[Spambayes] proposed changes to hammie & co.

T. Alexander Popiel popiel@wolfskeep.com
Thu Nov 21 23:06:27 2002

In message:  <w534raay1pe.fsf@woozle.org>
             Neale Pickett <neale@woozle.org> writes:
>I don't think there's a clear winner here.  Given that we get similar
>times, but a database half the size, I'm still inclined to go with not
>storing probabilities.

Sounds good.  (Not only would the probability have to be stored, but
the revision stamp would have to be stored, for even more DB bloat.

- Alex

More information about the Spambayes mailing list