[Spambayes] Bouncing Spam

Matt Sergeant msergeant@startechgroup.co.uk
Wed Nov 27 18:17:05 2002

On Wed, 2002-11-27 at 18:18, Sam Robertson wrote:
> Hi, I'm Sam and have been lurking here for quite a while.  I wanted to 
> chime in on this topic.  Any effort expended on notifying the bulk 
> mailers as to the validity of an account at message accept isn't really 
> going to net any benefit.  Bulk mailers spend more time farming new 
> addresses than maintaining their list of old addresses.

The benefit of 5xx'ing the spam is that FP's get informed right away. I
can't think of any other reason to do it.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes/attachments/20021127/b4309691/attachment.bin

More information about the Spambayes mailing list