SpamBayes, IIRC. Either way it's very odd - either bsddb is saying it exists when it doesn't, or the attempt to delete it is silently failing. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=962138&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon May 31 19:37:33 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon May 31 19:37:39 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-961713 ] server error when trying to change Statistics Options Message-ID: Bugs item #961713, was opened at 2004-05-28 05:30 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=961713&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Binary 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: psage (psage) >Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: server error when trying to change Statistics Options Initial Comment: Attempting to change the Ham cutoff or Spam cutoff statistic options and pressing Save produces the following error on this version and on the previous version of Spambayes proxy for Windows: 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "spambayes\Dibbler.pyc", line 461, in found_terminator File "spambayes\UserInterface.pyc", line 770, in onChangeopts File "spambayes\ProxyUI.pyc", line 731, in verifyInput File "spambayes\UserInterface.pyc", line 862, in verifyInput File "spambayes\OptionsClass.pyc", line 585, in convert File "spambayes\OptionsClass.pyc", line 266, in convert AttributeError: 'tuple' object has no attribute 'split' ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-06-01 11:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I can't duplicate this, whatever options I try. There is a problem, though, because this AttributeError has been reported by several people. My only explanation is that it's caused by an old value in configuration files, but I don't know which one it would be. Would you mind attaching your config file to this tracker? Cut out or XXX the servers if you like. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=961713&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon May 31 19:41:33 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon May 31 19:41:37 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-917107 ] Extra train buttons on review page Message-ID: Feature Requests item #917107, was opened at 2004-03-16 18:57 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=917107&group_id=61702 Category: Interface Improvements (example) Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Extra train buttons on review page Initial Comment: >From personal email: """ I've finally installed the latest SpamBayes version, and the change of ordering is a big help. However, one more suggestion: there should be a "train" button under all three sections, not just at the bottom. Thus it's not necessary to scroll all the way down after looking at just the unsure or ham messages. """ I agree with this, so if someone wants to get around to adding the extra buttons, that would be cool :) I'm not sure if it's just adding the extra html, since maybe the dynamic creation of the page will throw things off (not sure at all). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-06-01 11:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I share your opinion about encouraging people to blindly train, and also the uncertainty about whether to just believe the customer is always right. There are lots of fancy things we could do so that it was only there if they enable an option, or after they've trained x messages or something, but those all feel pretty kludgy. I'm going to copy your excellent example of passing the buck and leave this open with the patch. For the moment, anyone that cares can run from source with the patch. If there are more requests for this over the next few months, then maybe I'll apply it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Date: 2004-05-27 08:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=85414 I think it's a bad idea to encourage people to train without even looking at what they're training on. Mistakes will get reinforced without people's knowledge. But maybe the customer is always right; I don't know. Attached is a patch to add another train button at the top of the list. I don't want to commit it because I think it's bad UI design... Tony, you have a much better idea than I do about how people use the UI, so I'll leave it up to you (and anyone else with an opinion 8-) whether you commit it or not. copping-out-passing-the-buck-call-it-what-you-will-ly yrs, Richie ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-24 15:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Reopening, at least temporarily. Richie (if you're about), what about just one more "train" button, at the top of the page (above any messages)? This is requested every now and then, because lots of people just do the unsures and trust whatever default setting they have for ham/spam, so don't want to scroll down. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-24 15:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 See also: [ 955892 ] Train button should be on top ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-03-18 11:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Good point! I hadn't thought of that. There hasn't been a clamouring for this anyway, so I'll close it, and refer anyone that asks to the closed tracker :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Date: 2004-03-18 11:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=85414 Adding copies of the Train button would work, but FWIW I don't think it's a good idea. It's not obvious whether each button would submit the whole page, or just the section it was immediately underneath, or all the sections above it. Maybe changing the text could help, but if it says "Train all" or something then than only makes you wonder what the alternative is... then you end up adding "Train this section" buttons and the whole thing becomes overengineered. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=917107&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon May 31 19:46:43 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon May 31 19:46:58 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-957707 ] Mail items are NOT always filtered automatically Message-ID: Bugs item #957707, was opened at 2004-05-21 10:12 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=957707&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Source code 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Steven Tolkin (stolkin) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Mail items are NOT always filtered automatically Initial Comment: I have configured SpamBayes to run the Outlook Addin 1.0rc1 in background, with start delay of 2 seconds, and delay of either 1 or 0 seconds. (I tried both trying to solve the problem reported here.) When spam email arrives it sometimes, but not always, is filtered and then moved to my spamkeep or spam_maybe folders. Other times I have to manually invoke "filter messages" for something to happen. They have not been filtered, e.g. switching to another folder does not cause them to move. I think that once I have manually filtered in an Outlook session later emails will be filtered automatically. This behavior happened with my older (about 1 year old) SpamBayes. But now I notice the additional bad effect: if I archive a folder (e.g. my spamkeep folder -- I keep it in case I need to retrain) the messages are archived, but they do not *seem* to move until I click on another folder. This behavior is new, and undesirable. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-06-01 11:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Steven: could you attach a log file that covers a period with the first problem (the messages not filtering)? The messages not moving until they are deselected sounds similar to another reported problem, but, unfortunately, it's one that we're not sure what the cause of is, yet. huxley75: Any DBRunRecovery error means that the database is hosed, and the only way to fix that is to retrain from scratch. This is extremely rare with the plug-in, and we don't know why it happens in the remaining cases - any chance that Outlook crashed in the middle of training at some point? The timer values can't be zero - fixing the constraints is being dealt with in another tracker, IIRC. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Anthony Parcero (huxley75) Date: 2004-05-26 19:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=159242 I'm having a similar problem with my Outlook plugin, as well. I'm using Outlook 2K on WinXP and the problem just started cropping up (I've been running previous versions of SpamBayes without a hitch until I upgraded to v1.0b1, when I first noticed the issue). Looking at the SpamBayes log, I found: "Bayes database initialized with 779 spam and 1337 good messages *** - message database has 2095 messages - bayes has 2116 - something is screwey" in the log. I had noticed that SpamBayes wasn't adding new spam to its training database (I had gotten up to over 1000 spam in the Junk E-Mail folder but it never registered above 800 spam). There is also a "Folders/Junk Suspects - pythoncom error: Python error invoking COM method." error, "The timer is enabled, but one of the timer intervals values is zero You must set both intervals before the timer will enable", and a number of similar "'DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error, run database recovery -- fatal region error detected;" throughout the log file. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=957707&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon May 31 20:01:59 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon May 31 20:02:04 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-960610 ] URL checking in classifier.py fails (patch included) Message-ID: Bugs item #960610, was opened at 2004-05-26 19:17 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=960610&group_id=61702 Category: hammie Group: Source code 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Janne Sinkkonen (janne) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: URL checking in classifier.py fails (patch included) Initial Comment: The mistyped URL 'http:///www.pascal-network.org/' (I think) makes classifier.py to crash. I have the experimental URL checking options on. The attached patch cures the problem, although I think it would be better to change the URL parsing regexp. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-06-01 12:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 No patch attached! I also can't duplicate a crash with "http:///www.pascal-network.org/" - is it definately that? Which experimental URL options are you using? (There are three). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=960610&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon May 31 20:04:04 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon May 31 20:04:08 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-958500 ] Error when modifying configuration Message-ID: Bugs item #958500, was opened at 2004-05-23 01:29 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=958500&group_id=61702 >Category: pop3proxy Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: RAWright (rawright) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Error when modifying configuration Initial Comment: While trying to change the configuration to enable tagging headers with Spam or Ham annotations, the following error is returned: 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "spambayes\Dibbler.pyc", line 461, in found_terminator File "spambayes\UserInterface.pyc", line 770, in onChangeopts File "spambayes\ProxyUI.pyc", line 731, in verifyInput File "spambayes\UserInterface.pyc", line 862, in verifyInput File "spambayes\OptionsClass.pyc", line 585, in convert File "spambayes\OptionsClass.pyc", line 266, in convert AttributeError: 'tuple' object has no attribute 'split' This function was working perfectly until this morning. Last night I spent considerable time installing the latest security patches for Outlook Express 6 and Internet Explorer 6 (among other patches), and I suspect that something in these updates is interfering with the operation of SpamBayes. My OS is Win2K Server, SP4, in case that matters. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-06-01 12:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This has been reported by a few people, but I doubt it has anything to do with any of those updates. Annoyingly, I can't duplicate this - I suspect that it's the result of an old option value in the config file, which is no longer in the correct format, but I can't figure which one. Would you mind attaching your configuration file to this tracker? You can remove or XXX the server values. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=958500&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon May 31 20:08:59 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon May 31 20:09:04 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-958265 ] a problem with the SpamBayes configuration Message-ID: Bugs item #958265, was opened at 2004-05-22 09:17 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=958265&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Source code 1.0rc1 >Status: Closed Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Steven Tolkin (stolkin) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: a problem with the SpamBayes configuration Initial Comment: One time when I was first starting Outlook I got the message: There appears to be a problem with the SpamBayes configuration Please select the SpamBayes manager, and run the Configuration Wizard to reconfigure the filter. 1. Shouldn't the message also suggest: "Look in the log for more details." 2. What problem actually caused this message? Was it the fact that one of my timer values was zero? If this is invalid or bogus in some way, I think it should be prevented when I try to set it, rather than a day later when I restart outlook. If it is something else, please note that I had a few days earlier upgrades to 1.0rc1 from a year old version, and had not rebuilt the database. I have since rebuilt the database. If it is purely transient error, perhaps due to Outlook being busy, the message should suggest this, rather the rather time consuming "Configuration Wizard". Excerpt from the log: ****************************************** ******** The timer is enabled, but one of the timer intervals values is zero You must set both intervals before the timer will enable SpamBayes: Watching (for filtering) in 'Mailbox - Tolkin, Steve/_home' ****************************************** ******** The timer is enabled, but one of the timer intervals values is zero You must set both intervals before the timer will enable SpamBayes: Watching (for filtering) in 'Mailbox - Tolkin, Steve/Inbox' SpamBayes: Watching (for incremental training) in 'Mailbox - Tolkin, Steve/InboxMyMisc/spamkeep' Message '[ spambayes-Bugs-957707 ] Mail items are NOT always filtered automatically' in 'Mailbox - Tolkin, Steve/Inbox' had a Spam classification of 'No' FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (- 2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) The above toolbar message is common - recreating the toolbar... Error finding the MAPI folders for a folder switch event ERROR: 'There appears to be a problem with the SpamBayes configuration\r\n\r\nPlease select the SpamBayes manager, and run the\r\nConfiguration Wizard to reconfigure the filter.' Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.pyc", line 1087, in OnFolderSwitch File "msgstore.pyc", line 348, in GetFolder C:\Program Files\SpamBayes\lib\spambayes.zip\msgstore.py:126: FutureWarning: %u/%o/%x/%X of negative int will return a signed string in Python 2.4 and up MsgStoreException: MsgStoreException: Exception 0x80040115 (MAPI_E_NETWORK_ERROR): OLE error 0x80040115 ERROR: 'There appears to be a problem with the SpamBayes configuration\r\n\r\nPlease select the SpamBayes manager, and run the\r\nConfiguration Wizard to reconfigure the filter.' Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.pyc", line 1087, in OnFolderSwitch File "msgstore.pyc", line 348, in GetFolder MsgStoreException: MsgStoreException: Exception 0x80040115 (MAPI_E_NETWORK_ERROR): OLE error 0x80040115 Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.pyc", line 1087, in OnFolderSwitch File "msgstore.pyc", line 348, in GetFolder MsgStoreException: MsgStoreException: Exception 0x80040115 (MAPI_E_NETWORK_ERROR): OLE error 0x80040115 Ignoring OnCommand for 65535 GetNextPage with current 0 IDD_WIZARD_WELCOME Back button switching to page 0 Ignoring OnCommand for 65535 Ignoring OnCommand for 65535 Ignoring OnCommand for 65535 GetNextPage with current 0 IDD_WIZARD_WELCOME Cancelling wizard Saving configuration -> C:\Documents and Settings\A071046\Application Data\SpamBayes\Default Outlook Profile.ini ****************************************** ******** The timer is enabled, but one of the timer intervals values is zero You must set both intervals before the timer will enable SpamBayes: Watching (for filtering) in 'Mailbox - Tolkin, Steve/_home' ****************************************** ******** The timer is enabled, but one of the timer intervals values is zero You must set both intervals before the timer will enable ... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-06-01 12:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 1. Users aren't expected to be able to make any sense of the stuff in the log - it's really only to help us diagnose problems when people report them. If we referred people to them, we'd also have to explain what it all meant. 2. It would be nice to say what the exact problem was - the trouble is that this means coding in handlers for every possible problem. For some cases we do provide a more exact message - but if it's not in those, then you just get the generic message with the generic solution (which should fix any of the problems). For this particular case, the problem is with the timer values. Correctly constraining the values does need to be done - IIRC this is being handled in another tracker. Since the potential error will be handled there, we shouldn't need to create a new error message for this. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=958265&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon May 31 20:12:55 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon May 31 20:13:02 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-955758 ] Blocks Folder with ':' in the name Message-ID: Bugs item #955758, was opened at 2004-05-18 21:47 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=955758&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Martin Preishuber (preisl) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Blocks Folder with ':' in the name Initial Comment: I have one mailbox named ':Lastprognose VPL' (Note the colon at the beginning). After adding the Folder I get the message "Spam Bayes configuration broken" ... If I start outlook for the 2nd time, I don't get any error, but I can't access this mailbox. My own mailbox and a second mailbox work fine. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-06-01 12:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Is this an Exchange mailbox? If so, what sort of permissions do you have for the mailbox? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Martin Preishuber (preisl) Date: 2004-05-21 21:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=29575 My mistake, the first message is 'There appears to be a problem with the SpamBayes configuration\r\n\r\nPlease select the SpamBayes manager, and run the\r\nConfiguration Wizard to reconfigure the filter.' as seen in the log file ... I can access the mailbox after adding it. If I restart outlook, I can't access it any more. spambayes2.log is the log file which has been created during adding the mailbox, spambayes1.log is the one, when I tried to access it the second time. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-19 10:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 It's highly unlikely to be the same, because SpamBayes doesn't use the name at all - it uses Outlook's "entry id" and "store id" (big long numbers that uniquely identify the folder, basically). Certainly I can have a folder called ":Lastprognose VPL" and SpamBayes works fine filtering it (just checked). Could you attach your log file? It should have more information about what is going wrong. It's probably some trouble accessing that folder, for some other reason. The exact error message (nothing in spambayes prints out the word "broken") would help, too. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=955758&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon May 31 20:13:57 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon May 31 20:14:03 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-956834 ] Outlook crashes when accessing SpamBayes functions Message-ID: Bugs item #956834, was opened at 2004-05-20 04:16 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=956834&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Hans Otten (haotten) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook crashes when accessing SpamBayes functions Initial Comment: I have been using Spambayes for a while and when I upgraded to the 0.8 release everything worked fine until I highlighted an email that spambayes had not caught and clicked on the "Delete as Spam" button. Outlook crashed and I had to restart. Then I discovered if I try to access any SpamBayes function Outlook immediatly crashes. I just upgraded to rc1 and the same thing still occurs. Please note that the SpamBayes is still properly removing the spam. I have attached the log file, where I noticed several Eeek statements and the following error : only expecting one row from IPC.MS.REN.USERFIELDS ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-06-01 12:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 No log file attached. Could either of you attach the log file? (Don't forget to tick the wee box!). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Benjamin Curtis (bcurtis) Date: 2004-05-28 07:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=11944 I am also experiencing this problem. 1.0rc1 binary with Outlook 2003 using Exchange. It sorts out spam just fine, but if I click on the SpamBayes drop-down menu button from the toolbar Outlook crashes (every time). Great product otherwise! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=956834&group_id=61702