[Spambayes] SpamBayes installation (or not)

[Anthony Baxter]

>>> "Meyer, Tony" wrote
> It's a nice precis, but the problem isn't so much that no-one knows what
> a (user's) readme should look like, but that no-one has had the itch to
> write one (yet).  The existing readme is reasonably good, of course, for
> those that it was intended for (developers and testers).

I suggest the following approach. Move the current README aside and create
a new one. It can just have the section headings in there initially, then 
people can write sections as they go. The current approach of hoping for 
someone to come along and rewrite it all isn't working.

Anthony
-- 
Anthony Baxter     <anthony at interlink.com.au>   
It's never too late to have a happy childhood.