[spambayes-dev] Experimental SpamBayes build available

Mark Hammond mhammond at skippinet.com.au
Tue Dec 30 23:45:26 EST 2003

> I briefly tried it, and all seemed ok to me (Outlook XP and
> the others on
> WinXP).  I've also been trying various experimental builds of
> my own (both
> on the XP box and on Win98 at home).  I can't see how they would be
> different to your build since it's using the same process.
> (Latest CVS each
> time).

I've a few win32all changes yet to release in binary - but from memory most
are pretty trivial.  I'll do a win32all at the same time (next year :)

> Sorry I didn't report back earlier - didn't your message say
> that you were
> away for a couple of weeks and wouldn't be looking at
> anything until then?

It probably did, but I meant a few days :)  I always had to get back in time
for this huge bender of a party we have planned!  About to take off now.

> I got a 'not urgent' impression from it :)

It certainly wasn't urgent, and I'm glad it worked so well.  I was too
pesimistic to believe "no news is good news", but it seems to have been the

> is it sufficient for
> a 8.5 release,
> do you think?

I think an 0.85 would be perfect, in both source and binary.  We then go to
0.9, and we could still end up with 1.0 by March!

Happy new year!


More information about the spambayes-dev mailing list