[Spambayes] proposed changes to hammie & co.
T. Alexander Popiel
popiel@wolfskeep.com
Thu Nov 21 23:06:27 2002
In message: <w534raay1pe.fsf@woozle.org>
Neale Pickett <neale@woozle.org> writes:
>
>I don't think there's a clear winner here. Given that we get similar
>times, but a database half the size, I'm still inclined to go with not
>storing probabilities.
Sounds good. (Not only would the probability have to be stored, but
the revision stamp would have to be stored, for even more DB bloat.
Blech.)
- Alex
More information about the Spambayes
mailing list