[Spambayes] aging information
Tim Stone - Four Stones Expressions
tim at fourstonesExpressions.com
Mon Feb 17 13:33:42 EST 2003
2/17/2003 1:27:10 PM, "T. Alexander Popiel" <popiel at wolfskeep.com> wrote:
>In message: <3E509DBA.30411.320099E2 at localhost>
> "D. R. Evans" <N7DR at arrisi.com> writes:
>
>>Does spambayes have any concept that "the older information is, the
>>less value it has"?
>
>Not intrinsically. Some few of us who have slightly bizarre
>installations may have implemented such; for instance, I have
>a sliding 120-day window that I use for my nightly retrains,
>so for my purposes anything over 4 months old is forgotten.
>(The details of my setup are available in the contrib section
>in BULK.txt.)
>
>I have yet to measure the value of this aging process.
This measurement is important. I doubt that it actually accomplishes much,
but we could use some empirical data. If it really helps, then we should
include that function somewhere....
>
>>PS I am a new user (following the "Linux Journal" article. So far, I am
>>impressed at how well spambayes works. So far (after a few days) it has
>>not classified any ham as spam, and it is now catching about three
>>quarters of the spam.
>
>Glad to hear it.
>
>- Alex
>
>PS. Does anyone know the proper way to placate the computer gods?
> First it was a suspected cracking attempt which had to be
> investigated, then the 120G holding drive on the backup
> server spun off its bearings, and then yesterday one of the
> motherboards fried itself. What does one have to do to get
> some peace to finish coding in?
Good grief. Have you tried charging a .5f capacitor and touching the leads to
your tongue? I've heard it said that the gods look favorably on extreme
penitence... <wink> - TimS
>
>_______________________________________________
>Spambayes mailing list
>Spambayes at python.org
>http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes
>
>
c'est moi - TimS
http://www.fourstonesExpressions.com
http://wecanstopspam.org
More information about the Spambayes
mailing list