[spambayes-dev] A spectacular false positive
barry at python.org
Wed Nov 26 09:10:10 EST 2003
On Tue, 2003-11-25 at 22:03, Tim Peters wrote:
> If you can define what "greatest effect on the scores of the other unsure
> messages" means, exactly, then it should be easy to automate that decision
> (for each unsure: train on it, score all the other unsures, compute "the
> effect" on their scores (whatever that means to you), untrain it; then pick
> the one with the greatest whatever-it-is you measured).
Sounds like a genetic algorithm. The trick is deciding what it is you
want to maximize.
More information about the spambayes-dev