[spambayes-dev] Next to no feedback on the trial faq

Skip Montanaro skip at pobox.com
Fri May 30 13:18:49 EDT 2003

    >> http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/faq-rest.txt
    >> http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/faq-rest.html

    Alex> The <em> markup in the words vs. n-grams question doesn't seem to
    Alex> work.  Similarly the &mdash; in the cool tokenizer trick question.

I beliebe those were holdover bits of markup from faq.ht, not something
Docutils did.  I'll fix them.  Thanks.

    Alex> Back with the editor hat on, the positive and negative seem to be
    Alex> reversed (or at least confusing) in the case-folding question.

I'll take a look.

    >> * Does anyone have a problem that it doesn't follow the ht2html
    >>   format

    Alex> Doesn't bug me; I'd say don't add the extra step.

That's cool.  The less work the better.

    Alex> Making FAQ devs install a recent version seems reasonable...  but
    Alex> put that requirement in the FAQ under 'Why can't I get Docutils to
    Alex> work on my locally-edited version of this FAQ?'. ;-)

I think that can be arranged.

Thanks for the feedback.


More information about the spambayes-dev mailing list