[Spambayes] More back-patting - my brain's first FP where bayes
got it right
Tue Nov 19 20:09:32 2002
Tim> [Toby Dickenson]
>> Why exclude spams that score 100 from training? Even these really
>> spammy spams might contain clues that would help to classify other
>> more marginal spam.
Tim> Absolutely, but that's a different experiment. I've already done
Tim> "proper" training and know it works great for me. These are
Tim> experiments in doing silly training.
If you're taking notes on this in various files in CVS I wouldn't call it
"silly training". How about "realistic training"?
More information about the Spambayes