[Spambayes] Re: There Can Be Only One

[Greg Ward]

On 26 September 2002, Tim Peters said:
> The most embarrassing fn remaining is probably this one:  it's been a
> persistent fn under all schemes, and is ragingly obvious spam to the human
> judge:

Just for grins, I ran this one through SpamAssassin 2.41 (the latest,
but not yet on mail.python.org).  SA had no trouble calling it spam:

SPAM: ---- Start SpamAssassin results
SPAM: 20.30 hits, 5 required;
SPAM: *  2.2 -- From: has a malformed address
SPAM: *  1.7 -- Message-Id has no @ sign
SPAM: *  1.6 -- Invalid Date: header (not RFC 2822)
SPAM: *  1.2 -- Message-Id is not valid, according to RFC 2822
SPAM: *  1.1 -- Header with all capitals found
SPAM: *  4.3 -- BODY: Claims you can be removed from the list
SPAM: *  1.0 -- BODY: List removal information
SPAM: * -0.1 -- BODY: Spam phrases score is 08 to 13 (medium)
SPAM:           [score: 10]
SPAM: *  1.0 -- URI: Includes a link to a likely spammer email address
SPAM: *  2.7 -- Date: is 24 to 48 hours before Received: date
SPAM: *  1.4 -- Missing To: header
SPAM: *  2.2 -- RBL: Received via a relay in orbs.dorkslayers.com
SPAM:           [RBL check: found 4.90.52.217.orbs.dorkslayers.com.]
SPAM: 
SPAM: ---- End of SpamAssassin results

That give you any ideas for tokenization hacks?

        Greg
-- 
Greg Ward <gward@python.net>                         http://www.gerg.ca/
"Question authority!"  "Oh yeah?  Says who?"