[Spambayes-checkins] spambayes/spambayes OptionConfig.py,1.5,1.6

Tim Stone - Four Stones Expressions tim at fourstonesExpressions.com
Mon Mar 10 18:08:54 EST 2003

3/10/2003 5:41:33 PM, "Meyer, Tony" <T.A.Meyer at massey.ac.nz> wrote:

>BTW, is there any reason that the options config page looks like it does?  It 
seems to me that if it could handle checkboxes and radio buttons for certain 
options that would be nicer than having string values of "True" and "False" 
and so on.  I can play around with this if it is a good idea.

Ya, I hate it the way it is, but it was easier to do it that way than to 
figure out Dibbler at the time... Radio buttons for true and false would be 
great, and also the help text should probably be a popup window or something.  
It just clutters up the screen as it is...

On another note, I think the spamprob should probably be a different header, 
rather than added to the spambayes classification header.  That would make it 
more consistent with hammie, which has a 'debug' header.

Also did you read the post on having a 10* bargraph for spamprob?  It's from 
Skip, see what you think about that.  Seems simple enough to do... but I'm not 
quite sure I understand why... This requirement has been presented before...

So I propose the following headers:

X-Spambayes-Classification: {Ham|Spam|Unsure}
X-Spambayes-Spam-Probability: 0.981231492
X-Spambayes-Evidence: {clues list with probs here, like hammie}
X-Spambayes-Level: *******  (one * per 10%)

c'est moi - TimS

More information about the Spambayes-checkins mailing list