[Spambayes] gratuitous changes? + bugs
T.A.Meyer at massey.ac.nz
Tue Apr 29 12:29:55 EDT 2003
> I guess it's my fault for not reading every message in the
> spambayes group. It's just too much! :-)
I do try and make the important ones like that stand out, but I can
understand how they could be missed easily enough.
> It's one of my own scripts. None of the available scripts
> does what I need, so I wrote my own. And in order to keep my
> scripts independent of any spambayes testing that I was doing
> at the time, I used mergefiles to merge in my own settings.
Well, I was wrong anyway since hammiefilter did call mergefiles as well
(how the search missed that, I don't know). I'll be more rigorous about
the cvs logs next time, promise.
> If you look at the diff you'll see that I changed the test
> touching self.allowed_values. That is *allowed* values.
Ah, I get it now, sorry - I should have read the diff more closely.
It's the code in is_boolean that fails. I thought you meant code in the
is_valid test, which should work fine. I'll check a fix in for this
More information about the Spambayes