mhammond at skippinet.com.au
Wed Feb 19 19:53:31 EST 2003
> What about this as a method:
> What do you think?
It all sounds good to me. I guess you will need to handle the odd case
where, over time, a mail is forward to both addresses. Presumably you will
need to untrain the previous instruction.
Which, coincidently, leads us to what I have been advocating for some time
<wink>. The core spambayes code should persist the word database as now,
but also a basic "message database". If we can get these abstractions into
Corpus.py (and probably removing the factories), then Outlook could reuse
all this code.
If this sounds OK, I've a further idea I will expand in email :)
> which just leaves ... the training hooks.
Which also interests me!
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 1940 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes/attachments/20030219/fcb3066d/winmail.bin
More information about the Spambayes